Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

A Comparative Study: Abraham Maslow Hierarchy of Needs Vs Purushartha and Ashram concept of Vedas

A Comparative Study: Abraham Maslow Hierarchy Of Needs Vs Purushartha And Ashram Concept Of Vedas

ABRAHAM MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS:

Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs is an intriguing concept. It makes one understand the pattern of human needs & goals from a psychological point of view since Maslow was an acclaimed psychologist.
It consists of the following five stages:
1.       Physiological needs: Food, water, Sleep, Shelter, Sex,etc.
2.       Safety Needs: Personal security, Job security, emotional security, financial security, Health and well being, etc.
3.       Social Belonging/Affiliation Needs: Friendships, Intimacy, Family, Networking, Affiliations,etc.
4.       Esteem Needs: Recognition, Status, Importance, Respect from others, etc.
5.       Self Actualization: This is actually a Goal. It is stated as the Realization of one’s full potential.
Now interestingly, in later years, Maslow chose to be critical of his Self Actualization concept and added one more level to this hierarchy that is over and above Self-Actualization. He called it:
6.       Transcendence: This too is a Goal. One finds fullest realization in giving oneself to something beyond oneself – for example, in altruism or spirituality. The desire to reach the infinite. "Transcendence refers to the very highest and most inclusive or holistic levels of human consciousness, behaving and relating, as ends rather than means, to oneself, to significant others, to human beings in general, to other species, to nature, and to the cosmos" (Farther Reaches of Human Nature, New York 1971, p. 269).
All of the needs are basically aims to the goal which is self actualisation and Transcendence.
Now there is a lot of criticism that are associated with Maslow’s concept with regards to its sequence and its applicability, its validity, its methodology or lack of it, etc.
However, we still are very much indebted to its appeal and relevance across all quarters of academia and outside of it.
The aspect we are going to dwell upon here is of a different nature and scope. It is going to be a comparative study which will open up a lot of new academic avenues of the readers with regards to deeper study of the theories we read about in our academic books.

THE PURUSHARTHA CONCEPT IN THE VEDAS:
In ancient Indian texts of Sanatan Dharma, the Vedas, detailed the four aims of human life. The Purushartha – Purush meaning Human and Artha meaning Purpose. The Purpose of being Human or the Purpose of Human Life. The way Human Life should be guided by proper,value oriented and correct actions.
The ancient Sanatan Dharma seers believed that motivation of human behavior was based on four important needs: physical and bodily comforts, security needs through proper order and regulation of family as well as society, need for name and fame as well as recognition through thorough reading and knowledge of the scriptures as well as applying them in practical life, and last but not the least, the need to actualize one’s hidden Self through meditation and living an austere life with spiritual enlightenment to gain salvation and join with the Divine forever.
The ultimate Goal of human life is to attain Moksha. Moksha is salvation, Nirvana, freedom from the cycle of birth & death, the realization of inner spirituality of man.
Now this concept written thousands of years ago is strikingly similar to the modern theory of Maslow’s. Before going on to a comparative study of the same let us explain the Purushartha concept briefly in order to make it amply clear and relatable.
The four Purusharthas are:
  • Dharma: Righteousness, Duty
  • Artha: Wealth
  • Kama: Desire
  • Moksha: Liberation
It need not be in the hierarchial order as it is stated but it is supposed to be in an order of priority.
Dharma: Dharma which is often confused with religion, simply means one’s rightful duty in all circumstances and if one needs to do away with the confusion as to what is right or wrong while performing a duty for a correct life then he/she should refer to the Vedas,the Vedangas, the Sutra literature of which the most important are the Dharmashastras, and scriptures such as the Bhagavadgita. for guidance. Dharma is responsible for It is responsible for order, regularity, harmony, control, predictability and accountability in human life and Earth.
Artha: It means wealth. Wealth earned is not wrong but wealth accumulated by loot or deceit is forbidden and leads to a lot of havoc in life. One has to follow the right way of accumulating wealth based on right intention, right means and moderation. Dharma has to be followed while earning wealth as well.
Kama: It simply means desire. Desires could be of any kind whether personal or professional. It needs to follow the right code of conduct/Dharma as well else it would lead to one’s own downfall.
Moksha: It is the ultimate goal of a human life to attain salvation and oneness with the Divine. A stage of Nirvana and inner realization of the individual self and the universal connect we all have inside us in the form of the soul. It leads to selfless deeds then which helps the society/mankind as a whole.
Now, the interesting part is that the pursuit of Dharma begins when one is initiated into studies at a young age, the pursuit of kama Artha begins after one completes their studies and becomes a professional and householder. The pursuit of Moksha can begin at any time when one feels the pull.

PURUSHARTHA CARRIED OUT VIA THE FOUR ASHRAMS/STAGES OF HUMAN LIFE:

The path of these Purusharthas also have a designed stage for it that is detailed in the four ashrams/stages of human life.
Source – Wikipedia:
The Ashram system
Ashram or stage
Age (years)[8]
Description
Rituals of transition
Brahmacharya
(student life)
Till 24
Brahmacharya represented the bachelor student stage of life. This stage focused on education and included the practice of celibacy.[2] The student went to a Gurukul (house of the guru) and typically would live with a Guru(teacher), acquiring knowledge of science, philosophy, scriptures and logic, practicing self-discipline, working to earn dakshina to be paid for the guru, learning to live a life of Dharma (righteousness, morals, duties).
Upanayana at entry.[9][10]Samavartana at exit.[11]
Grihastha
(household life)
24–48
This stage referred to the individual's married life, with the duties of maintaining a household, raising a family, educating one's children, and leading a family-centred and a dharmic social life.[2][12][13] Grihastha stage was considered as the most important of all stages in sociological context, as human beings in this stage not only pursued a virtuous life, they produced food and wealth that sustained people in other stages of life, as well as the offsprings that continued mankind.[2][4] The stage also represented one where the most intense physical, sexual, emotional, occupational, social and material attachments exist in a human being's life.[14]
Hindu weddingat entry.
Vanaprastha
(retired life)
48–72
The retirement stage, where a person handed over household responsibilities to the next generation, took an advisory role, and gradually withdrew from the world.[15][16] Vanaprastha stage was a transition phase from a householder's life with its greater emphasis on Artha and Kama (wealth, security, pleasure and sexual pursuits) to one with greater emphasis on Moksha (spiritual liberation).[15][17]

Sannyasa
(renounced life)
72+
(or anytime)
The stage was marked by renunciation of material desires and prejudices, represented by a state of disinterest and detachment from material life, generally without any meaningful property or home (Ascetic), and focussed onMoksha, peace and simple spiritual life.[18][19] Anyone could enter this stage after completing the Brahmacharyastage of life.[1]



Alternate classification system of life stages:



Developmental
stages of life[citation needed]
Period
Ashrama
(stages of
dutiful life)
Purushartha
(aims of life)
Description
Saisava
0–2 years


No moral codes during this period
Balya
3–12 years
Brahmacharya
Dharma
Vidyarambha, Learning of alphabet, arithmetic, basic education
Kaumara
(13–19)
Kaishora
13–15 years
Brahmacharya
Dharma and Moksha

Tarunya
16–19 years
Brahmacharya
Dharma and Moksha

Yauvana
(20–59)
Yauvana-I
(Tarunayauvana)
20–29 years
Brahmacharya orGrihastha
Dharma, Artha and Moksha

Yauvana-II
(Praudhayauvana)
30–59 years
Grihastha
Dharma, Artha and Kamaand Moksha

Vardhakya
(60+ )
Vardhakya
(Period-I)
60–79 years
Vanaprastha
Dharma and Moksha

Vardhakya
(Period-II)
80+ years
Sanyasa
Dharma and Moksha



COMPARATIVE STUDY:

Now if one compares this with Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs it bears an uncanny mirror image reflection of the former on the latter.
Kama can be equated with Physiological needs and Belonging/Affiliation needs
Artha can be equated with Security needs and Esteem needs.
Dharma can be equated with Self Actualization.
Moksha can be equated with Transcendence.
And all these are taught or fulfilled during the various Ashrams/stages of human life as mentioned above as well.

CONCLUSION:

With this one should understand that in order to enhance one’s knowledge and work upon existing theories as well as understand modern theories it is imperative to find their base in ancient scriptures that are scientifically valid even today and withold the test of time. Also due credit should be given to them. There is a vast repository of knowledge lying hidden and untouched that needs to be brought to the fore and imbibed as a student of the discipline of Social Sciences.


