Back in the Federal Courthouse where most of an Eight year-long Case has played out, the Fight over forcing Texas back under Federal Oversight, Bail-In, of its Mapmaking appeared to hinge on whether the State should be held Accountable for Political Maps that never took effect.

The Arguments for a Return to the days when Texas needed Approval, Preclearance, of its Political Districts diverged significantly during a Thursday Court Hearing before a Panel of Three Federal Judges.

The State and the Plaintiffs, Voters of Color, Civil Rights Groups, and Democratic Lawmakers, each appeared to have a Judge on their Side.

One Judge was Skeptical of any Sort of Supervision for State Lawmakers, while another Judge openly considered why Texas should be Allowed to Redraw its Maps without any Sort of Guardianship given its recent Discrimination against Voters of Color.

But the High-Stakes Fight, and ultimately the Ruling from the Three-Judge Panel Overseeing the Case, may very well rest on Chief U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia, who made few remarks during the Hearing but summed up the issue in One question.

“Is it actual injury or threatened harm that controls the issue?” Garcia asked.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker