Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Neck Sharpies: The Other Outside Run

Neck Sharpies: The Other Outside Run
Seth October 17th, 2023 at 9:00 AM
You bring down a safety on a run blitz, you have your DTs filling both A gaps, you have your linebackers flying down at the first sign of Duo, and then this happens. [Bryan Fuller]

In Week 2 against UNLV Michigan tried to run Stretch (aka Outside Zone) as their primary counter to Duo, their base running play. It didn't work. The problem with that is if your base running play is inside the tackles you still need something you can run well that goes outside of the tackles. Otherwise your Duo runs are just going to get swallowed up.

This sounds pretty basic. But what kind of outside run could look like Duo/Inside Zone? And how can you spot it? Let's look.

[After THE JUMP: Wrappers]

Jamming Duo

Duo, as we've discussed ad nauseum, is the running play where you double both DTs to get so much movement on them that a linebacker has to pick one side to go to, at which point the RB can bounce to the other gap. In our base example the RB angles towards the frontside "A" gap between the center and guard, and once he gets the MLB to commit to that gap he bounces out to the C gap.

But he could just as well attack the nose tackle and WLB. The read for the running back is one of those doubles is likely going better than the other, so lock eyes with the linebacker behind it and get him to commit to the wrong gap.

The reason Duo works is because defenses usually align with one fewer defender in the box than there are gaps. If you're defending a six-man front with six guys in the box, and the ends are taking the edges, you're one gap short.

The defense would like their "a"-aligned linebacker to be able to hang back and get to the C gap they're leaving open by alignment, but he can't do that if the "B" tackle gets blown down into him. The LB is forced to pick a side. When the offense gives you an option, whichever one you choose is going to be wrong.

Every defense would love to defeat this by having tackles who won't get shoved out the of way with doubles, but with Michigan's blockers that's a tough ask. Finding a DT who's stronger than two FBS-caliber offensive linemen isn't easy. Even Mason Graham gets moved by doubles.

How do you cheat against this? There are three main ways:

1. Do it with DL: Where your linemen line up are hard nodes, places it's harder to run. Defenses move them to different gaps before and after the snap, and offenses seek soft nodes to widen and attack. Pay attention here where these DL align, and where they end up.

This is a basic Over front with hard nodes threatening the strongside D and B gaps, and the backside A and C gaps.

After the snap the assignments are a little different.

This is a "Pinch." Indiana moved a DT down a gap, jamming up both A gaps. This forces the soft nodes that the RB can threaten further apart, and puts the hardest nodes—those DTs—in adjacent gaps. If one double goes well the RB can't cut to the inside of it because there's another DT there.

2. Do it with LBs: Duo really causes problems for defenses because once you move the DT out of the way you get a linebacker who can't cover both sides of it (unless he gets a safety covering his backside). So if you want to jam up duo, tell your linebackers to shoot up into those doubles and stop them in their tracks.

Watch #44 Aaron Casey, the LB on the bottom hash.

Michigan is getting movement, but even before the ball is in Corum's hands Casey is coming down towards the line of scrimmage to help his DT.

Teams expecting a run up the gut will often slam their linebackers into the line of scrimmage as soon as they see those doubles forming, which not only relieves the DT getting doubled but creates another hard node in the defensive front at a crucial moment. The linebacker's running start gives his body the effect of a particularly strong DT. This should halt the offense's momentum downfield, and might even reverse it.

And since the linebacker here gets to choose which OL he attacks, he's going to take the outside shoulder of the blocker with the most advantageous position, squeezing him next to the guy he was doubling with—closing that gap—and allowing his DT to cover the one behind it. The result is usually a running back running up into the backs of his blockers, technically in an unprotected gap, but not one that he fit a body through.

3. Do it with DBs:

You probably already noticed by now that IU has a seventh guy at linebacker depth. That's #15, Nic Toomer, a cornerback who transferred in this year from Stanford.

Remember the reason Duo works is because defenses usually align one gap short.

If you bring down a safety, or in this case add a cornerback, you've got a guy for every gap.

As this all resolves, the pinching DTs and quick-slamming WLB have created a pileup inside with three defenders occupying four blockers, giving the RB a choice between two lanes outside of those double-teams that have defenders waiting in.

On this particular play the DE on the top actually came inside too late and might have given up a bounce to the outside, but you get the idea. Indiana is selling out on this three ways (and a fourth). It's time to make them boys pay.

DON'T PINCH ME

The best way to mess with a defense that's attacking inside is to run outside, obviously. This also works in the micro. When the defense pinches its DTs they're not just committing their strongest run defense to the A-gaps; they're shifting a linebacker responsibility out of the A-gap, IE they're taking a linebacker out of the middle.

Note how Michigan has a lot of blocking material on the right side of the offense, and Indiana's closest hard node is the frontside B gap.  (This is from the replay).

They're expecting to pass rush here, not defend an outside run. What they get is a jet sweep with the tight ends blocking down and the frontside guard and tackle pulling around. The defense is quickly outflanked and Corum picks up a chunk behind his escorts.

The Jet Sweep is a neat outside running trick, but it doesn't really look like the main thing Michigan runs, which limits its effectiveness. Here it was a gimmick on a passing down that took advantage of the defense relaxing while Corum motioned, apparently to his normal RB position, to hide the jet intentions.

But the Jet Sweep is really just a variation on the Crack Sweep--the play where they pitch it to the RB--and that should work on pinching DTs just as well. That looks like Duo before the snap at least. But what if I told you there's a way to run outside from a pure Duo look?

WINDBACK

Windback, also known as Counter Duo, attacks outside after committing the defense to trying to get upfield. It's usually run with a tight end wrapper but Wilson will do here:

Windback has three main components:

  1. Duo blocking inside that gets the last interior defender downblocked.
  2. Edge control from the last man on the line of scrimmage.
  3. A "wrapper"—basically some kind of long backside puller to handle the edge defender.

click makes big

Usually this also includes some kind of counter motion from the running back to really sell the Duo look before he bounces outside (I used to say always but I've learned not to). I also use "Edge control" instead of "kickout" because that's more of a zone block—if that SAM decides to go inside of Bredeson he has to downblock and the wrapper, in this case Roman Wilson, will know to head another gap outside, or become the kickout man if he meets an unblocked defender on the edge. Also if the SS in this graphic were to come down outside of Loveland, he'd have to kick him out and that would be the gap.

But this is what they're expecting. The safety hammered down to add himself to the front and Loveland put him inside. The SDE is responsible for the edge and accepts a kickout from Bredeson. The gap forms between the kickout and the next guy inside, who needs to be blocked down.

There are reasons both obvious and subtle that this works as such a great counter to a defense that's selling out for Duo. The obvious part is the defense is burying itself in the line of scrimmage, using up its linebackers for gaps that the offense has no intention of going through. Look at Casey (#44) on the bottom hash in the clip above. He came to help his DT getting doubled by Zinter and Nugent, and now he's in no position to get back to Corum until the midfield M at least. That's the obvious part.

The subtle part is how the DTs (and in this case, a DE on the top) end up beating themselves by trying to beat Duo blocking. The end on the side they're running is the crucial player who needs to be blocked down, else he can gum up the entire works. They need this guy put inside, and intend to double through him to the linebacker level if needed. AJ Barner and LaDarius Henderson are committed to the task.

But this guy thinks he's defending Duo, right? So when he gets that double he thinks the best thing he can do is occupy the gap while working across Henderson to close the B gap forming behind him.

This would be some great defense if it was Duo. That DE is feeling super proud at this moment I bet. He has the C gap between Henderson and Barner controlled, and he's winning the B gap between Henderson and Keegan as well. And with the linebackers crashing down to fill those gaps this Duo should be good and stuffed.

The point is our DT is fighting to get to the wrong side of Henderson. Henderson just has to let him. If the linebacker figures out what's up, Barner should be able to come off and seal him. After all, the linebackers are obsessing over inside gaps—it's not dangerous to let the outside guy release.

Barner didn't release. He just kept blocking down and blocking down. The MLB saw Henderson as the main threat and slammed into him.

The other thing I want to point out here is the strong safety, who filled the gap behind Barner. Remember how nosy DBs were one of the issues with the run game earlier? The Harbaugh response to that is to turn those DBs into true run defenders. If you wanna play the game, we'll give you a tight end. Step right up and play the game, or in this case, eat Potato man; you're now the inside of the gap.

We said the DTs were hard nodes; a safety is not, and Bredeson widens the kickout to make a nice lane. As Wilson and Corum approach it, it starts to dawn on Casey at the bottom that he maybe shouldn't completely bury himself in Nugent. He abandons the backside B gap and starts to work his way back. The safety is not built for this. The DE is still fighting to get himself washed away from the play.

The WLB, Casey, is able to track this down from behind after just a decent gain. But had he been stuck on the blocking—say, if Keegan had been able to release after his DT crossed his face, the WLB wouldn't have an angle to get back. Space Coyote did a nice breakdown of it just over a year ago when Michigan brought it out against Maryland that showed the efficacy of these vertical blocks.

Michigan ran windback again after the jet sweep got Corum down to the redzone. This time the windback was Bredeson. Case again made the stop, though not before Corum got a head of steam against a cornerback and gained most of the distance to the goal line.

If you're grading this, watch the blockdowns from Loveland and Barner on the top and notice how much they move their respective guys. Loveland blocked down instead of kicking out (like Bredeson) on the play we drew up.

Michigan ran this or things like it (like power where the backside guard is the windback) a few more times on the first drive of the second half. And Indiana learned their lesson. Because the next Michigan went to run Duo, rather than putting their hard nodes on the inside, IU had the DTs slanting frontside, and the linebackers picking sides.

KBLOW

October 17th, 2023 at 9:36 AM ^

Thank you for the concise and clear explanation. Great stuff!

M Vader

October 17th, 2023 at 9:59 AM ^

Thank you for doing this.  Makes watch8ng the game more enjoyable!

dragonchild

October 17th, 2023 at 10:00 AM ^

The key thing about counters (no, not the play "counter" you pedants, I mean "counter to what the defense is doing") is that they have to look like the base play.

It seems obvious, right?  But it took Michigan way too long to learn this.  There's never a good time to mention it, but this is probably the best we'll get as far as going back to the Dark Times:  We here were infuriated that Michigan under Hoke was constantly running plays for which there were no constraints.  As in, the plays they ran looked nothing like each other.  Defenses -- and even fans -- could easily predict what Michigan was going to run based on the personnel and alignment.

This is a lesson I learned playing Tecmo Super Bowl as a kid, but millionaires who think they've earned every penny from their brilliance (namely Al Borges) would not only refuse to grasp the concept, when asked they would get openly indignant that their mastery was questioned by the unwashed masses.  And defenses continued to feast.

Anyone my age has learned to not take a good constraint for granted, unfortunately.

In reply to The key thing about counters… by dragonchild

bighouseinmate

October 17th, 2023 at 10:20 AM ^

Agreed, but I’d say Al Borges has definitely earned my respect as far as breaking down plays goes. He might not be good at game planning, but he knows exactly where everyone should go, how they should get there, and why they should be doing what they are doing. 
 

As an aside, between the neck sharpies here and the Michigan insider YouTube’s with Devin Gardner, Al borges and Vance Bedford I’ve learned more about football in the past three years than in the previous 30+ from just watching it on tv.

In reply to Agreed, but I’d say Al… by bighouseinmate

dragonchild

October 17th, 2023 at 11:00 AM ^

I'm fine that Borges is a fine commentator.  Some people are good at some things and not others.  Nothing wrong with that.

But the way he handled himself as an OC was downright shameful.  Now, everyone's human and makes mistakes, but I'm wary of those who not only refuse to learn, but double down when confronted with the causes of their failures.  Heiko (former MGoBlogger) at a presser asked why he doesn't run a simple constraint play to exploit free yards defenses were giving him, and he reacted like a hormone-addled teenager.  And through it all he kept getting worse.  At one point OSU was literally keying on our plays based on which QB he rolled out, which to me is "should never happen" territory.

