(Originally published in 2009)
Profiles:
http://cnup.neurobio.pitt.edu/people/peopleDetail.aspx?uid=49
http://www.cnbc.cmu.edu/faculty/olson.shtml
http://www.all-creatures.org/saen/pa/res-fr-pa-upitt-grant-olson-2006.html
The
Olson Lab of Carnegie Mellon University does research involving
invasive methods of measuring the vision of performing nonhuman
primates. In this research, the monkeys are first given intensive
surgeries [1,2,3]. They cut open the monkeys’ heads to expose the tops
of their skulls, implant screws into the bone, fasten a plastic cap over
the skull, in which a head restraint bar is fastened. Coils
are then placed on the eyeballs to record their movement. These remain
implanted in the animal’s heads for the entirety of their training which
can last for months. Cylindrical recording devices are then cemented
into place in the animals heads in order to record from cells in their
brains. Before every session, new electrodes are inserted into their
brains. Olson’s articles tend not to say what happens to the animals
when the experiments are finished. Since new surgeries are performed for
each experiment, we can assume new animals are brought in for every
one. Even if they were not, it would mean a very sad existence for the
animals whose lives would be spent in cages for this research.
As
we have stated in other entries, these animals are highly intelligent.
Nonhuman primates like the rhesus monkeys used in Olson’s experiments
have complex emotions, form loving relationships, and recent studies
show they plan for the future [4,5] much like humans do. The confinement
to cages in unnatural and non-stimulating environments is already
extremely cruel and is very stressful for these animals. This often
leades to mental health problems including self-injury and stereotypic
pacing or circling in their cages. The research carried out on them by
laboratories like this one creates even greater suffering.
Furthermore,
similar studies can be done ethically in human beings using functional
magnetic resonance imaging (or fMRI) and using eye-tracking methods.
Functionality of the human brain is studied in this manner by many
researchers around the world. There is no need to study monkey brains in
order to understand that of humans when we can easily do so in humans
themselves without harming humans or any other animals in the process.
Contact Carl Olson at [email protected].
Have information on an animal laboratory that you would like to share? Email us at paavATtutanotaDOTcom about it. We will protect your privacy.
[1]
Mooreman, DE & Olson, CR. (2007). Combination of Neuronal Signals
Representing Object-Centered Location and Saccade Direction in Macaque
Supplementary Eye Field. J Neurophysiol. 97. 3554–3566,
[2] McMahon,
DBT & Olson, CR. (2007). Repetition Suppression in Monkey
Inferotemporal Cortex: Relation to Behavioral Priming. J Neurophysiol.
97. 3532-3534.
[3] Mooreman, DE & Olson, CR. (2007). Impact of
Experience on the Representation of Object-Centered Space in the Macaque
Supplementary Eye Field. 97. J Neurophysiol. 2159-2173.
[4] Researchers say animals plan for the future: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/12/ap/tech/main4798684.shtml
[5] Zoo chimp ‘planned’ stone attacks: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7928996.stm
This post first appeared on Pittsburgh Association For The Abolition Of Vivisection, please read the originial post: here