Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Contesting A Will No Win No Fee

Are you looking for a lawyer who can help you with Contesting a will no win no fee? Most lawyers need a retainer of at least $5000 to work on an estate dispute. It might be challenging for you to find a lawyer on contingency. However, if you are owed $100,000 it worth spending over $10,000 on legal fees.

Here is a situation that applies to contesting a will…You have control over your assets and belongings. For example, if you own a house you decide who lives in it. When you sell your home, you decide on the new purchaser. This form of freedom—freedom to do what you want with your items as you see fit—is extended beyond death in the form of a Will. Legally this is called “Testamentary Freedom”.

However, what if a Will is unclear? Or, what if the Will seems to run contrary to intentions that the Testator made clear while she or he was alive? What options are available to those left behind who are not mentioned in the Will of a loved one? These are some of the questions asked of estates lawyers and litigators.

Looking for a lawyer for Contesting A Will No Win No Fee? Sadly, we don’t have one. But we can arrange a free 15-minute consultation with an estate lawyer. See if it’s worth it to pay the lawyers legal fees to work on your claim.

GROUNDS FOR SETTING ASIDE A WILL

When a person feels that she or he did not receive entitlements that should have been owing to him or her under a Will, the person may consider contesting the Will. Put another way, if a person feels she or he should have received something from a deceased person’s estate, that person may want to consider whether there are sufficient grounds to dispute a Will and assert a claim.

There are only so many ways a person can validly contest a Will. Generally accepted grounds for setting aside a Will are:

1. “Undue Execution”: Or, in other words, non-compliance with a technical legal requirement.

2. “Lack of testamentary capacity”.

3. “Undue Influence” and suspicious circumstances.

4. “Fraud and/or Forgery”.

Due Execution or Compliance With Statutory Requirements

In Ontario the rules of Will execution are found in the Succession Law Reform Act, and must be strictly complied with, as follows:

· a Will must be in writing (so, a video-recorded Will on your iPhone is invalid)

· a Will must be signed by the testator at the end after it has been completed

· a Will must be signed in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the same time, both of whom must sign the Will in the presence of the testator; and

Witnesses and their spouses cannot be beneficiaries under the Will.

Holograph Wills | Contesting A Will No Win

There is a difference between a Regular Will and a Holograph Will. A Holograph Will is a valid Will which is:

1. wholly in the testator’s handwriting;

2. is signed; and

3. does not require the presence or signature of a witness.

Holograph Wills remains in use today.

So perhaps as you’re sitting here today, you may want to draft your handwritten will. Or, you may choose to listen to the rest of my presentation. Your choice, of course. If someone wants to claim that a Will is invalid because it was not executed properly, the onus of proof is on the propounder of the Will. Put another way, you will have to prove that the Will is valid: the challenger does not bear the burden of proof.

A Lack of Testamentary Capacity

A person must be of sound mind, memory and understanding on the day the Will is executed to be able to make a valid Will. When a Will is contested on the grounds of mental incapacity, the Propounder of the will must prove on a balance of probabilities (which means that it is more likely than not) that the Testator understood what she or he was doing.

The testator must be able to:

· understand the nature and effect of a Will;

· comprehend and recollect what property she or he possessed that is being given under the Will;

· know the people that ordinarily might be expected to benefit under the Will;

· understand the extent of what is being given to each beneficiary;

· understand the persons who might have a claim and why they are being excluded; and

· have the capacity to give instructions.

Interestingly enough, a person may still be able to make a valid ill after having been declared incapable of managing his or her affairs. So, one might not be able to prudently manage his or her investments but still have the requisite capacity to create a Will.

Will Challenge Based on Lack of Capacity

Regardless of whether or not you are the one contesting a Will or the propounder of a Will, if capacity is a seeming-concern you will probably want to obtain medical evidence. If you or a relative wants evidence to prove sufficient capacity at the time a Will is made, obtain a capacity assessment report. You would hire a “capacity assessor” to do so. If you are looking to challenge a Will on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity, substantial and persuasive medical evidence must be obtained.

Evidentiary requirements would also include contacting witnesses as to fact, such as neighbors and friends, to substantiate the medical evidence of lack of capacity. In some instances, the services of an expert medical witness will be engaged to give a “retrospective opinion” on capacity after death. This is less useful than a medical witness who actually knew the testator. The expert witness will review the medical data compiled from various sources and consider the observations of witnesses. The expert witness will also consider relevant medical records and lawyer’s notes from the date of the instructions for and execution of the will.

Undue Influence | Contesting A Will No Win

Undue influence is found where the Will reflects the intentions/interests of another person and not the intentions of the testator. A key indicator is a power imbalance between the influencer and testator. An EXAMPLE would be when the testator is coerced into signing a Will benefiting the person exerting the power. Undue influence is particularly an issue in the case of elderly or vulnerable individuals, as those people are most susceptible to pressure exerted on them by relatives, friends or acquaintances.

The person challenging the Will carries the burden of proof. The challenger must show on a balance of probabilities that the mind of the testator was overcome by the influence exerted by another person. Therefore, there was no voluntary approval of the contents of the Will.

Coercion in essence must be proven. In practice, it is usually very difficult to prove undue influence.

The Presence of Suspicious Circumstances

Suspicious circumstances may be raised by:

· circumstances surrounding the preparation of the will;

· circumstances tending to call into question the capacity of the testator; or

· circumstances tending to show that the free will of the testator was overcome by acts of coercion or fraud.

In conclusion, we don’t have a Contesting A Will No Win No Fee lawyer. But we do have great lawyers that can assist you. See our videos on Youtube.

The post Contesting A Will No Win No Fee appeared first on ClearWay Law.



This post first appeared on Law Firm, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Contesting A Will No Win No Fee

×

Subscribe to Law Firm

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×