The belated Cuban musician Agustin Fernandez created a gloomy, gritty human anatomy of works that imagine a hyper sexed, electronic corporeality.

PARIS A visceral, http://www.camsloveaholics.com/rabbitscams-review hyper sensibility that is sexualized through the extravagantly fashionable oeuvre of Cuban musician Agustin Fernandez, whom resided right here from 1959 to 1968 and passed away in new york in 2006. The effectiveness of plucky erotic dreams and intimate innuendos, FernandezвЂs leitmotif, frequently supersedes respectful significance that is thereforecial so one aspect of FernandezвЂs inventive art is forever likely to be libertine, even if tempered by our comprehending that the dominance associated with the right western male position is not any longer unquestioned in art. Gender is socially ( perhaps maybe maybe not naturally) constructed and, whenever thought to be a fluid concept in art, defies effortless recognition. Of course, there is nothing less specific in art than sex, and although irreverent works like Yoko OnoвЂs cheeky film “Four” (1966), Valie ExportвЂs “Action Pants: Genital Panic” (1969), Kembra PfahlerвЂs “Wall of Vagina” (2011), and Betty TompkinsвЂs Fuck Paintings may recommend otherwise, a lot of women feel there will be something profoundly feckless, or even downright alienating, about reducing the human anatomy to its remote intercourse components. Not in Paradoxe de la Jouissance (“Paradox of Pleasure”), the chutzpah stuffed exhibition of FernandezвЂs controversial late work insightfully curated by Jeanette Zwingenberger during the town hallway of ParisвЂs arrondissement that is fourth.

Agustin Fernandez, “Untitled” (1998), oil on canvas, 94 x 144 cm (courtesy and Agustin Fernandez Foundation; picture by Daniel Pype)

Art historically, FernandezвЂs slightly sadomasochistic and obsessively erotic semi abstract paintings of constrained human anatomy components squeeze into the context of mannerist (or decadent) late Surrealism, which delighted in degradation by interpreting it as a work of alchemical transmutation delivering transgressive freedom from puritanical imposition. Used by the latter time Surrealists, Fernandez revealed with Francis Picabia at Galerie FuМ€rstenberg in 1965 in accordance with Yves Tanguy, Salvador DalГ­, Hans Bellmer, and Pierre Roy at Galerie AndrГ© FranГ§ois Petit in 1966. FernandezвЂs surreal, elliptical, and bent that is erotic maybe most demonstrably illustrated in the present show by his coolly sadistic painting “Untitled” (1998), which illustrates a severed, splayed, and distorted purplish bird headed human anatomy lacking volitional control while undergoing coitus. Beyond constrained, psychosomatic, surreal fantasy imagery and a broad slippery machine ambiance, it shows if you ask me a certain exaggerated erotic desire that values the vulnerability of abused individual flesh held in bondage for some imagined non intimate post biological reality. A piquant wind blows you ponder the poking device directly linking the humanoid sexual systemвЂs electronic signals to some pitiless bio controller probe, foregrounding the frailty of human flesh when pierced by the somber impregnability of technology through you as. right Here, and consistently somewhere else throughout the diagrammatic, fetishized period covered within the exhibition, Fernandez disregards the beatific (if banal) blooming mood typically connected with intimate imagery by painting in a gritty, dark, and greasy metallic palette that distances his work through the tropical chromaticism frequently related to their indigenous Cuba.

Agustin Fernandez, “Taboo” (2004), oil on canvas, 180 x 180 cm (courtesy and Agustin Fernandez Foundation; picture by Daniel Pype) Agustin Fernandez, “Untitled” (circa 2003), oil on canvas, 152 x 228 cm (courtesy and Agustin Fernandez Foundation; picture by Daniel Pype)

Other more minimal paintings featured right right here have constrained, quasi ritualistic rigor about them that recommends separated, zoomed in glimpses of intimate bondage and humiliation, such as the exquisitely medieval“ that is looking (2004). Bound and freaky cyborg parts abound inside the work, nonetheless “Taboo” goes further into complexity because it merges intimate types of both sexes by depicting a gleaming remote black colored womanвЂs breast with all the indentation in her nipple created to resemble the opening in a penis. Once again, in other very idiosyncratic hybrid paintings, female parts of the body appear to have now been coerced in order to outstrip the dichotomy between technology while the human body.

The post Other more minimal paintings showcased right here have constrained, quasi ritualistic rigor about them appeared first on Sharad Technologies Pvt Ltd.