Latest Judgement of Supreme Court on Service Matters
| 1 | AURELIANO FERNANDES Vs STATE OF GOA AND OTHERS – [2023] 7 S.C.R. 772 Judge Name: A.S. BOPANNA,HIMA KOHLI principles of natural justice. Administration of Justice – Reasonableness into the procedural regime in service matter – The cardinal principle required to be borne in mind is that the person accused of misconduct must be informed of the case, must be supplied the evidence in support thereof and Date of decision : 12-05-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2482/2014 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 2 | SECURITY PRINTING AND MINTING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ORS. ETC Vs VIJAY D. KASBE AND ORS. ETC – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 246 Judge Name: V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN,PANKAJ MITHAL services of the Union/State, persons holding civil posts under the Union/State – service matter dispute including claim for allowances raised before Administrative Tribunal – Duty of the Tribunal – Discussed – Constitution of India –Article 309, proviso to Art.309 – Administrative Tribunals Act Date of decision : 18-04-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2911/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 3 | UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs PARASHOTAM DASS – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 598 Judge Name: SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,ABHAY S. OKA,B.V. NAGARATHNA that an aggrieved person in a service matter , if restrained from approaching the High Court, would be left with no legal recourse to approach any appellate authority, including the Supreme Court, since service matters are private in nature and do not involve “point of law of general public Date of decision : 21-03-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/447/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 4 | English ગુજરાતી – Gujarati Disclaimer RUSHIBHAI JAGDISHCHANDRA PATHAK Vs BHAVNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – [2022] 16 S.C.R. 1014 Judge Name: AJAY RASTOGI,SANJIV KHANNA A B C D E F G H 1014 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 16 S.C.R. RUSHIBHAI JAGDISHCHANDRA PATHAK v. BHAVNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (Civil Appeal No. 4134 of 2022) MAY 18, 2022 [AJAY RASTOGI AND SANJIV KHANNA, JJ.] service matter : Pay Scale – Recovery of arrears – In terms of the scheme Date of decision : 18-05-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4134/2022 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed |
| 5 | ABHAY JAIN Vs THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AND ANR – [2022] 16 S.C.R. 693 Judge Name: UDAY UMESH LALIT,VINEET SARAN Judicial Officer and will not be taken into consideration against the Judicial Officer in any service matter including transfer, promotion and for compulsory retirement.” (emphasis supplied) In the present case, the record clearly showcases that no verifiable complaint was filed against the Date of decision : 15-03-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2029/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 6 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs P. S. GILL – [2019] 17 S.C.R. 405 Judge Name: L. NAGESWARA RAO,HEMANT GUPTA . 405 405 A B C D E F G H 406 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 17 S.C.R. not maintainable – As regards the maintainability of s.14, the said section enables a person aggrieved to make an application to the Tribunal in any service matter – ‘service matters’ are defined in s.3(o) to mean all Date of decision : 27-11-2019 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/404/2013 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 7 | VISHAL ASHOK THORAT AND ORS. Vs RAJESH SHRIRAMBAPU FATE & ORS. – [2019] 9 S.C.R. 628 Judge Name: ASHOK BHUSHAN,NAVIN SINHA respondent No.1 was not styled or framed as PIL. It is well settled that with regard to service jurisprudence, PIL are not entertained. In Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs. State of Maharashtra and others, (2013) 4 SCC 465, this Court has reiterated that PIL should not be entertained in service Date of decision : 19-07-2019 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5444/2019 | Disposal Nature : Case Allowed |
| 8 | LT. COL. VIJAYNATH JHA Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [2018] 4 S.C.R. 560 Judge Name: A.K. SIKRI,ASHOK BHUSHAN they all relate to matters relating to conditions of service pertaining to the conditions of service of persons subject to Army Act, Navy Act and Air Force Act – Impugned order before the Tribunal was by a different organization – Therefore, cannot be held to be service matter within the meaning Date of decision : 18-05-2018 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2020/2013 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 9 | MOHAMMED ANSARI Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [2017] 1 S.C.R. 422 Judge Name: DIPAK MISRA,UDAY UMESH LALIT Constitution) in relation to all service matters. (2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a person aggrieved by an order pertaining to any service matter may make an application to the Tribunal in such form and accompanied by such documents or other evidence and on payment of such fee Date of decision : 02-02-2017 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/10131/2016 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 10 | YASH PAL & ORS. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – [2017] 1 S.C.R. 406 Judge Name: T.S. THAKUR,D.Y. CHANDRACHUD held that since th c porters are not subject to statutory provisions which govern the Anny, Navy and Air Force, their grievance did not fulfii the definition ofa ‘ service matter ‘ under Section 3(o) of the Armed Forces fribunal Act, 2007. Hence by the judgment of the Tribunal, the application was Date of decision : 02-01-2017 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/616/2013 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 11 | RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs SHASHI SHARMA & ORS. – [2016] 6 S.C.R. 488 Judge Name: RANJAN GOGOI,PRAFULLA C. PANT,A.M. KHANWILKAR . The Division Bench held that the scheme of financial assistance postulated in Rules of 2006, is a service benefit which accrues to the dependents of the deceased and is in the domain of service matter /benefit given to the employee as a result of the service rendered by the deceased employee Date of decision : 23-09-2016 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/9654/2016 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed |
| 12 | S.E.B.I. Vs ALLIANCE FINSTOCK LTD. & ORS. ETC. ETC. – [2015] 10 S.C.R. 145 Judge Name: VIKRAMAJIT SEN,SHIVA KIRTI SINGH discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16. In Mohd. Rashid Ahmed the Court was dealing with service matter and was called upon to decide whether a E particular rule could be given retrospective effect. Since the statute vested the State Government with power to frame rules even with Date of decision : 03-11-2015 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4493/2006 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 13 | UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs MAJOR GENERAL SHRI KANT SHARMA & ANR. – [2015] 4 S.C.R. 676 Judge Name: S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA,N.V. RAMANA ) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a person aggrieved by an order pertaining to any service matter may make an application to the Tribunal in such form and accompanied by such documents or other evidence and on payment of such fee as may be prescribed. (3) On receipt of an application Date of decision : 11-03-2015 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7400/2013 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 14 | ANIL JOSHI AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS – [2015] 3 S.C.R. 351 Judge Name: F.M. IBRAHIM KALIFULLA,ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE facts of the case in hand and the facts which were subject matter of the cases relied on. The case in hand being a service matter , the rights of the parties were required to be decided in the light of the F statutory service Rules applicable to the parties .. So far as the decisions relied on Date of decision : 09-03-2015 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/6097/2009 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 15 | STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Vs ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA & ORS. – [2014] 12 S.C.R. 193 Judge Name: JASTI CHELAMESWAR,A.K. SIKRI on the ground that the petitions were exactly similar to those petitions which were preferred in another case. No doubt, writ petition was dismissed on the ground of C unexplained inordinate delay, but it would be necessary to observe that it was not a service matter . However, the principle Date of decision : 17-10-2014 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/9849/2014 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 16 | U.0.I. Vs S.P. NAYYAR – [2014] 6 S.C.R. 116 Judge Name: S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA,KURIAN JOSEPH appellants to grant promotion to the respondent rather than directing the B appellants to reconsider the case under DPC; and (b) The High Court without any evidence, adjudicated disputed issue of malafide acts alleged against the appellant no. 3 in writ jurisdiction while dealing with a service Date of decision : 30-06-2014 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5852/2014 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 17 | MADAN LAL Vs HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR & ORS. – [2014] 4 S.C.R. 226 Judge Name: S.S. NIJJAR,F.M. IBRAHIM KALIFULLA returned to the petitioners or filed in the PIL Cell, as the case may be: 1. xxxx xxxx xxxx 2. service matter and those pertaining to Pension and Gratuity.” 9. That apart time and again this Court repeatedly held that E F in service matters Public Interest Litigation is not maintainable Date of decision : 28-03-2014 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1393/2002 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 18 | CENTRAL ELECTRICITY SUPPLY UTILITY OF ODISHA Vs DHOBEI SAHOO & ORS. – [2013] 14 S.C.R. 621 Judge Name: ANIL R. DAVE,DIPAK MISRA following contentions: – (a) In relation to a service matter a public interest B litigation is not maintainable except as far as it relates to a writ of quo warranto and in the case at hand, the High Court has failed to understand the implications of the writ of quo warranto and has not only Date of decision : 01-11-2013 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/9872/2013 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 19 | BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. Vs S.K. BHATNAGAR & ORS. – [2013] 10 S.C.R. 279 Judge Name: T.S. THAKUR,VIKRAMAJIT SEN in detail. F 3~ Learned counsel for Respondent no.1 has drawn our attention to -Union of India & Ors. v. Tarsem Singh (2008) 8 . sec 648 wherein this Court has held that normally service matter claims are rejected either on limitation or on the grounds of delay/laches; the exception being Date of decision : 24-10-2013 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/9644/2013 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 20 | DR. JAGMITTAR SAIN BHAGAT Vs DIR. HEALTH SERVICES, HARYANA & ORS. – [2013] 8 S.C.R. 77 Judge Name: B.S. CHAUHAN,S.A. BOBDE Narendra Hooda, learned Senior AAG, Haryana, has raised preliminary issue of the jurisdiction submitting that the service matter of a government servant cannot be dealt with by any of the Forum in any hierarchy under the Act. Therefore, the matter should not be considered on merit at all. More so Date of decision : 11-07-2013 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5476/2013 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 21 | SUKHDEV SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – [2013] 5 S.C.R. 1004 Judge Name: RAJENDRA MAL LODHA,MADAN B. LOKUR,KURIAN JOSEPH (other than military service ) – Matter refeffed by Division Bench of Supreme court to Three Judge Bench, finding inconsistency as regards the law laid down on the issue, by the judgments passed in *U.P. D Jal Nigam case and **Major Bahadur Singh case – Subsequently, Supreme Court, in ***Dev Dutt Date of decision : 23-04-2013 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5892/2006 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 22 | STATE OF PUNJAB