Apple just brought out their new Watch Ultra 2 and Series 9. They’ve added some cool stuff since the last models.
Conversely, Google will show off their Pixel Watch 2 next month.
But how does the first Pixel Watch match up to Apple’s Series 9 before that happens? We’re here to show you the big and small differences.
Related Articles
Let’s see what each watch offers and help you pick the right one.
Dive in!
Apple Watch Series 9 vs Google Pixel Watch: Pricing
Let’s start with the price point. The Apple Watch Series 9 retains a similar pricing structure to its predecessor, with a starting price of $399 for the 41-millimeter GPS-only model and $499 for the GPS + cellular version. The larger 45-millimeter model starts at $429 and goes up to $529 with cellular support.
In contrast, the Google Pixel Watch is priced at $350 for the Wi-Fi and GPS edition and $400 for the LTE version. It’s worth noting that Google’s offering is slightly more affordable, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers.
Apple Watch 9:
- View on Amazon
Google Pixel Watch:
- View on Amazon
Apple Watch Series 9 vs Google Pixel Watch: Specs Comparison
| Specification | Apple Watch Series 9 | Google Pixel Watch |
|---|---|---|
| Case Material | Aluminium or Stainless Steel | Stainless steel |
| Sizes | 41mm, 45mm | 41mm |
| Display | 41mm: 904sq mm OLED, 2000 nits 45mm: 1143sq mm OLED 2000 nits | 1.2 inch AMOLED |
| Resolution | 41mm: 430 x 352 pixels 45mm: 484 x 396 pixels | 450 x 450 pixels |
| Dimensions | 41 x 35 x 10.7mm (41mm model) 45 x 38 x 10.7mm (45mm model) | 41 x 41 x 12.3 mm |
| Weight | 41mm – 32g (aluminum), 42.3g (stainless steel), 45mm – 38.8g (aluminium), 51.5g (stainless steel) | 33 g |
| Battery | Up to 18 hours | 294mAh up to 24hrs |
| Connectivity | GPS only, GPS & Cellular | Bluetooth v5.0 LE, e-SIM, 4G LTE |
| Water Resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM |
| Health sensors | Body temperature, Blood oxygen, Optical heart rate, Electrical heart rate | Compass, altimeter, Blood oxygen sensor, Multipurpose electrical sensor (ECG), Optical heart rate sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Ambient light sensor |
| NFC | Apple Pay | Google Pay |
| Color options | Pink, Midnight, Starlight, Gold, Silver, Graphite, Black, PRODUCT (RED) | Champagne Gold case / Hazel Active band. Matte Black case / Obsidian Active band. Polished Silver case / Chalk Active band. Polished Silver case / Charcoal Active band. |
Trending:
- Garmin Venu 3 vs Google Pixel Watch: Which is Right for You?
- Apple Watch Series 9 vs Garmin Venu 3: Which Should You Buy?
- Apple Watch Series 9 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Comparing the Heavyweights!
Apple Watch Series 9 vs Google Pixel Watch: In-Depth Review
Design and Display
When it comes to design, both smartwatches maintain their signature styles.
The Apple Watch Series 9 continues with its iconic squircle design, while the Google Pixel Watch features a sleek and modern look with a stainless steel body.
The Apple Watch Series 9 introduces a new pink finish to its color options, which complements the latest iPhone 15.
The Apple Watch Series 9 boasts the brightest display in the flagship lineup, reaching up to 2,000 nits. This enhancement ensures excellent visibility even in bright sunlight.
On the other hand, the Google Pixel Watch features a smaller AMOLED display but manages to make good use of the available screen real estate.
It offers vibrant colors and responsiveness, although it has a larger black bezel surrounding the display than the Apple Watch Series 9.
Health and Fitness Tracking
The Apple Watch Series 9 and the Google Pixel Watch excel in health and fitness tracking.
The Apple Watch Series 9 leverages its upgraded S9 SiP with machine-learning capabilities that are 30% faster than its predecessor.
This means more accurate fitness tracking, better heart rate monitoring, and even on-device communication with Siri for health-related insights.
The Google Pixel Watch, on the other hand, integrates Fitbit’s expertise in health and fitness tracking. It offers comprehensive tracking features, including heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and exercise tracking.
However, integrating with Fitbit can sometimes feel like a separate experience, requiring a separate account.
WearOS vs. watchOS
Choosing between WearOS (Google’s operating system for wearables) and watchOS (Apple’s operating system for Apple Watch) is crucial.
The Apple Watch Series 9 runs on watchOS 10, offering a seamless and well-integrated experience with other Apple devices.
It provides access to the extensive App Store, allowing users to customize their watch with various apps and watch faces.
On the other hand, the Google Pixel Watch utilizes WearOS, which has dramatically improved over the years. It offers excellent integration with Android smartphones, providing notifications, maps, and apps.
Google Assistant is a standout feature, offering hands-free access to information and tasks.
Battery Life
Battery life is a significant consideration for smartwatch users. The Apple Watch Series 9 maintains its predecessor’s “all-day” 18-hour battery life. While it does offer a low-power mode for extended usage, it’s not a standout feature in terms of battery life.
The Google Pixel Watch claims a 24-hour battery life, which can be influenced by factors such as using the always-on display. In real-world usage, users can expect around 26 hours of battery life. While it’s not industry-leading, it should suffice for a day’s use.
Apple Watch Series 9 vs Google Pixel Watch: Which Should You Buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the Apple Watch Series 9 and the Google Pixel Watch depends on your priorities.
If you’re deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem and seek seamless integration with your iPhone, the Apple Watch Series 9 is a natural choice. Its impressive display, health tracking capabilities, and access to the App Store make it a versatile and powerful smartwatch.
On the other hand, the Google Pixel Watch offers an attractive alternative for Android users who want a stylish, feature-rich wearable. Its affordability, Google Assistant integration, and solid fitness tracking capabilities make it a compelling option.
