Those familiar with this blog will already be aware of its analysis of the Mainstream Media. Please read the blog title description before progressing further:

 When the Corporate Mainstream Media Controls The Question, We Don't Ask Any", thus forfeiting our right to the Truth, endorsing what is done in our name.......".

The reason for this is because there are those who with just a momentary glance at the front page of this site will dismiss it immediately with the familiar programmed derogatory response, applying terms such as `Conspiracy Theory' or `Tin Foil Hat'. Such terms were designed to appeal to their ego, believing it to be an original personal conclusion as they imagine it makes them sound ingenious. They are unaware that with such an automatic critical response they have incapacitated their natural ability for independent, analytical, and objective thought as well as their own individuality. In other words, they are oblivious that such a response is not their own and that their impulsive reaction has been programmed into them. There is little point in appealing to such people and it would be fruitless to even attempt it because the most frightening aspect of our society today is that a majority rely solely on the mainstream media for information on what is going on in the world, convinced that it is the truth. Some will be in such denial that their typical rationale is, "If it was true, then it would be on the news". There is little to be gained from debating with those who defy logic, just as they defied the laws of physics during the Kennedy assassinations and 9/11. Sadly, all reason is lost on them and we cannot hope to engage with those who are oblivious to the fact that they have consigned themselves to the human assembly line of conditioned behavior.

If the truth is too frightening to contemplate, then it may be best advised not to watch the following film and instead utilise the comfort of the daily deception of the TV dinner each evening while watching the news followed by the extra serving of drama in overdrive in the eventful soap opera.

It is important to draw attention to the articles on 1917 and Bernays. Edward Bernays was the nephew of Sigmund Freud. He is known today as the "Father of Public Relations" and at this point we ought to pause for a moment to dwell on this description as it is crucial that we understand the development of our modern language. In 1928, he published his book, Propaganda, a socially engineered noun that we take for granted today with such ease. However, disturbingly, one of the more recent terms we have been conditioned to indulge in our modern culture as an "Acceptable Level of Evil" is "paedophile". Once we accept the terminology, we accept the practice and there can be no doubt that this is exactly what the Tavistock Institute had in mind. "Who could have predicted forty years ago that in the future the killing and abuse of children whether in war or domestic would become so common that we would consider it as "an unfortunate but acceptable symptom of modern society?" Such a diabolical vision would have horrified us, especially if we had considered that in some way we would be unwittingly complicit. Over the years, from 1987-95 while trying to alert people of our programmed social development to an "Acceptable level of evil as an unfortunate but acceptable symptom of modern society", I realised that I was sacrificing myself to isolation. Today, we nonchalantly refer to such social development as "Social Engineering". This summer alone in the UK, the television news reported a staggering frequency of child murders and abuse throughout Britain. Yet, while many may be shocked at learning this, it is not the most worrying aspect. What is truly frightening is that few even noticed that this had become `daily' news and in such a short period. Please think cautiously on what this tells us about ourselves. If we research such news reports in search engines we may struggle to find results, especially when we consider that Google is a CIA straw man and all search results come from mainstream corporate sources. We will elaborate further on the role of the intelligence services later. In the meantime the truth is often too intimidating for us to contemplate, therefore in such circumstances it is significantly easy to justify the control of information albeit an art in the mastery of deception. Yet tellingly, we rely on such control entirely for what we perceive as being the `Truth' to the extent that many are unaware that `Google' has become a verb. It is also worth remembering that Google is a monopoly, yet it is not subject to investigation by the monopolies commission. Our trust in the mainstream media only serves as a distraction from the truth, especially in an increasingly narcissistic age where celebrities churn out babies as `status fashion accessories', giving them bizarre labels rather than Christian names. From an early age, we aspire to be famous, since the seizure and control of the human ego is initiated at birth. When celebrities become aware of their role and the truth about the purpose they serve, it inevitably leads to drug and alcohol abuse and often involuntary suicide. When reminded of their contract, attention may be drawn to the point at which they sold their very souls.

At some point we may wonder who could be responsible for such diabolic indoctrination of each generation. "Who could have the capacity for such abominable mind control and where will it lead us to in the future?" I should suggest that the devil is extremely patient. After all, he has been waiting for what we would term `an eternity', which must be remembered is only a human point of reference in our relationship with the sun, which for him may only be a few minutes in `time'.

