Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Why have the former tenants of Grenfell Tower who survived the fire not received help from the British government?


The former tenants of Grenfell Tower are now homeless, so far they have been treated appallingly by the Tory government. These folk have lost all their personal possessions, clothing and furniture, and the roof over their heads, yet despite there being countless empty houses and apartments within the millionaire rows across the capital, they have been shipped off to hotels or bed and breakfast flea pits.

Why have the Tory government not requisitioned, if only temporarily, these empty houses and flats and moved these poor souls into them?

Sitting in hotel room or bed and breakfast will make it nye on impossible for them to even begin to rebuild their shattered lives. Make no mistake if the government fails to act most of these people will remain homeless for a long time, which would be adding injury to their current misery and despair.

They have had to rely on charity for the clothing which cover their bodies, thankfully fellow residents on their estate and ordinary folk from across London and beyond have turned out to help them in large numbers.  But why should they have to rely on charity, where are the Marks and Spencers, Debenhams, Harrods and John Lewes, etc? Why have they not opened their doors to the victims of the fire and allowed them to chose new clothing for free? If the stores are unwilling to cover the cost let them give the bill to the British government. I doubt a single taxpayer would begrudge them this in their time of need.

MH.
----------------------------------------------------
The Grenfell Tragedy is Class War by Phil Burton-Cartledge
The victims of yesterday’s fire at the Grenfell tower in north Kensington are casualties of the class war. There is no other frame, no other explanation that can convincingly thread together the answers to questions about how this unnecessary and entirely avoidable tragedy happened, and why it was allowed to happen.

Consider the circumstances:

Grenfell residents had repeatedly complained to the council (coincidentally, Conservative-run) about fire safety issues and were brushed off by councillors and officers.

Residents had also complained about their treatment at the hands of the contractors placed in charge of the two-year £10m block refurbishment. These complaints included allegations of physical intimidation on the part of the contractors.

The external refurbishment of the tower was added ostensibly to deal with water ingress into the building, but residents have suggested that cladding was added to make it look more agreeable to the eyes of nearby tenants and owners of luxury properties.

The fire happened in the context of the closure of ten fire stations in London at the behest of Boris Johnson during his time as London mayor. This is part of a nationwide package of measures aimed at reducing the numbers of firefighters and creating markets in the fire service through the outsourcing of calls, administration, and provision of equipment.

It comes after years of warnings and recommendations from the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Fire Safety and Rescue that have routinely been ignored by successive governments. Their latest recommendations pertaining to high-rises were sat on for four years by the government.

It comes in the context of a government utterly beholden to the ridiculous view that regulation, and particularly health and safety regulations, are so much red tape. This was taken to its extreme by the Tories who ran on a platform pledging to scrap two regulations for every one introduced: an intellectually bankrupt and profoundly stupid approach that risks lives for the sake of core vote grubbing.

Though the Grenfell tower would not have been affected by it, the government benches voted down proposed legislation requiring landlords to guarantee a basic minimum standard of housing fit for human habitation.

And, in the aftermath, following the media attention and the outpouring of sympathy and grief, the Prime Minister was at the scene for a “private visit”. She decided against meeting surviving residents.

Today the media is overflowing with hot takes about how it is a very political tragedy. But it is more than that. This has been a gross episode, a massacre, in the class struggle. It is a moment where local and national politics, the economics of housing, the snobby cultures of the H-band classes, and the managerial arrogance attuned to tuning out poor and working class voices all came together and have robbed dozens – hopefully not hundreds – of people of their lives. It’s a consequence of markets run rampant, of the gutting of public service provision to squeeze more cash into private coffers. That cash now comes dipped in blood.

We’ve seen what class politics in the 21st century can look like. This, however, is what's going on on the other side. They still have the whip hand, they are responsible for this state of affairs, and these are the consequences when the war on the housing front has gone their way unimpeded for so long.

More here:
Shadow housing minister John Healey asks why ministers failed to act on coroners’ concerns about tower block fires

Jeremy Corbyn warns Tory ministers must be questioned over Grenfell Tower fire and 'if you cut funding there's a price

Disaster waiting to happen': fire expert slams UK tower blocks





This post first appeared on ORGANIZED RAGE, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Why have the former tenants of Grenfell Tower who survived the fire not received help from the British government?

×

Subscribe to Organized Rage

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×