5 Ways To Make Your Planting Feel More Minimalist – The Tricks Landscape Designers Use For Less Fussy Backyards
a Minimalist patio in a backyard
When it comes to creating a landscaping design, a minimalist scheme has got to be easier to create than one that embraces a riot of color, form and texture, right? Well not necessarily. There's an art to creating a perfectly pitched backyard design when you're taking a pared-back approach to planting. Get it wrong and you're left with an outdoor space that feels insipid, uninspiring and bland.
'Minimalist planting scheme requires strong form and structure in the design,' agrees says landscape designer Jennifer Hayman, 'using a small number of plants, repeated throughout.'
Want to know the secrets to making a minimalist planting scheme work for your backyard? We asked landscape designers for their top tips – here are the 5 things you need to consider.
1. Go all greenA sheltered veranda sitooterie
There are endless garden color schemes that will make your backyard feel alive with color, but for a minimalist outdoor space, sometimes it pays to keep things simple and opt for all-green planting.
'I like playing with shades of green for a minimalist garden and there are a myriad of ways to achieve a beautiful, dynamic mix even with this limited palette,' says Kat Aul Cervoni, landscape designer and founder of Staghorn NYC and The Cultivation by Kat.
If you're worried about it feeling a bit one note, make sure to choose varieties of plants that will bring light and shade to your planting scheme. 'Using a mix of hues (i.E., light green, mid green, dark green) and also playing with variegated options will add interest and dimension to the garden,' says Kat.
2. Or green and whitea garden with thuja trees planted
To bring a little more variation to a minimalist backyard, a simple color palette can also be used for a classic look. 'I prefer a more neutral color palette and often use white, greens and greys in my landscapes,' says says landscape architect Joe Richardson, founder of Richardson & Associates Landscape Architecture.
'Boxwoods, hydrangeas and hybrid roses work well in the Northeast and provide a clean, minimalist garden palette. Their white blooms against verdant leaves will always refresh and soothe the senses.'
Story continues
If you're looking for somewhere to introduce color, Joe says it's much easier to control this in other elements of your backyard decor. 'Decorative pots are a great place to experiment with intense colors such as reds and oranges, for example,' he says.
Annabelle hydrangea shrub
The perfect all white hydrangea shrub for a minimalist backyard that still feel lush and verdant.
3. Repetitiona backyard with small trees
The secret to a more pared-back planting scheme isn't just in limiting the colors, but also the variety of plants.
'Repetition of the same plants, such as a row of evergreens or one type of flowering bush, will also help create a more minimalist feeling to the space,' says landscape designer Amber Freda.
Designer Jennifer Hayman agrees. 'Mass planting and repetition of a few key plant varieties that contrast or connect with the architecture and hardscaping will keep your landscaping feeling more restrained,' she says.
'Sprinter' boxwood shrub
Structured shrubs like Buxus are an easy way to create the sense of repetition in a landscaping design.
4. Focus on texturean outdoor space with a banana leaf palm
With that said, if you don't want your backyard planting to feel too monotonous, you still need to experiment with texture to a certain degree. 'When using a minimalist color palette, I like focusing on including a diverse mix of textures and shapes to help give more visual interest to the garden,' says Kat Aul Cervoni.
For Jennifer Hayman, it's about building up the planting in the right way so that the planting feels layered, yet not overly complex. 'Establishing form starts with first creating a backdrop of tall columnar hedging or trees for privacy or a green backdrop, and repeating a mix layers of hedging at different heights,' she explains.
5. Feature a focal pointA backyard with bench
What you want to avoid when planting in a minimalist style is everything feeling like it's in the background. 'Even if you're aiming for something minimalist, you must have a focal point,' says Jennifer, 'whether that's a bench, sculpture, or even a tree (or even a series of trees) - this offers repetition and a sense of direction.'
Don't forget about ensuring your backyard still looks good once the sun goes down, and complement your scheme with modern garden lighting. 'Landscape lighting can create shadow, grazing and sculptural effect and great for year round interest,' Jennifer adds.
What plants are best for a minimalist backyard?
Landscape designer Kat Aul Cervoni has these suggestions for a minimalist planting scheme.
Minimalist plants for sunny spots:
Boxwood shrubs, Yew shrubs, Pennisetum "Hameln", Nassella tenuissima, Artemisia stelleriana, Eryngium yuccifolium, Molinia "Bergfreund"
Minimalist plants for shady spots:
Ilex glabra, Hakonechloa macra "Aureola", Carex "The Beatles", Ophiopogon "Nana", Prunus "Otto Luyken", Dryopteris erythrosora, Matteuccia struthiopteris, Polygonatum "Variegatum"
Principles Of Landscape Ecology
Beier, P. & Noss, R. F. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conservation Biology 12, 1241–1252 (1998).
