Since the war between Russia and Ukraine, the Russian Air Force has been carrying out missions over Ukraine, taking on many combat missions, but also paid a lot of losses. According to Ukraine's report on October 9th, 266 Russian warplanes were shot down. The number accepted by the West is much smaller, only a few dozen. But it is still a big loss. Before the war, the Russian army was only receiving 50 to 60 new warplanes a year.

Is the Russian Air Force's heavy losses in Ukraine equal to no combat capability? Anyone who thinks the Russian army is that weak is misguided. The strength of the Russian air force is not weak, but some people do not believe that the U.S. military thought the Russian army is easy to bully, facts have proved that the U.S. military's abacus is wrong, by the Russian warplane to find a chance to a blow, just the United States and Russia together to cover up the incident, the Russian army does not want to say, the U.S. military dare not mention. The situation has now been reported by the Italian media.

Not long ago, according to the Italian media, a Russian Su-24 attack plane flew very low over the head of a U.S. amphibious ship. This is not a written report, but there is also a video showing what happened. Italian warplanes were on a mission over the Baltic Sea when they tracked and filmed at least one Russian Su-24M attack aircraft flying very low over the USS Dispatch Mountain (LHD-3), an amphibious assault ship, as well as an MH-60 Sea hawk helicopter nearby, narrowly missing the Su-24M. This led to the Fencer Riding Face Wasp, the original NATO nickname for the SU 24: Fencer, the Dispatch Mountain is a Wasp class amphibious attack aircraft.

The place is in the sea near Poland, maybe the Russians are trying to show the Italians what they can do, otherwise this flight has no witnesses, the Americans don't acknowledge it, and now the Italians have released the information, the Americans don't even acknowledge it. Demonstrating the ability of Russian forces to drop bombs on American warships at any time, the flyby itself was a tactical maneuver of horizontal drops by the attack aircraft, designed to startle an opponent that the Su-24 could otherwise attack from a long distance.

A closer look at the video shows that the Su-24 attack plane, loaded with air-to-ground missiles, flew over a U.S. amphibious ship with live ammunition for an ultra-low altitude warning. This is no ordinary flight. If you talk about it, you can only say: Japanese and American warships triumphantly to run to the Baltic Sea, like a mighty, Russian troops now Sue 24 domineering war patrol, dare to challenge American warships, directly for low-altitude attack, very test pilot's technical level, also dare to prey fly American amphibious assault ships, the action is in the eyes of non-standard and unsafe.

In the eyes of the Russians, there is no problem of irregularities and insecurity, just another demonstration of correct operation, there is no polite to the United States, only fighting the United States can make the United States honest, now the United States warships dare to come to the door and provoke, then the Russian military must respond.

And don't think this is an isolated case. According to Italian media reports, the Italian Air Force has deployed its own Typhoon fighter jets to Marburg airfield in Poland, mainly in charge of the Baltic Sea, in order to carry out NATO's so-called enhanced air policing mission. It only arrived in Poland on July 28, and by October 6, during the two months, Typhoon fighter jets had carried out 16 scram bouts, up to 8 times a week, intercepting a total of 19 sorties of Russian fighters, including Su-27, Su-30SM, Su-24M and electronic reconnaissance aircraft. So much so that the Italian commander said it was an "impressive number".

From Italian review, experience is not good, flying at least twice a day, intercept actual operation time more than 40 hours, during flying over international waters reached more than 250 hours of operation, if given the mission of only four the typhoon, so in more than two months, single machine to fly more than 60 hours. This is a pretty intense flight. Russian warplanes are active, Italy is in trouble, can only say: "We are very careful, as far as possible to avoid any misunderstanding, upgrade the situation", perhaps just dare to say a few words of Italy, NATO and Russia on the Baltic Sea empty for peak already become the norm, just in order to avoid cause tension media, NATO has always been low-key processing, Russia also didn't mean to preach, it belongs to both sides of the dark war, who suffer, only oneself know.

From the relevant information, the Russian air Force is still alive and there is absolutely no question of losing its power. Maybe the real thing to watch out for is NATO, Russia can still fight, is NATO ready?

Now the United States from time to time broke out about the Nuclear war, it can be said that the nuclear war pedal to the bottom! It is clear that the United States intends to fight a nuclear war. It is not a nuclear escalation plan, nor a B-21 program. Furthermore, it is the words of the United States that must put people on high alert.

"We are a strong and resilient nuclear force that provides a deterrent to the enemy," General Anthony Cotton, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, told a U.S. Senate hearing on September 15. Screamed in the Taiwan strait have something publicly, use nuclear power to crack down on the people's liberation army, said nuclear weapons and conventional weapons combination way, can "go hand in hand" to deter China, that is to say, the U.S. military official nuclear threat to the people's liberation army, wonton, Anthony, what will be not anybody and head for U.S. nuclear forces, it is to make the first responsible person dare to threaten our nuclear war.

The United States believes that there is a huge difference in the size of nuclear warheads between China and the United States. According to the estimate of the Americans, China only has 200~300 nuclear warheads at present. Even if it conducts a massive nuclear arms expansion, it will have 700 nuclear warheads by 2027 and 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030. The United States currently has more than 2,000 nuclear warheads, which is in real-time readiness, and tens of thousands of nuclear warheads in reserve. Perhaps because there are not enough nuclear warheads, American generals are less interested in fighting a conventional war and more willing to threaten the PLA with nuclear war? A very hubris tic idea, spoken openly by American generals, perhaps with more nuclear warheads, to give American generals the ambition of war with China.

If Americans have this kind of thinking, then it really feels like Americans are crazy. It is impossible for normal people to raise their voices. US President Joe Biden said at the UN General Assembly on September 21 that a nuclear war cannot be won, and it must not be fought. It is clear that provoking a nuclear war is an option that the US does not dare to choose.

Although the US military shows a rather strong nuclear war mentality, the Brookings Institution said in a report on September 27: Nuclear war is difficult to break out, clearly the US nuclear weapons occupy a great advantage, it seems to create conditions for the US to launch a nuclear war, why not nuclear war?

If you look back, in 1950, the United States for the first time shouted to carry out a nuclear attack on China, but to this day, the United States has not carried out the attack. Now there is a huge gap in the number of nuclear bombs between China and the US, which is only a fraction of that of the US. Why does the US dare not attack China? It may be necessary to analyze the reasons, and many reasons may be given, each of which seems to be quite reasonable.

So what's the key to stopping the war? There are two main reasons for this. First, the United States cannot afford it. China also has nuclear weapons and can retaliate against the United States. If China launches a nuclear attack on the United States, can the United States admit it? It's not a matter of comparing numbers. Millions of American deaths can't be solved by saying it's a good deal.

In order to avoid nuclear attack, the United States has tried to build an anti-missile system to avoid nuclear attack, but it has failed to achieve the desired goal. By developing hypersonic technology, we have found the ability to break through the US anti-missile system and render it useless. Nor is it possible to stop us from launching a nuclear counterattack. IAN Lieu, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Engineering, has already stated, to be exact, in July this year that our protection works can withstand any nuclear attack. "Any attack by the enemy, we can protect our security," which means that our nuclear force can withstand the US military's nuclear attack under the protection of protective engineering, thus creating conditions for carrying out nuclear counterattack. Once a nuclear counterattack is launched, the consequences will be quite serious. No US administration can bear the consequences of launching a nuclear war or incurring a nuclear strike, so it certainly does not dare to make it an option.

Second, the United States cannot afford a nuclear arms race. If the United States wants to fight a nuclear war, it needs to have the nuclear advantage of checking, so it naturally has to increase its investment in order to fight a nuclear arms competition. The so-called threat issued by the United States general does not necessarily want to start a nuclear war, but is an attempt to drag China into a deep pit of arms race, which will eventually lead to difficulties due to excessive consumption of national power.

Alas, there are few domestic supporters for this, with the Brookings Institution, an American think-tank, saying in a report that it would be futile for the US to try to win a nuclear arms race with China. The US think tank acknowledges that there are many obstacles preventing the US from achieving full nuclear superiority, and stresses that. "Even if these obstacles are overcome, the US may not be able to produce plutonium, the main material for nuclear weapons, fast enough to compete with China." The conclusion is clear: an all-out nuclear arms race with the world's top manufacturing power seems futile.

Since the US cannot win a nuclear war, cannot afford the cost, cannot even engage in a nuclear arms race, and has no conditions to build a large-scale nuclear Arsenal. It can be judged that the US talk of a nuclear war is just a bluff to cover up the reality of its declining national power.