Vs SAUL SABHLOK AND ORS. – [2013] 5 S.C.R. 18 Judge Name: A.K. PATNAIK,MADAN B. LOKUR was just a service matter in which only the aggrieved party had the locus to initiate a legal action in the court of law – The writ petition was a matter affecting c interest of the general public in the State of Punjab and any member of the public could espouse the cause of the general Date of decision : 15-02-2013 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7640/2013 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 23 | P. SESHADRI Vs S. MANGATI GOPAL REDDY AND ORS. – [2011] 3 S.C.R. 1134 Judge Name: B. SUDERSHAN REDDY,S.S. NIJJAR Parpathedar of Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam by TTD Board – Allowed by High Courl – Held : High Court ought to have satisfied itself with regard to the credentials of 0 the writ petitioner before entertaining the petition as pubL interest litigation – A pure and simple service matter has been Date of decision : 29-03-2011 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2688/2011 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 24 | GIRJESH SHRIVASTAVA AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS – [2010] 12 S.C.R. 839 Judge Name: G.S. SINGHVI,A.K. GANGULY High Court and they filed review petitions. The High Court dismissed the review petitions. Therefore, the appellants filed the instant appeals. c Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The dispute in the instant case is over selection and appointment which is a service matter . A PIL in a Date of decision : 22-10-2010 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/9227/2001 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 25 | M/S. KRANTI ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. & ANR. Vs SH. MASOOD AHMED KHAN & OTHERS – [2010] 10 S.C.R. 1070 Judge Name: G.S. SINGHVI,A.K. GANGULY the conclusions made (See para 14 page 1922). B 32. In Gurdial Singh Fijji vs. State of Punjab and Ors., (1979) 2 sec 368, this Court, dealing with a service matter , relying on the ratio in Capoor (supra), held that “rubber-stamp reason” is not enough and virtually quoted the observation in C Date of decision : 08-09-2010 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7472/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 26 | HARI BANSH LAL Vs SAHODAR PRASAD MAHTO AND ORS. – [2010] 10 S.C.R. 561 Judge Name: P. SATHASIVAM,B.S. CHAUHAN 486; The State of Mysore & Anr. v. Syed Mahmood & Ors. (1968) 3 SCR 363 – relied on. 1.2. In the instant case, it is not seriously disputed 8 that the matter in issue is not a service matter . Besides this objection was not raised before the High Court. Even otherwise, in view of the fact that Date of decision : 30-08-2010 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7165/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 27 | M.D., H.S.l.D.C. AND ORS. Vs M/S. HARI OM ENTERPRISES AND ANR. – [2008] 9 S.C.R. 821 Judge Name: S.B. SINHA,V.S. SIRPURKAR – ance has been placed by Mr. Jaspal Singh to contend that in a given case, this court may not exercise its discretionary juris- G diction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India even if the order is found to be illegal. This court was concerned with a service matter . It was held Date of decision : 16-05-2008 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4089/2008 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 28 | UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs GULAM MOHD. BHAT – [2005] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 367 Judge Name: ARIJIT PASAYAT,AR. LAKSHMANAN – UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. A v. GULAM MOHD. BHAT OCTOBER 20, 2005 [ARIJIT PASAYAT AND DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN, JJ.) B service matter : Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949-Sections 9, JO and I I-Central Reserve Plaice Rules, 1955-Rule 27-Emp/oyee reporting for duty long after C sanctioned Date of decision : 20-10-2005 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4950/1999 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 29 | GURPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. – [2005] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 215 Judge Name: ARIJIT PASAYAT,S.H. KAPADIA GURPAL SINGH A v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. MAY 10, 2005 [ARIJIT PASAYAT AND S.H. KAPADIA, JJ.] B Public Interest Litigation: service matter -Writ petition by an individual filed under public interest litigation challenging appointment of another individual-Appointee C questioning locus Date of decision : 10-05-2005 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2802/2002 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 30 | CHAIN SINGH Vs MATA VAISHNO DEVI SHRINE BOARD AND ANR. – [2004] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 798 Judge Name: SHIVARAJ V. PATIL,B.N. SRIKRISHNA case of the dispute with regard to licence/tenancy, and Labour Court, with regard to the dispute pertaining to the service matter . Learned counsel replied that the appellants have been placed in a very unenviable predicament, being treated neither as fowl nor fish. According to the appellants Date of decision : 28-09-2004 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4596/1999 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 31 | STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANR. Vs R.K. MANIKANTSINGH AND ORS. – [2003] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 1262 Judge Name: V.N. KHARE,S.B. SINHA ): After careful examination of the service matter in respect of Shri R.K. Manikanta Singh, Superintending Engineer, IFC Department, Manipur, the Governor of Manipur is E pleased to relax the provision under Column-II of the M.P.S.C. Form-8 of the Recruitment Rule of the Additional Chief Engineer Date of decision : 19-12-2003 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/10207/2003 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 32 | ORISSA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL & TECHNOLOGY AND ANR. Vs MANOJ K. MOHANTY – [2003] 3 S.C.R. 753 Judge Name: SHIVARAJ V. PATIL,ARIJIT PASAYAT – ORJSSA UNIVERSITY OF AG RI CULTURAL & TECHNOLOGY AND ANR. A v. MANOJ K. MOHANTY APRIL 17, 2003 [SHIV ARAJ V. PATIL AND ARIJIT PASAYA T, JJ.] B service matter : Temporary appointment of the incumbent as Typist against the vacancy of Junior Assistant-Regularisation of service of Date of decision : 17-04-2003 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4210/2000 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 33 | J.P. BANSAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. – [2003] 2 S.C.R. 933 Judge Name: SHIVARAJ V. PATIL,ARIJIT PASAYAT reasonable opportunity to make representation against change of policy came in. E Lastly we come to the three-judge Bench judgment in National Building Construction Corporation v. S. Raghunathan and Ors., [I 998] 7 SCC 66. This case has more relevance to the present case, as it was also a service Date of decision : 12-03-2003 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5982/2001 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 34 | DR. (MRS.) CHANCHAL GOYAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN – [2003] 2 S.C.R. 112 Judge Name: SHIVARAJ V. PATIL,ARIJIT PASAYAT ) and to Hindustan Development Corporation’s case (supra). Lastly we come to the three judge judgment in National Building Construction Corporation v. S. Raghunathan and Ors., [1998] 7 SCC 66. This case has more relevance to the present case, as it was also a service matter . The respondents were Date of decision : 18-02-2003 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7744/1997 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 35 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer P. LAL Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – [2003] 1 S.C.R. 846 Judge Name: S.S.M. QUADRI,S.N. VARIAVA (v) any other matter whatsoever.” Thus, amongst other things, the question of seniority is a matter which is a service matter . Section 14 vests in the Tribunal the jurisdiction, power and authority earlier exercised by Courts, amongst others, in respect of service D matters. As admitted by Mr Date of decision : 05-02-2003 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1050/2003 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 36 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer PUBLIC SERVICES TRIBUNAL BAR ASSOCIATION Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANR – [2003] 1 S.C.R. 666 Judge Name: V.N. KHARE,ASHOK BHAN -Discussed. D legislative action of State-Scope of-Discussed U.P. Public Services (Tribunal) Act, 1976: (as amended by Act 5 of 2000): Section 4(/)-Reference of claim to Tribunal with regard to an ‘order’ pertaining to service matter – Validity of-Held: since no amendment or clarification had Date of decision : 29-01-2003 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/3946/2001 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 37 | K.L. NANDAKUMARAN NAIR Vs K.I. PHILIP AND ORS. – [2001] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 14 Judge Name: S. RAJENDRA BABU,DORAISWAMY RAJU A B c D E F G K.L. NANDAKUMARAN NAIR v. K.I. PHILIP AND ORS. SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 [S. RAJENDRA BABU AND DORAISWAMY RAJU, JJ.] service matter : Selection of electricians (HS) after conducting trade test-Appellant secures qual{fying minimum marks-Promoted to electrician ( HS Date of decision : 10-09-2001 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5340/1997 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 38 | T. SUDHAKAR PRASAD ETC. Vs GOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS. – [2000] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 610 Judge Name: A.S. ANAND,R.C. LAHOTI,K.G. BALAKRISHNAN the Supreme Court has ruled in CHANDRA KUMAR ‘s case that no judgment rendered by the Administrative Tribunals in service matter can be directly appea!able the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution, that the contempt jurisdiction still vests in the Administrative Tribunals, as Date of decision : 13-12-2000 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5089/1998 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 39 | AJIT KUMAR RATH Vs STATE OF ORISSA – [1999] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 302 Judge Name: S. SAGHIR AHMAD,R.P. SETHI A AJIT KUMAR RA TH v.’ STATE OF ORISSA NOVEMBER 2, 1999 B (S. SAGHIR AHMAD AND R.P. SETHI, JJ.] service matter —Orissa Service of Engineer Rules, 1941-Rule 26-Fixation of inter-se seniority between direct recruits and promotees appointed to the same post in the same year-If appointed Date of decision : 02-11-1999 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/11811/1995 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 40 | PUNJAB COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – [1999] 2 S.C.R. 1033 Judge Name: S.B. MAJMUDAR,M. JAGANNADHA RAO Corporation V. s. Raghunathan & Others, [1998] 7 sec 66. This was a service matter . The respondents were appointed in CPWD and they went on deputation to the NBCC in Iraq and they opted to draw, while on deputation, their grade pay in CPWD plus deputation allowance. Besides that, the NBCC granted them Date of decision : 04-05-1999 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2685/1999 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 41 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer SRI RAMENDRA KISHORE BISWAS Vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS. – [1998] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 400 Judge Name: A.S. ANAND,V.N. KHARE,M. SRINIVASAN not proper. The Single Judge ought to have decided the case on its merits and not made a short cut of it. (402-H; 403-A-B) 1.3. Service Rules neither expressly nor by implication have taken C away the jurisdiction of the civil courts to deal with service matter . The opinion of the Single Judge Date of decision : 04-12-1998 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/6080/1998 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 42 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer DR. DURYODHAN SAHU AND ORS. Vs JITENDRA KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS. – [1998] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 77 Judge Name: S.C. AGRAWAL,S. SAGHIR AHMAD,M. SRINIVASAN considering the provisions of the Act held that a private citizen or a stranger having no existing right to any post and not intrinsically concerned with any service matter is not entitled to approach the Tribunal. The foUowing passage in the judg- ment is relevant: H A B c D E 90 SUPREME Date of decision : 25-08-1998 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4215/1998 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 43 | UNION OF INDIA Vs K.N. SIVADAS AND ORS. – [1997] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 211 Judge Name: SUJATA V. MANOHAR,M. JAGANNADHA RAO UNIOi-! OF INDIA v. K.N. SIV ADAS AND ORS. AUGUST 1, 1997 [SUJATA V. MANOHAR AND M. JAGANNADHA RAO, JJ.) A B service matter -{;asual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and Regulation) Scheme, 1989-Members of Reserved Trained Pool set up under the Department of Posts/Telegraph, are Date of decision : 01-08-1997 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/80/1996 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 44 | P.S. RAMAMOHANA RAO Vs A.P. AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY AND ANR. – [1997] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 201 Judge Name: SUJATA V. MANOHAR,M. JAGANNADHA RAO P.S. RAMAMOHANA RAO A v. A.P. AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY AND ANR. :::l JULY 31, 1997 [SUJATA V. MANOHAR AND M. JAGANNADHA RAO, JJ.] B service matter -Andhra Pradesh Act 24 of 1963-Teacher-Superan~ nuation age-College where petitioner worked was transferred to the A.P. University as per S Date of decision : 31-07-1997 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/898/1992 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 45 | STATE OF HARYANA Vs DR. A.K. SINHA – [1997] 2 S.C.R. 323 Judge Name: K. RAMASWAMY,S. SAGHIR AHMAD -; STATE OF HARYANA v. DR. A.K. SINHA FEBRUARY 20, 1997 [K. RAMASWAMY ANDS. SAGHIR AHMAD, JJ.] service matter : All India Services (Conditions of Service Residuary Matters) Rules, I960: Rule 2(b )-Advance increments on acquiring Ph.D. degree-Member of !AS-Allotted to State Cadre Date of decision : 20-02-1997 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/11411/1983 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 46 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer DR. H. MUKHERJEE Vs S.K. BHARGAWA – [1996] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 123 Judge Name: B.P. JEEVAN REDDY,S.C. SEN entertain the suit. The Civil Court held that the suit does not pertain to service matter and the same is filed against the Defendant/ Appellant in his individual F capacity and not official capacity. Hence, Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide the suit. Appellant filed appeal before High Date of decision : 09-04-1996 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/6973/1996 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 47 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer KARUNA LAHIRI Vs GAUTAM KUMAR CHAKRABORTY AND ORS. – [1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 322 Judge Name: K. RAMASWAMY,B.L. HANSARIA : Leave granted. It is rather unfortunate that the Law Department of the Orissa State is functioning in unsatisfactory way. It is reflected in this case also. This is D one of the three cases which have come up before this Court relating to service matter . Other Departments, look for guidance Date of decision : 07-12-1995 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/11966/1995 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 48 | GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR. Vs M. PANDURANG AND ORS. – [1995] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 487 Judge Name: K. RAMASWAMY,B.L. HANSARIA uncon stitutional and it has also jurisdiction to decide the service matter . The controversy is now referred to a larger Bench of 7 Judges and the same is pending in this Court. In view of the flux in the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, several matters were entertained by the High Court. However Date of decision : 20-11-1995 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/11465/1995 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 49 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer KRISHAN PRASAD GUPTA Vs CONTROLLER, PRINTING AND STATIONERY – [1995] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 436 Judge Name: KULDIP SINGH,S. SAGHIR AHMAD . The Appellate jurisdiction of the Tribunal is extremely limited and was conferred on the Tribunal so that the judgment, if any passed by a munsif or civil or subordinated judge in ·a civil suit relating to F a service matter (decided before the establishment of the Tribunal) may be challenged Date of decision : 18-10-1995 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1980/1995 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 50 | SARWAN SINGH LAMBA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – [1995] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 427 Judge Name: A.M. AHMADI,J.S. VERMA,P.B. SAWANT,B.P. JEEVAN REDDY,N.P. SINGH impugned Act is equally efficacious as the High Court so far as the power of judicial review over service matter is concerned. We must, therefore, address ourselves to the question whether the Administrative Tribunal established under the im pugned Act can be regarded as equally effective and Date of decision : 12-05-1995 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5061/1993 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 51 | SRI R.N.A. BRITIO Vs THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS. – [1995] 3 S.C.R. 932 Judge Name: KULDIP SINGH,N. VENKATACHALA redressal of their grievances in relation to any service matter concerning them. [942-B, 941-H, 942-A) 2. The provisions in the Act, clearly show that several functions which were required to be performed by the State are entrusted to the Panchayats. They also show that the properties yested in Date of decision : 01-05-1995 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/718/1993 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 52 | NAROITAM DAS BESHITO/B.P. DOBHAL Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – [1994] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 670 Judge Name: KULDIP SINGH,B.L. HANSARIA petition praying to prohibit the · Administrative Tribunal from proceeding further with the adjudication relating to service matter of the petitioners. It was submitted that as this police force was an ‘armed force of the Union’, the incumbents had to be taken as members of this force, because of Date of decision : 16-08-1994 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/687/1988 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 53 | GUJARAT STATE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEERS’ ASSOCIATION Vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. – [1994] 3 S.C.R. 983 Judge Name: KULDIP SINGH,J.S. VERMA,R.M. SAHAI candidates may be drawn as and when necessary?; and lastly how long can it operate? These H are some important question which do arise as a result of direction issued ( • ) ENGINEERSASSN. v. STATEOFGUJARAT[SAHAl.J.] 995 by the High Courl. A waiting list prepared in service matter by Date of decision : 10-05-1994 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5193/1989 |
