Champions of Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV) argue the System leads to a more Accurate Reflection of Public Opinion in Election Results, by Requiring Winners to receive the Majority of Voter Support by removing the need for a separate “run off”. Under a RCV Voters Rank Candidates in Order of Preference. If No Candidate is Selected as the Top Preference by at least 50% +1 of Voters, then the RCV system comes into play. The Candidate with the Fewest First-Choice Votes is Eliminated. Then their Second Choice Selections on the Ballots are then Distributed to the remaining Contenders. This Process is Repeated until a Candidate secures a Majority of the Vote.
“It just kind of tallies the will of the people much more accurately than the current system we have because it allows people to really make a statement about every candidate,” Rep. Laura Sibilia (I-Dover) said of RCV. Sibilia, an Independent from Dover, and Plans on Spearheading an effort in the House to pass a RCV Bill into Law.
Sen. Chris Pearson (D-Chittenden), will also be introducing a RCV Bill in the Senate.
“The system could improve voter engagement and the tenor of political campaigns in Vermont,” Sibilia says. Under a RCV, Candidates in a Crowded Field are not only competing for First Choice Votes, but also Second and Third Place Rankings. This would make it harder for candidates to use “generalized sound bites” and “partisan talking points” in Campaigns, according to Sibilia. “It requires the candidates to behave seriously,” she said. “You can’t turn the voters off too much. You’ve got to watch yourself.”
Pearson said a RCV system would allow Candidates to Focus more on Issues and Less on Party Affiliation, particularly among Candidates Outside the Two Major Parties. “Candidates who are running as an independent spend a lot of time explaining how they are interested in operating outside of the two party system,” he said. “I think that voters and candidates would rather talk about healthcare and climate change and property taxes.”
In 2007, the Legislature Passed a Bill that would have established RCV in Congressional Races. However, then Governor Jim Douglas (R), Vetoed the Measure. Between 2006 and 2010, Burlington used a RCV system also known as Instant-Runoff Voting. It was Repealed by Voters in 2010, after Bob Kiss, a Progressive, was Re-Elected as Mayor in 2009. Kiss Won the Five-way Race without Receiving the Highest Number of First-Preference Ballots, but Won after other Candidates were Eliminated from the Race.
Kurt Wright, a former Republican Representative who is now the Burlington City Council President, received the Most First-Preference Ballots, about 33% of those Cast, while Kiss only received about 29%. But because Wright didn’t have a Majority in the First Round, Kiss was able to Close In and Win the Race after Two other Candidates were eliminated. After Kiss’s Election, there was a successful push to Overturn Instant-Runoff Voting in 2010.
“I think people just saw the result,” Wright said. “They saw, wow, a candidate that gets the most traditional votes can not end up winning in this system.”
Wright, who Lost Re-Election to the House in November, said he hopes Lawmakers decide Not to Pass a Statewide RCV. He said that in Burlington, RCV Failed to boost Voter Turnout and encouraged Candidates to be Overly Cautious.
“It produced a really vanilla type campaign. There was still the negativity, but people were afraid to take really strong stands on issues,” he said.
Sibilia thinks it’s possible that the Legislature could Pass the Bill within Two years, but she said there’s a Fair Amount of Public Education about RCV that should take place before it becomes Law.
NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker
