Bail Judgments Supreme Court of India
| 1 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer RAMESH CHANDRA VAISHYA Vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. – [2023] 6 S.C.R. 643 Judge Name: S. RAVINDRA BHAT,DIPANKAR DATTA lodge the F.I.R., it was not registered; instead, the appellant was challaned and kept under detention by the concerned inspector in- charge under sections 151, 107, and 116, Cr. PC. He was subsequently released upon furnishing bail bond. Owing to the failure of the Police to register the F.I.R Date of decision : 19-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1617/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 2 | SEBIL ELANJIMPALLY Vs THE STATE OF ODISHA – [2023] 6 S.C.R. 563 Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,ARAVIND KUMAR A B C D E F G H 563 [2023] 6 S.C.R. 563 SEBIL ELANJIMPALLY v. THE STATE OF ODISHA (Criminal Appeal No. 1578 of 2023) MAY 18, 2023 [K. M. JOSEPH AND ARAVIND KUMAR, JJ.] bail – Denial of – When not proper – Appellant charged for commission of offences u/s. 20(b)(ii)(C), NDPS Act Date of decision : 18-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1578/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 3 | RAVI MANDAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – [2023] 7 S.C.R. 1 Judge Name: HRISHIKESH ROY,MANOJ MISRA that Govind was not with his son, rather it was Shabbir along with others who were there, he gave the second report (Ex. Ka-2) to the police on 10.11.2001. During cross examination, PW-1 admitted that there were three or four criminal cases against his son (the deceased) wherein, he was on bail Date of decision : 18-05-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/511/2011 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 4 | DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Vs ADITYA TRIPATHI – [2023] 5 S.C.R. 410 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR bail – Sustainability of – Allegations of tempering of bids – Accused chargesheeted u/ss. 120-B, 420, 468, 471 IPC and s. 7 rw s. 13(2) of the PC Act, the scheduled offences – Offences under the PML Act, 2002 added later – Enforcement Directorate initiated money laundering investigation Date of decision : 12-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1401/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 5 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer SANJAY DUBEY Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 939 Judge Name: KRISHNA MURARI,AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH directions/orders in bail pleas – FIR was filed against accused u/ss.376, 506, IPC; POCSO Act, SCST Act and IT Act –FSL Report was forwarded to the appellant- Inspectorwith a note that DNA examination as per guidelines be undertaken however, the DNA examination was not carried out – In the Date of decision : 11-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1466/2023 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 6 | PRIYANKA MISHRA & ORS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. – [2023] 5 S.C.R. 1152 Judge Name: SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH learned Magistrate, she has stated that she was forcibly sent to her parental home by the accused persons. 13. Learned counsel also drew the Court’s attention to the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gwalior dated 26.11.2018, by which anticipatory bail was granted to the appellants in Date of decision : 08-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1545/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 7 | ATULBHAI VITHALBHAI BHANDERI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 239 Judge Name: AJAY RASTOGI,AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH A B C D E F G H 239[2023] 4 S.C.R. 239 239 ATULBHAI VITHALBHAI BHANDERI v. STATE OF GUJARAT (Criminal Appeal No. 1390 of 2023) MAY 04, 2023 [AJAY RASTOGI AND AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, JJ.] bail : Grant of – Appellant involved in intimidating and threatening the victim in connivance Date of decision : 04-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1390/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 8 | MUKESHBHAI VALLABHBHAI ABHANGI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 1137 Judge Name: AJAY RASTOGI,AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH A B C D E F G H 1137[2023] 4 S.C.R. 1137 1137 MUKESHBHAI VALLABHBHAI ABHANGI v. STATE OF GUJARAT (Criminal Appeal No. 1391 of 2023) MAY 04, 2023 [AJAY RASTOGI AND AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, JJ.] bail : Grant of – Appellant, along with accused no.1 who was operating an organised crime Date of decision : 04-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1391/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 9 | OMPRAKASH SAHNI Vs JAI SHANKAR CHAUDHARY & ANR. ETC. – [2023] 5 S.C.R. 141 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,J.B. PARDIWALA brother by the Trial Court and sentenced to life imprisonment – The order of conviction and sentence passed by Trial Court was challenged in appeal by the respondents before the High Court – Respondents prayed before the High Court that they be released on bail pending the final disposal of their Date of decision : 02-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1331/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 10 | JUDGEBIR SINGH @ JASBIR SINGH SAMRA @ JASBIR & ORS. Vs NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY – [2023] 6 S.C.R. 1 Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.B. PARDIWALA ), 173 – Default bail – Entitlement to, u/s. 167(2) – Though the chargesheet might have been filed within the statutory time period as prescribed in law yet the chargesheet was without a valid order of sanction passed by a competent authority – Held : It cannot be said that a chargesheet filed Date of decision : 01-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1011/2023 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 11 | SH. RAKESH RAMAN Vs SMT. KAVITA – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 552 Judge Name: SUDHANSHU DHULIA,J.B. PARDIWALA were arrested the same day, while they were attending a marriage ceremony, and this was done in the presence of 15 to 20 of his friends. Later the two were released on bail , though the wife persisted with the matter and even moved an application for cancellation of their bail . The wife then filed a Date of decision : 26-04-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2012/2013 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 12 | RITU CHHABARIA Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 826 Judge Name: KRISHNA MURARI,C.T. RAVIKUMAR A B C D E F G H 826 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. RITU CHHABARIA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 60 of 2023) APRIL 26, 2023 [KRISHNA MURARI AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.167(2) – Right of default bail – A chargesheet Date of decision : 26-04-2023 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL)/60/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 13 | HARBHAJAN SINGH Vs STATE OF HARYANA – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 545 Judge Name: ABHAY S. OKA,RAJESH BINDAL having been proved by the prosecution. Hence, the conviction of the Appellant cannot be legally sustained. 13. For the aforementioned reasons, the appeal is allowed. The judgments passed by the Courts below are set aside. The bail bonds of the Appellant stand discharge. Nidhi Jain Appeal allowed. (Assisted by : Mayank Batra and Rakhi, LCRAs) HARBHAJAN SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA [RAJESH BINDAL, J.] Date of decision : 25-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1480/2011 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 14 | SUNEETHA NARREDDY Vs Y S AVINASH REDDY & ANR – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 568 Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA 2023. The High Court was moved with an application for the grant of Anticipatory bail to the first respondent under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 19731 in connection with RC-04(S)/2020/ SC-III/ND. 3. The deceased, YS Vivekananda Reddy, was found to have been murdered at his house Date of decision : 24-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1251/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 15 | JITENDRA KUMAR RODE Vs UNION OF INDIA – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 512 Judge Name: KRISHNA MURARI,SANJAY KAROL his gain in corrupt and illegal manner. Thus, the offence under section 7, 13(1) and 13(2) of the PC Act 1988 is proved against the accused and he is liable to be punished for these charges. Accused is on bail and his bail bonds are discharged. Accused should be taken into custody immediately Date of decision : 24-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1269/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 16 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer ANOOP BARTARIA & ETC Vs DY. DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR. – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 531 Judge Name: cognizable; (b) No person accused of an offence punishable for a term of imprisonment of more than three years under Part A of the Schedule shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless.” A B C D E F G H 539 22. Subsequently, sub-section (1) was substituted by the Act 20 of 2005 w.e.f Date of decision : 21-04-2023 | Case Number : SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL)/2397/2019 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 17 | SANJAY RAGHUNATH AGARWAL Vs THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – [2023] 5 S.C.R. 461 Judge Name: V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN,PANKAJ MITHAL A B C D E F G H 461[2023] 5 S.C.R. 461 461 SANJAY RAGHUNATH AGARWAL v. THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT (Criminal Appeal No. 1198 of 2023) APRIL 20, 2023 [V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND PANKAJ MITHAL, JJ.] bail – A criminal complaint u/ss. 406, 407, 415 to 420, 120B r/w s.34 IPC was filed Date of decision : 20-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1198/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 18 | CHARAN SINGH @ CHARANJIT SINGH Vs THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 511 Judge Name: ABHAY S. OKA,RAJESH BINDAL allowed. The impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside. The bail bonds stand cancelled. Nidhi Jain Appeal allowed. (Assisted by : Tamana, LCRA) Date of decision : 20-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/447/2012 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 19 | ANSAR AHMAD Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 577 Judge Name: SURYA KANT,J.B. PARDIWALA A B C D E F G H 577 ANSAR AHMAD v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1168 of 2023) APRIL 18, 2023 [SURYA KANT AND J. B. PARDIWALA, JJ.] bail – bail applications filed by two respondents herein in a case crime u/ss.147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 120-B and 34 IPC and ss Date of decision : 18-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1168/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 20 | English தமிழ் – Tamil Disclaimer SOUNDARAJAN Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIGILANCE ANTICORRUPTION DINDIGUL – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 133 Judge Name: ABHAY S. OKA,RAJESH BINDAL . The bail bonds of the appellant stand cancelled. Nidhi Jain Appeal allowed. (Assisted by : Yash Chavan and Tamana, LCRAs) SOUNDARAJAN v. STATE REP. BY THE INSP. OF POLICE VIG. ANTICORRUPTION DINDIGUL [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] Date of decision : 17-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1592/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 21 | English বাংলা – Bengali Disclaimer M/s SRI MAHAVIR AGENCY & ANR. Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 126 Judge Name: ABHAY S. OKA,RAJESH BINDAL pointed out at the time of hearing that any such action was taken. 17. In view of the aforesaid reasons, the appeal is allowed. Impugned judgment and final order of the High Court is set aside. bail bonds of the appellant stand discharged. Nidhi Jain Appeal allowed. (Assisted by : Mayank Batra and Tamana, LCRAs) Date of decision : 17-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/982/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 22 | English ગુજરાતી – Gujarati Disclaimer CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs SANTOSH KARNANI & ANR – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 476 Judge Name: SURYA KANT,J.K. MAHESHWARI , he along with the staff members physically assaulted the ACB team and escaped the office – FIR was registered u/ss. 7, 13(1) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Respondent preferred an application for grant of anticipatory bail before the Special Judge, which was rejected Date of decision : 17-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1148/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 23 | English ਪੰਜਾਬੀ – Punjabi Disclaimer B. S. HARI COMMANDANT Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 431 Judge Name: KRISHNA MURARI,AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH his trial and the impugned order therein, as also seeking directions to quash all consequential orders and to release the pensionary and other benefits to the appellant. 15. On 19.09.1997 [1997 SCC OnLine P&H 1176], the appellant was granted bail by the High Court and he remained on bail w.e.f Date of decision : 13-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1890/2014 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 24 | KEKHRIESATUO TEP ETC. Vs NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 523 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,SANJAY KAROL A B C D E F G H 523[2023] 3 S.C.R. 523 523 KEKHRIESATUO TEP ETC. v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY (Criminal Appeal Nos. 415-417 of 2019) APRIL 12, 2023 [B. R. GAVAI AND SANJAY KAROL, JJ.] Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 – ss. 39, 40, 43D(5) – bail under –Special Judge Date of decision : 12-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/415/2019 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 25 | English ગુજરાતી – Gujarati Disclaimer QAMAR GHANI USMANI Vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 824 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR A B C D E F G H 824 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 2 S.C.R.[2023] 2 S.C.R. 824 824 QAMAR GHANI USMANI v. THE STATE OF GUJARAT (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1045-1046 of 2023) APRIL 10, 2023 [M. R. SHAH AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 167(2) – Default bail Date of decision : 10-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1045/2023 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 26 | English বাংলা – Bengali Disclaimer CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs VIKAS MISHRA @ VIKASH MISHRA – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 321 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR A B C D E F G H 321[2023] 3 S.C.R. 321 321 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. VIKAS MISHRA @ VIKASH MISHRA (Criminal Appeal No. 957 of 2023) APRIL 10, 2023 [M. R. SHAH AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 167(2) – Application for default bail Date of decision : 10-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/957/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 27 | PRAMOD SINGLA Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 793 Judge Name: KRISHNA MURARI,V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN 20.11.2021, the appellant along with other members of the syndicate was arrested by the officers of respondent no.4 authority, whereupon they were produced before the Ld. CMM, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi and were subsequently remanded to judicial custody. 9. The appellant then sought for bail before Date of decision : 10-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1051/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 28 | BALU SUDAM KHALDE & ANR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – [2023] 6 S.C.R. 851 Judge Name: SUDHANSHU DHULIA,J.B. PARDIWALA indicate that both the appellants herein were ordered to be released on bail pending the final hearing of the present appeal. The appellant No.2 was ordered to be released on bail vide order dated 01.10.2010 and the appellant No. 1 herein was ordered to be released on bail vide order dated Date of decision : 29-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1910/2010 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 29 | MOHD MUSLIM @ HUSSAIN Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 697 Judge Name: S. RAVINDRA BHAT,DIPANKAR DATTA accused of committing offences punishable under NDPS Act has been in custody since 2015, if entitled to bail – Held: Recovery of ganja was made from the four co-accused – Appellant was arrested at the behest, and on the statement of one of the co-accused – Prosecution relied on that statement, as Date of decision : 28-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/943/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 30 | ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Vs KAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR. ETC – [2023] 5 S.C.R. 918 Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,HRISHIKESH ROY,B.V. NAGARATHNA . 167(2) proviso (a) (ii) – Default bail – Claim for – 60/90 day period of remand under proviso (a) to s. 167(2) – Computation of – Day on which the Magistrate orders remand to be included or excluded – Held: s. 167(2) pertains to the power of the Magistrate to remand an accused and there is no Date of decision : 27-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/701/2020 | Disposal Nature : Reference answered |
| 31 | English ગુજરાતી – Gujarati ਪੰਜਾਬੀ – Punjabi Disclaimer AVTAR SINGH & ANR. Vs STATE OF PUNJAB – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 639 Judge Name: . 562-SB of 1997 dated January 15, 2010 and the order dated 08.07.1997 passed by the Trial Court are set aside. As a consequence, the conviction and sentence of the appellants under Section 7 of the Act is set aside. The bail bond stands discharged. Nidhi Jain Appeal allowed. AVTAR SINGH & ANR. v. STATE OF PUNJAB [RAJESH BINDAL, J.] Date of decision : 23-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1711/2011 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 32 | UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs PARASHOTAM DASS – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 598 Judge Name: SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,ABHAY S. OKA,B.V. NAGARATHNA the order appealed against. (3) Pending any appeal under sub-section (2), the Supreme Court may order that- (a) the execution of the punishment or the order appealed against be suspended; or (b) if the appellant is in confinement, he be released on bail : UNION OF INDIA & ORS. v. PARASHOTAM Date of decision : 21-03-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/447/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 33 | SUNDAR @ SUNDARRAJAN Vs STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE – [2023] 5 S.C.R. 1016 Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,HIMA KOHLI,PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA court, through evidence, that the probability is that the convict cannot be reformed or rehabilitated. This can be achieved by bringing on record, inter alia, material about his conduct in jail, his conduct outside jail if he has been on bail for some time, medical evidence about his mental make Date of decision : 21-03-2023 | Case Number : REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL)/159/2013 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 34 | English ಕನ್ನಡ – Kannada Disclaimer SEEMANT KUMAR SINGH Vs MAHESH PS & ORS. – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 587 Judge Name: KRISHNA MURARI,AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH A B C D E F G H 587 SEEMANT KUMAR SINGH v. MAHESH PS & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 872 of 2023) MARCH 21, 2023 [KRISHNA MURARI AND AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, JJ.] bail – Adverse remarks – Expunction of – During the pendency of bail proceedings of respondent no.1, the High Court made Date of decision : 21-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/872/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 35 | AFJAL ALI SHA @ ABJAL SHAUKAT SHA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 1090 Judge Name: SURYA KANT,J.K. MAHESHWARI security; (vi) De-facto complainant to be cross examined by the Special Public Prosecutor; (vii) Respondent no.2 or any other accused who are in custody to be transferred to Central Jail at Calcutta; (viii) Respondent no.2 not to be enlarged on bail till the conclusion of trial save and except by Date of decision : 17-03-2023 | Case Number : TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL)/409/2021 | Disposal Nature : Directions issued |
| 36 | English मराठी – Marathi Disclaimer MS. X Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 1112 Judge Name: A.S. BOPANNA,HIMA KOHLI . 354,354-B, 376 and 506 – Anticipatory bail – Cancellation of – A complaint filed by the appellant- prosecutrix, against the respondent No.2-accused, who lured her under the garb of offering some modelling assignments, raped her in a hotel room where she was staying – Initially, the FIR was registered Date of decision : 17-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/822/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 37 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer BHASIN INFOTECH AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD. Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 1053 Judge Name: DINESH MAHESHWARI,J.K. MAHESHWARI the prayer in A B C D E F G H 1075 the said writ petition, inter alia, for consolidation of investigation and trial against him. While entertaining that writ petition, this Court, by the order dated 06.11.2019, granted the concession of bail to the petitioner in relation to all the FIRs Date of decision : 17-03-2023 | Case Number : TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL)/82/2022 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 38 | NEERAJ DUTTA Vs STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 997 Judge Name: ABHAY S. OKA,RAJESH BINDAL consequently, the offence under Section 13(1)(d) will not be attracted. 20. Hence, the appeal must succeed. We set aside the impugned judgment and the judgment of the Special Court and set aside the conviction and sentence of the appellant. The bail bonds of the appellant stand cancelled. Appeal is allowed. Nidhi Jain Appeal allowed. (Assisted by : Yash Chavan and Tamana, LCRAs) NEERAJ DUTTA v. STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] Date of decision : 17-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1669/2009 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 39 | English ಕನ್ನಡ – Kannada Disclaimer RAVASAHEB @ RAVASAHEBGOUDA ETC. Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 965 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,VIKRAM NATH,SANJAY KAROL this regard. 27. In view of the aforesaid background, submissions advanced, law appreciated and analysed we find the present appeals to be lacking in merit and therefore, the same are dismissed. Accused, if on bail , are directed to immediately surrender before the Court concerned. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. Ankit Gyan Appeals dismissed. (Assisted by : Aarsh Choudhary, LCRA) Date of decision : 16-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1109/2010 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 40 | GUNA MAHTO Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 782 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,SANJAY KAROL by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in Criminal Appeal No.214 of 2001 dated 23.7.2004 titled as Guna Mahto v. State of Jharkhand needs to be interfered with. A B C D E F G H 789 21. We set-aside the orders passed by both the courts below. Since the appellant is already on bail Date of decision : 16-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/108/2012 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 41 | SHANKAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 661 Judge Name: AJAY RASTOGI,C.T. RAVIKUMAR are thus allowed, upsetting the judgments and orders of the High Court as also that of the court of Session. The bail bonds executed by the appellants stand discharged. Nidhi Jain Appeals allowed. (Assisted by : George J. and Rakhi, LCRAs) SHANKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [C. T. RAVIKUMAR, J.] Date of decision : 15-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/954/2011 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 42 | PAWAN KUMAR CHOURASIA Vs STATE OF BIHAR – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 875 Judge Name: ABHAY S. OKA,RAJESH BINDAL conviction of the appellant cannot be sustained at all. Accordingly, the impugned judgments are set aside and the appellant is acquitted of the offences alleged against him. The bail bonds of the appellant stand cancelled. The appeal is allowed. Divya Pandey Appeal allowed. (Assisted by : Sanika Thakare and Shevali Monga, LCRAs) Date of decision : 14-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/2230/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 43 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer KARAN @ FATIYA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 587 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,VIKRAM NATH,SANJAY KAROL as the appellant therein had already undergone almost six years’ incarceration but had been released on bail , the bail bonds were discharged and all proceedings against the appellant were declared to have terminated. 27. In the aforesaid case, the appellant had not taken the plea of juvenility Date of decision : 03-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/572/2019 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed |
| 44 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer RAVI DHINGRA Vs THE STATE OF HARYANA – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 164 Judge Name: SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,B.V. NAGARATHNA this Court by filing their respective Special Leave Petitions, in which leave has been granted and are now considered Criminal Appeals. On 11.05.2009, this Court noted that the appellants had served seven years in prison and could be granted bail on the satisfaction of the Trial Court of Date of decision : 01-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/987/2009 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed |
| 45 | IMTIYAZ AHMAD MALLA Vs THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 165 Judge Name: AJAY RASTOGI,BELA M. TRIVEDI Police District Headquarter, Handwara, for cancellation of the selection of the petitioner. During the course of inquiry,a summary of allegations and charge-sheet were served to the petitioner. It was alleged that in the said criminal case, the petitioner was released on bail after four days of his Date of decision : 28-02-2023 | Case Number : SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)/678/2021 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 46 | THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Vs M. GOPAL REDDY & ANR – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 79 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR , CrPC – Held: Once the prayer for anticipatory bail is made in connection with offence under the 2002 Act, the underlying principles and rigours of s.45 must get triggered, although the application is u/s.438, CrPC – In the present case, once the enquiry/investigation against respondent No. 1 Date of decision : 24-02-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/534/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 47 | ANANT THANUR KARMUSE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 56 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR disposed of by the respective learned Courts. It is further submitted that in a case filed by a lady, accused No. 13 has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Court and the lady who registered the FIR against accused No. 13 is herself facing an FIR under IPC and POCSO Act. It is submitted Date of decision : 24-02-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/13/2023 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed |
| 48 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer MUNNA LAL Vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – [2023] 3 S.C.R. 224 Judge Name: S. RAVINDRA BHAT,DIPANKAR DATTA on consideration of the materials on record, the High Court concurred with the findings returned by the Sessions Judge and observed that there was no sufficient ground to interfere. While dismissing the said appeal, the High Court directed Munna Lal and Sheo Lal, who were on bail , to surrender Date of decision : 24-01-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/490/2017 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 49 | TALAT SANVI Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. – [2023] 1 S.C.R. 289 Judge Name: SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,ABHAY S. OKA A B C D E F G H 289 289 TALAT SANVI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 205 of 2023) JANUARY 24, 2023 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND ABHAY S. OKA, JJ.] Victim compensation: Interim victim compensation in proceedings for anticipatory bail cannot be imposed as a condition Date of decision : 24-01-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/205/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 50 | English తెలుగు – Telugu Disclaimer THE STATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs T. GANGI REDDY @ YERRA GANGI REDDY – [2023] 1 S.C.R. 741 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR A B C D E F G H 741 741 THE STATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. T. GANGI REDDY @ YERRA GANGI REDDY (Criminal Appeal No. 37 of 2023) JANUARY 16, 2023 [M. R. SHAH AND C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : s. 167(2) – Default bail – Cancellation of, on Date of decision : 16-01-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/37/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 51 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer BIMLA TIWARI Vs STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. – [2023] 1 S.C.R. 501 Judge Name: DINESH MAHESHWARI,HRISHIKESH ROY A B C D E F G H 501 501 BIMLA TIWARI v. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. (SLP (Criminal) No. 834 – 835 of 2023) JANUARY 16, 2023 [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND HRISHIKESH ROY, JJ.] bail – Pre-arrest bail and regular bail – Grant of – Considerations – Held: The process of criminal law cannot be Date of decision : 16-01-2023 | Case Number : SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL)/834/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 52 | MOHINDER PAL AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF J & K – [2023] 1 S.C.R. 375 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,M.M. SUNDRESH , find that the sentence already undergone would serve the purpose. The bail bonds of the appellants shall stand discharged. 22. The appeal is partly allowed in the above terms. Bibhuti Bhushan Bose Appeal partly allowed. (Assisted by : Shubhanshu Das, LCRA) Date of decision : 12-01-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1863/2010 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed |
| 53 | PRAKASH NAYI @ SEN Vs STATE OF GOA – [2023] 1 S.C.R. 823 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,M.M. SUNDRESH one meant for schizophrenia. Accordingly, he was prescribed the medicine ‘Thioril’. 23. Before the Court of Sessions, an application under Section 329 of Cr.P.C. was filed on behalf of the appellant. Even while considering the application for bail , the Court noticed the inability of the appellant Date of decision : 12-01-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/2010/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 54 | BOBY Vs STATE OF KERALA – [2023] 1 S.C.R. 335 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,M.M. SUNDRESH . The appellant is acquitted of all the charges charged with. The bail bonds of the accused shall stand discharged. 37. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Bibhuti Bhushan Bose Appeal allowed. (Assisted by : Shevali Monga, LCRA) Date of decision : 12-01-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1439/2009 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 55 | THE STATE OF GUJARAT Vs SANDIP OMPRAKASH GUPTA – [2022] 17 S.C.R. 765 Judge Name: S. ABDUL NAZEER,J.B. PARDIWALA , in respect of which activity more than one chargesheets have been filed before a competent court within the preceding period of ten years and the Court has taken cognizance of such offence. [Para 24][782-D-E] 2. The considerations which normally weigh with the Court in granting bail in non Date of decision : 15-12-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/2291/2022 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 56 | T.P. GOPALAKRISHNAN Vs STATE OF KERALA – [2022] 14 S.C.R. 478 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,B.V. NAGARATHNA . 4. The appellant herein was released on bail vide order of this Court dated 30.01.2017 subject to fulfilment of the conditions imposed by the Trial Court. Facts of the Case: 5. Succinctly stated, the case of the prosecution in C.C. No. 24 of 2003 is that while the accused was working as Date of decision : 08-12-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/187/2017 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 57 | RATNAMBAR KAUSHIK Vs UNION OF INDIA – [2022] 18 S.C.R. 326 Judge Name: A.S. BOPANNA,HIMA KOHLI A B C D E F G H 326 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 18 S.C.R. 326 RATNAMBAR KAUSHIK v. UNION OF INDIA (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No. 10319 of 2022) DECEMBER 05, 2022 [A. S. BOPANNA AND HIMA KOHLI, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 439 – Grant of bail Date of decision : 05-12-2022 | Case Number : SPECIAL LEAVE TO PETITION (CRIMINAL)…/10319/2022 | Disposal Nature : Case Allowed |
| 58 | CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs P.S. JAYAPRAKASH ETC. ETC. – [2022] 16 S.C.R. 635 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR A B C D E F G H 635[2022] 16 S.C.R. 635 635 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. P.S. JAYAPRAKASH ETC. ETC. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 2147-2149 of 2022) DECEMBER 02, 2022 [M. R. SHAH AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Anticipatory bail : High Court granted anticipatory bail to private respondents Date of decision : 02-12-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/2147/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed | Direction Issue : Appeals allowed and matters remitted to High Court. |
| 59 | V. P. SINGH ETC Vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. – [2022] 8 S.C.R. 847 Judge Name: SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,ABHAY S. OKA Penal Code (IPC) on the complaint that the said suicide was instigated by the three accused i.e. the teacher, the Head of the Department and the Principal. It is interesting to note that on the bail application on 06.8.2008, one of the factors which weighed with the High Court while granting Date of decision : 24-11-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/2103/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 60 | NANDINI SHARMA AND ANR. Vs REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND ORS. – [2022] 9 S.C.R. 760 Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,HRISHIKESH ROY to any proceedings in the Court and as to the fees to be charged in respect of proceeding therein; (g) rules as to the granting of bail ; (h) rules as to stay of proceedings; (i) rules providing for the summary determination of any appeal which appears to the Court to be frivolous or vexatious Date of decision : 16-11-2022 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/1087/2022 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 61 | MR. VINAY PRAKASH SINGH Vs SAMEER GEHLAUT & ORS. IN THE MATTER OF:- SHIVINDER MOHAN SINGH – [2022] 8 S.C.R. 660 Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,HRISHIKESH ROY 2018 from 03.02.2020 itself when he was brought from Jail No.7, Tihar Jail, New Delhi to this Court. It is further stated that the applicant had never applied for bail after 03.02.2020 and he thus has been in continuous custody of this Court. Thereafter the cause for moving the present application Date of decision : 14-11-2022 | Case Number : MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION/1902/2022 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 62 | BHURI BAI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2022] 10 S.C.R. 190 Judge Name: DINESH MAHESHWARI,SUDHANSHU DHULIA A B C D E F G H 190 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 10 S.C.R. BHURI BAI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No.1972 of 2022) NOVEMBER 11, 2022 [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND SUDHANSHU DHULIA, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 439(2) – Cancellation of bail – Power of – Held Date of decision : 11-11-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1972/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 63 | GIREESAN NAIR & ORS. ETC. Vs STATE OF KERALA – [2022] 8 S.C.R. 599 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA , 147, 148 IPC and 3(2)(e) A B C D E F G H 627 of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984 r/w Section149 of the IPC. iii. The Appellants are acquitted of all the charges, and their bail bonds, if any, stand discharged.Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand Date of decision : 11-11-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1864/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 64 | THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Vs DR. MAROTI S/O KASHINATH PIMPALKAR – [2022] 8 S.C.R. 821 Judge Name: AJAY RASTOGI,C.T. RAVIKUMAR . 6 in the aforesaid crime. 6. Apprehending arrest in connection with the said crime, the respondent herein filed an anticipatory bail application before the Ld. Sessions Judge on 10.06.2019 and the same was rejected on 25.06.2019. The said order was challenged before the High Court and the High Date of decision : 02-11-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1874/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 65 | SUMITHA PRADEEP Vs ARUN KUMAR C.K & ANR. – [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1012 Judge Name: SURYA KANT,J.B. PARDIWALA A B C D E F G H 1012 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 14 S.C.R. SUMITHA PRADEEP v. ARUN KUMAR C.K & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1834 of 2022) OCTOBER 21, 2022 [SURYA KANT AND J. B. PARDIWALA, JJ.] Anticipatory bail : Case filed against respondent no.1 under ss.354(1)(i), (ii) and (iv Date of decision : 21-10-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1834/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 66 | MD. JABBAR ALI & ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM – [2022] 15 S.C.R. 773 Judge Name: AJAY RASTOGI,B.V. NAGARATHNA . Currently, all the accused-appellants are on bail . accused No.4 and accused No.10 were granted bail vide order of this Court dated 18.08.2017; accused No.11 was granted bail by order dated 03.04.2017 and the accused Nos.2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 were granted bail vide order dated 25.10.2010. 10 Date of decision : 17-10-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1105/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 67 | English हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer DEVENDRA NATH SINGH Vs STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. – [2022] 15 S.C.R. 692 Judge Name: DINESH MAHESHWARI,ANIRUDDHA BOSE had been as regards dealing with a bail application, which were not approved by this Court while observing, inter alia, as under: – “15. In our considered opinion, the High Court had no jurisdiction to direct the Sessions Judge to “allow” the application for grant of bail . Indeed, once such Date of decision : 12-10-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1768/2022 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 68 | GALI JANARDHAN REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – [2022] 15 S.C.R. 656 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,KRISHNA MURARI A B C D E F G H 656 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 15 S.C.R. GALI JANARDHAN REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Misc. Application No. 528 of 2020) In (SLP (Criminal) No. 7053 of 2013) OCTOBER 10, 2022 [M. R. SHAH AND KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.] bail – Applicant sought modification of Date of decision : 10-10-2022 | Case Number : MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION/528/2020 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 69 | SUSHANTA KUMAR BANIK Vs STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 484 Judge Name: UDAY UMESH LALIT,S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J.B. PARDIWALA passing the detention order and consequently render the detention order bad and invalid – Furthermore, the vital fact that the appellant detenu had been released on bail despite the rigours of s. 37 of the NDPS Act, was not brought to the notice and was withheld and the detaining authority was Date of decision : 30-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1708/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 70 | AJWAR Vs NIYAJ AHMAD & ANR. – [2022] 7 S.C.R. 356 Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,HIMA KOHLI A B C D E F G H 356 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. AJWAR v. NIYAJ AHMAD & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1722 of 2022) SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 [DR DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND HIMA KOHLI, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss. 161, 482, 173 – bail – When not granted – FIR was Date of decision : 30-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1722/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 71 | BOHATTI DEVI Vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. – [2022] 7 S.C.R. 283 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,KRISHNA MURARI A B C D E F G H 283 BOHATTI DEVI v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1695 of 2022) SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 [M. R. SHAH AND KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss.302, 120B – bail – Respondent no.2- accused granted bail by High Court – On appeal, held : No Date of decision : 30-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1695/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 72 | MUNIKRISHNA @ KRISHNA ETC. Vs STATE BY ULSOOR PS – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 415 Judge Name: UDAY UMESH LALIT,S. RAVINDRA BHAT,SUDHANSHU DHULIA that the approach at certain stages including the stage of considering the bail application may be qualitatively different. At the stage of consideration of bail , the primary concern is to weigh in balance the liberty of an accused and the possible prejudice that may get visited upon the societal Date of decision : 30-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1597/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 73 | SATISH CHANDRA YADAV Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS – [2022] 10 S.C.R. 537 Judge Name: SURYA KANT,J.B. PARDIWALA /506 IPC. Admittedly, the Petitioner got bail in the above Criminal case which was for cognizable offences. It is not therefore the case where the time of filing up of the verification form-25 the Petitioner was not aware of the pendency of the Criminal case against him. x Date of decision : 26-09-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/6955/2022 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 74 | JIGAR @ JIMMY PRAVINCHANDRA ADATIYA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 367 Judge Name: AJAY RASTOGI,ABHAY S. OKA (2) – Proviso added by the 2015 Act to sub-section (2) of s.167, CrPC – Interpretation of. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.167(2) – Default bail – The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015 – s.20(2) – Order of extension passed in exercise of power under the proviso to Date of decision : 23-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1656/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 75 | AMINUDDIN Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. – [2022] 19 S.C.R. 271 Judge Name: DINESH MAHESHWARI,KRISHNA MURARI A B C D E F G H 271 AMINUDDIN v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1669 of 2022) SEPTEMBER 23, 2022 [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.] bail – Grant of, on parity – When not justified – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.147, 148, 149, 302, 352 and 34 – Held: When the Date of decision : 23-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1669/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 76 | YASHPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR – [2022] 4 S.C.R. 835 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,KRISHNA MURARI A B C D E F G H 835 YASHPAL SINGH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1509 of 2022) SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 [M. R. SHAH AND KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.] bail – Cancellation of – Allegedly a land dispute was going on between respondent no.2-original accused and original Date of decision : 15-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1509/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 77 | VINOD KATARA Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – [2022] 9 S.C.R. 836 Judge Name: DINESH MAHESHWARI,J.B. PARDIWALA B C D E F G H 852 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 9 S.C.R. in excess of three years, which is the maximum for a juvenile, we deem it appropriate to grant the petitioner interim bail on such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Sessions Court. We further direct the Sessions Court to Date of decision : 12-09-2022 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL)/121/2022 | Disposal Nature : Directions issued |
| 78 | JOSEPH JOHNSON N. MAITHKURI Vs SUBRAHMANYA & ANOTHER – [2022] 7 S.C.R. 505 Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,KRISHNA MURARI A B C D E F G H 505 JOSEPH JOHNSON N. MAITHKURI v. SUBRAHMANYA & ANOTHER (Criminal Appeal No. 1439 of 2022) SEPTEMBER 09, 2022 [M. R. SHAH AND KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.] bail – Cancellation of – High Court granted bail to accused persons – Original complainant has preferred appeal before Date of decision : 09-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1439/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 79 | RASHIDUL JAFAR @ CHOTA Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR – [2022] 8 S.C.R. 475 Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,HIMA KOHLI High Court; (iv) The period of imprisonment undergone: (a) Without remission; and (b) With remission; (v) Whether the petitioners are on bail ; and (vi) The current status of the application for premature release. 14. Such a statement has been shared by counsel for the petitioners and has Date of decision : 06-09-2022 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL)/336/2019 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off |
| 80 | XYZ Vs ABHISHEIK & ANR – [2022] 14 S.C.R. 420 Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,HIMA KOHLI the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Satna3. The first respondent took the plea that he was a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 20004 on the date of the alleged offence. The counsel appearing on his behalf filed an application for bail , together with a Date of decision : 02-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1408/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 81 | MUNUWA @ SATISH ETC. Vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – [2022] 12 S.C.R. 86 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA A-3. The Trial Court further discarded the contradictions that surfaced by the improvements in the statements of eye-witnesses PW-1 and PW-6 during cross-examination, noting that they were a result of intimidation by the accused persons who were on bail at the time of recording of evidence. It Date of decision : 26-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/2224/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 82 | ZAKIR ABDUL MIRAJKAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. – [2022] 9 S.C.R. 150 Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,SURYA KANT jurisdiction of this court under Article 136 of the Constitution. Rajendra Dave, filed SLP (Criminal) No. 6034 of 2022 to challenge an order of aSingle Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 11 August 2021 declining bail in connection with the same FIR for the following reasons: ZAKIR ABDUL MIRAJKAR v. THE Date of decision : 24-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1125/2022 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed |
| 83 | RAJBIR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB – [2022] 11 S.C.R. 80 Judge Name: HEMANT GUPTA,VIKRAM NATH appellant deserves to be extended benefit of doubt. The judgments of the High Court and the Trial Court are set aside, the appellant is acquitted. He is already on bail . His bail bond is cancelled and sureties are discharged. [Paras 18, 47- 49][101-A-D] Case Law Reference [1985] 1 SCR 88 relied Date of decision : 24-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/2152/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 84 | PUSHPENDRA KUMAR SINHA Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND – [2022] 11 S.C.R. 25 Judge Name: N.V. RAMANA,J.K. MAHESHWARI,HIMA KOHLI bail to the Appellant on merits, it was categorically observed by the High Court that the Appellant had put up the matter before higher authorities for instructions before proceeding further and did not act unilaterally; PUSHPENDRA KUMAR SINHA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND [J. K. MAHESHWARI, J.] A Date of decision : 24-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1333/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 85 | MAKHAN SINGH Vs THE STATE OF HARYANA – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 357 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA Case No. 55 of 1998 are quashed and set aside; (iii) The appellant is acquitted of all the charges charged with and his bail bonds shall stand discharged. 23. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of in the above terms. Ankit Gyan Appeal allowed. Date of decision : 16-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1290/2010 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 86 | RAM NIWAS Vs STATE OF HARYANA – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 138 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA all the charges charged with. The bail bonds shall stand discharged. 23. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. Ankit Gyan Appeal allowed. RAM NIWAS v. STATE OF HARYANA [B. R. GAVAI, J.] Date of decision : 11-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/25/2012 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 87 | KHEMA @ KHEM CHANDRA ETC. Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 21 Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA with. Deepi, who has been enlarged on bail , shall have his bail bonds cancelled, while the rest of the accused are directed to be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in any other case. A B C D E F G H 33 31. Pending application(s), if any, including application for bail , shall Date of decision : 10-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1200/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 88 | JANABAI WD/O DINKARRAO GHORPADE & ORS. Vs M/S. I.C.I.C.I. LAMBORD INSURANCE COMPANY LTD – [2022] 6 S.C.R. 1041 Judge Name: HEMANT GUPTA,VIKRAM NATH admitted that, he had not filed any proceeding to quash the FIR against Sanjay. He further deposed that he had taken bail of Sanjay in the said crime. The bail Application and surety and 7/12 extract are at Exhs.68, 69 and 70. It is to be noted that, in the examination-in-chief, Chudaman Patil has Date of decision : 10-08-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5220/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 89 | MEHMOOD PRACHA Vs CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – [2022] 7 S.C.R. 20 Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,HRISHIKESH ROY , the Court may direct that a person charged with contempt under this section shall be detained in such custody as it may specify: Provided that he shall be released on bail , if a bond for such sum of money as the Court thinks sufficient is executed with or without sureties conditioned that the Date of decision : 10-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/892/2020 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 90 | VARSHA GARG Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 150 Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,A.S. BOPANNA where: a. It is an abuse of the process of the Court; or b. The prosecution‘s evidence was closed long back. (v) The prosecution‘s evidence was closed long back; (vi) The reasons for non-examination of the witnesses earlier are not satisfactory; (vii) The accused had been denied bail and are Date of decision : 08-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1021/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 91 | JAI PRAKASH TIWARI Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2022] 10 S.C.R. 198 Judge Name: N.V. RAMANA,KRISHNA MURARI,HIMA KOHLI sentence and was released on bail by this Court during the pendency of the present appeal. JAI PRAKASH TIWARI v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH A B C D E F G H 204 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 10 S.C.R. 3. The factual matrix as per the prosecution is that, on 14.02.2003 at about 10:30 p.m., the Date of decision : 04-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/704/2018 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed |
| 92 | HONNAIAH T.H. Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS – [2022] 6 S.C.R. 1108 Judge Name: D.Y. |
This post first appeared on Jabalpur Advocate: Best Jabalpur Advocate Top Jabalpur Lawyer High Court DRT, please read the originial post: here
