A Coalition of 21 States Sued the Trump Administration, Friday August 28th, for what they called a "rule that is, at its heart, the gutting" of America's Bedrock Environmental Law.

The White House, in July, Finalized a Rollback of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which for 50 years has Required the Government to weigh Environmental and Community concerns before Approving: Drilling Permits; Highways; New Factories; Pipelines; or any Major Action, on Federal Lands.

Washington Attorney General, Bob Ferguson (D), called it the Magna Carta of Environmental Law. "NEPA requires something basic, but very important from the federal government. It basically requires the federal government to look before they leap. Pretty straightforward. Look at the science, look at the impacts. What's going to happen if we go forward?" he said.

What the Trump Administration wants to do is put Blinders on before the Federal Government Leaps, so we Don't know what those Impacts can do.

The Rewrite of NEPA Removes Requirements to consider Climate Change before Proceeding on a Project. Protocols for Weighing concerns from nearby Communities, often Communities of Color, would become far more Complex.

It also Opens the Door for more Industry involvement in Reviewing the Environmental Effects of their Projects or Nixing Reviews entirely for some Projects that receive Little Federal Funding. President Trump has repeatedly called NEPA the "single biggest obstacle" to Major Construction Projects.

The White House, which Promulgated the Rule through its Council on Environmental Quality, said it does Not Comment on Litigation.

The Trump administration has already faced Multiple Lawsuits from Various Environmental Groups challenging its NEPA Rollback.

The Suit from the States offers similar Arguments: The Trump Administration both Violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), which Lays Out the Technical Process for Changing Rules, and Undermined the very Basis of NEPA itself.

"The Trump administration is impatient; the Trump administration is sloppy, and the Trump administration doesn't like to do its homework. And the result is that oftentimes before we can get to the substance of the matter, we beat them on the procedure; we beat them because they didn't go to court, or they didn't go through the regulatory process and try to implement it the right way. We're able to succeed because on the substance we've got those great allies - the facts, the science and the law with us - but it also helps that these guys are just plain sloppy and impatient. And it really helps us have a record of success." California Attorney General, Xavier Becerra said.

The Suit, filed in the Northern District of California, is California's 100th against the Trump Administration, and its 51st Challenging a bevy of Environmental Rollbacks. It asks the Court to Throw Out the Rule entirely, arguing it Undermines NEPA itself, which "prioritizes careful, informed decision making over rushed and reckless action," the States write.

The Rewritten Rule would also lead to "uninformed federal decisions that adversely impact vulnerable communities," they argue, such as the Black, Brown, and Poor Communities that are already Overburdened by Polluting Projects ranging from Factories to Highways.

It's been a busy week in Court for the Trump Administration:

North Carolina - is Suing the Federal Government over its Decision to try to Locate Oil and Gas off its Coast despite Objections from the State. In June, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) allowed a Company to Move ahead with Seismic Testing, which uses Blasts from Air Guns to try to Detect Oil and Gas Deposits in the Ocean. This Decision Overrode an Objection from the State, which Opposed the Testing.

The Seismic Testing is a Step that comes Ahead of Offshore Drilling, and NOAA's Decision falls in line with the Administration's Goals of Expanding Oil and Gas Production. In a Lawsuit filed Wednesday August 26th, North Carolina's Government argued that NOAA did Not adequately show that Testing would Significantly Advance the National Interest and also didn't Adequately Show that the Adverse Impacts would be Minor.

Pennsylvania - Environmentalists Won their Battle Challenging the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Regulation of Pennsylvania's Air Quality, with the Court Ruling the Agency used a "pernicious loophole" when Greenlighting Laxer Standards for Coal-Fired Power Plants.

The Suit from the Sierra Club against the EPA and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Challenged a Permit Governing the State's Air Quality Standards. The Group argued Power Plants in the State were Capable of Meeting much Tougher Standards than what had been Agreed to by the Two Agencies.

The Court called the Reasoning behind Different Elements of the Permit "questionable individually," adding that "joined together they are decidedly worse than the sum of their parts." The Three Judge Panel for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals also took the Agency to task for Failing to Weigh Data showing Five Plants in the State were Capable of much Greater Pollution Reductions. "Even more disquieting, the EPA ignores its own Air Markets Program Data showing that all five Pennsylvania power plants noted above have actually achieved much greater reductions," the Court wrote.

Southeast - The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is facing another Suit over its Rule that Limits States' Ability to Block Pipelines and other Controversial Projects that Cross their Waterways. The Clean Water Act previously Allowed States to Halt Projects that Risk Hurting their Water Quality, but that Power was Scaled Back by the EPA in June, a move Administrator, Andrew Wheeler, said would "curb abuses of the Clean Water Act that have held our nation's energy infrastructure projects hostage."

The Latest Suit, however, argues the Trump Administration is Inappropriately Denying States Veto Power over Major Projects that pose Risks to their Waterways. "Stripping away the states' ability to protect local waters and strangling the voices of impacted communities are the epitome of protecting polluters instead of protecting people," Frank Holleman, Senior Attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center, said in a Release.
"For the first time, the Trump EPA's rule denies those protections to the states and local communities, sacrificing the nation's clean water to benefit polluting industries and their lobbyists."

On Monday, August 31st, The Hill will hold a Virtual Event titled Science & American Advancement. Science and Advancement go Hand-in-Hand. However, the way Science Works, Not by Straight Lines, but sometimes by Accident, can Frustrate Strict Timelines and Investment Efforts. Why is continued Scientific Investment so Important?

Can Science Overcome many of the Challenges it Faces today in Order to Lead us to a brighter future? The Hill will bring Policy-Makers and thought Leaders together to look at the Historical Contributions Science has made to American Advancement and the Status of the Scientific Community today, featuring Former National Science Foundation Director, France Córdova, Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ), Rep. Trey Hollingsworth (R-IN), Energy Department Under Secretary for Science, Paul Dabbar and more.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker