Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>
Idioma: En

Jabalpur Judgments Supreme Court of India

Jabalpur Judgments Supreme Court of India

1  English           हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer
SANJAY DUBEY Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 939
Judge Name: KRISHNA MURARI,AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
, Principal Seat at jabalpur in MCRC No. 43998 of 2022. A B C D E F G H 941 Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv., Awanish Kumar, Siddharth Kumar Sharma, S. K. Pandey, Chandrashekhar A. Chakalabbi, Anshul Rai, M/ s. Dharmaprabhas Law Associates, Advs. for the Appellant. Mukul Singh, A.A.G., Mrinal Gopal to as the “Impugned Judgment”) rendered by a learned Single Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur (hereinafter referred to as the “High Court”) in MCRC No. 43998 of 2022, in which a finding, albeit prima facie, of being guilty of dereliction of duty against the appellant has
Date of decision : 11-05-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1466/2023 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed
2  English           हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs PHOOLCHAND RATHORE – [2023] 5 S.C.R. 601
Judge Name: SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,MANOJ MISRA,ARAVIND KUMAR
JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal Nos.1315-1316 of 2023. From the Judgment and Order dated 11.12.2015 of the High Court of M.P. Principal Seat at jabalpur in CRLR Nos.1292 and 02 of 2015. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, Mrs. Anuradha Mishra, Vikas Bansal, Advs. for the Appellant. Yashraj Singh Deora (Amicus Curiae), Abhishek Singh, Adv. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MANOJ MISRA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the judgement and order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur (for short “the High Court”) dated
Date of decision : 28-04-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1315/2023 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed
3  English           हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer
ISOLATORS AND ISOLATORS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MRS. SANDHYA MISHRA Vs MADHYA PRADESH MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD. AND ANR – [2023] 4 S.C.R. 445
Judge Name: DINESH MAHESHWARI,SANJAY KUMAR
2023. From the Judgment and Order dated 23.04.2021 in WP No.12075 of 2020 and dated 13.12.2021 in RP No.894 of 2021 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Seat at jabalpur . Vinay Navare, Sr. Adv., R. M. Sharma, Prashant R Dahat, T. R. B. Sivakumar, Advs. for the Appellant. Bharat Singh jabalpur in Writ Petition No. 12075 of 2020 whereby the High Court partly allowed the writ petition and while maintaining the order of debarment as passed against the appellant, modified its term of operation by making the same effective from 13.02.2020 for a period of three years, instead of being
Date of decision : 18-04-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2890/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
4ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Vs KAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR. ETC – [2023] 5 S.C.R. 918
Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,HRISHIKESH ROY,B.V. NAGARATHNA
1; Olmstead vs. US, 277 US 438 (1928); ADM jabalpur vs. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521 : [1976] 0 Suppl. SCR 172; K.S. Puttaswamy Vs. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1 : [2017] 10 SCR 569; Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1876); Kharak Singh vs. State of UP (1964) 1 SCR 332; Francis Corallie liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” 45. The above passage was approvingly quoted by Justice HR Khanna in his dissenting opinion in ADM jabalpur .37 It hardly needs to be emphasized that the question of default Bail is inextricably linked to
Date of decision : 27-03-2023 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/701/2020 | Disposal Nature : Reference answered
5RAJENDRA KUMAR SHRIVAS Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & OTHERS – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 219
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR
and Order dated 23.02.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at jabalpur in WP No. 3190 of 2018. Santosh Paul, Sr. Adv., Sriharsh N. Bundela, Akshay Kumar, Maithreya Shetty, Dr. Ashutosh Garg, Advs. for the Appellant. Mrs. Swarupama Chaturvedi, AAG, Mrinal Gopal Elker, Mrs, Principal Seat at jabalpur in Writ Petition No. 3190/2018, by which the High Court has dismissed the said writ petition by holding that the original writ petitioners are not entitled to seek a writ of quo warranto, the: original writ petitioner No.1 has preferred the present appeal. 2. Before the
Date of decision : 13-03-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1514/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off
6BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs BONNIE FOI LAW COLLEGE & ORS. – [2023] 2 S.C.R. 343
Judge Name: SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,SANJIV KHANNA,ABHAY S. OKA,VIKRAM NATH,J.K. MAHESHWARI
Judgment and Order dated 17.03.2008 of the High Court of M.P. Principat Seat at jabalpur in WP No.13698 of 2007. With W.P. (C) No.25 of 2021, T.C. (C) Nos.16, 12, 13, 36, 14, 15 of 2011, T.C. (C) Nos.75, 88 of 2012, W.P. (C) No.987 of 2013, T.P. (C) No.692 of 2015, T.C. (C) No.8 Of 2012 And T.C. (C
Date of decision : 10-02-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/969/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off
7  English           हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer
GAS POINT PETROLEUM INDIA LTD. Vs RAJENDRA MAROTHI & ORS. – [2023] 1 S.C.R. 433
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR
(1955) 1 SCR 108 relied on Para 8.1 (2009) 17 SCC 690 relied on Para 8.2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 619 of 2023. From the Judgment and Order dated 29.04.2016 of the High Court of M.P. Principal Seat at jabalpur in WP No.3342 of 2015. Ravindra Shrivastava, Sr. Adv., Arjun Garg aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 29.04.2016 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Seat at jabalpur in W.P. No. 3342/2015, by which, the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred by respondent No. 1 herein and has set aside the order
Date of decision : 10-02-2023 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/619/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
8NEPA LIMITED THROUGH ITS SENIOR MANAGER (LEGAL) Vs MANOJ KUMAR AGRAWAL – [2022] 14 S.C.R. 446
Judge Name: SANJIV KHANNA,SUDHANSHU DHULIA
] 3 Suppl. SCR 421 referred to Para 23 [2014] 14 SCR 1029 referred to Para 24 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3984 of 2019. From the Judgment and Order dated 19.06.2017 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Civil Revision Petition No. 368 of 2012. Sumeer Sodhi, Aman computed on the basis of the order passed by the executing court quantifying the decree amount as Rs. 3,97,382/- and included interest payable on the said amount. 13. Aggrieved, the respondent preferred a civil revision before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur , which had been allowed by
Date of decision : 08-12-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/3984/2019 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
9PRAMOD SINGH KIRAR Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. – [2022] 15 S.C.R. 841
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,C.T. RAVIKUMAR
04.02.2022 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Main Seat jabalpur in WA No.723/ 2018 & RP No. 672/2021. S. K. Gangele, Sr. Adv., Ms. Priya Sharma, Prathvi Raj Chauhan, Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Ankita Chaudhry, Dy. AG, Ankit Mishra, Sunny Choudhry, Shreyas Balaji, Advs. for the Respondents. A B C D E F G H 843 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with impugned judgment(s) and order(s) dated 10.02.2020 and 04.02.2022 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur
Date of decision : 02-12-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/8934/2022 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed
10M. P. POWER MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, JABALPUR Vs M/S. SKY POWER SOUTHEAST SOLAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS – [2022] 5 S.C.R. 1
Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,HRISHIKESH ROY
A B C D E F G H 1[2022] 5 S.C.R. 1 1 M. P. POWER MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, jabalpur v. M/S. SKY POWER SOUTHEAST SOLAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS (C.A. No. 8515-8516 of 2022) NOVEMBER 16, 2022 [K. M. JOSPEH AND HRISHIKESH ROY, JJ.] Electricity Laws – Electricity Act, 2003. [Para 54][51-G; 52- A-B] 8. The existence of a provision for arbitration, which is a forum intended to quicken the pace of dispute resolution, is viewed as a near bar to the entertainment of a Writ Petition. [Para 54][52-C] M. P. POWER MANAGEMENT COMPANY LTD., jabalpur v. M/S. SKY POWER
Date of decision : 16-11-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/8515/2022 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed
11MOHD. FIROZ Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 1027
Judge Name: UDAY UMESH LALIT,S. RAVINDRA BHAT,BELA M. TRIVEDI
Petition (Crl.) No. 282 of 2022 in Criminal Appeal No. 612 of 2019. [From the Judgment and Order dated 15.07.2014 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No.2920 of 2013 and Criminal Reference No. 9 of 2013] B. H. Marlapalle, Sr. Adv., (AC), Ms. Trisha Chandran
Date of decision : 21-10-2022 | Case Number : REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL)/282/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
12SUNITA BURMAN Vs THE COMMISSIONER, M.P. HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND OTHERS – [2022] 14 S.C.R. 973
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,HIMA KOHLI
High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Main Seat at jabalpur in Writ Appeal No. 1600 of 2018. Prathvi Raj Chauhan, Ms. Priya Sharma, Arup Banerjee, Advs. for the Appellant. Saurabh Mishra, AAG, R. C. Mishra, Sr. Adv., Ilin Saraswat, Ms. Ananya Mishra, Mahendra Kumar, Ms. Ilma Saifi, Rajnish Kumar SUNITA. 1. The appellant – widow of Late Munna Lal Burman, is aggrieved by the judgment dated 23rd January, 2020, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at jabalpur in Writ Appeal No. 1600 of 2018 reversing the order dated 06.09.2018, passed by the learned
Date of decision : 14-10-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7068/2022 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed
13KESAR BAI Vs GENDA LAL & ANR. – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 564
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,KRISHNA MURARI
APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7129 of 2022. From the Judgment and Orders dated 02.03.2022 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Second Appeal No. 8 of 1999. Arjun Garg, Shobhit Jain, Aakash Nandolia, Ms. Sagun Srivastava, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, AAG, Sunny Choudhary, Manoj Kumar, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Seat at jabalpur in Second Appeal No. 8 of 1999
Date of decision : 14-10-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7129/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
14THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER Vs M/S COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS AND BODY BUILDING COMPANY LIMITED – [2022] 14 S.C.R. 985
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,KRISHNA MURARI
, jabalpur , which may be available under Section 46(1) of the MP VAT Act, 2002. [Paras 5, 7][987-E-F; 991-F] The State of Maharashtra and Others v. Greatship (India) Limited [2022] 13 SCALE 770; United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon and Others (2010) 8 SCC 110 : [2010] 9 SCR 1 – relied on. Case, Principal Seat at jabalpur in W.P. No. 7628 of 2015. Saurabh Mishra, AAG, Sunny Choudhary, Abhinav Shrivastava, Advs. for the Appellants. Amar Dave, Akshay Sapre, Abhijeet Swaroop, Vinam Gupta, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved
Date of decision : 14-10-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7170/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
15SHIV KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2022] 7 S.C.R. 493
Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,HRISHIKESH ROY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 1503 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 12.03.2019 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 1261 of 2006. Lav Kumar Agrawal, Ms. Jyoti Mishra, Ms. Usha Garg, Rajender Prasad, Shiv Kumar Vats, Advs. for
Date of decision : 07-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1503/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
16THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. Vs M/S. SAMARTH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS & ANR. – [2022] 16 S.C.R. 151
Judge Name: SURYA KANT,ABHAY S. OKA
. N. Modi and Ors. (1998) 3 SCC 573 : [1998] 1 SCR 601 – distinguished. Rukmanibai Gupta v. Collector, jabalpur and Ors. (1980) 4 SCC 556 – relied on. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. and Anr. v. Deepak Cables (India) Ltd. (2014) 11 SCC 148 : [2014] 4 SCR 771 – referred to. Case the arbitration clause. This proposition was settled by this Court way back in Rukmanibai Gupta v. Collector, jabalpur and Ors.4, while viewing erstwhile section 2(a) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 which contained the definition of “arbitration agreement”. It was held that: “6. ……Arbitration
Date of decision : 07-09-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/6272/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
17PUSHPALATA Vs VIJAY KUMAR (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS. – [2022] 18 S.C.R. 85
Judge Name: UDAY UMESH LALIT,S. RAVINDRA BHAT,SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Para 22 [2014] 13 SCR 735 relied on Para 27 [2015] 10 SCR 786 relied on Para 28 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 4078 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 04.04.2013 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in S.A. No.1738 of 2005. Anupam Lal Das, Sr. Adv., Kunal the parties, this matter is heard finally. The present appeal challenges a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court A B C D E F G H 87 at jabalpur , dismissing the petitioners’ second appeal1 and affirming the order and decree passed by the trial court2. Facts and contentions: 2
Date of decision : 05-09-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4078/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
18XYZ Vs ABHISHEIK & ANR – [2022] 14 S.C.R. 420
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,HIMA KOHLI
