Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Cyclists & Squirrels: The Pros and Cons of Google Powered Autonomous Automotives


And you thought your Prius was the pinnacle of innovation.
Step aside green car for the all new self-driving car! With innovations in Smart Technology ranging in everything from your cellphone to your house, why should automobiles be off the table? Innovators like Google, General Motors, Apple, and Mercedes-Benz are all climbing behind the wheel for one last human driven ride.
But are they safe? Mostly, there are still some kinks to work out. But so far there are only a couple of accidents reported and all of them were determined ultimately to be the causation of human error, not the Google car. So how do they work?
Are you ready for this?
Frickin’ Laser beams.
That’s right. A series of laser beams are used to guide the car through environments without the aid of a human driver. It’s pretty incredible when you think about it, and coupled with modern safety features already in place on most vehicles, in less than ten years motorists may only have to tell their car to head to the “Dry Cleaners” and stop by “McDonalds” on the way “Home” in order to navigate through their busy schedule.
This could also head toward faster posted speeds in the future, leading to less congestion, shorter commute times, and most importantly, less motorist fatalities. Everything here sounds good on paper, but what about the science? What is LIDAR? How do these Smart cars see their environment and stop in time for things like children and deer? Are they safe? What will they look like? How well have these things been tested?
We’re going to answer all those questions and more, including a little background on the  history of LIDAR. Come with me at To Infinity and…In Theory today as we discuss whether or not the Autonomous automobile market is destined to crash and burn.
Before we begin, let’s start with some basic statistics so you can see why this technology is so important.

Highway To The Danger Zone


In 2012, just in the United States, more than 34,000 motorists were killed in vehicular accidents. A further 4,000+ bystanders were killed, thousands more were injured, and 700 bicyclists were killed. That’s a lot of human related motorcade carnage if you ask me.
Those numbers get far higher as you branch out into the rest of the world, as they well should. The United States is but a fraction of the world’s population. The majority of those deaths resulted from human and mechanical error. I’m sure there were faults of nature that could not have been avoided, just as I’m sure even a Google car can get annihilated by a sudden sinkhole, but those numbers could drop significantly.
During the decade or so of testing autonomous vehicles, Google alone has logged over 700,000 miles on their cars. With over a dozen on the road in four states including Nevada, California, Florida, and Michigan, there have been exactly 0 deaths reported.
There have however been two accidents reported. One being a rear-end collision, the fault of a human driver in a non-Google car, and the other was hilariously in front of the Google Headquarters building in California. The car was being manually driven at the time, (and KITT probably laughed his carburetor off). But to date there have been no reported accidents related to the software installed to make the car autonomous.
So just how does it sense its surroundings and make intelligent decisions based on the information it ascertains?
It’s not magic. It’s science.

Nice Laser


Ah yes, the famous Albert Einstein. And the famous photo of him with his tongue out. If you’ve ever wondered the story behind that photo ponder no more, it’s quite hilarious actually. It was his birthday party, and all night long all the guests were asking to pose with Albert and take pictures, or make him smile and take a photo. Albert grew tired of smiling and as he was leaving a guest pleaded for one last photo of the famous physicist. Not wanting to deny his public, but horribly bored with smiling, he turned to the camera and instead stuck his tongue out. The photographer happened to also be a journalist and this quickly became one of the most famous photographs of the brilliant man.
And you thought he was just batty.
But anyway, I’ve digressed terribly far. In 1917, taking the work of Max Planck’s radiation experiments in another direction, Einstein unintentionally laid the groundwork for what would later become the laser and the maser.
Next came Rudolf Ladenburg who confirmed the existences of the phenomena of stimulated emission and negative absorption. Over a decade later, Valentin Fabrikant predicted the use of stimulated emission to amplify short waves.
In repetitious fashion the cycle repeats itself. It takes another ten years before Willis Lamb and R. C. Retherford found apparent stimulated emission in hydrogen spectra and effected the first demonstration of stimulated emission. Finally, in 1957, Charles Townes and Arthur Schawlow, then at Bell Labs, began a serious study of the infrared laser.
In May of 1960 the first laser was fired by Theodore H. Maimann in Malibu, California, United States. It was the first successful display of the technology and it set in motion a revolution the entire world over. From the Iranian physicists Ali Javan, and William R. Bennett, and Donald Herriott, who constructed the first gas laser, using helium and neon that was capable of continuous operation in the infrared, to the recent advances in the technology, ranging from using lasers to aide in delicate surgeries or just annoy your cat for a funny YouTube video.
Lasers have a rich history, including lawsuits, besmirching, and cutthroat research. If you want to read more about the history of this fascinating technology head over to the Wikipedia page by clicking here. For time’s sake we’re going to move on to explaining just how lasers play a role in keeping you from crashing in your new Google-Benz.

Mixed (Hand) Signals


There are many kinds of lasers out there now but for the purposes of this article we’re going to be talking about a specific kind. The light laser, or LIDAR, for short, is a combination of imaging lasers and radar technology, hence the name. The unit sends out a laser signal (in the form of infrared or even in the visible spectrum) from it and the laser is reflected off of the surface of an object and bounced back to the source. This reflection is then interpreted by a computer and processed into an image.
The LIDAR system of laser technology has been around since the 1960s, but it wasn’t until the invention of modern synthetics that were able to scale the tech down in size and bulk that it became conventional for uses like this.
In the case of the Google car, it’s equipped with a Velodyne oscillating LIDAR on the roof. This laser has 64 independent beams that rotate very fast above the vehicle. As these beams are bounced off of the surrounding environment and sent back to the car, software in the cars computer compares the imaging with real-world images of the geographical landscape. It then uses these images to make adjustments accordingly for traffic, laws, construction, and road hazards.
While the technology is capable of sensing hundreds of objects at a time there are some pitfalls to it still. It can sense things like jaywalkers and deer crossing into the road, but squirrels, cats, and possums aren’t quite as lucky. Another thing about the sensor technology right now is that while it is capable of picking up on potholes in the road ahead, it doesn’t go around them, simply slows down to minimize the damage. In states here like Michigan where potholes can swallow a semi, that’s just not going to cut it. 
Another hilarious piece of information I gleaned off of the net is that supposedly it is difficult for the car to handle traffic cops. When the police start directing traffic with their erratic hand gestures the car doesn't know what to do and so turns control of the vehicle over to the human in the hopes they'll be able to sort it out. They’ll continue to work on this technology, but Google certainly isn’t the only one.
While Google is using LIDAR to pick the kids up from Soccer practice remotely, a researcher at Stanford working tirelessly on his own autonomous vehicle is going a different direction with the research. A direction that could pay off big time for every autonomous vehicle manufacturer in the world.
Christian Gerdes considers himself an “above-average driver”, at least according to his delightful TEDx talk which you can watch by clicking the video below…



…but instead of equipping his cars with a ton of lasers and real-time traffic control, he’s content with the modern safety features available to most consumers currently with a few extra high-tech cameras and computer algorithms on the side. He isn’t testing to see if his car will stop in time, in fact, he doesn’t want it to stop at all. Christian is taking his autonomous cars to some of the most dangerous locales in the world, and he’s pushing them to their physical mechanical limitations.



Christian isn’t looking to design a car that works like a soccer mom. He’s looking to design a car that drives like Jeff Gordon. Racecar drivers are incredibly intuitive drivers. They are capable of feats behind the wheel of a vehicle that even the most veteran of commuters wouldn’t even dare dream of attempting. So why do you want a car that isn’t capable of taking risks? After all, isn’t having the ability to take risks the best way to learn to avoid them?
Researchers at Stanford think so, and have worked day and night for several years now attempting to do so. In 2010 they announced their autonomous Audi Quattro would make the climb up Pikes Peak in Colorado. This raceway has been active for almost 100 years, and its known for its treacherous hairpin turns. The autobot? It performed spectacularly.
But just what goes into these smart cars that makes them so darn smart?

