Question

You have a project in Azure DevOps named Project1. Project1 contains a build pipeline named Pipe1 that builds an application named App1.

You have an Agent pool named Pool1 that contains a Windows Server 2022-based self-hosted agent. Pipe1 uses Pool1.

You plan to implement another project named Project2. Project2 will have a build pipeline named Pipe2 that builds an application named App2.

App1 and App2 have conflicting dependencies.

You need to minimize the possibility that the two build pipelines will conflict with each other. The solution must minimize infrastructure costs.

What should you do?

A. Add another self-hosted agent.
B. Add a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines.
C. Change the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9.
D. Create two container jobs.

Answer

D. Create two container jobs.

Explanation 1

The answer is D. Create two container jobs.

By creating two separate container jobs, each build pipeline will run isolated in its own container, thus ensuring that the dependencies of App1 and App2 do not interfere with each other. Containers encapsulate an application with its environment, including its dependencies, into one standalone unit. This isolation allows you to simultaneously run applications with conflicting dependencies since they are no longer sharing the same environment.

Here’s why the other options are not advisable:

A. Add another self-hosted agent: This can potentially avoid conflict, but it would not minimize infrastructure costs as requested in the problem, as it necessitates additional hardware resource and maintenance.

B. Add a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines: Docker Compose is used to define and run multi-container Docker applications, but it doesn’t necessarily isolate dependencies of different applications running on the same agent.

C. Change the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9: Simply changing the operating system of the agent does not solve the problem of conflicting dependencies. Even on a different OS, if both applications are being built on a single agent, their dependencies may still conflict.

Explanation 2

The correct answer is D. Create two container jobs.

This is the most efficient way to minimize the possibility of conflicts between the two build pipelines. By creating two separate container jobs, each build pipeline will run in its own isolated environment, without conflicting with each other. This will also minimize infrastructure costs, as the self-hosted agent can be used for both pipelines.

Option A, adding another self-hosted agent, would also minimize the possibility of conflicts, but it would not be as efficient as creating two container jobs. This is because each build pipeline would still be running on the same physical machine, which could still lead to conflicts.

Option B, adding a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines, would not be effective in minimizing conflicts. Docker Compose is a tool for running Docker containers, but it does not isolate the containers from each other. This means that conflicts could still occur between the two build pipelines.

Option C, changing the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9, would not be effective in minimizing conflicts. The operating system is not the main factor that causes conflicts between build pipelines. The main factor is the dependencies of the applications being built.

I hope this explanation is helpful.

Explanation 3

The correct answer is D. Create two container jobs. A container job is a job that runs on a containerized agent. A containerized agent is an agent that runs inside a Docker container. By using container jobs, you can isolate the dependencies of each build pipeline and avoid conflicts. Container jobs also reduce the infrastructure costs because you do not need to provision and maintain additional self-hosted agents.

Option A is incorrect because adding another self-hosted agent will increase the infrastructure costs and will not guarantee that the two build pipelines will not conflict with each other if they use the same agent pool.

Option B is incorrect because a Docker Compose task is used to build, push, or run multi-container Docker applications. It does not create containerized agents for the build pipelines.

Option C is incorrect because changing the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9 will not solve the dependency conflicts between App1 and App2. It will also require additional configuration and licensing costs for the self-hosted agent.

Explanation 4

The correct answer is D. Create two container jobs.

According to the documentation, a container job is a job that runs on a self-hosted agent and uses a container to provide a consistent and isolated execution environment for your build or deployment tasks. A container job can help you avoid conflicts between different applications that have incompatible or conflicting dependencies, such as different versions of frameworks, libraries, or tools. By using a container job, you can specify the image, environment variables, and volumes for each build pipeline, and ensure that they run in isolation from each other.

To create a container job, you need to add the following syntax to your YAML pipeline:

jobs:
• job: JobName

container: ContainerName
steps:
• script: echo Hello from the container!

The ContainerName can be either a predefined Microsoft-hosted image or a custom image that you create and store in a container registry, such as Azure Container Registry or Docker Hub. You can also use multiple containers in a single job by using the services keyword.

Option A is incorrect because adding another self-hosted agent would increase the infrastructure costs and would not guarantee that the two build pipelines would not conflict with each other if they run on the same agent.

Option B is incorrect because adding a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines would not create a container job, but rather build and run multi-container Docker applications. A Docker Compose task is used to orchestrate the deployment of multiple containers that are defined in a docker-compose.yml file.

Option C is incorrect because changing the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9 would not solve the problem of conflicting dependencies between App1 and App2. It would also require additional configuration and licensing costs.

I hope this explanation helps you understand how to use container jobs in Azure Pipelines to avoid conflicts between different applications.

Explanation 5

The correct option is:

D. Create two container jobs.

Explanation:

To minimize the possibility of conflicting dependencies between build pipelines while also minimizing infrastructure costs, the best approach is to use containerization. Containerization provides an isolated environment for each build pipeline, ensuring that dependencies and configurations do not conflict with each other. Azure DevOps supports running jobs within containers as part of the build pipeline.

Option A (Add another self-hosted agent) might help with isolation to some extent, but it’s not the most efficient solution. It would require maintaining additional infrastructure, which could increase costs, and still might not fully address the conflict issue.

Option B (Add a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines) refers to using Docker Compose to manage multi-container applications. While Docker can help with containerization, it doesn’t inherently guarantee isolation between build pipelines. Using container jobs directly in Azure DevOps is a more straightforward approach.

Option C (Change the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux) doesn’t directly address the conflict between dependencies. The choice of the operating system doesn’t inherently solve the dependency conflict issue between different applications.

The correct approach is to create two container jobs:

By creating two container jobs—one for each build pipeline—you can ensure that each job runs in an isolated environment using containers. This means that App1 and App2 can have their dependencies and configurations encapsulated within separate containers, minimizing the possibility of conflicts.

Containerization provides benefits like isolation, reproducibility, and portability. It also minimizes infrastructure costs since containers can run on the same self-hosted agent.

In conclusion, using two container jobs—one for each build pipeline—is the most efficient and effective solution to minimize the possibility of conflicting dependencies while minimizing infrastructure costs.

Explanation 6

The correct answer is D. Create two container jobs.

A container job is a build job that runs in a Docker container. This isolates the build environment from the host machine, which can help to prevent conflicts between the two build pipelines.

Option A, adding another self-hosted agent, would also help to prevent conflicts, but it would also increase infrastructure costs.

Option B, adding a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines, would not be enough to prevent conflicts. The Docker Compose task would only create a container for the build, but the dependencies for the build would still be installed on the host machine.

Option C, changing the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9, would not be enough to prevent conflicts. The operating system of the host machine is not the only factor that can cause conflicts.

Here are the steps on how to create two container jobs in Azure DevOps:

1. In the Azure DevOps project, go to Pipelines > Pipelines.
2. Click the New Pipeline button.
3. Select the Container job template.
4. In the Agent pool drop-down list, select a self-hosted agent pool.
5. In the Dockerfile field, specify the Dockerfile that will be used to build the application.
6. In the Args field, specify any arguments that need to be passed to the Dockerfile.
7. Click the Create button.

Once you have created two container jobs, you can add them to the build pipelines for App1 and App2.

This will ensure that the two build pipelines are isolated from each other and that the possibility of conflicts is minimized.

I hope this explanation is helpful.

Explanation 7

To minimize the possibility of conflicts between the build pipelines for App1 and App2, while also minimizing infrastructure costs, the best option would be to create two container jobs.

Option D: Create two container jobs.

By creating two container jobs, each build pipeline (Pipe1 and Pipe2) can run in its own isolated environment. This ensures that the dependencies of App1 and App2 do not conflict with each other. Containerization provides a lightweight and portable solution, allowing each build pipeline to have its own set of dependencies without interfering with other pipelines.

Adding another self-hosted agent (Option A) would provide additional resources, but it would not guarantee isolation between the build pipelines. The conflicting dependencies could still cause issues, and it would increase infrastructure costs.

Adding a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines (Option B) could help with managing dependencies, but it would not provide complete isolation between the pipelines. Docker Compose allows you to define and run multi-container applications, but it does not guarantee that the containers will be completely isolated from each other.

Changing the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9 (Option C) may provide a different operating system environment, but it would not guarantee isolation between the build pipelines. The conflicting dependencies could still cause issues, and it may not be the most cost-effective solution.

Therefore, the best option is to create two container jobs to ensure isolation between the build pipelines and minimize the possibility of conflicts, while also minimizing infrastructure costs.

Explanation 8

The correct answer is D. Create two container jobs.

Here is a detailed explanation:

• Container jobs are a feature of Azure DevOps that allows you to run your pipeline steps inside a container. This provides isolation from the host agent and enables you to pin specific versions of tools and dependencies that your build requires.
• By creating two container jobs, one for Pipe1 and one for Pipe2, you can avoid the conflict between App1 and App2’s dependencies. Each container job will have its own environment and context, and will not interfere with the other one.
• Option A is incorrect because adding another self-hosted agent will increase the infrastructure costs and complexity. You will need to provision, configure, and maintain another agent machine. Moreover, adding another agent will not guarantee that the two build pipelines will not conflict with each other, as they may still run on the same agent at different times.
• Option B is incorrect because adding a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines will not solve the problem of conflicting dependencies. A Docker Compose task is used to build, push, or run multi-container Docker applications. It does not run the pipeline steps inside a container, but rather creates and manages containers as part of the pipeline.
• Option C is incorrect because changing the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9 will not prevent the conflict between App1 and App2’s dependencies. The operating system of the agent does not affect the dependencies of the applications, unless they are platform-specific. Moreover, changing the operating system of the agent may introduce compatibility issues with other tools or tasks in the pipeline.

Therefore, to minimize the possibility that the two build pipelines will conflict with each other and minimize infrastructure costs, you should create two container jobs.

I hope this explanation helps you understand the concept better.

Explanation 9

According to the Azure DevOps documentation, container jobs are a feature of Azure Pipelines that executes pipelines within a container. This allows you to isolate the dependencies of each pipeline and avoid conflicts. You can specify the container image to use for each job and the agent will pull it from a registry. Therefore, based on this information, the correct answer to your question is option D: create two container jobs. This would minimize the possibility that the two build pipelines will conflict with each other and also minimize infrastructure costs since you don’t need to add another self-hosted agent or change the operating system of the existing one. I hope this helps.😊

Explanation 10

The correct answer is D. Create two container jobs.

This is the most efficient way to minimize the possibility of conflicts between the two build pipelines, while also minimizing infrastructure costs. By using container jobs, each build pipeline can run in its own isolated environment, without conflicting with each other.

Option A, adding another self-hosted agent, would increase infrastructure costs.

Option B, adding a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines, would not completely isolate the build pipelines. There is still a possibility that the two build pipelines could conflict with each other, if they use the same Docker images.

Option C, changing the self-hosted agent to use RHEL 9, would not completely isolate the build pipelines. The two build pipelines could still conflict with each other, if they use the same software packages.

I hope this explanation is helpful.

Explanation 11

The question is about how to minimize the possibility of conflicts between two build pipelines that use the same self-hosted agent pool. A self-hosted agent is an agent that you set up and manage on your own to run jobs. Self-hosted agents give you more control to install dependent software needed for your builds and deployments.

Based on the options given, the best one is D. Create two container jobs. This is because container jobs allow you to run your build or deployment in a container on a self-hosted agent. This way, you can isolate the dependencies of each application and avoid conflicts. You can also use a Docker Compose task to create and run multiple containers.

Option A is not optimal because it would increase the infrastructure costs and still not guarantee that the two pipelines will not conflict with each other if they run on the same agent.

Option B is not correct because a Docker Compose task alone will not solve the problem of conflicting dependencies. You still need to run the task in a container job.

Option C is not relevant because changing the operating system of the self-hosted agent will not affect the dependencies of the applications.

I hope this helps.

Explanation 12

The correct answer is: Create two container jobs.

The two build pipelines will conflict with each other because they have conflicting dependencies. To minimize the possibility of conflict, we can create two container jobs. This will allow us to run the two build pipelines in separate containers, which will prevent them from interfering with each other. This is the most cost-effective solution because it does not require us to add any additional agents or change the operating system of the existing agent.

Explanation 13

To minimize the possibility of conflicts between the build pipelines for App1 and App2, while minimizing infrastructure costs, the recommended solution is to create two container jobs.

Option D. Create two container jobs.

Explanation:
By creating two container jobs, you can isolate the build environments for App1 and App2, ensuring that they do not conflict with each other. Each container job can have its own set of dependencies, allowing you to build and test the applications independently.

Container jobs provide a lightweight and isolated environment for running tasks within a pipeline. They can be configured with different operating systems, dependencies, tools, and versions. By using container jobs, you can achieve separation between the build pipelines for App1 and App2 without the need for additional physical or virtual machines.

Here’s how you can implement this solution:

1. Create a new build pipeline named Pipe2 in Project2 for building App2.
2. Edit Pipe2 and add a container job that specifies the required build environment for App2. You can choose the appropriate base image and configure the necessary dependencies and tools.
3. In the pipeline for App1 (Pipe1), make sure it continues to use the existing self-hosted agent in Pool1.
4. Configure the pipeline steps in Pipe1 to build and test App1 as needed.

By using separate container jobs for each application, you can ensure that the conflicting dependencies between App1 and App2 are isolated from each other. This approach minimizes the infrastructure costs because you can reuse the existing self-hosted agent for App1 and only provision a container environment for App2 when needed.

Option A. Adding another self-hosted agent would increase infrastructure costs unnecessarily and may not provide the necessary isolation between the build pipelines.

Option B. Adding a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines may help with managing dependencies, but it would not provide the required isolation between App1 and App2. It would still rely on the same underlying agent and potentially lead to conflicts.

Option C. Changing the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9 would not address the conflicting dependencies between App1 and App2. It would only change the operating system of the agent but still use the same underlying environment.

Therefore, the most suitable and cost-effective solution is to create two container jobs to isolate the build pipelines for App1 and App2.

Explanation 14

The best approach here is to create two container jobs (option D).

Here is a detailed explanation:

• Project1 and Project2 will have build pipelines (Pipe1 and Pipe2 respectively) that build different applications (App1 and App2) which have conflicting dependencies. This means the build environments cannot be shared.
• Currently there is only one self-hosted agent pool (Pool1) being used by both pipelines. Sharing this agent increases the chances of the builds interfering with each other due to the conflicting dependencies.
• Adding another self-hosted agent (option A) would address the issue but introduce additional infrastructure costs due to having to provision and maintain another build machine. The goal is to minimize costs.
• Adding a Docker Compose task (option B) does not isolate the builds from each other. Docker Compose is for defining and running multi-container Docker applications, but it does not provide isolation between the different jobs/pipelines that would be running on the same agent.
• Changing the agent OS (option C) does not actually address the root cause of the conflicting dependencies between the builds. It still leaves them running on the same shared agent.
• Creating two container jobs (option D) leverages Docker containers to isolate each pipeline/job and provides the necessary separation and insulation between App1 and App2’s conflicting dependencies. Containerization minimizes the chances of them interfering with each other while reusing the same underlying agent infrastructure, thus achieving the goal of minimizing costs.

Therefore, option D – Create two container jobs – is the best approach that meets all requirements to isolate the builds properly while minimizing infrastructure costs as requested.

Explanation 15

Here is the detailed explanation for the question:

The key here is that App1 and App2 have conflicting dependencies, so we need to isolate the build environments for Pipe1 and Pipe2 to avoid conflicts.

Option A of adding another self-hosted agent won’t help since it’s still a shared build environment that could lead to conflicts.

Option B using Docker Compose also won’t isolate the builds enough to prevent dependency conflicts.

Option C changing the OS of the agent could help technically, but it’s overkill and incurs unnecessary infrastructure costs.

Option D is the best answer. By creating two separate container jobs, we can fully isolate the build environments for each pipeline while minimizing infrastructure costs since containers are lightweight. The container jobs will have their own isolated dependencies, avoiding any conflicts between the two pipelines building App1 and App2.

In summary, creating two container jobs is the optimal solution to isolate the builds and their dependencies, while keeping infrastructure costs low by leveraging lightweight containers. This avoids build conflicts in the most cost-effective manner.

Explanation 16

To minimize the possibility of conflicting dependencies between the build pipelines and minimize infrastructure costs, the recommended solution is to create two container jobs. Therefore, the correct option is D: Create two container jobs.

Here’s a detailed explanation:

By creating two container jobs, you can isolate the build environments of App1 and App2, ensuring that their dependencies do not conflict with each other. Containerization provides a lightweight and isolated environment for running applications, making it an effective solution in this scenario.

Here’s how you can implement the solution:

1. Create a new project in Azure DevOps named Project2.
2. Within Project2, create a build pipeline named Pipe2.
3. Modify Pipe2 to include two container jobs, one for building App1 and the other for building App2.
   • For the first container job, configure it to use the Windows Server 2022-based self-hosted agent from Pool1 and set it up for building App1.
   • For the second container job, configure it to use a different agent pool or a different self-hosted agent that can support the conflicting dependencies of App2.
4. Configure the container jobs to use the necessary build steps and define the build processes for each application independently.

By using container jobs, you can ensure that each build pipeline, Pipe1 and Pipe2, runs in isolated environments, preventing any conflicts between their dependencies. This approach allows you to leverage existing agents and agent pools without the need for additional infrastructure, minimizing costs.

Option A (Add another self-hosted agent) would increase infrastructure costs without addressing the conflict between dependencies.

Option B (Add a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines) is not the most suitable solution in this case. Docker Compose is primarily used for defining multi-container applications, orchestrating their deployment, and managing their dependencies. However, it may not provide the level of isolation required to prevent conflicts between the build pipelines in this scenario.

Option C (Change the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9) may help in some cases if the conflicting dependencies are specific to the Windows environment. However, it may not be a comprehensive solution if the conflicts extend beyond the operating system. Additionally, it might require additional infrastructure changes and incur additional costs.

In summary, creating two container jobs offers a cost-effective and efficient solution by isolating the build environments of App1 and App2, minimizing the possibility of conflicts between their dependencies.

Explanation 17

The correct answer is B: Add a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines.

Explanation:

In this scenario, we have two build pipelines, Pipe1 and Pipe2, that build applications App1 and App2, respectively. These applications have conflicting dependencies, which means that they cannot be built on the same agent at the same time. We need to minimize the possibility of conflict between the two build pipelines and minimize infrastructure costs.

Option A, adding another self-hosted agent, would not solve the conflict issue as both pipelines would still be competing for the same agent.

Option C, changing the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9, would not solve the conflict issue either, as the conflicting dependencies would still be present.

Option D, creating two container jobs, would not be the most efficient solution as it would require two separate container jobs, which would increase infrastructure costs.

Option B, adding a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines, is the best solution. Docker Compose allows us to define and run multi-container Docker applications. By adding a Docker Compose task to both build pipelines, we can ensure that the conflicting dependencies are isolated within separate containers, reducing the possibility of conflict between the two pipelines. Additionally, using Docker Compose does not require additional infrastructure costs as it can run on the existing self-hosted agent.

Therefore, the correct answer is B: Add a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines.

Explanation 18

The correct answer is (B) Add a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines.

Here’s why:

Conflicting dependencies between App1 and App2 can be resolved by using Docker Compose. Docker Compose allows you to define and run multi-container Docker applications, including managing the dependencies between them. By adding a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines, you can ensure that App1 and App2 are built independently of each other, reducing the possibility of conflict.

Here’s how you can implement this solution:

1. Create a Docker Compose file that defines the App1 and App2 applications, including their dependencies.
2. Add the Docker Compose file to the build pipeline of Project1 (Pipe1) and Project2 (Pipe2).
3. Configure the Docker Compose task to use the appropriate Docker images for each application.
4. In the build pipeline, use the Docker Compose task to build each application independently.

By using Docker Compose, you can minimize the infrastructure costs by avoiding the need for additional self-hosted agents or changing the agent operating system.

I hope this helps!

Explanation 19

In Azure DevOps, you can minimize the possibility of conflict between two build pipelines with conflicting dependencies while also minimizing infrastructure costs by using agent jobs and containerization.

• Agent Jobs: You can run each build pipeline on a separate agent. This way, each pipeline has its own environment and dependencies, reducing the chance of conflicts. To minimize costs, you can use Microsoft-hosted agents which are included in the Azure DevOps pricing and do not require separate infrastructure.
• Containerization: You can use Docker containers to package the build environment for each pipeline. This ensures that each pipeline has its own isolated environment with its own dependencies, eliminating the possibility of conflicts. Docker containers are lightweight and can be run on the same infrastructure, minimizing costs.

Remember to clean up resources after each pipeline run to further reduce costs.

Explanation 20

To minimize the possibility of conflict between the build pipelines for App1 and App2, while also minimizing infrastructure costs, you should consider the following options:

A. Add another self-hosted agent:

• This option involves adding another Windows Server 2022-based self-hosted agent to the agent pool.
• By having separate agents for each project, you can isolate the build pipelines and reduce the chances of conflicts.
• However, this option may increase infrastructure costs as you need to provision and maintain an additional agent.

B. Add a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines:

• This option involves using Docker Compose to create isolated containers for each build pipeline.
• By containerizing the build environments, you can ensure that the dependencies for App1 and App2 are isolated and do not conflict with each other.
• Docker Compose allows you to define and manage multi-container applications, making it easier to maintain separate environments for each project.
• This option can help minimize infrastructure costs as you can use a single agent and leverage containerization.

C. Change the self-hosted agent to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9:

• This option involves switching the self-hosted agent from Windows Server 2022 to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.
• By using a different operating system, you can further isolate the build environments for App1 and App2.
• This option may help minimize conflicts, especially if the conflicting dependencies are specific to the Windows environment.
• However, it’s important to consider the compatibility of your application and build tools with the Linux environment.

D. Create two container jobs:

• This option involves creating two separate container jobs within the build pipelines.
• Each job can be configured with its own container environment, ensuring that the dependencies for App1 and App2 are isolated.
• This option is similar to using Docker Compose but provides more granular control over the build process.
• Like option B, this option can help minimize infrastructure costs as you can use a single agent and leverage containerization.

In summary, the options to consider are adding another self-hosted agent (option A), using Docker Compose or creating two container jobs (options B and D), or changing the self-hosted agent to use RHEL 9 (option C). The best option depends on your specific requirements, infrastructure, and compatibility considerations.

Explanation 21

Based on the information provided, the best solution to minimize the possibility of conflicts between the two build pipelines and minimize infrastructure costs would be:

B. Add a Docker Compose task to the build pipelines.

Here’s why:

• Docker Compose is a tool that allows you to define and run multi-container Docker applications. By using Docker Compose, you can ensure that each build pipeline has its own isolated environment, which will minimize the risk of conflicts between the two pipelines.
• Docker Compose tasks can be added to each build pipeline, allowing you to define the dependencies and configuration for each pipeline. This will ensure that each pipeline has the necessary resources and dependencies to build its corresponding application.
• Using Docker Compose tasks will not require you to add additional self-hosted agents or change the existing Windows Server 2022-based self-hosted agent. This will help to minimize infrastructure costs and avoid the need for additional hardware or software.
• Docker Compose tasks can be easily integrated into Azure DevOps pipelines, allowing you to leverage the existing Azure DevOps infrastructure and tools.

In summary, adding a Docker Compose task to each build pipeline will provide a flexible and efficient solution for managing conflicting dependencies between two build pipelines, while minimizing infrastructure costs.

Reference

• Azure Pipelines Agents – Azure Pipelines | Microsoft Learn
• Run a self-hosted agent in Docker – Azure Pipelines | Microsoft Learn
• Deploy an Azure Pipelines agent on Windows – Azure Pipelines | Microsoft Learn
• Container Jobs in Azure Pipelines and TFS – Azure Pipelines | Microsoft Learn
• python – Azure Pipeline fails with conflicting dependencies – Stack Overflow
• npm – How to handle conflicting peer dependencies? – Stack Overflow
• Manage dependencies in Azure YAML Devops Pipelines – Stack Overflow
• Jobs in Azure Pipelines and TFS – Azure Pipelines | Microsoft Learn
• Jobs in Azure Container Apps (preview) | Microsoft Learn

Designing and Implementing Microsoft DevOps Solutions AZ-400 certification exam practice question and answer (Q&A) dump with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the Designing and Implementing Microsoft DevOps Solutions AZ-400 exam and earn Designing and Implementing Microsoft DevOps Solutions AZ-400 certification.

The post Microsoft AZ-400 Q&A: What should do to minimize possibility project build pipelines conflict appeared first on PUPUWEB - Information Resource for Emerging Technology Trends and Cybersecurity.