Madhya Pradesh Principal seat at jabalpur in Criminal Revision No. 278 of 2016 and Misc. Criminal Case No. 5495 of 2016. Aditya K. Dubey, Nitin Singh, Devvrat, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Ankita Choudhary, Dy AG, Suryanarayana Singh, Sr. Adv., Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Ms. Pooja Dhar, Pashupathi
Date of decision : 02-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1408/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
19THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs NANDU @ NANDUA – [2022] 7 S.C.R. 487
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,KRISHNA MURARI
JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 1356 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 17.05.2019 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at jabalpur in CRA No. 219 of 1995. Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, Dy. AG, Gopal Jha, Amit Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 219 of 1995 by which the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal preferred by the respondent – accused – Nandu [2022] 7 S.C.R
Date of decision : 02-09-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1356/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
20M.P. MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. – [2022] 7 S.C.R. 67
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,B.V. NAGARATHNA
dated 11.10.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Bench at jabalpur in W.A. No.1073 of 2018. With Civil Appeal Nos. 5528, 5529 and 5530 of 2022. P. S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv., Sanjay Sarin, Rohin Oza, Ms. Meghna Mittal, Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur, Aditya Sarin, Pushkar Karni Sinha, Dinkar Kalra Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur in Writ Appeal No. 1073 of 2018 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ appeal preferred by the State of
Date of decision : 26-08-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5527/2022 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed
21MANENDRA PRASAD TIWARI Vs AMIT KUMAR TIWARI & ANR. – [2022] 13 S.C.R. 174
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.B. PARDIWALA
. A B C D E F G H 178 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 13 S.C.R. From the Judgment and Order dated 02.12.2021 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in CRR No. 211 of 2021. Siddharth Singh, Adv. for the Appellant. Ms. Ankita Choudhary, Dy AG, Swarnendu Chatterjee, Ms. Pragya the deceased) and is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur dated 02.12.2021 in the Criminal Revision Application No. 211 of 2021 by which the High Court allowed the revision application filed by the accused (respondent No. 1 herein) and
Date of decision : 12-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1210/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
22JAI PRAKASH TIWARI Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2022] 10 S.C.R. 198
Judge Name: N.V. RAMANA,KRISHNA MURARI,HIMA KOHLI
Pradesh Principal Seat at jabalpur in CRA No. 1870 of 2005. Kaustubh A., Ashwin Kumar Nair, Vikas Upadhyay, Advs. for the Appellant. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, Mirza Kayesh Begg, Prakhar Srivastav, Ms. Sneh Bairwa, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by N. V. RAMANA, CJI 1. The present appeal arises from the judgment dated 26.05.2017 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 1870/2005. The High Court dismissed the appellant’s appeal against judgment dated 18.08.2005 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Sidhi
Date of decision : 04-08-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/704/2018 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
23PRAHLAD Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. – [2022] 16 S.C.R. 82
Judge Name: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
: Criminal Appeal No. 2043 of 2009. From the Judgment and Order dated 11.05.2009 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 247 of 1993. With Criminal Appeal No. 983 of 2010. A B C D E F G H 85 Vivek K. Tankha, Sr. Adv., B. K. Satija, R. K. Yadav, Vipul Tiwari these appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 11th May, 2009, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No.247 of 1993, thereby allowing the appeal filed by the respondent-State of Madhya Pradesh in part and reversing the order of
Date of decision : 27-07-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/2043/2009 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
24AMARENDRA KUMAR PANDEY Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS – [2022] 12 S.C.R. 223
Judge Name: SURYA KANT,J.B. PARDIWALA
bad example of indiscipline in the army. Virendra Kumar Dubey ultimately came to be discharged from service by an order dated 14.12.1992. He preferred a departmental appeal, which failed. He, thereafter, went to the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur , however, the High Court declined to
Date of decision : 14-07-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/11473/2018 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
