We’ve been eagerly anticipating the arrival of the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 fitness tracker, and thanks to some certification listings and earlier leaks, we knew it was on its way. In a surprising turn of events, it seems Samsung accidentally spilled the beans about the tracker on one of its websites.

For a brief moment, Samsung Gulf had the official Galaxy Fit 3 product page up for the world to see before quickly taking it down. This sneak peek has given us a lot to talk about, allowing us to dive into a detailed comparison with its predecessor, the Galaxy Fit 2.

Although the price remains a mystery for now, Samsung has been generous enough to provide a detailed list highlighting the differences between the Galaxy Fit 3 and its earlier versions.

With this information at our disposal, let’s take a closer look at how the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 and Fit 2 measure up against each other, focusing on their specs and features.

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 vs Galaxy Fit 2: Specs Comparison

Related:

• Samsung Galaxy Fit 2 vs Honor Band 6
• Samsung Galaxy Fit vs Galaxy Fit 2 vs Galaxy Fit E
• Fitbit Charge 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit 2
• Xiaomi Mi band 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit 2

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 vs Galaxy Fit 2: Design & Display

When comparing the designs and displays of the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 and Galaxy Fit 2, it’s clear that both trackers maintain the sleek and streamlined look we’ve come to expect from the Galaxy Fit series, yet they each bring something unique to the table.

Starting with the Galaxy Fit 3, this model steps it up in terms of luxury with its aluminum casing, giving it a more upscale vibe. It’s a tad bigger, measuring in at 42.9 x 28.8 x 9.9mm, making it stand out a bit more on your wrist. The Fit 2, with its durable polycarbonate body, is slightly smaller and more discreet with dimensions of 46.6 x 18.6 x 11.3mm. 

Despite their differences, both are super light and comfy to wear all day – the Fit 3 is just 18.5 grams (strap not included), and the Fit 2 is even lighter at 11.3 grams.

The way you interact with each device also differs. The Fit 3 features a sleek, flat button on the side that keeps things simple and modern. The Fit 2, however, opts for a touch-sensitive button below its screen, providing a seamless way to navigate your tracker.

Display-wise, the Galaxy Fit 3 shines with its larger 1.6-inch AMOLED screen, boasting a resolution of 192 x 490 pixels. This means everything from texts to your fitness stats looks crisp and clear. The Fit 2 isn’t far behind, though, with its 1.1-inch AMOLED display and a resolution of 126 x 294 pixels, still offering vibrant visuals but on a smaller scale.

A noteworthy upgrade on the Fit 3 is its light-sensing technology, which adjusts the screen brightness automatically – a handy feature the Fit 2 misses out on. To make the most of its vibrant display, the Fit 3 also comes with over 100 watch face options, compared to the 70 available on the Fit 2, allowing for even more customization.

Color options add another layer of personalization. The Fit 3 is available in trendy shades like Prism Crush White, Pink, and Dark Gray, while the Fit 2 sticks to classic Black and Scarlet. Both models offer easy-to-swap straps, so you can change up your look in a snap.

Durability is a strong suit for both trackers. They boast a water resistance rating of 5 ATM and an IP68 rating, meaning they’re tough enough to handle a dip in the pool or a dusty trail, ensuring they’re ready for whatever adventure comes your way.

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 vs Galaxy Fit 2: Health & Fitness Features

Stepping into the spotlight, the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 really ramps up the health and fitness tracking game, making a significant leap over its predecessor, the Fit 2. It’s packed with new features that will catch the eye of anyone keen on keeping tabs on their health and fitness progress.

Let’s talk about what’s new with the Fit 3. It brings to the table a neat little gadget called a barometric altimeter, perfect for those who love to add some elevation to their workouts by climbing stairs. This is something the Fit 2 doesn’t have. Also, there’s a new blood oxygen sensor on the Fit 3, which is a big deal for monitoring your breathing health – another tick in the box that the Fit 2 doesn’t check. These additions, along with the standard heart rate monitoring, elevate the Fit 3’s capability to give you a fuller picture of your health.

Both trackers come equipped with a suite of sensors to keep an eye on your activity, including an accelerometer, gyroscope, and heart rate monitor. But the Fit 3 edges out its sibling with a few extra perks like a barometer, blood oxygen measurements, and an intelligent light sensor that adjusts your screen brightness depending on where you are.