| 54 | KRISHNA SAHAI & ORS. Vs STATE OF U.P. & ORS. – [1990] 2 S.C.R. 168 Judge Name: RANGANATH MISRA,M.M. PUNCHHI,K. RAMASWAMY legislation in terms of Art. 323-A of the Constitution, the jurisdiction of the High F Court in regard to service matter is intended to be taken away and vested in the Tribunal. It is open to the State to also set up Tribunals for adjudication of service disputes in regard to its employees. Several Date of decision : 23-03-1990 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/6729/1983 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 55 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer ISHWAR CHAND JAIN Vs HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AND ANOTHER – [1988] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 396 Judge Name: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH,K.N. SINGH A B c D ISHWAR CHAND JAIN v. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AND ANOTHER MAY 26, 1988 [E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND K.N. SINGH, JJ.] service matter -Whether the High Court was right in recommend-· ing termination of the services of the appellant, a judicial officer, on probation, on the Date of decision : 26-05-1988 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/811/1988 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 56 | FEDERATION OF ALL INDIA CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE STENOGRAPHERS (RECOGNISED) & ORS. Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [1988] 3 S.C.R. 998 Judge Name: R.S. PATHAK,SABYASACHI MUKHERJI A FEDERATION OF ALL INDIA CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE STENOGRAPHERS (RECOGNISED) & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MAY 5, 1988 B [R.S. PATHAK, C.J, AND SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.] service matter -Stenographers of Grade I attached with officers in I pay scale of Rs.2500-2750 (Level I) in the Date of decision : 05-05-1988 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/5019/1982 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 57 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer R.L. GUPTA & ANR. Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [1988] 3 S.C.R. 255 Judge Name: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH,K.N. SINGH R.L. GUPTA & ANR. A v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MARCH 16, 1988 [E.S. VENKATARAMIAH & K.N. SINGH, JJ.J B service matter -Whether supersession of a judicial officer by junior officers placed on probation when that officer is on deputation to another office and is not relieved from there in Date of decision : 16-03-1988 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/619/1987 | Disposal Nature : Case Allowed |
| 58 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer BRIJ NANDAN KANSAL Vs STATE OF U.P. & ANR. – [1988] 3 S.C.R. 79 Judge Name: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH,K.N. SINGH I ~· .. I -~ • BRIJ NANDAN KANSAL v. STATE OF U.P. & ANR. FEBRUARY 26, 1988 [E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND K.N. SINGH, JJ.] A B service matter -Challenging order of dismissal-Denial of reasonable opportunity of defence contemplated by Article 311(2) before its amendment-Whether Date of decision : 26-02-1988 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1068/1976 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 59 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer NIRMAL KUMAR CHOUDHARY & ORS. ETC. Vs STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS., ETC. – [1988] 2 S.C.R. 410 Judge Name: RANGANATH MISRA,G.L. OZA A B c D NIRMAL KUMAR CHOUDHARY & ORS. ETC. v. STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS., ETC. DECEMBER 16, 1987 [RANGANATH MISRA AND G.L. OZA, JJ.] service matter -Amalganation of different cadres of employees and resultant gradation-Challenge thereto. Civil Appeal Nos. 2049 and 3129 of 1979 Date of decision : 16-12-1987 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2049/1979 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 60 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer SRI K. PRASAD & ORS. Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [1988] 2 S.C.R. 285 Judge Name: RANGANATH MISRA,S. RANGANATHAN SRI K. PRASAD & ORS. A v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. DECEMBER 10, 1987 [RANGANATH MISRA AND S. RANGANATHAN, JJ.] B service matter -Seniority dispute raised by initial recruits and direct recruits of the Indian Forest Service (I.F.S.) from the States of Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh & Orissa Date of decision : 10-12-1987 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/3072/1980 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed |
| 61 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer TEKRAJ VASANDI ALIAS K.L. BASANDHI Vs UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS – [1988] 2 S.C.R. 260 Judge Name: RANGANATH MISRA,S. RANGANATHAN A TEKRAJ VASANDI ALIAS K.L. BASANDHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS DECEMBER 10, 1987 B [RANGANATH MISRA AND S. RANGANATHAN, JJ.] service matter -Dismissal from service as a result of disciplinary action-Institute of Constitutional and Parliamentary Studies-Whe ther ‘State’ within the Date of decision : 10-12-1987 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4959/1984 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 62 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer B.K. MOHAPATRA Vs STATE OF ORISSA – [1988] 1 S.C.R. 650 Judge Name: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH,K.N. SINGH A B.K. MOHAPATRA v. STATE OF ORISSA OCTOBER 28, 1987 B [E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND K.N. SINGH, JJ. c Teacher’s service matter -Rationalisation scheme for integration of services of teachers in different types of schools-Dispute regarding terms thereof relating to seniority and Date of decision : 28-10-1987 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/661/1971 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 63 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer K. MADHAVAN AND ANR. ETC. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. – [1988] 1 S.C.R. 421 Judge Name: RANGANATH MISRA,M.M. DUTT K. MADHAVAN AND ANR. ETC. A v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. OCTOBER 9, 1987 [RANGANATH MISRA AND MURARJ,MOHON DUTT, JJ.] B service matter -Dispute about seniority-Notional/deemed date of appointment-Effect of-Length of service prior to transfer-Whether to be considered after transfer for Date of decision : 09-10-1987 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/9847/1983 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 64 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer VASANT KUMAR JAISWAL Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [1988] 1 S.C.R. 73 Judge Name: SABYASACHI MUKHERJI,G.L. OZA ), VASANT KUMAR JAISWAL A v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SEPTEMBER 8, 1987. [SABYASACHI MUKHARJI AND G.L. OZA, JJ.] B service matter -Seniority on the basis of length of service- Determination of-In the absence of any statutory rule or executive memorandum or order relating to determination Date of decision : 08-09-1987 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2189/1987 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 65 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer YASHBIR SINGH & ORS., ETC. Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [1987] 3 S.C.R. 1018 Judge Name: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH,K.N. SINGH A B YASHBIR SINGH & ORS., ETC. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. AUGUST 18, 1987 [E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND K.N. SINGH, JJ I ·-.,, service matter -Seniority list challenged-Injunction sought against issue of altered seniority list for the purpose of promotions, confirmations, etc. The Date of decision : 18-08-1987 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/9222/1981 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 66 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. Vs YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA & ORS. – [1987] 3 S.C.R. 115 Judge Name: O. CHINNAPPA REDDY,M.M. DUTT retrospective effect to the combined seniority list. Further, it has been 132 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [ 1987] 3 S.C.R. A observed by the learned Chief Justice that no scheme governing service matter can be fool-proof and some section or the other of employees is bound to feel aggrieved on the Date of decision : 01-05-1987 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4125/1986 | Direction Issue : Appeals allowed and Petition dismissed |
| 67 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer S.P. SAMPATH KUMAR ETC. Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [1987] 1 S.C.R. 435 Judge Name: P.N. BHAGWATI,RANGANATH MISRA,V. KHALID,G.L. OZA,M.M. DUTT 323A, only if it can be shown that the Administrative Tribunal set up under the impugned Act is equally ,efficacious as the High Court, so far as the power of judicial review over service matter is concerned. We must, therefore, address ourselves to the question whether the Administrative Tribunal Date of decision : 09-12-1986 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/12437/1985 | Disposal Nature : Case Allowed |
| 68 | S.C. JAIN Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. – [1985] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 727 Judge Name: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH,R.B. MISRA Respondents. The judb’ll”nt of the Court was delivered by MISRA, J. Special leave granted. This appeal by special leave is directed against the order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 5th January, 1984 dismissing the writ petition in a service matter . The appellant joined service as a Date of decision : 04-11-1985 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4953/1985 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 69 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer V.T. KHANZODE & ORS. Vs RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. – [1982] 3 S.C.R. 411 Judge Name: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,A.D. KOSHAL II and III on the other. Private interest of employees of public undertakings cannot override public interest and an effort has to be made to harmonize the two considerations. No scheme governing service matter can be fool-proof and some section or the other of employees is bound to feel aggrie Date of decision : 05-03-1982 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/4158/1978 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 70 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer D. RAMASWAMI Vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU – [1982] 3 S.C.R. 75 Judge Name: O. CHINNAPPA REDDY,A.P. SEN 75 D. RAMASWAMI v. STATB OF TAMIL NADU • January 28, 1982 (0. Cl!INNAPPA REDDY AND A. P. SEN, JJ.) service matter -Fundamental Rule 56 (d}-Government Servant earned quick,promotiona solely on merit-One adverse entry in confidential file-Exonera ted after full enquiry-Promoted to Date of decision : 28-01-1982 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/3436/1979 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 71 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer COMMODORE COMMANDING, SOUTHERN NAVAL AREA, COCHIN Vs V. K. RAJAN – [1981] 3 S.C.R. 165 Judge Name: S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,A.P. SEN,A. VARADARAJAN , COMMODORE COMMANDING, SOUTHERN NAVAL AREA, COCHIN v. V. K. RAJAN March 10, 1981 165 [S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, A. VARADARAJAN AND A.N. SEN} service matter -Article 16-Service of a temporary government servant termi· nated by a termination order simpliciter-Article 16, if attracted Date of decision : 10-03-1981 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1154/1970 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 72 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs M. B. PATNAIK & ORS. – [1981] 2 S.C.R. 817 Judge Name: S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI,A. VARADARAJAN • , ‘ .. I 817 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. v. M. B. PATNAIK & ORS . February 11, 1981 (S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI AND A. VARADARAJAN, JJ.] Disciplinary Proceedings in a service matter -Order of reversion quashed by the High Court on a technical ground-Propriety of the second enquiry on Date of decision : 11-02-1981 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2119/1979 | Disposal Nature : Case Allowed |
