For a more clear vision, here are a few scenarios to explain the usability of either of the testings in different test cases.

Exploratory Testing: In this type of testing there is a need for the tester’s consciousness experience, interpretive/rational aptitudes, ingenuity, and intuition. You need the human abilities to accomplish the testing process in this scenario and therefore should conduct manual testing.

Usability Testing: This is one area in which you need to see and test as to how user-friendly, effective, or suitable the software is ultimately for the end users. Here, the human opinion is the utmost significant factor, so a manual method is a better choice.

Ad-hoc Testing: In this test case scenario, there is no definite approach which is used. It is a completely haphazard method of testing where the indulgence and acumen of the tester is the only central factor. Therefore, manual testing can be preferred.

Regression Testing: In this scenario, automated testing is considered suitable because of recurrent changes required in the code and the capability to run the regressions in a timely manner is required.

Load Testing: Automated testing is also the best-suited method to complete this kind of testing competently when it comes to load testing.

Repeated Execution: Testing which needs the repeated implementation of a task is best automated.

Performance Testing: Likewise, testing which needs the replication of numerous concurrent users definitely needs automation.

To Conclude

Analyze your testing requirement on the basis of parameters explained above & choose the option between manual or automated testing. We use trending testing methodology, technology expertise & best industry practices in quality assurance services.