Sleep tracking gets a major upgrade with the Fit 3, offering insights into the quality of your sleep, including the different stages of sleep, snore detection, and even your blood oxygen levels while you’re catching some Zs. It even dishes out personalized tips on improving your sleep quality, something the Fit 2’s more straightforward sleep tracking can’t do.

The Fit 3 also steps up its game in tracking physical activities, now recognizing up to 100 different sports activities, including swimming in the pool, and can automatically detect several of these activities, giving you more ways to monitor how you move.

A standout feature of the Fit 3 is its ability to detect if you’ve fallen and immediately check on you to see if you need help. Plus, a quick press of the Home button five times sends out an SOS to your emergency contacts along with any vital medical info you’ve stored, offering an extra layer of safety for those who might need it most.

GPS functionality remains the same in both models, relying on a connected smartphone to pinpoint your location. This setup helps save on battery life and keeps the devices more compact and affordable.

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 vs Galaxy Fit 2: Other Features

Shifting our focus to the smart features that both the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 and Fit 2 bring to the table, it’s clear that these devices are about more than just keeping fit. They’re powered by FreeRTOS and pack in a variety of handy functions that make life a bit easier. 

You can stay on top of your notifications, control your music, and see who’s calling or texting without ever having to pull out your phone. However, it’s worth noting that you won’t find cellular connectivity on either device. This means you can’t make calls or send texts directly from your wrist without having your smartphone nearby.

When it comes to memory, the Galaxy Fit 3 leaps ahead with a generous 16MB of RAM and 256MB of internal storage. This is a big step up from the Galaxy Fit 2, which is equipped with just 2MB of RAM and 32MB of storage. This boost in memory and storage for the Fit 3 translates into a smoother experience and the potential for more sophisticated software features. Yet, despite this increased capacity, storing music directly on the devices is still off the table.

And just like its predecessor, the Fit 3 stays true to its roots in fitness and health tracking, foregoing NFC capabilities for contactless payments. This choice emphasizes the devices’ focus on keeping you active and healthy, rather than doubling as a digital wallet.

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 vs Galaxy Fit 2: Battery Life

Upon examining the battery life of Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 and Fit 2, we discovered a crucial feature that significantly improves the overall user experience of these fitness trackers.

The Galaxy Fit 3 is equipped with a robust 208 mAh Li-po battery, ensuring that users can enjoy up to 13 days of use on just one charge. This level of endurance is quite remarkable, especially when you consider the sophisticated features and bigger screen it packs. Adding to its appeal, Samsung has incorporated fast charging into the Fit 3, allowing you to quickly recharge to 65% battery in merely half an hour.

Meanwhile, the Galaxy Fit 2, with its slightly smaller 159 mAh Li-po battery, surprisingly takes the lead in battery longevity. Its smaller screen size plays a crucial role here, enabling the Fit 2 to offer up to 15 days of usage under typical conditions, and even extending to an astonishing 21 days with lighter use.

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 vs Galaxy Fit 2: Should You Upgrade?

Having explored the features and differences between the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 vs Fit2, you might be wondering if it’s time for an upgrade or if the Fit3 is a good pick for your first fitness tracker. 

The Fit 3, with its stylish aluminum body and bigger display, definitely steps up the game, offering a more upscale look and feel. It shines with new health-focused features like the blood oxygen sensor and stair-tracking altimeter, plus safety nets like fall detection and emergency messages, making it a tempting choice for those who dive deep into their health stats.

On the other hand, the Galaxy Fit 2 keeps things simple but effective, with a durable design and an emphasis on straightforward fitness tracking. Its extended battery life and compact form factor make it appealing for the everyday user who wants reliability without complexity.

Thinking about whether to switch to the Fit 3 or stick with the Fit 2 (or pick it as your go-to)? If advanced health tracking and a bit of luxury in design sound like your cup of tea, the Fit 3 might be worth the splurge. But, if you’re all about the basics and prefer a gadget that lasts longer between charges, the Fit 2 remains a solid, dependable choice.

In the end, your decision should align with what you value most in a fitness tracker—be it the latest health features and sleek design of the Fit 3 or the simplicity and enduring battery life of the Fit 2. It’s all about what fits your lifestyle and fitness goals best.

Latest:

• Xiaomi Mi band 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit 2
• Honor Watch 4 vs Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro
• Fitbit Charge 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit 2