Controlling the Media to Indoctrinate the People to accept a One World Government
Following Abraham Lincoln's bank war and his attempt to introduce the greenback dollar, his enemies, the wealthy industrialist banker families, the Rothschild's and Rockefeller's seized the global banking system in 1910 in what was known as the Jekyll Island plot, which established the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. A group of  leading financiers acting as agents for the Rothschild's and Rockefeller's met at JP Morgans retreat on Jekyll Island, Georgia. Their opponents were conveniently killed during the Titanic disaster in 1912. The subsequent objective for the engineering of WWI was to establish the League of Nations with the intention to eventually establish a one world Global Government controlled by the banking elite. WWI also served as a useful distraction. The League of Nations subsequently became the United Nations in 1921 to appease the U.S. when Rockefeller built the UN building in New York as it's global headquarters. The publishing company for the new UN in 1921 was the "Lucifer Trust", founded by occultist Alice Bailey, a devout disciple of prominent Satanist, Aleister Crowley. It was renamed the Lucis Trust shortly afterwards to distract attention away from it's true significance. Following the enforcement of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913, an illegal tax on labour was forced into law. "Income Tax" was introduced for the first time, just before WWI in 1914. It had previously been opposed by every American president since Lincoln, hence assassinations and attempted assassinations. Prior to its introduction, it had been declared illegal by several Supreme Court Judges who saw it as unethical and immoral to charge a man tax for his labour. That statute still stands today and American citizens are NOT legally obliged to pay income tax. However, as previously explored, now it is considered a normal and acceptable practice. Following the seizures of the banking system, free renewable energy (Nikola Tesla), illegal taxes and the consolidation of global power through WWI, there was one final conquest that needed to be dealt with and it was with an urgency.

Eventually the public would begin making connections and asking questions about the frequency of such monumental global events within a relatively short period of time between 1910 and 1920 and the insatiable natural human instinct for knowledge had to be appeased. The banking elite had to ensure that the world would never learn of their plans. Therefore, they had to take control of the `question'. The only way to accomplish this was for mass mind control of the population and of the generations to come. Through the indoctrination of each new generation, terms such as `Conspiracy Theory' would serve as a distraction in the mindset of the public. In 1917, they purchased the five most influential newspapers, including the Washington Post and placed their own editors to run them. Since then, the role and `definition' of an `editor' has never been questioned and is taken for granted today. In 1917, newspapers were the mainstream media and the main source of information, hence the term `public(ation)'. However, the bankers knew that the thirst for knowledge was human instinct and that the inevitable questions would only be passed on for others to ask, so controlling the question, thereby controlling our understanding of history had to be indefinite. This meant addressing our natural inquisitiveness and nobody was more inquisitive than children. For this reason Walt Disney served a useful purpose.and it was only a matter of time before people began to analyze and discover innuendos in Disney products. For example, Aladdin and the character of the anglicized `genie' is an embellishment of a demon described in early Arabian and later Islamic mythology and theology as supernatural creatures, known as the `Jinn'. (There are many other examples, however they can be found in other articles in this blog). Another demonstration of this is my own example. As an inquisitive 5-year-old in 1969, I kept annoying adults by asking, "How a man on the moon could talk to people on earth without a wire connection?" This question developed into asking why wireless technology, such as the mobile/cell phone wasn't available much earlier? As `media' developed beyond newspapers into broadcasting, its power of influence was bankrolled through the establishment of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) by JD Rockefeller and the aforementioned Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. To further divert the prying eyes of progressive generations, it was essential to keep the young subdued and anesthetized by popular culture. It had to be entertained. It was therefore important to commandeer youth culture in what became known as the `Roaring Twenties', later to be replicated by the 'Swinging Sixties'. No doubt, Sigmund Freud played a significant role in this while developing his studies of the human ego. His nephew, Edward Bernays certainly did and as previously mentioned, he published his book, "Propaganda" in 1928. Bernays was employed by the U.S. intelligence services, whose role is to act as the front line to protect the bankers from their enemy, `we the public'. Again, `Intelligence' is another term that we have been conditioned to take for granted in our common language and social understanding. We automatically assume that intelligence agencies work for the Government against foreign and hostile threats. The role of the CIA, MI5/MI6, Mossad and other intelligence agencies is to control information on behalf of the banking elite, who also provide every Government treasury with its funding, hence the absence of any effort for `revolution' in western society today. Intelligence agencies have a blank cheque to control the mindset of each generation and to prevent us from asking the most basic and obvious of questions and to assign safeguards to disarm us when we do present such questions. A typical example is to ask, "Why have Islamic extremists, such as ISIS/ISIL and it's forerunner Al-Qaeda never targeted and committed their barbaric atrocities on Israel?" Asking such a crucial question usually results in immediate accusations of Antisemitism. Another example is to ask, "Why have we seldom heard the names, `Rothschild or Rockefeller' mentioned in the mainstream media for whatever reason, such as criminal activities, charitable deeds, ceremonial events etc?" Similarly, to challenge the Rothschild or Rockefeller names also results in the retort of .Antisemitism, despite the fact that the Rockefeller's are not Jewish. Another example of disarming is the aforementioned term, "Conspiracy Theorist". We now even view Al-Qaeda as being tame to the point of accepting them. Few even noticed at which point ISIS/ISIL replaced Al-Qaeda as the bogeyman. This was only done to divert us from making the increasing connection between the CIA and Al-Qaeda as a new game-plan.


Finally, to understand where our current global crisis emerged from after the 1910 - 1920 stage, we must address the objective of WWII and identify similar patterns that followed WWI, such as the indoctrination of a new generation. In the aftermath of WWII European countries were more prepared to surrender their individual sovereignty and accept a consolidation of sovereign states into one dominating unit. Or, more accurately, the citizens of Europe could be much easier manipulated to accept something they never would have agreed to in the first place. This Problem, Reaction, Solution process is otherwise known as the "Hegelian Dialectic" as previously mentioned. It is designed to distract us from asking the most basic yet most fundamental questions and turning the most Obvious into the most Ridiculous. With each new generation it also reinvents our perception of morals and ethics (as David Cameron did so masterly in the UK in just six years). History may record the events surrounding definitive moments in our evolution, but it will rarely ask why or how they occurred and how we reached such a critical point. An example are the events in Germany and the U.S. prior to WWII. 

Germany was economically on its knees and financially bankrupt. It was an impoverished nation in crisis. Yet, few are prepared to ask where it got the finances and resources to build a huge military war machine that almost conquered Europe and the scientific minds that dominate our understanding today, such as NASA. The answer originates in the U.S. and the players previously mentioned. Most Americans believe that the closest they came to an overthrow of their Government was when JFK was assassinated in 1963. However, few are aware that a coups d'état was staged in 1934 and that it was led by the Bush family patriarch, Prescott Bush, who's son, former US president, George HB Bush later became Director of the CIA in the 1970s after his involvement in the Kennedy assassination in Dallas in 1963. By 1934 Prescott Bush was the Director of the Brown Brothers Harriman Union Banking Corporation. Brown Brothers Harriman acted as a U.S. base for the German industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, who helped finance the rise of Hitler throughout the 1930s. Prescott Bush, the DuPont family, the Remington family and JP Morgan attempted to assassinate president Franklin D. Roosevelt and overthrow the American Government and install a Nazi style regime which Adolf Hitler himself then adopted. The coup attempt only failed because the general they recruited to lead it, Major General Smedly Butler was a decorated hero who remained long enough with the conspirators to identify them and blow the whistle. However, after being ordered by the FBI to disband and cease their activities, the plotters kept their assets and remained until 1951. This gave them the opportunity to formulate the introduction of the 1948 National Security Act, which gave special powers and unaccountability to the CIA. The newly formed CIA replaced the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). The agency was headed by Allan Dulles who was appointed its director. Over the next twenty years, all seven deputy directors of the CIA were drawn from the Wall Street financial aristocracy; and six were listed in the New York social register. From the beginning the CIA was an exclusive Wall Street club. Dulles himself was a Wall Street lawyer who had protected bankers and was later implicated in the assassination of JFK after Kennedy sacked him as CIA director. Dulles was then appointed to steer the Warren Commission into its findings on the Kennedy assassination.

Americans would never learn of this part of their history while Allan Dulles and his brother, John Foster Dulles oversaw the formation of the illusion, The American Dream, which was a Trojan horse for infiltrating the American family and instilling family values as a typical wholesome American ideology. This gave the CIA access to American youth culture throughout the 1950s, which they subsequently nurtured through an induced stage of incoherence by the introduction of drugs such as LSD during the 1960s. In the 1920's model it was alcohol, hence the earlier introduction of prohibition. The ideology of the The American Dream was fully integrated into the American mindset by the seizure of Hollywood, under the pretense of the 1950s McCarthy Witch Hunts in exposing Communist sympathisers. The McCarthy era was nothing more than a CIA operation to infiltrate Hollywood and thereby control movie scripts and overall output as content to influence and indoctrinate the American people. Just as the bankers seized control of media back in 1917 and appointed their own people to influence and steer the thoughts of the American public, they replicated this model to every section of society since, including pharmaceuticals, education and the music industry. Teenagers began to view drug and alcohol abuse as `cool' due to its association with fame and fortune. As it became common for families in the UK to have family doctors, it was not uncommon for American families to have family therapists.