The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is on the verge of its official launch, sparking curiosity about how this new entrant stacks up against the reigning champion of fitness bands, the Fitbit Charge 6.
With a significant price difference between the two, consumers find themselves at a crossroads, pondering which device offers the best value for their investment.
In this comparative analysis, we will delve into the specifics of both the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 and the Fitbit Charge 6, scrutinizing their specifications to provide a clear picture of what each has to offer.
This comparison aims to assist you in making an informed decision on which fitness tracker is the most suited to meet your needs.
Samsung Galaxy Fit3 vs Fitbit Charge 6: Price & Availability
As we’ve touched on, there’s a noticeable price difference between the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 and the Fitbit Charge 6.
The Galaxy Fit3 is expected to be priced between $100+. Although Samsung has yet to confirm the official price, we’ll be sure to update this article once we have the details.
On the other hand, the Fitbit Charge 6 comes with a price tag of around $160, making it a one-off purchase. Additionally, Fitbit offers an optional subscription model that enhances the user experience. While the device itself provides ample features, subscribing unlocks personalized insights, detailed sleep analysis, custom fitness programs, and more.
Samsung Galaxy Fit3 vs Fitbit Charge 6: Specs Comparison
| Category | Samsung Galaxy Fit3 | Fitbit Charge 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Aluminium, Silicone straps | Aerospace grade aluminum, Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display, anodized aluminum housing and buckle Silicone Straps |
| Shape | Rectangular | Rectangular |
| Dimension | 42.9 x 28.8 x 9.9mm | 36.78 x 23.1 x 11.2mm |
| Physical Buttons | 1 | 1 |
| Display Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 192 x 490 pixels | 260 x 170 pixels |
| Screen Size | 1.6 inches | 1.04 inches |
| Weight | 18.5 grams (without strap) | 37.6 grams (without strap) |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyroscope, heart rate, SpO2, barometer, ambient light sensor | 3-axis accelerometer, Optical heart rate monitor, Pulse Ox, Multipurpose electrical sensors (ECG & EDA Scan apps), Ambient light sensor |
| Water-resistance | 5 ATM + IP68 | 5 ATM |
| GPS | Connected GPS | GPS, Glonass |
| Built-in Speaker | No | No |
| Microphone | No | No |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Music Storage | No | No |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth, WiFi |
| Battery Life | Up to 13 days (typical usage) | Up to 7 days, or up to 5 hours with GPS |
| Operating System | FreeRTOS | FitbitOS |
| Colors | Prism Crush White, Pink, Dark Gray | Obsidian, Porcelain, Coral |
| Price | $100+ (update later) | $160 + subscription option |
Related:
- Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 vs Galaxy Fit 2
- Fitbit Charge 6 vs Whoop 4.0
- Fitbit Charge 6 vs Oura Ring Gen 3
- Fitbit Charge 6 vs Oura Ring Gen 3
Samsung Galaxy Fit3 vs Fitbit Charge 6: Design & Display
When it comes to design and display, both the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 and the Fitbit Charge 6 showcase their unique style with a sleek, rectangular shape that’s become a staple in contemporary fitness trackers.
The Galaxy Fit3 presents a more luxurious vibe with its aluminum casing, perfect for those who appreciate a bit of sophistication in their gadgets. On the flip side, the Fitbit Charge 6, crafted from aerospace-grade aluminum and shielded by Corning Gorilla Glass 3, promises durability and resilience, making it a reliable companion against the rigors of daily life.
Size-wise, the Fit3 is slightly larger, measuring 42.9 x 28.8 x 9.9mm, catering to users who favor a bolder statement on their wrist. Meanwhile, the Fitbit Charge 6 opts for a more compact and slightly thicker design at 36.78 x 23.1 x 11.2mm, appealing to those seeking a subtler, lightweight option. A common feature between the two is the convenience of a single physical button for navigation.
The display is where both devices truly shine, thanks to their AMOLED screens. The Fit3 takes the lead with a generous 1.6-inch display, offering a crisp resolution of 192 x 490 pixels for a vivid and engaging visual experience. Conversely, the Charge 6 comes with a smaller 1.04-inch screen but still delivers sharp imagery with a resolution of 260 x 170 pixels.
Color choices are abundant, allowing users to express their personal style. The Fit3 is available in Prism Crush White, Pink, and Dark Gray, offering shades from subtle to bold. The Fitbit Charge 6 doesn’t lag behind, with options like Obsidian, Porcelain, and Coral, ensuring there’s a hue to suit every taste.
