Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Would It Make Sense to Kill Cash?

Tags: cash money bill

Would It Make Sense to Kill Cash?

Cash, bills, coinage, notes, greenbacks, dough—cha-ching! Our government is printing more Cash than ever. Should we be ditching cash? We love to fill our tub with bills and roll in it as much as the next person, but cash actually enables crime. That’s right. Bribery, tax evasion, drug dealing, and plain-old theft are easier with cash involved; which makes sense, you just hadn’t thought about it (hopefully). So why (when other countries are discouraging the printed bill) is the U.S. printing more money than ever? Because the issue is more complex than it seems on the surface, and you are selling your privacy for the convenience of digital money.

“In 1976, the U.S. saw about $80 billion of currency in circulation. Today there’s roughly $1.5 trillion in circulation, nearly 20 times as much, which, on the one hand, would seem to make sense — inflation, right? But on the other hand, why is there so much cash floating around when we’ve got so many other ways to pay for things? And here’s what’s even stranger: back in 1976, about 25 percent of U.S. cash was in $100 bills. And now? Around 80 percent! (Freakonomics: Why Are We Still Using Cash?)”

Do you use big bills to make purchases? Then why such a great demand for bigger bills? Um hum, that’s where we’re going with this. If so many big bills are being used for unseemly transactions i.e. crime, why not just quit making them or even ban them? Or even get rid of cash altogether? One big reason is because the government makes money by making money—literally.

To simplify, the Fed prints money and offers it to central banks that are owned by the Treasury. If the government prints bills and coins to settle its debts, rather than issuing bonds, it does not add to its snowballing debt obligations.  Think about it. It makes the Fed look like a big profit center, but it’s a total illusion. We’ve written a lot about what’s called fiat money; or creating money from thin air. Read more in our blogs called How To Better Understand The Premise Of Money and A Quick Look At The Fed And How It Impacts You.

Regardless of the government’s benefitting from cash, the issue needs to be carefully debated. Serious privacy consequences and unintended consequences (like a possible black market for cash users) are important concerns for those who oppose going digital. People on both sides of the issue of trading in cash for cards (or other biometric ways of paying—like with your fingerprint) have strong opinions. Let’s look at the pros and cons for the average Joe (or Josephine).

What people who support going cash-free say:

  • • “It will lower crime and make it harder to commit tax evasion.”
  • • “It’s convenient and promotes the free flow of money, and that stimulates the economy.”
  • • “Digital money offers security. It’s easy to shut down my accounts if my wallet is lost or stolen.”
  • • “When I use my credit card I get ‘cash back’ on purchases.”
  • • “Money is really dirty. Seriously, who knows where it’s been?”

What people who oppose going cash-free say:

  • • “I don’t want anyone to know how I spend my money. The day we go cashless the government will know your every move.”
  • • “I don’t trust computers to keep track of my money. And banks could crash. And hackers.”
  • • “I’ve heard about this somewhere in Sunday school—the mark of the beast, right?”
  • • “If I can’t touch it is it really my money?”
  • • “How would we spontaneously help those who are down on their luck? What about the poor who don’t have access to the banking system?”

For now the dollar bill is still central to our economy, and any drastic plan for a less-cash society would need to be carefully thought out and gradually implemented, because with all its benefits, a cashless society comes with hefty costs in privacy and potential economic impacts.

Where do you weigh in?

When it comes to your personal finances, one thing we can all agree on is that stagnant money is bad—a retirement plan based on cash isn’t going to get you very far. Having access to liquid funds is an important of creating more money, and we want to show you a way that you can grow your stash while spending it at the same time. No, we’re not crazy, we’ve discovered the most effective wealth strategy around. It’s called the Perpetual Wealth Strategy that allows you to grow your wealth, access cash value, and leave a legacy for your family. The keystone to this strategy is found in a well-planned whole life insurance policy with a paid-up cash addition.

Let us tell you more about this strategy. Take a few minutes to learn about the Perpetual Wealth Strategy. It’s our mission to provide you with financial education. We invite you to take 2 minutes to sign up for a FREE, extensive eCourse called Infinite 101®. You’ll receive access to video tutorials, articles, and podcasts. It literally costs you nothing to become educated on this ideal financial strategy and start changing your wealth paradigm!

Take advantage of this FREE resource by clicking below.

Reference: http://freakonomics.com/podcast/still-using-cash/

The post Would It Make Sense to Kill Cash? appeared first on Paradigm Life Blog.



This post first appeared on Paradigm Life, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Would It Make Sense to Kill Cash?

×

Subscribe to Paradigm Life

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×