First, I have to apologize for the delay in getting this review out; I would have posted this last week, but I was busy looking for a killer-for-hire to take out the movie’s writers. Searching the deep web for sharpshooters is a pain. Especially when all I had to offer was $3.75 and a pack of gum.
Related Articles
But let’s get down to it. For those of you who don’t know, the movie is based out of a Danish game from the early 2000s, called ‘Hitman‘. The game’s storyline revolves around Agent 47, a cloned super-assassin for hire who has superhuman abilities and a flawless record of kills. It was a pretty nifty game, and adapting it into the big screen was inevitable.
All things said, the movie was a decent attempt at bringing the Hitman mythos to life – It had to expand the plot from the video game source, include some drama, some tension, and generally apply liberal assault on logic and sensibilities to shoehorn action sequences wherever possible. When it comes to leave-your-brain-behind type of movies, I’m quite happy for them to shoehorn in action sequences.
Sarah here has been preparing for such movies all her life.
But that’s enough talk about the 2007 movie, ‘Hitman’, the one starring Timothy Olyphant. It was never a great movie, but compared to the new 2015 reboot, it was downright genius.
Timothy Olyphant is still writing thank-you notes to the new movie’s crew.
We’re introduced to the female protagonist, Katie, who is searching for a mysterious chap from the past, while apparently living in acute paranoia against people who are hunting for her.
Fifteen minutes in, the movie became self-aware. It realized how crappy a movie it was and decided to imitate a better one. So, for a brief while, the movie turned into The Terminator; Emotionless killing machine 47 is apparently out to kill the apparently hapless girl, Katie, but the apparent good guy, John Smith, apparently tries to save her from the T800… I mean 47.
Being the keen eyed reader you are, I’m sure you noticed all the ‘apparently’s I’ve thrown up there in the last paragraph, right? Come on. I know you did. Give yourself a cookie.
I won’t tell your calorie counting app.
So yes, it turns out none of that is true. 47 is NOT out to kill the girl. The chap the girl is looking for is her father, who was the scientist who created the Agent program. The girl is NOT helpless; unknown to herself, she’s sort of a cloned Agent too, who has heightened senses and survival skills that’s even more insane than 47’s, and her powers work in reflex mode; John Smith is NOT the good guy; he’s an assassin whose body is genetically modified to withstand bullets, car crashes and pretty much anything the plot can throw at him, and he’s working for an evil syndicate called… Syndicate.
Yes. Syndicate. You have something to say about it? It took us two full days to come up with the name.
Past this point, the movie quits trying to imitate the Terminator movies, and quickly transforms to 1995’s Assassins. John Smith now plays Antonio Banderas’ character who really, really, really wants to show he’s a better assassin than Sylvester Stallone 47.
In short, the plot was a haphazard mess. But that’s par for the course. At least the action sequences were good enough to save the day, you may be thinking. That unbridled optimism is what I love about you, you figment of my imagination, you.
Have ALL the cookies.
I don’t want to berate the actor who’s playing Agent 47 in this movie. He’s a Friend, you see. In any case, there’s no acting to berate. His role involved shooting, fighting, driving, and performing impossible CGI stunts while exerting as few emotions as possible, and this, he did quite well.
Speaking of repressed emotions, John Smith is played by Zachary Quinto. In the rebooted Star Trek movies, he was amazing as the emotionless, cold and calculating fan favourite, Spock. In this movie, he masterfully destroys any doubt of his acting prowess; With casual, almost flippant ease, he confirms how he’s not ready yet to earn his actor badge.
The casting was quite interesting, I think. Personally, I feel it was done in tandem with plot development. I imagine the writers went “Let Hannah Ware be … a woman on the run… everybody’s like – hey, where is she? Where’s Ware?… Where? Yes! And then… she finds out that Rupert Friend is like, not her enemy at all; he’s like a ‘friend’! That’s gold, man!! And Zach Quinto? He’s… well… Zach Quinto’s ‘so keen to’ become the best assassin ever. High Five!”
They didn’t bring Timothy Olyphant back because they couldn’t fit an elephant into the plot.
- Belated Reviews: Quantum of Solace
- Belated Reviews: Evidently Feeble
- ReArranging Cupid
- Thoughts Must Be Crazy
- Why so serious?