Friday, December 21, 2018

Social Media in e-Governance: A Study with Special Reference to India

ABSTRACT
This paper makes an attempt to analyze current use of Social Media and their promising advantages for e-governance in government organizations. It discusses potential issues especially issues related to security and privacy of individuals, employees, infrastructure and data that impede successful implementation of social media for e-governance. It examines draft government of India framework for embedding social media in organizational structure and examines issued guidelines for platform to be used, authorization to engage on behalf of government organization, scope and extend of such engagement, etc. It compares these guidelines with similar guidelines of some other nations in terms of employee’s access, account management, acceptable use, employee conduct, content, security, legal issues and citizen conduct and enumerates its merits, demerits and scope for further improvements.

Article Courtesy: https://file.scirp.org/Html/1-2680023_30781.htm 
 
1. Introduction
Social media provides users with deep and rich experience for participation, interaction and collaboration. Various social media tools allow their users to create and share information on the web and collaborate with others interactively thus making easier to find information and connect online with one another. Social media has also been used for e-learning as they have created opportunities for effective teacher-learner, learner-learner and teacher-teacher communication, interaction and collaboration. With the inclusion of mobile technology, there has not only been an intense rise in the number and type of social media tools but their use is also on increase. In developed countries like USA, Poland, UK and Korea at least four in ten adult citizens use social media tools. Social media sites dominate the Internet usage in Asia and the Pacific [1]. In comparison to men, women are more actively engaged in social media sites [2]. Though currently the use of social media sites is more popular among youngsters but studies are revealing that there is an increasing trend of participation by elders from last few years. In general social media can be classified in the following four categories: 1) online networks and ecosystems—e.g. Facebook LinkedIn, MySpace and Twitter2) online publications—e.g. YouTube, Flicker, RSS, SlideShare and Twitter, 3) Online collaborative platforms —e.g. Wikis like MediaWiki, blogs like Wordpress or Blogger, and collaborative office solutions like Office- 365, Google Docs, MS Lync, Debategraph, Teamwork or WorkSpot, and 4) online feedback systems—e.g. voting and debating, rating and commenting, surveys, polls, blogs, etc. Online networks and ecosystems build and reflect the networks and relationships between peers. Online publication tools provide services or platforms for sharing and publishing content online. Collaborative platforms facilitate cooperative and work processes between people. Tools for online feedback facilitate input from an audience through one-way or two-way communication. To promote business many organizations have included social media in their organizational structure. Governments of various nations have also incorporated social media in e-governance, however, to make this integration secure and more efficient they have devised frameworks, policies and guidelines that regulate this integration.

The remaining paper is organized as follows: Section 2 briefly presents current use of social media in e-governance, followed by discussions on its potential advantages and involved risks in Sections 3 and 4 respectively. Section 5 presents the highlights of a recent study that analyzed 26 social media documents. In Section 6, core elements of a successful social media policy are enumerated. In Section 7, Indian Government framework & guidelines for use of social media in e-governance are examined and its limitations are enumerated in Section 8. Finally, Section 9 provides guidelines for improving this framework followed by conclusion.

2. Social Media in e-Governance
Commercial organizations, academic institutions and individuals use social media extensively for online presence, promotion of goods and services, gathering customer feedbacks, experience sharing, consumer and customer interactions, collaborative content preparation, elearning, communication, social interaction, etc. Recently, politicians, citizens, and governments throughout the globe including those from least developed countries have demonstrated effective use of social media tools to revolutionize governance arrangements, mobilize movements against and in support of governments, hold election campaigns, sustain government-citizen communication in disorder, etc. Barack Obama and Mitt Romney have actively embraced Twitter and used the social networking sites as campaign tools during the 2012 presidential contest to communicate directly with supporters and, more importantly, drive the political conversation in a way that reaches far beyond the site. Governments under some policy or government officials in their personal capacity have been using social networks for foreign affairs, administration and information. USA and UK governments beside others like Australia and Sweden are most active in the use of social media for digital diplomacy. Currently, 66 percent of all USA Government agencies use one or the other form of social media website [1]. According to the UN e-Governance survey 2012 [3], 48 percent i.e. 78 member states provide either a “follow us on Facebook” or “follow us on Twitter” statement on their government websites. According to same survey 7 percent such websites provide chat rooms or IM features to gather public opinion. In India, various ministers and officials actively use social media to communicate with citizens.

Recently, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also shown his presence on Twitter as his office launched its social media initiative through Twitter (http://twitter. com/#!/pmoindia), You Tube (http://www.facebook.com/ pages/Indian-Prime-Ministers-Office/107934225905981) and Facebook (


This post first appeared on Public Administration, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

A Comparative Study: Abraham Maslow Hierarchy of Needs Vs Purushartha and Ashram concept of Vedas

×

Subscribe to Public Administration

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×