The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act (H.R. 4), responds to current conditions in Voting today, by Restoring the Full Protections of the Original, Bipartisan Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was last Reauthorized by Congress in 2006, but gutted by the Supreme Court in 2013. By calling the Coverage Formula to determine if a State or Local County, Out-of-Date to determine if they should require Preclearance of any Change to Voting Processes. But the Court told Congress they could Update the Formula, which never happened.

Following the Shelby County Decision Seven years ago, several States passed sweeping Voter Suppression Laws that Disproportionately prevent Minorities, the Elderly, and the Youth from Voting.

The Bill provides the Tools to Aaddress these Discriminatory Practices and seeks to Protect All Americans’ Right to Vote.

The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act creates a New Coverage Formula that applies to All States and hinges on a finding of Repeated Voting Rights Violations in the Preceding 25 years.

Significantly, the 25-year period “rolls,” or continuously moves, to keep up with “current conditions,” so that only States that have a Recent Record of Racial Discrimination in Voting are covered.

States that have Repeated and Persistent Violations will be Covered for a period of 10 years, but if they establish a Clean Record moving Forward, they can come Out-of-Coverage.

The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act establishes a Targeted Process for Reviewing Voting Changes in Jurisdictions Nationwide, focused on Measures that have Historically been used to Discriminate against Voters.

The Process for Reviewing Changes in Voting is Limited to a Set of Measures, such as the Institution of a Voter ID Law or the Reduction of Multilingual Voting Materials, Practices that have Historically been found to have the Greatest Discriminatory Impact.

The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act also:

– Allows a Federal Court to Order States or Jurisdictions to be Covered for Results-based Violations, where the effect of a Particular Voting Measure, including Voter ID Laws, is to lead to Racial Discrimination in Voting and to Deny Citizens their Right to Vote.

- Increases Transparency by requiring Reasonable Public Notice for Voting Changes.

- Allows the Attorney General Authority to Request Federal Observers be Present anywhere in the Country where there is a serious Threat of Racial Discrimination in Voting.

- Revises and Tailors the Preliminary Injunction Standard for Voting Rights Actions to Recognize that there will be Cases where there is a need for immediate Preliminary Relief.

- Increases Accessibility and Protections for Native American and Alaska Native Voters.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) has always had these Options:

- Bail-In: At any time, Citizens of a State or Local District, with Creditable Facts, can ask the Courts to put them on Preclearance.

- Bail-Out: At any time, A State or Local District, with Creditable Facts, can ask the Courts to Remove them from Preclearance.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker