BitClout, a cryptocurrency-based social media platform, experienced a tumultuous journey marked by rapid growth, controversy, and significant changes.
Launch and Initial Reception
- Launch: BitClout was launched in March 2021 by an anonymous team led by Nader Al-Naji, who used the pseudonym “Diamondhands”. The platform aimed to combine social media with cryptocurrency, allowing users to buy and sell “creator coins” tied to the reputations of individuals.
- Preloaded Profiles: At launch, BitClout preloaded 15,000 profiles of prominent Twitter users without their consent, which led to significant backlash and legal threats. This approach was intended to prevent name-squatting but was controversial.
Controversies and Criticisms
- Anonymity and Security Concerns: The anonymity of its founders and the initial inability to withdraw funds from the platform raised security and trust issues among users. Critics also pointed out the potential for misuse, such as “pump and dump” schemes and the monetization of personal reputations without consent.
- Legal and Ethical Issues: Several high-profile individuals and developers demanded the removal of their profiles, citing unauthorized use of their likenesses. Some even filed cease-and-desist orders.
Financial and Operational Challenges
- Funding and Investor Support: Despite the controversies, BitClout attracted significant investment from major venture capital firms like Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia Capital, and Coinbase Ventures. The platform raised over $225 million in Bitcoin within a month of its launch.
- Market Performance: BitClout’s native cryptocurrency, $CLOUT, saw significant trading activity but faced challenges in being listed on major exchanges initially. Over time, it was listed on platforms like AscendEX and Blockchain.com.
Strategic Shifts and Rebranding
- Rebranding to DeSo: In late 2021, Nader Al-Naji revealed his identity and announced the rebranding of BitClout to DeSo (Decentralized Social), aiming to create a broader decentralized social media ecosystem. The DeSo blockchain was designed to support various social media applications beyond BitClout.
- BitClout 2.0: In 2024, BitClout 2.0 was announced, introducing new features and products like Creator Coins V2 and a sophisticated airdrop scheme to incentivize user engagement and trading activity. This version aimed to build on the original concept by enhancing the platform’s functionality and user experience.
Current Status and Future Prospects
- Continued Development: BitClout, now part of the DeSo ecosystem, continues to evolve with ongoing development and new features aimed at decentralizing social media and providing new monetization opportunities for creators. The platform remains active, with various applications and projects being built on the DeSo blockchain.
- Challenges and Opportunities: While BitClout has faced significant challenges, including regulatory scrutiny and user trust issues, it has also paved the way for new models of decentralized social media. The platform’s future will depend on its ability to address these challenges and leverage its innovative approach to social media and cryptocurrency.
In summary, BitClout’s journey has been marked by rapid growth, significant controversy, and strategic rebranding. The platform has evolved into DeSo, aiming to create a decentralized social media ecosystem. Despite its challenges, BitClout has had a lasting impact on the intersection of social media and cryptocurrency.
Key Highlights
- Launch: Launched in March 2021 by an anonymous team led by Nader Al-Naji (“Diamondhands”); aimed to combine social media with cryptocurrency, allowing users to buy and sell “creator coins” tied to individuals’ reputations.
- Preloaded Profiles: Preloaded 15,000 profiles of prominent Twitter users without consent, leading to backlash and legal threats.
- Anonymity and Security Concerns: Raised security and trust issues due to anonymous founders and initial inability to withdraw funds; potential for misuse, such as “pump and dump” schemes.
- Legal and Ethical Issues: High-profile individuals demanded profile removal, citing unauthorized use of likenesses; some filed cease-and-desist orders.
- Funding and Investor Support: Attracted significant investment from venture capital firms like Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia Capital, and Coinbase Ventures; raised over $225 million in Bitcoin within a month.
- Market Performance: BitClout’s native cryptocurrency, $CLOUT, saw significant trading activity but faced initial challenges in being listed on major exchanges; later listed on platforms like AscendEX and Blockchain.com.
- Rebranding to DeSo: Rebranded as DeSo (Decentralized Social) in late 2021 to create a broader decentralized social media ecosystem; revealed Nader Al-Naji’s identity.
- BitClout 2.0: Announced in 2024, introducing new features like Creator Coins V2 and a sophisticated airdrop scheme to enhance user engagement and trading activity.
- Continued Development: Part of the DeSo ecosystem, continues to evolve with new features aimed at decentralizing social media and providing new monetization opportunities for creators.
- Challenges and Opportunities: Faced regulatory scrutiny and user trust issues but paved the way for new models of decentralized social media; future depends on addressing challenges and leveraging innovative approaches.
- Summary: Marked by rapid growth, significant controversy, and strategic rebranding; evolved into DeSo, aiming to create a decentralized social media ecosystem; lasting impact on the intersection of social media and cryptocurrency.
Other Failure Stories
What Happened to WeWork
WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services. It was founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey in 2010. WeWork’s business model was built on complex arrangements between the company and its landlords. There were also several conflicts of interest between Neumann and WeWork, which provided the impetus for the failed IPO and significant devaluation that would follow.
What Happened to Netscape
Netscape – or Netscape Communications Corporation – was a computer services company best known for its web browser. The company was founded in 1994 by Marc Andreessen and James H. Clark as one of the internet’s first and most important start-ups. The Netscape Navigator web browser was released in 1995 and became the browser of choice for the users of the time. By November 1998, it had been acquired by AOL, which tried unsuccessfully to revive the popularity of the web browser. Ten years later, Netscape was shut down entirely.
What Happened to Musical.ly
Musically, or Musical.ly as it is officially known, was a Chinese social media platform headquartered in Shanghai. After passing 200 million users in May 2017, the platform was shut down by tech company ByteDance in November. After its acquisition, ByteDance suggested Musical.ly would continue to operate as a standalone platform. Company representatives noted that it would be able to leverage ByteDance’s AI technology and enormous reach in the Chinese market. Musically was ultimately absorbed into TikTok in June 2018, with the app no longer available in August of the same year. Existing users were offered technical support and several new features as a sweetener.
What Happened to Vine
Vine was an American video social networking platform with a focus on looping video clips of six seconds in length, founded by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll in 2012 to help people capture casual moments in their lives and share them with their friends. Vine went on to become a massively popular platform. Yet by 2016, Twitter discontinued the mobile app, allowing users to view or download content on the Vine website. It then announced a reconfigured app allowing creators to share content to a connected Twitter account only. This marked the end of Vine.
What Happened to CNN Plus
CNN Plus was a video streaming service and offshoot of CNN’s cable TV news network that was launched on March 29, 2022. The service was ultimately shut down just one month after it was launched. Trouble began for the platform when parent company WarnerMedia merged with Discovery. The latter was unimpressed with paltry viewer data and, with $55 billion in debt to clear, was not interested in funding CNN+ moving forward. Other contributing factors to CNN Plus’s demise include a lack of compelling content and streaming service market saturation.
What Happened to Clubhouse
Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate with each other in audio chat rooms. At one point, the company was worth $4 billion and boasted users such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. Clubhouse declined because it rode the wave of pandemic lockdowns and suffered when people resumed their normal routines. The decision to remove the invite-only feature also caused a rapid influx of new members and removed any exclusivity. Clubhouse management also failed to define a business model and was unaware of the components of a successful social media site.
What Happened to Facebook
What Happened To Carvana
Carvana is an American online used car retailer headquartered in Tempe, Arizona. The company – which sells cars in unique vending machines – was the fastest-growing used vehicle retailer in the United States, with revenue of $3.94 billion in 2019. Yet by 2022, on $12.8 billion in revenue, the company reported almost $2.9 billion in net losses.
What Happened To Houseparty
Houseparty was an app-based group video chat platform for mobile and desktop. Released in February 2016, the platform rapidly grew to hundreds of millions of users and was the #1 social app in 82 countries by May 2020. Less than 18 months later, however, owner Epic Games announced that it would be shutting down the app in October 2021. Let’s explain the reasons for Houseparty’s demise below.
What Happened To ChaCha
ChaCha was a human-guided search engine founded in 2006. The platform provided a valuable service at a time when traditional search engine algorithms were unreliable and less developed.
When algorithms did become sufficiently developed, they provided answers to questions for free and much more rapidly than ChaCha could. The ChaCha business model was also unscalable, with employees overworked as the company tried to stay ahead of innovation.
ChaCha’s demise was also compounded by the smartphone, which provided another avenue for consumers to find information. A belated attempt to restructure and cut costs followed, but the company could not service its debt past 2016.
What Happened To RadioShack
RadioShack is an American electronics retailer founded by brothers Milton and Theodore Deutschmann in 1921. The company enjoyed market dominance in the 70s and 80s but faded fast after a slew of missed opportunities.
RadioShack operated over four thousand stores in the USA, but many were placed too close together which caused sales cannibalization. These stores were also often small and had a confusing inventory mix.
RadioShack sold the first mass-produced personal computer with much success. However, the company saw no future in personal computers because of the high cost of hardware. It then instructed sales managers to intentionally keep PC sales under a certain threshold.
What Happened To Compaq
Compaq was an American developer and producer of computer products and services. After strong initial success, the company was acquired by HP in 2002 with the Compaq brand retired in 2013.
Compaq’s short-sighted acquisition of DEC provided the catalyst for its decline. While the company was dealing with the ramifications of the acquisition, competitors such as Dell and Gateway increased their market share.
Compaq also experienced a loss in revenue after the dot-com bubble burst. This was exacerbated by the standardization of chipsets and motherboards by Intel.
What Happened To Kodak
Kodak is an American photography product and service company founded in 1892 by George Eastman and Henry A. Strong. After dominating the photographic film industry for decades, the company filed for bankruptcy in 2012.
Kodak was not ignorant of digital camera technology. But it did fail at various stages to commit to digital products entirely despite overwhelming evidence that the technology would prove profitable.
Kodak was also the victim of the changing retail landscape and consumer sentiment toward foreign products in the United States. Blind in its devotion to printing, it also missed an opportunity to create a Facebook-style photo-sharing website three years before Facebook itself was conceived.
What Happened To Friendster
Friendster was a social networking site that then transitioned to a gaming platform. Ultimately, Friendster failed to capitalize on its early success as one of the first social media platforms to experience mass uptake.
When Friendster became a gaming platform, it failed to notify its user base. This set in motion the migration of users to Facebook which would continue for some years.
Friendster’s decision to raise funds via venture capital funding populated its board with investors who were not interested in technology or innovation. The company was acquired by MOL Global in 2009 who then sold its patents to Facebook soon after.
What Happened To StumbleUpon
