https://t.co/aX0Ivw59fc Regarding the “Forensic Audit” and “Public Inquiry” into Nalcor Boondoggle project, Muskrat Falls, Newfoundland and Labrador [NL] Canada [CA] there are pertinent questions to be asked from the history of unsustainable development at Port Hope Simpson on the Labrador coast of Eastern Canada and by Denise Cole Activist and Spokesperson https://www.facebook.com/search/top/… Labrador Land Protectors:

The history of The Public Inquiry into the Affairs of the Labrador Development Company Ltd. operating in Port Hope Simpson 1934-45 although self-evidently from a different time, place and scale to the current Nalcor Hydro Muskrat Falls Boondoggle project, clearly tells us that it was first conceived by six Civil Service officials based at The Dominions Office in London as a way of completely breaking the British Government’s relationship with John Osborn [JO] Williams, Company Owner.

JO Williams had been financed by loans from The Colonial Fund, had failed to provide homes for the loggers and their families in the camp at Port Hope Simpson, failed to pay reasonable wages on time and operated a monopoly system on buying goods from The Company Store which meant loggers and their families were forced to live in debt and abject conditions. At the same time the Company’s officials were well-provided for with food and houses as the overseas truth about what had been going on behind the scenes was a secret kept by the J.O. Williams family, by the Company’s People in the logging settlement, by the Newfoundland Commission of Government as well as by the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, by the Government of Canada and by the Government of the United Kingdom.

The main purpose behind setting The Terms of Reference for The Public Inquiry into the Affairs of the Labrador Development Company Ltd. drawn up by Civil Servants and Minister of State in London was to show that J.O. Williams was a bad, unreliable character who could not be trusted.

So, as far as the Public Inquiry into Nalcor is concerned, at least seven questions need to be addressed:
1. Is the real unjust, deceitful purpose behind calling a Public Inquiry into Nalcor simply to give Stan Marshall, CEO Nalcor sufficient time to complete the project?

2. Does is make any sense at all to not shut Muskrat down until the Public Inquiry has time to satisfactorily complete its findings?

3. Furthermore, given there are over-riding humanitarian, economic and environmental reasons why the project should not go ahead isn’t it better to shut the boondoggle down until the Public Inquiry based on a Forensic Audit has time to complete its findings?

4. Since the project is obviously “a direct infringement on indigenous rights and way of life and culture as well as land and water” isn’t it better to shut it down?

5. “Was the Duty to Consult fulfilled throughout the life of this project?”

6. “Did you”…[Indigenous Governments]…”ever give free, prior and informed consent as laid out in the United Nations Declaration for Indigenous Peoples?”

7. “Should this project ever have been sanctioned and should it still be sanctioned now becomes a big question”
Source Questions 4-7 Audio: Denise Cole, Labrador Land Protectors Civil Rights Movement, Judge Murphy Allowing Court Injunction to be Challenged, Labrador Land Protectors Challenging Injunction Sep 5, 2017, 11:18 AM - OKâlaKatiget Society Radio (Nain) Labrador Land Protectors Facebook Page 12.9.17

https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/01Bai5 - To help The Labrador Land Protectors in our legal fight, you can donate to our legal fund
or donate via https://www.facebook.com/labradorlandprotectors/ our Facebook page

https://goo.gl/bJucWD 84 public items supporting Labrador, Labradorians, The Labrador Land Protectors, NunatuKavut, Nunatsiavut, Innu Nation and Qalipu First Nation Campaigning against Nalcor Crown Corporation Hydro project, Muskrat Falls, Newfoundland and Labrador [NL] Canada https://t.co/rcgEFEwLHO