More Proof Liberals Hate Facts:
In the Hill article about failing newspapers;
Doing journalism is difficult work. News organizations make countless decisions each day that affect the nation’s news agenda and subsequent civic discussions. Today’s technology-driven world means those decisions are made quickly. Every second provides a new deadline. Having acknowledged the challenge, however, doing solid journalism shouldn’t be impossible. That is what it seems like these days, as the News Industry continues to stumble with self-inflicted mistakes and colossal errors in judgment.
http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/388947-news-industry-suffers-from-self-inflicted-wounds
My rebbutal based on facts that was sensored by The Hill:
Everything was fine until this; "Without confidence in the news media, citizens turn to social media or the guy at the bar for their information needs."
I agree, after over 30 years in newspapers sales and circulation, I have witnessed a slow decline in readership, even before the Internet.
The biggest complaint? They got tired of editorial contents that pandered to views that weren't their own.
As liberals Began taking over newsrooms all over. Readers were forced to read articles and editorials that didn't fit their morals and views.
Then the backlash began. Circulation declined. Readers would tell my sales crews, "we wouldn't subscribe to that trash!" Even at 50% off. I warned several newspapers to be more balanced.
No. They said. "We're into force feeding DIVERSITY, code for liberalism views on our readers.
I noticed that most newspapers began to bring down conservatives and Republicans, while covering up Democrats and their own sins.
They began to endorse candidates that didn't meet readers views. The anger began, thus the decline also began.
They began to attack Christianity.
After the Internet, with the invention of I Phones and Android, circulation free fall began for most newspapers.
Where I disagree with the writer's comments above. We have numerous news sources available outside newspapers and TV networks.
We've got talk radio, we've got Drudge, just like the Hill, we've got Breitbart, we've got the Daily Caller and the Gate Way Pundit and much more.
We have so much venues to go to whereas we never had before.
I also disagree that most people don't get their news on social media.
That's where Facebook and Twitter feel their overblown, grandeur of self importance is huge, which in reality is not. Most of us go straight to the source.
In the Hill article about failing newspapers;
Doing journalism is difficult work. News organizations make countless decisions each day that affect the nation’s news agenda and subsequent civic discussions. Today’s technology-driven world means those decisions are made quickly. Every second provides a new deadline. Having acknowledged the challenge, however, doing solid journalism shouldn’t be impossible. That is what it seems like these days, as the News Industry continues to stumble with self-inflicted mistakes and colossal errors in judgment.
http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/388947-news-industry-suffers-from-self-inflicted-wounds
My rebbutal based on facts that was sensored by The Hill:
Everything was fine until this; "Without confidence in the news media, citizens turn to social media or the guy at the bar for their information needs."
I agree, after over 30 years in newspapers sales and circulation, I have witnessed a slow decline in readership, even before the Internet.
The biggest complaint? They got tired of editorial contents that pandered to views that weren't their own.
As liberals Began taking over newsrooms all over. Readers were forced to read articles and editorials that didn't fit their morals and views.
Then the backlash began. Circulation declined. Readers would tell my sales crews, "we wouldn't subscribe to that trash!" Even at 50% off. I warned several newspapers to be more balanced.
No. They said. "We're into force feeding DIVERSITY, code for liberalism views on our readers.
I noticed that most newspapers began to bring down conservatives and Republicans, while covering up Democrats and their own sins.
They began to endorse candidates that didn't meet readers views. The anger began, thus the decline also began.
They began to attack Christianity.
After the Internet, with the invention of I Phones and Android, circulation free fall began for most newspapers.
Where I disagree with the writer's comments above. We have numerous news sources available outside newspapers and TV networks.
We've got talk radio, we've got Drudge, just like the Hill, we've got Breitbart, we've got the Daily Caller and the Gate Way Pundit and much more.
We have so much venues to go to whereas we never had before.
I also disagree that most people don't get their news on social media.
That's where Facebook and Twitter feel their overblown, grandeur of self importance is huge, which in reality is not. Most of us go straight to the source.
