In an ongoing legal debate about authorship in the AI art world, the question of whether AI systems can generate new art or are just rehashing the efforts of human artists is at the center. The case involves inventor Stephen Thaler seeking legal protections for the art produced by his AI system, Creativity Machine. The ruling in this case could have far-reaching consequences for AI art.

Thaler’s Creativity Machine is an AI system developed by Imagination Engines Incorporated. The machine has not only generated art but has also created inventions, composed music, and been involved in the field of AI military technology. Thaler claims that his AI systems are capable of true creativity and even sentience.

The specific artwork under scrutiny is titled “A Recent Entrance to Paradise.” Thaler attempted to register it with the US Copyright Office, naming Creativity Machine as the author. However, the office denied the application multiple times, stating that the artwork lacked human authorship necessary for copyright protection.

The recent ruling by Judge Beryl A. Howell of the US District Court for the District of Columbia supported the copyright office’s decision. Howell emphasized the importance of human creativity in copyrightability and stated that without our understanding of human creativity, copyright laws would not exist.

The implications of this ruling go beyond copyright law. As AI-powered systems become more powerful, questions arise about their autonomy and creativity. At what point do we consider them creative beings rather than just tools? Denying AI systems ownership of their creations raises questions about their rights. The ongoing legal battles in cases like the Creativity Machine will help shape our understanding and interaction with AI art in the future.

Sources: None

The post Are AI Systems the Creators of Original Artworks? appeared first on TS2 SPACE.