Road Tested, Soccer Mom Approved


That’s just what was available as of 2008. As of this writing we have technology ranging from self-parking cars, to anterior cameras that sense obstructions in the road ahead (like unaware adolescents) and automatically apply the brakes. As all of this technology developed it wasn’t a surprise to see autonomous cars being announced by every major car manufacturer in the world.
Some of the features are Tire Pressure Monitoring. A sensor in the wheels alerts the driver via an audible sound or a light on the instrument panel that the tires are low. Also more and more cars are slated to be equipped with run-flat tires, which are capable of driving at a high-rate of speed for around fifty miles after being punctured. This cuts down on blowout tire related accidents.
Blindspot assistance has come along now as well. Sensors on the sides and rear of the vehicle collect information on the vehicles surroundings. If the driver attempts to make a lane-change into an occupied section the car will quickly alert the driver to this, thereby avoiding a collision. Sounds like that’s just one step away from I-Robot to me.
And what about Chrysler’s Electronic Roll Mitigation? Suppose you take a curve too sharply and the vehicle senses there’s a high likelihood of a rollover, it will apply the brakes and throttle accordingly so as to avoid the incident. Once again, if mapped altogether as one neat little computerized package, all of this sounds intuitively autonomous to me already.
With backup cameras and automatic Emergency service alert in the event of a collision, everything was already in place. The software just needed to come along in order to get these cars on the road. So are they safe? For the most part. They still require extensive field testing, stress testing, and more than likely many more upgrades to various systems before they’ll be ready for consumers.
But considering 3D mapping is going to be available on your Smartphone soon, nothing here should surprise you.

Virtual Reality: The “Home” Game


Google recently announced another project along the same lines as the technology that went into making their Smart cars autonomous. It’s called Project Tango, and no, it isn’t a “So You Think You Can Dance?” app. It’s actually a highly detailed program able to take the two-dimensional viewpoint of your Smartphone, into the awesome 3D world.
We live in a 3D world, so it only makes sense that we should be able to capture the dimensional properties around us. Google thought so too. Using the same kind of technology as Microsoft’s Xbox 360 Kinect, and the new 3D chip called the Myriad-1 developed by Movidius, it enables the user to capture 3D simulated images of their environment.
This technology could be useful for a “myriad” (see what I did there…) of purposes and Google is reaching out to hundreds of software developers worldwide and distributing Dev Kits containing the technology. From uses as simple as taking a full scale imaging of one’s living room before going furniture shopping to the ultimate in fully immersive one of a kind virtual reality gaming experiences, the possibilities seem endless.
The point I’m trying to make is that if Google is capable of taking such a cutting edge kind of technology and scaling it down to be utilized in a Smartphone, then they should have no problem working out all the bugs in their Smart Cars. I can’t wait to see what the future holds for self-driving automobiles.
For now I’ll just have to keep my ear to the ground for updates on this as they come. As of right now there are varying estimates on release times for fully autonomous vehicles, ranging everywhere from 2015 to 2025. Personally, 2025 sounds much more probable to me, but we’ll see.
Thanks for reading everyone!

-Ryan Sanders


Thanks for reading everyone! As always if you would like to know more about any of the topics discussed above you can by following any of the links below. Feel free to share this around on Facebook and Twitter.

-       Wiki entry on Lasers
-       Wiki entry on LIDAR
-       Wiki entry on Pikes Peak
-       Edmunds.com article on self-driving cars
-       Timeline of safety feature implementations
-       Edmunds.com article on top ten safety features
-       Article detailing Project Tango
-       Wired.com article outline Google Car
-       The Economist Article on how autonomous cars work
-       Blind Man drives Googles Smart Car (Video Included)
-       Wiki entry on Autonomous Vehicles
-       An article from an irate motorist against Google cars on his commute from Businessweek







This post first appeared on To Infinity And...In Theory, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Cyclists & Squirrels: The Pros and Cons of Google Powered Autonomous Automotives

×

Subscribe to To Infinity And...in Theory

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×