When it comes to braving the elements, both trackers are up to the task with impressive water resistance. The Fit3 boasts a 5 ATM + IP68 rating, ensuring it’s safeguarded against water and dust. Similarly, the Fitbit Charge 6 is equipped with a 5 ATM rating, ready for swim sessions without a hitch. This makes both devices not just stylish and functional but also rugged enough to keep up with your active lifestyle.
Samsung Galaxy Fit3 vs Fitbit Charge 6: Health & Fitness Tracking
In the battle of health and fitness tracking capabilities, the Fitbit Charge 6 clearly takes the lead with its superior health tracking features. It’s decked out with a variety of sensors, making it a powerhouse for those who take their health seriously. These include a 3-axis accelerometer for movement tracking, an optical heart rate monitor for continuous heart rate checks, a Pulse Ox sensor for blood oxygen level monitoring, and electrical sensors that work with the ECG and EDA Scan apps for heart health and stress management. This wide array of sensors enables the Charge 6 to monitor a broad spectrum of health and fitness metrics comprehensively.
The Samsung Galaxy Fit3, while impressive in its own right, focuses more on the basics. It’s equipped with an accelerometer and gyroscope for motion tracking, a heart rate monitor for heart activity, SpO2 for oxygen saturation levels, a barometer for altitude, and an ambient light sensor. While it covers essential health and fitness tracking, it doesn’t quite match the Charge 6’s advanced capabilities.
A key point of difference is their GPS functionality. The Fitbit Charge 6 stands out with its built-in GPS and Glonass, allowing for precise tracking of your outdoor activities directly from the wristband, without needing your phone. The Galaxy Fit3, however, relies on connected GPS, meaning it uses your smartphone’s GPS to map your runs and bike rides. This makes the Charge 6 a more convenient option for those who prefer to exercise without carrying their phone.
Samsung Galaxy Fit3 vs Fitbit Charge 6: Other Features
When it comes to those extra perks that blur the lines between fitness trackers and smartwatches, both the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 and Fitbit Charge 6 bring some handy features to the table. You’ll find the basics covered, such as receiving notifications, controlling music playback, setting alarms, and more, making both devices a convenient extension of your smartphone.
However, when diving deeper into the realm of additional functionalities, neither device ventures into offering onboard music storage. This means you’ll need to rely on your smartphone or another device for your music needs during workouts or casual listening.
Yet, the Fitbit Charge 6 stands out with its inclusion of built-in NFC for contactless payments, adding a layer of convenience for those quick purchases on the go. Moreover, Charge 6 users benefit from an integration of Google features, allowing control over Youtube Music, navigating with Google Maps, and managing transactions through Google Wallet directly from their wrist. This integration not only enhances the usability of the Charge 6 but also positions it closer to a full-fledged smartwatch experience, offering more ways to stay connected and efficient without constantly reaching for your phone.
Samsung Galaxy Fit3 vs Fitbit Charge 6: Battery Life
Battery life is a standout feature for both devices, ensuring you’re well-equipped for days on end. The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 slightly edges ahead in this department, boasting up to 13 days of battery life on typical usage, thanks to its 208 mAh Li-po battery. It’s also designed for the fast-paced user, with fast charging capabilities that can power the device up to 65% in just a mere 30 minutes. This means a quick charge can easily extend its usage significantly, making it incredibly convenient for those on the go.
On the other hand, the Fitbit Charge 6 offers up to 7 days of battery life on a single charge, providing ample time for most users’ needs. However, it’s worth noting that turning on the GPS feature for outdoor activities like running or cycling can reduce its battery life drastically to about 5 hours. This is an important aspect to consider for users who often rely on GPS for their workouts, as it may require more frequent charging to accommodate their active lifestyle.
Samsung Galaxy Fit3 vs Fitbit Charge 6: Final Verdict
After going through the detailed comparison, it’s clear that each of these fitness trackers has its own strengths, catering to different preferences and needs.
If we were to pick a standout, the Fitbit Charge 6 edges ahead, primarily due to its advanced health monitoring features, including the built-in GPS and NFC capabilities. These additions make the Charge 6 a comprehensive tool for those who prioritize health insights and the convenience of contactless payments, alongside reliable fitness tracking.
On the other hand, if your priorities lean towards enjoying a larger, better-quality screen and having a solid set of basic tracking features at a more budget-friendly price point, then the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 stands out as an excellent choice. It’s a reliable and affordable fitness tracker that covers all the essentials, making it a great companion for daily wear.
Latest:
- Huawei Band 8 vs Apple Watch Series 9
- Huawei Band 8 vs Fitbit Inspire 3
- Garmin Vivoacitve 5 vs Amazfit Active
- Google Pixel Watch 2 vs Suunto Race