| 73 | BALESHWAR DASS & ORS. ETC Vs STATE OF U. P. & ORS. ETC. – [1981] 1 S.C.R. 449 Judge Name: V.R. KRISHNA IYER,R.S. PATHAK 449 BALESHW AR DASS & ORS. ETC. v. STATE OF U. P. & ORS. ETC. August 19, 1980 {V. R. KRISHNA IYER AND R. S. PATHAK, JJ.] service matter -Duly qualified persons appointed as Assistant Engineers in temporary posts-Officiating service-Whether could count for seniority-Senio rity, how Date of decision : 19-08-1980 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1317/1976 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed |
| 74 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer KAMAL KANTI DUTTA AND ORS. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – [1980] 3 S.C.R. 811 Judge Name: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,N.L. UNTWALIA,P.S. KAILASAM,D.A. DESAI,E.S. VENKATARAMIAH the generality of cases, should be the final arbiter of contro versies relating to conditions of service, including the. vexed question ·Of seniority, may save the courts from the avalanche of writ petitions and appeals in service matter ‘. The proceedings of such Tribunals can have the merit of Date of decision : 23-04-1980 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/66/1974 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 75 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer SUNIL KUMAR BANERJEE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – [1980] 3 S.C.R. 179 Judge Name: V.R. KRISHNA IYER,R.S. PATHAK,O. CHINNAPPA REDDY / ,. • 179 SUNIL KUMAR BANERJEE A v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. March 26, 1980 [V. R. KRISllNA IYER, R. S. PATHAK AND 0. CmNNAPPA REDDY, JJ.J B service matter -All India Services Discipline and Appeal Rules 1969- Consultation with Vigilance Commissioner, if vitiates the order Date of decision : 26-03-1980 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1277/1975 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 76 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer JAGJIT SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB – [1978] 3 S.C.R. 547 Judge Name: V.R. KRISHNA IYER,JASWANT SINGH,V.D. TULZAPURKAR ; ‘ JAGJIT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB March 28, 1978 S47 [V. R. KRISHNA IYER, JASWANT SINGH AND V. D. TULZAPURKAR, JJ.] service matter -Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branclt)-One out of six posts for each year reserved for Scheduled Castes candidates-Appellant, a Scheduled Caste Date of decision : 28-03-1978 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2962/1977 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 77 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer S. B. PATWARDHAN & OTHERS ETC. ETC. Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS – [1977] 3 S.C.R. 775 Judge Name: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD,P.K. GOSWAMI,S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI J S. B. PATWARDHAN & OTHERS ETC. ETC. v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS May 4, 1977 775 [Y.V. ClfANDRACHUD, P.K. GOSWAMI AND fl. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, JJ.] service matter -Promotees and direct recruits–Rule that “the probationer recruited directly to the service of Engineer Class II Date of decision : 04-05-1977 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1113/1974 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 78 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer VASANT KRISHNARAO PATURKAR & ANR. Vs D. R. MAJRAMKAR & OTHERS – [1974] 3 S.C.R. 857 Judge Name: HANS RAJ KHANNA,P.K. GOSWAMI appellants herein. Thirdly, that the High Court should not have allowed the application under order I, rule 8, Civil Pro:edure Code, and should have insisted upon personal service of the rule nisi on the affec~ed petitioners in a service matter of such implications. G Mr. Bhandare, learned counsel for Date of decision : 08-04-1974 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1227/1972 |
| 79 | BHAGAT SINGH Vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB – [1961] 1 S.C.R. 64 Judge Name: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,K.C. DAS GUPTA,J.C. SHAH .-This is an: appeal by spedal leave Wanchoo J. against the judgment of the Punjab High Court • in a service matter . The b~ief f1J,cts necessary for present purposes a.re that’ the lJ.ppellant was appointed ·as a. foot-constable in 1931 in the Punjab Police and.was dismissed on J anua.ry 25 Date of decision : 21-07-1960 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/349/1957 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 80 | M. NAR.ASIMHACHAR Vs THE STATE OF MYSORE – [1960] 1 S.C.R. 981 Judge Name: BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA,SYED JAFFER IMAM,J.L. KAPUR,K.N. WANCHOO,K.C. DAS GUPTA . L. Iyengar and T. M. Sen, for respondent. 1959. October 12. The Judgment of the Court was deliv:ered by v. The Stale of Mysot1 W ANCHOO J.-This is an appeal by special leave wanehoo J. against an order of the Mysore High Court in a service matter . The appellant was in the service of the Date of decision : 12-10-1959 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/438/1958 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
Latest Judgement of Supreme Court on Service Matters
Advocate in Jabalpur – Lawyer in Jabalpur – Ajay Gautam Advocate Jabalpur
This post first appeared on Jabalpur Advocate: Best Jabalpur Advocate Top Jabalpur Lawyer High Court DRT, please read the originial post: here
