Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Unverified Voracity Goes For It

Unverified Voracity Goes For It
Brian June 28th, 2023 at 1:03 PM
Brindley should hear his name tonight [Bill Rapai]

RIP. Sad week for the Michigan family, as Mister Simpson and Ryan Mallett both died far too young. Mallett drowned off the Gulf Coast—apparently one of 11 people to lose their lives to rip currents in the past two weeks. Simpson's death is under investigation by the Cincinnati police department. Keep their families in your thoughts.

Toe meets leather. Warde Manuel asserts that the changed Big Ten format will not affect The Game:

“The Game will remain at noon in the regular season when we play,” Manuel said on “In the Trenches,” a podcast produced by Michigan Athletics. “We’ve had great fan enjoyment of that game, and being at noon. Great television response in terms of numbers of people who who watch that game. I think there’s no need to move it to any other time. It’s really been become a part of that series and people sort of set their calendar, set their clock to watch that game at noon on the Saturday after Thanksgiving.”

This of course sets up the unappetizing possibility of an immediate rematch for the Big Ten championship, but aside from some wacky bloggers making wacky, impossible suggestions—Seth and I are specialists in this department—I'm not sure what the alternative is.

Also note the assumption that the Game will be at noon, which is technically not guaranteed—Fox could choose another Big Ten game for their #1 overall pick—but is about as certain as anything in this crazy mixed-up world.

Math wins. There used to be a cottage industry around here: fourth-down clucking. We still mention it from time to time, but the section on the podcast that used to mention unforgivable Brady Hoke decisions has mostly been reduced to things like "ehhh… that's really close." That's because college football has gotten a lot more aggressive on fourth down. Bill Connelly provides a graph:

Since there are occasional correct punt decisions even in the top two categories college coaches are probably approaching optimal. I also enjoy the big spike in 2020, as the college football collective decided that nothing mattered lol. Then they were like "oh… that worked" and kept going for it.

Michigan was not on the leading edge—you probably know this—but chose its spots superbly:

Meanwhile, Michigan went for it just 21% of the time (87th) but picked its spots well and profited by 5.3 points per game (ninth). Jim Harbaugh's Wolverines converted 17 of 21 attempts (81%, second in FBS) and scored 81 points after those 17 conversions. Opponents scored only seven points after the four failures.

No decision was more important, bold, and correct than Michigan going for it on fourth and one in their own territory early in the third quarter against OSU. Meanwhile, the Buckeyes:

I imagine this is high on the list of offseason priorities in Columbus. It'll be interesting to see how that number changes this year. If it stays stubbornly low it could be a sign that Ryan Day's just a finesse kind of guy.

[After THE JUMP: yeahhhh we're just going to ignore you thanks]

The rerank. The Athletic's Max Olson re-ranks the 2019 recruiting classes. 2019 was the Dax Hill-Chris Hinton-Charbonnet-Mazi Smith class, and Michigan slides well up from their original ranking of 8th:

3. Michigan

Adjusted average: 2.85
Class rank in 2019: 8th
Four-year record: 36-11
Attrition: 44%
Top signees: DB Daxton Hill, DL Mazi Smith, LB David Ojabo, DB DJ Turner, DL Mike Morris

Jim Harbaugh and his coaches found 13 starters and eight All-Big Ten players in this class, hitting on a remarkable number of NFL-caliber defenders who helped lead the run to back-to-back Big Ten championships and College Football Playoff appearances. Smith Joined Hill in becoming a first-round draft pick this spring, while Ojabo and Turner were both second-round selections. Morris and defensive lineman Mike Danna also got drafted, and D-lineman Christopher Hinton is playing in the league as well.

The Wolverines’ offensive haul in 2019 included quarterback Cade McNamara, offensive linemen Trevor Keegan and Karsen Barnhart, wide receiver Cornelius Johnson and running back Zach Charbonnet, who became the best back in the Pac-12 after transferring to UCLA.

Michigan's attrition rate is fairly standard, FWIW. Alabama had a whopping 61% attrition rate and still slid in just behind Michigan at #4. Must be nice.

FWIW, that was the class where Michigan missed on the top three kids in state, causing much panic on the Michigan internet and rejoicing in East Lansing. Not so fast, my friend: The in-state top three of Logan Brown (UW), Devontae Dobbs, and Julian Barnett (both MSU) all failed to make an impact. Mazi Smith, #4, just got drafted in the first round.

Just find one corner. Michigan's other CB slots are in excellent hands:

I don't see any OSU players on that list.

Let them enforce it. The NCAA's trying to keep the lid on NIL business, for all the good that will do:

Texas A&M's AD has directly stated they're ignoring this: "The state law is going to govern how we do business." In this new era of anything goes that's not a huge surprise; what is the NCAA going to do about it? As mentioned repeatedly around here, scholarship limits are more or less fictional. They really do not want to issue postseason bans. Does anyone care about vacated wins? No. Is a federal court going to side with the NCAA? Not likely.

This is all futile posturing by people with jobs that are rapidly becoming obsolescent.

FWIW, a bill that somewhat liberalizes Michigan's NIL law has been introduced in the state legislature. MLive's summary:

It seeks to expand Michigan’s existing NIL law for college athletes to allow colleges to partner with third-party licensees and help athletes better utilize NIL opportunities.

“The NIL legislation that we are seeking promotes fairness and equity among student-athletes,” sponsoring Rep. Angela Witwer, D-Delta Township, told the higher ed committee.

HB 4319 would also encourage colleges to offer financial literacy, brand management and life skills programming for athletes.

That's not at the level of the more aggressive state legislatures but seems like a good change.

Obligatory Berhalter take. I endorsed his return after the World Cup and nothing in the intervening six months did much to change my opinion. ESPN's Ryan O'Hanlon has a briefer version:

At the 2022 World Cup, there was a team that didn't allow a single goal from open play in the group stages. They drew with -- and outshot -- England. And they didn't lose a game in the opening round: one win and two draws.

Sure, they lost in the round of 16, but it came against the Netherlands -- a traditional world power -- and this team had almost 60% of the possession in that match, also outshooting the Dutch 17 to 11. A couple of bounces go differently, and this team is playing Lionel Messi and Argentina in the quarterfinals.

Now, this team didn't even qualify for the previous World Cup. And at the World Cup before that, this team went out in a match against Belgium that was so lopsided that the literal president of this team's country called this team's goalkeeper to congratulate him on all of the saves he'd made.

At every previous World Cup this team had qualified for, they'd rolled out the traditional international-underdog playbook: defend well, wait for set pieces and counterattacks. Supporters, who had been both pining for more modern tactics and to see their team perform at the World Cup, got it all in Qatar: this team played in a new way, and this team got results.

So, when this team announced that it was rehiring the same manager that guided this team at the World Cup, everyone rejoiced ... right? You simple, silly person. This is the United States men's national team: we don't rejoice here, buddy!

The #BerhalterOUT crew on twitter—which some wag just dubbed the QSMNT—is losing their minds, but given the realistic prospects out there I'm more or less content to continue with a coach who had the US playing on the front foot with a very young team who seems to be thrilled to have him back.

TBH unless you get an extreme outlier like Klinsmann, an international manager is not really going to move the needle much. As long as Berhalter is able to smooth things over with Reyna, which is likely, there's no reason to not continue to build on what was an encouraging cycle.

Etc.: Talking with Adam Fantilli just before this year's NHL draft. Men's tennis coach bounces for Florida. Manuel talking about NIL. Fantilli endorses Gavin Brindley. Alan Bowman's going to start for Okie State.

matty blue

June 28th, 2023 at 1:19 PM ^

i know i'm being super-dense here, and maybe trying to reduced my caffeine intake is hurting more than helping, but i don't get "QSMNT."

In reply to i know i'm being super-dense… by matty blue

Wallaby Court

June 28th, 2023 at 1:32 PM ^

I am about 98% sure that it is a riff on Q-Anon.

In reply to I am about 98% sure that it… by Wallaby Court

NotADuck

June 28th, 2023 at 1:45 PM ^

This is the only thing I can think of that makes sense.

In reply to I am about 98% sure that it… by Wallaby Court

matty blue

June 28th, 2023 at 4:35 PM ^

oh, right.  almost certainly!

In reply to I am about 98% sure that it… by Wallaby Court

steviebrownfor…

June 28th, 2023 at 4:41 PM ^

Yes, partially inspired by conspiracy theories involving Berhalter promoting MLS by overrepresentation of MLS in his roster selections.

There is a definite nepotism component that lead to GGG being hired in the first place, but the QSMNT branding is still on point.  USMNT fans in Twitter are notoriously toxic and conspiracy-driven.

In reply to Yes, partially inspired by… by steviebrownfor…

dragonchild

June 28th, 2023 at 4:44 PM ^

I mean. . . it's Twitter.

In reply to i know i'm being super-dense… by matty blue

canzior

June 28th, 2023 at 3:05 PM ^

Quit supporting?

yossarians tree

June 28th, 2023 at 1:25 PM ^

I will support the Berhalter endorsement but wow had he better make nice with Gio Reyna because he raises the whole team a level. Good problems to have with Reyna, McKennie, Adams and Musah all deserving time in the midfield.

In reply to I will support the Berhalter… by yossarians tree

Needs

June 28th, 2023 at 1:45 PM ^

I generally don't think that it works to have the same coach for two world cup cycles, but given the options, I think this is fine (though the process to get there seems nuts).  The Copa next summer also offers a good test at the midway point of the World Cup cycle. If the US significantly underachieves (goes out in the initial round or gets played off the pitch by a team other than Brazil or Argentina in the quarters) then the US can explore options. If they meet or exceed expectations, then all's good. 

As you say, Reyna's super important, not only because he's very talented, but also because he allows for mid-field rotation without a drop off. MMA starting every match in Qatar did leave the US vulnerable against the Dutch, just because they do so much work and were noticeably leggy in that match.

dragonchild

June 28th, 2023 at 1:30 PM ^

Also note the assumption that the Game will be at noon, which is technically not guaranteed—Fox could choose another Big Ten game for their #1 overall pick—but is about as certain as anything in this crazy mixed-up world.

Exactly.  This is Manuel championing something that didn't change, was under no real threat to change, and he has no power to change anyway.  He's been doing that quite a bit.  Expressed strong public opinions to keep the MSU rivalry when frankly it would've been a huge uphill battle for anyone to change that.  OTOH even something as common sense as re-signing Harbaugh was "controversial" enough to get him soiling his pants and publicly involving his boss.

To be fair, this sort of cynical posturing is hardly unique.  It's a depressingly common, tried-and-true way to build and establish a teflon reputation. . . turn something that is technically popular and already status quo into a "cause" so when nothing happens you can stick gaudy feathers in your cap for doing diddly squat, while staying as far away as possible from anything with even remotely divided opinion.

To be fair, that means Manuel is, in essence, a politician.

In reply to Also note the assumption… by dragonchild

matty blue

June 28th, 2023 at 3:13 PM ^

lol.

NotADuck

June 28th, 2023 at 1:43 PM ^

I don't think its accurate to say "a couple bounces go differently and this team is playing Lionel Messi and Argentina in the quarterfinals."  The US may have outshot the Dutch, but the Dutch were dominating that game and were snipers on the counterattack.  The 3 to 1 score line felt justified.  There was a clear difference in quality between the two teams.

All that being said, there were no better options than Berhalter available to the USMNT so I'm also for the rehire.  The team should be much better heading into the 2026 World Cup after playing together in the same system and continuing to gain experience.  A couple adjustments here and there and they should make a lot of noise in 2026.

In reply to I don't think its accurate… by NotADuck

Needs

June 28th, 2023 at 1:51 PM ^

Also, the US goal in that match may have been the flukiest scored in the entire tournament. Cross hits an attacker's trailing leg and somehow chips the keeper from 3 yards out? The US played well in the tournament but they were clearly outplayed in that match.

In reply to Also, the US goal in that… by Needs

los barcos

June 28th, 2023 at 2:08 PM ^

Yeah, I've seen Brian make this argument multiple times before. I don't buy it. It strikes me as a similiar way the stat-heads all looked at the M/OSU game and said M was lucky to win because of the big plays, without recognizing the big plays were a result of the way OSU was calling the game.  In other words, The Dutch let the US have the possession because they knew 1) the US wasn't dangerous in the attack 2) they could punish us on the counter and 3)they led for a large portion of the game and game theory stated they didn't need to play aggressive.  Guess what happened - they punished us on the counter and the US wasn't dangerous on the attack.  It wasn't unlucky - that's how the game would have played out 9 times out of 10.

With that said, I have been ambivalent about the Gregg hire.  You're not getting anyone much better with only one major tournament (copa) over the next 3+ years.  If Gregg does well there, good.  If not, then we need to be re-evaluating the manager going into the World Cup.  So, I don't believe he should be viewed as a shoo-in to be on the sidelines in 2026.

In reply to Yeah, I've seen Brian make… by los barcos

NotADuck

June 28th, 2023 at 5:08 PM ^

The quote wasn't from Brian, it was from another article that he was quoting.

Brian wasn't saying they played well at the World Cup, just that they played well when you consider everything going against them like youth, inexperience, lack of a true striker, poor centerback play, etc.

If you go back and read his World Cup postmortem, he criticized the US's inability to score.  He outlined that the best teams were great on the counter attack and were NOT firing crosses into the box as often as the US did.

I think if Gio Reyna plays in WC 2022, we see a different approach.  Less focus on the wide parts of the pitch, more bringing the ball through the center.  Also Michael Robinson would have been a huge upgrade at CB.  The lack of a true striker was half on Berhalter and half on the players he had available.  He didn't bring the right guy



This post first appeared on Mgoblog, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Unverified Voracity Goes For It

×

Subscribe to Mgoblog

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×