He's moved on where he can't do any more damage, so yay.  But in my experience, his stubborn rejection of critical feedback is a toxic trait that leads to bad behaviors in more than just football.  He seems to be a friendly fellow (he later accepted an invite for a public deep dive with Heiko), at least when he's not losing games, but his kind of arrogance has literally gotten people killed in other lines of work.

In reply to I'm fine that Borges is a… by dragonchild

kehnonymous

October 17th, 2023 at 11:46 AM ^

Borges was morbidly fascinating because when he was on, he was ON; i.e., the 2013 OSU game… until the last play.

In reply to Borges was morbidly… by kehnonymous

ca_prophet

October 17th, 2023 at 12:37 PM ^

2013 ND game plan was brilliant too.  There was one big pass play where they half-rolled away from the pressure and Gardner got to sit back in a huge, clean pocket while a receiver ran free for a big strike.

That sort of thing is why I think the "party line" on Borges is overstated.  "OSU keying on our QB" is lazy thinking if you're talking about 2012, when we had no choice due to Denard's elbow.  He couldn't throw, and he couldn't really play RB (couldn't pass protect, block for Gardner or catch out of the backfield).  Either Denard sat out the OSU game, or he played his limited role (run the ball, or be a decoy).

Asking Michigan to install a new position for Denard midseason also seems like a big ask (e.g. the Deebo Samuel role for SF); I would classify that failure to find a brilliant solution, rather than incompetence for not finding the obvious.

The bigger picture to my mind is that Borges followed RichRod, who seemed tailor-made to maximize Denard, and tried to install an offense which focused the QB on medium-complicated passing - decidedly not Denard's strength - and which preferred to block people rather than give them the chance to make a play - also not tailored to our strengths.

Did Borges get the most out of Denard and Devin?  No.  Was he dismissive of amateurs second-guessing his undoubtedly vast knowledge?  Yes, at times.  Did that play a role in infuriating a fanbase which thought we were heading back to our rightful place, only to continue falling?  Absolutely.

But none of that makes him the drooling incompetent that the aforementioned party line often seems to portray.

bighouseinmate

October 17th, 2023 at 10:12 AM ^

Watching those I noticed Casey for Indiana played them all pretty good, from the first duos to the windbacks. On that first windback that was shown, if not for him Corum probably breaks the tackle from the cb and gains another 5-10 yards with a lone safety draped on him. He reads well, makes a decision and then goes hard. He is probably their best player overall, imo.

In reply to Watching those I noticed… by bighouseinmate

MNWolverine2

October 17th, 2023 at 11:18 AM ^

Hopefully Michigan is saving a few new wrinkles for Penn State.  Casey is a good player, but PSU has 2 linebackers that are head and shoulders better than Casey.  

In reply to Hopefully Michigan is saving… by MNWolverine2

bighouseinmate

October 17th, 2023 at 12:28 PM ^

I don’t know if I’d say they’re heads and shoulders above him. How much do the PSU DTs free them up to take on other responsibilities? Casey was making plays all over the field, including a sack and a couple tackles for loss. He’s the best LB Michigan has faced so far this year, and could possibly be in the top three when the season is over. 
 

As for PSU’s LBs and overall defense, we’ll see just how good they are this weekend. 

In reply to Watching those I noticed… by bighouseinmate

Nothsa

October 17th, 2023 at 1:21 PM ^

Casey had a great game against Ohio State for the reasons you provide. Allen knows how to coach defense and IU's linebackers have been good during his tenure.

JHumich

October 17th, 2023 at 11:51 AM ^

Love the last clip. Imagining Blake saying "Nice gap guys!" in a non-sarcastic, non-ironic sort of way on that one.



This post first appeared on Mgoblog, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Neck Sharpies: The Other Outside Run

×

Subscribe to Mgoblog

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×