So why is it that I can choose  a process some might regard as crucial to Health best practice - "informed consent" and reject chemo, radiation, immunology, statins, even Aspro. I can do this and still have the support of my GP. SO why do I need to go begging to a busy, expensive specialist who must then interface with a Health official for something that is (a) intrinsically safe, (b) low cost, (c) supported in science (d) and MY CHOICE?

Indeed when it comes to informed consent, why should I need to do anything just because a Doctor says, or doesn't say....

Ipso facto, what I do, or choose not too is a matter between me and my Doctor. (cf: Rolleston Method)

What if I am sensitive about my health status, for ACC or Health Insurance? Or just because, well, just because, OK!   (see http://www.businessinsider.com/marijuana-sex-2016-12 )

Someone needs to read the Ottawa Charter