Costanza, R., Voinov, A. Et al. Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent River watershed, Maryland. Ecological Monographs 72, 203–232 (2002).
Cushman, S. A., Evans, J. S. Et al. Landscape ecology: past, present, and future. In Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation, eds. S. A. Cushman & F. Huettmann(New York: Springer, 2010): 65–72.
Ellis, E. C. & Ramankutty, N. Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6, 439–447 (2008).
Fahrig, L. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 603–610 (1997).
Forman, R. T. T. & Godron, M. Landscape Ecology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
Fortin, M. J. & Dale, M. R. T. Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Haddad, N. M., Bowne, D. R. Et al. Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology 84, 609–615 (2003).
Houghton, R. A. Land-use change and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biology 1, 275–287 (1995).
Johnston, C. A. Effects of animals on landscape pattern. In Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes, eds. L. Hansson et al. (London: Chapman and Hall, 1995): 57–80.
Kingsland, S. E. Modeling Nature. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Knapp, A. K. Et al. The keystone role of bison in North American tallgrass prairie. Bioscience 49, 39–50 (1999).
Manel, S. Et al. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 189–197 (2003).
May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973.
McGarigal, K. & Marks, B. J. FRAGSTATS, spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. In USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351 (1995).
Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
Opdam, P. & Wascher, D. Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation 117, 285–297 (2004).
Phillips, M. L. Et al. Analysis of predator movement in prairie landscapes with contrasting grassland composition. Journal of Mammalogy 85, 187–195 (2004).
Simberloff, D. S. & Abele, L. G. Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science 191, 285–286 (1976).
Turner, M. G. Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36, 319–344 (2005).
With, K. A. The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conservation Biology 16, 1192–1203 (2002).
Wu, J. Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainable science. Landscape Ecology 21, 1–4 (2006).
Wu, J. & Loucks, O. L. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 70, 439–466 (1995).
How Are Women Changing Our Cities?
With fast-growing urbanisation inexorably transforming every facet of cities and the wider biosphere, many creative people want to change the status quo. We're living not only with a lot of outdated legislation, but also a back-catalogue of failed urban models that do not serve contemporary cities as diverse communities well – in terms of cultures, ethnicities, ages and overall needs.
Urbanistas: Women Innovators in Architecture, Urban and Landscape Design puts the work of five practitioners working in the UK today under the spotlight, illuminating the many commonalities among women architects, urban designers and landscape architects who want things to change for the better.
The ethical challenges lying at the feet of the specialists working together across neighbourhoods, towns, cities and continents are those which, emphatically, both genders are facing. Women and men in the design professions are actively working alongside each other as never before, given the growing numbers of young women graduates entering the field.
Urbanista.Org founder Lucy Bullivant. Photograph: David VintinerSo why make an exhibition about five women practitioners? Rather than adopting the rose-tinted default that is a retrospective approach to city making, and imagining that low-density, late-19th-century "garden city" models or perpetuating historical fabric will suffice, these five "urbanistas" want to make a public realm of social value. Should that be so hard? In London, where more than 300 different languages are spoken, the population is growing and high-quality public green spaces are one of its chief assets. These women embrace that cultural reality, using tactics that draw on both the arts and natural sciences.
Green infrastructure, silviculture (trees) and the science of soils, biophilic design, climatic future-proofing and convivial spaces for everyone – "the soft stuff is the hard stuff" is a common refrain that local borough staff, community groups and some enlightened developers are increasingly adopting as a practical philosophy.
This exhibition brings together Irena Bauman, founder of Bauman Lyons Architects working in Leeds and around Yorkshire, architect Alison Brooks, AWP's Alessandra Cianchetta, Liza Fior and Katherine Clarke, founders of muf architecture/art in Hackney, and Johanna Gibbons, co-founder of J&L Gibbons in Highbury and Islington.
Instead of wasting urban land, or denuding it of its resources, these urbanistas focus on drawing out its potential through new cyclical processes of soft planning – dealing with climate and ecological issues, mixed and seasonal uses – rather than only the hardware of infrastructure. While urban design's stock-in-trade has traditionally revolved around hard morphologies and monuments of city identity these exhibitors carry out place-making in ways that re-humanise even the most degraded post-industrial sites, helping to foster meaningful legacies.
A visualisation of Western Riverside housing, Bath, by Alison Brooks ArchitectsStrategies like Alessandra Cianchetta's, of AWP, for the masterplan for La Défense in Paris, open up closed infrastructures and knit together districts. Alison Brooks' award-winning housing design – Newhall Be at Harlow, Essex, and at Bath Western Riverside – assert new geometries and greater permeability with nature for high-density living spaces.
Working within a construction industry obsessed with short-term profit, this commitment to long-term value is hard to uphold and pursue, but these urbanistas don't settle for atomised results. From the micro- to the macro-scale of the city and its region, they draw out responsive, cohesive solutions.
If women built cities, what would our urban landscape look like?
Read more
The role of architect is under pressure, everyday at risk of being pushed aside by value engineering, but these urbanistas know that architecture is one of the very few generalist professions . If you cannot assert your personal values you give up the architect's duty of care, and you might as well leave the career that you love. A poet, an author, a singer or a playwright can concoct a narrative of place, but only an architect can create a narrative of place and give the city new physical resources with stories and languages that everyone can share and enjoy.
Each city and town has its own DNA, but urban centres need more support from integrated plans in which people from across the whole community can play an active part. They should feel a greater sense of involvement in the use of local resources, land, waste and renewable energy. The urbanistas have seen this happen, and know it is possible.
While each has a unique approach, their kinship thrives on identifying and cultivating urban assets. This means the potential of neighbourhoods are drawn out, and solutions for long-term renewal created. The urbanistas' purpose is to renew the city and its landscape in ways that are liveable, loveable and legacy-directed. But don't just take my word for it ...
Irena BaumanWe are changing cities by challenging the prevailing values
Photograph: Paul McHale"Architects are like high-class whores: we can turn down projects the way they can turn down some clients, but we've both got to say yes to someone if we want to stay in business." So said Philip Johnson, one of America's leading architects, justifying his commercially greedy architectural output.
Commercial exploitation and professional vanity are the values that dominate the construction industry and, along with wealth and political power, shape our cities. These are largely male values. When uncritically embraced, these values perpetuate the globalisation of urban design and place our creativity and skills in the unhappy service of making the rich richer and the powerful more powerful still.
Some men, and many women architects (but by no means all) support different values: we are wary of professional vanity and of commercial growth as the primary drivers of our business model. Instead we embrace and use our practice to support alternatives.
There are many ways of achieving this. Our approach at Bauman Lyons is that we do not accept work beyond two hours' travel (by road) from our studio, in order to maximise productivity and enable deep understanding of the places where we work. We do not submit our projects for awards; instead, we direct effort at dissolving professional boundaries by researching, teaching, fabricating, collaborating and co-producing projects. We challenge the overtime culture by working five days in four to create three-day weekends, which allows time for personal development.
These values attract clients who appreciate and share them – no need to act as any kind of whores. Together we build projects that help revive declining markets, buildings and communities, generate new economies and innovate solutions for adaptations to climate change and for sustainable building solutions. We are changing cities by challenging the prevailing values.
Alison BrooksIdeas are gender-free
Photograph: Paul McHaleThe built form of the city is a complex representation of social, political, technological and economic forces; of ideals, ideologies and values over hundreds of years. Cities are cultural artefacts. Yet we live in cities where nearly 100% of the environment around us has been owned, legislated, designed and implemented by men.
This is because, outside of monarchic city-builders like Catherine the Great, women have only had access to positions where they could engage in the shape and evolution of cities for the last 100 years. Ethel Charles, the first female architect in Britain was registered with the RIBA in 1898. Women have only had the vote for 87 years. Architects, engineers, urban planners, theorists, developers, politicians and civil servants – women with a direct role in the shaping of the environment – have only been "in action" for one generation.
Women in all sectors of society will increasingly change the way our cities operate, look and feel – not because of their gender, but because of the additional 50% of human creative intelligence that will be addressing the problems of the city (not to mention those less heroic topics, suburbs and rural environments).
Ideas are gender-free. Is the work of Jane Wernick, engineer of the London Eye, somehow feminine? Can anyone tell on a basis of gender, the difference between Elizabeth Wilbraham's churches or those of Christopher Wren – her student? But ideas, invention, and techniques must be accompanied by both expertise and authority to act on those ideas, and there is the assumption that these, on a grand scale, are the exclusive territory of men. But the ability to create, to manage complexity and solve problems are things women have always been good at; it's just that we haven't had access to the problems.
Tellingly, I'm writing this piece for the male editor of the Guardian Cities section. Can we all imagine a day when, in your mind's eye, the city mayor, the chief architect, the developer, the contractor and the newspaper editor are all automatically female, rather than male? Now that's a changed city.
Alessandra CianchettaWP's work has been devoted to developing a practice on the intangible dimensions of architecture
Photograph: Paul McHaleThis is not a question of gender: I owe many fascinating and delightful things to my womanhood, but I am not sure that urbanism is one of them. I can't speak for other women, but here are some ways in which I aim to change cities through design.
I am the leading architect and founding partner of AWP, an international design practice working across scales and genres - from the 160-hectare strategic masterplan for the Paris central business district, to pavilions, landscapes, interiors, exhibitions and publications. In my architectural work I give equal weight to the substance of building and its intangible effects, addressing sensual and perceptual experiences at large urban scales.
Such concerns have been developed in our current project for the major business centre of La Défense, a location both archetypal of the modern city in general, and specific to Paris in particular. The biggest deck in Europe – 30ha – and most conspicuous high-rise in Paris, with a six-floors deep multi-layered underworld including major infrastructures, the district is now soulless, obsolete, disconnected and at risk of shrinking.
I am currently building a 70,000m2 public space adjoining the Grande Arche de la Défense, including a unique series of buildings, and have conceived the first new masterplan of Paris's central business district following the original 1960s one. Declared of national interest, both projects have embraced its inherent complexity to create an attractive, enlivened and inclusive space on the scale of the metropolis, and to frame its transformations over the next decades through a multi-scalar, soft and hard approach.
Through practice and theoretical research, I explore the binary relationship between soft systems and permanent strategies – such as landscape, light, night or art – proposing an innovative, much more supple approach to master planning and public space design. An important part of AWP's work has been devoted to developing a practice on the intangible dimensions of architecture, questioning how much of architecture exists in addition to the fixed and solid and how these slow, fast, hard, soft, and solid elements interact.
Liza FiorWe endeavour in all our projects to make spaces where more than one (fragile) thing can coexist at a time
Photograph: Paul McHaleAll buildings in the UK have a planning classification according to use: B1 is office and workspace, A3 is a restaurant, C includes "dwellings" and so on. The most expansive of all classifications is D1, which includes health buildings, libraries, crèches, education, galleries, museums and community halls. What goes on in all these types of building relies both on non-monetary exchange and also on a lot of women's work.
We see the public realm as an extension of D1 use, as the potential site par excellence of non-monetary exchange – a place of protection and of exploration, learning and rest. The late Kath Shonfield, an muf collaborator, described the public realm as the place to experience democracy.
We endeavour in all our projects to make spaces where more than one (fragile) thing can coexist at a time; truly public spaces where you can spend time without having to buy anything; spaces for play which are not playgrounds, where there is space for reverie and exploration. Our projects include Barking Town Square, Altab Ali Park on Whitechapel Road, Mile End Road, the Hackney Wick suite of public spaces, and Making Space in Dalston. The muf office remains at least 80% female, with flexible working practices.
As cuts in public spending deepen, we hear more and more of words like "restructure" (ie. Sack people, a lot of whom are women) and "intensify" (ie. Build lots of housing units, most of which are private and reduce the possibilities of spaces which are left). The generosity of the women we meet in every project, who attempt to salvage the possibility of the city as a shared platform for the best and worst of times and those in between, becomes ever more heroic.
Johanna GibbonsOur profession concerns what makes land a landscape, the people who inhabit it and the resilience of the environment
Photograph: Paul McHaleThe city is a landscape; its soils and geology define its fundamental character. Our work and interests stem from understanding time and territory, the geology and wider landscape patterns, the river catchment with propositions for water sensitive urban design, the urban forest with how liveable the city is and how resilient the urban dweller feels. Our work ranges from strategic planning to forensic analysis of the below-ground condition, considering the soil's biological complexity and its capacity for yield and absorption.
Collaborations enable our practice to reach widely into the marginal territories that inform our work; the poetry and science of soils; the sound of geology; the value of shared grass roots knowledge; the biomimetics of spider sheet webs. Our profession concerns that which makes land a landscape, the people who inhabit it and the resilience of the environment and the individual that together create city communities in all their density and diversity. We seek an archaeological narrative and creative ways of how to stimulate the stewardship of the city's natural capital.
Nearly 40 years ago, as a teenager, I sat in a meadow with Dame Sylvia Crowe, and we talked about how landscape architecture was surely the most honourable profession. She focused my ambitions not only in terms of career but also as a professional woman. Her drive was understated but enormously respected. I followed her instruction of where to study, and was infected by her love and enthusiasm for her work which influenced city planning as much as forestry practice.
Next year, J&L Gibbons will celebrate 30 years in the industry. I now see my role in many environments; providing advice and advocacy whether to the Forestry Commission, English Heritage or the Mayor; collecting wild flora along the Lee Navigation with the Olympic Youth Panel; walking Woolwich with eminent representatives of Reading's Inclusive Environment Research Group; collaborating with artists and neuroscientists in the engineering of a digital tool to measure state of mind and response to place.
Everything is connected.
Angel Building, Islington: designed by AHMM, landscape architecture by J&L Gibbons. Photograph: Sarah Blee/J&L GibbonsUrbanistas: Women Innovators in Architecture, Urban and Landscape Design runs at Roca London Gallery from 6 March to 27 June 2015. Exhibition design by Feix&Merlin. An event on Thursday 30 April will discuss the advantages "soft planning" approaches have over "hard" design.
