Already I have seen the same NRA-like challenging questions that gun-supporters ask of any / all commenters who suggest Increased Gun Regulation when a mass shooting occurs.

Each time suggested solutions are offered.

Regardless of how thoughtfully crafted, no matter how logical and sensible and even how protective the suggested solutions are to 2nd amendment rights, the opposition remains stubbornly static and predictably offers no compromise.

Offering up suggested legislative solutions for dissection by NRA-canned, preformed, lobbyist-like argumentative replies is pointless.

At this point I personally, as a voter, choose to support any and all legislative proposals which might, regardless of how remotely, inhibit these occurrences.

I have no more patience or tolerance for the debate and I do not wish to hear anymore of the NRA-scripted arguments against Regulation because I have heard them all and I have concluded that they are largely nonsensical in the greater scheme of things.

So while questions about what legislation might help will bait some others to reenter that tired, old, debate with NRA-supporters, I won't be one of them.

My mind is made up and I will be as resolute in my support of increased Gun Regulation efforts as the NRA will be opposed to same.

I have no regard for efforts to shout down the calls for Greater Regulation. Going forward I will forever support any / all efforts to inhibit the use of guns to kill innocent members of the public and I will never be shouted down by those opposed to greater regulation.

Done & done.