These BlueHost vs FatCow are both historically huge names in web hosting. They are experienced, reputable, economical, and successful hosting businesses.
They have been set up in 90’s and both hold high rated reviews from their valued customers.
Blue Host is a professional hosting provider designed for professional individuals and small organizations. Fat Cow is moreover a hosting website with overall shared hosting solutions.
Here is a detailed comparison between both companies:
1- Price
BlueHost vs FatCow both provide economical and cheap hosting solutions. Blue Host is comparatively cheaper than the Fat Cow.
Their plan starts at 2.99 USD per month with one free domain name and exclusive features like Google ad words, cPanel and control panel.
Fat Cow provided the hosting for 49 USD annually that comes down to approximately 4.20 USD per month. The renewal charge for both companies also differs and Blue Host is cheaper option.
2- Performance
The most important feature of a website hosting provider is the performance and speed. Most of the service providers would offer a free domain name but what makes a difference is performance.
Blue Host offers a better bandwidth than Fat Cow.
3- Technical Support
BlueHost vs FatCow both offer 24/7 customer support through phone, email and online chat. Both the companies have friendly and helpful staff, which is always ready to cater the customers.
However, Blue Host is awarded better reviews than the Fat Cow. As per a survey, 91% of the customers were happy and satisfied with the customer services provided at Blue Host.
Fat Cow has a dedicated team which calls itself Moo Crew and has been fairly good in customer services.
4- Popularity
As per Google analytics, Blue Host is an indisputable leader in web hosting. It has acclaimed honest reviews from satisfied customers and users.
Blue Host outranked Fat Cow in terms of popularity with almost 50 % score. Blue Host is popular worldwide whereas Fat Cow is mainly used in North America.
5- Free Domain Name
Blue Host and Fat Cow, both offer free domain name for the first year after registration. Fat Cow offers 1 GB of free cloud storage for documents, photos, music and videos stored on your computer giving you access from anywhere anytime which makes them a winner compared to Blue Host.
6- Automated Back ups
While establishing one’s website, the most important task becomes the backing up of files and documents. Blue host automatically backs up your database free of cost.
Fat Cow does not offer automatic back up but the database can be manually stored using cPanel.
7- – Usability
When one signs up for hosting, they do not get a professional website but a place to put their website with ready made themes, pages and images to install which would never set you apart from others.
It is not user friendly neither easy to understand. Blue Host uses the best kind of back end called cPanel. It has a straightforward interface, which reduces clutter largely and simplifies the process further.
Fat Cow uses a back end that is not as efficient as the cPanel. If you want to build multiple sites on the account, it could become a frustrating affair.
If you are a beginner looking for a simple website with easy interface and never planning to change anything, Fat Cow is the winner.
If you are looking for long-term availability and flexibility, Blue Host is the best option.
8- Hosting Packages
Both companies offer similar packages when small websites are concerned.
If you are looking for more professional websites, database comes into being. Blue Host offers a better database that is limitless compared to Fat Cow.
On the other hand, Fat Cow has interesting packages like Milk and Butter, all in one hosting solution that included everything you need to put your business online for 49 USD a year.
They also offer a variety of tools to help you sell online: shopping carts, catalogs with coupons, PayPal integration and much more.
Memory limit is another important feature, which determines the overall decision. Blue Host offers a much better memory as compared to Fat Cow.
After considering all the features offered in hosting packages, Blue Host is a clear winner.
9- Performance
They both offer free domain for a year with web hosting but who is a better performer. Fat Cow beats Blue Host for the free money ads by integrating Bing, Face book and Google Ads. Blue Host is faster than Fat Cow in providing information to the consumers.
10- Account Set Up
Fat Cow and Blue Host, both offers a similar ease in account set up. You can create your website right away once you have registered at either of the companies.
If you are checking for economical and small website, opt for Fat Cow. However, if you are looking for an independent, advanced, and multi-faceted website, Blue Host is your best choice.
What do you think of our off the charts web hosting review of bluehost vs fatcow.
The post Bluehost vs Fatcow- Who wins the knockout battle appeared first on Cheap Web Hosting | Best Web Hosting | DailyHosting.net.