25VIRENDRA Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2022] 7 S.C.R. 464
Judge Name: SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,M.M. SUNDRESH
jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 1367 of 2005. Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Ms. Akshita Katoch, Chitranshul A. Sinha, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Ankita Choudhary, Dy. AG, Pashupathi Nath Razdan, Padmesh Mishra, Prakhar Srivastav, Sneh Bairwa, Ms. Himanshi Shakya, Advs
Date of decision : 11-07-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/466/2018 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
26MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT ADVOCATES BAR ASSOCIATION AND ANR Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR – [2022] 15 S.C.R. 299
Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,HRISHIKESH ROY
as per exigencies and it is not necessary to locate them in every State – Prayer for relocating the Bhopal NGT to jabalpur is unmerited and is rejected. s.22 – Remedy of direct appeal to the Supreme Court from the decisions of the NGT u/s. 22 – Held: Remedy of direct appeal to the Supreme Court locate them in every State. The prayer for relocating the Bhopal NGT to jabalpur is unmerited and is rejected. [Para 38][233-G-H; 323-A-C] Whether the NGT ousts the High Court’s jurisdiction under Sections 14 & 22 of the NGT Act? 2. The power of judicial review under Articles 226, 227, and 32
Date of decision : 18-05-2022 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/433/2012 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed
27M.P. RAJYA TILHAN UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANGH MARYADIT, PACHAMA, DISTRICT SEHORE AND OTHERS Vs M/S. MODI TRANSPORT SERVICE – [2022] 4 S.C.R. 647
Judge Name: SANJIV KHANNA,BELA M. TRIVEDI
referred to Para 31 [1980] 2 SCR 249 referred to Para 31 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1973 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 19.09.2019 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at jabalpur in First Appeal No. 505 of 1996. Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, Dy. AG
Date of decision : 11-05-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1973/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
28Ms. P Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER – [2022] 3 S.C.R. 823
Judge Name: N.V. RAMANA,KRISHNA MURARI,HIMA KOHLI
, Principal Seat at jabalpur in MCRC No. 55343 of 2021. MS. P v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER A B C D E F G H 826 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 3 S.C.R. Mahesh Srivastava, Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Ms. Shikha Khurana, Ms. Riya Thomas, Kanishk Khullar, Advs. for the Appellant from an order dated 16th November, 2021, passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature for Madhya Pradesh; at jabalpur in MCRC No. 55343 of 2021, whereby an application filed by the respondent No. 2/accused under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731 has
Date of decision : 05-05-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/740/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
29DR. JACOB THUDIPARA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. – [2022] 3 S.C.R. 68
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,B.V. NAGARATHNA
on Para 2.1 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No.2974 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 09.05.2017 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at jabalpur in Writ Appeal No. 667 of 2016. DR. JACOB THUDIPARA v.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. A B C D E F the impugned judgment and order dated 09.05.2017passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at jabalpur in Writ Appeal No. 667/2016, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal, original writ petitioner – appellant herein has preferred the present
Date of decision : 21-04-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2974/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
30MOHD. FIROZ Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2022] 19 S.C.R. 168
Judge Name: UDAY UMESH LALIT,S. RAVINDRA BHAT,BELA M. TRIVEDI
[1983] 3 SCR 413 relied on Para 41 (2021) 1 SCC 596 relied on Para 42 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 612 of 2019. From the Judgment and Order dated 15.07.2014 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Criminal Appeal Nos. 09, 2920 and 3132 of 2013. A B C D Pradesh at jabalpur , in the Criminal Reference No. 09 of 2013, Criminal Appeal No. 2920 of 2013 and Criminal Appeal No. 3132 of 2013. During the pendency of the present appeal, the said appellant having expired, the accused Firoz has been substituted as the appellant in view of the order passed
Date of decision : 19-04-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/612/2019 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
31PREMLATA @ SUNITA Vs NASEEB BEE & ORS. – [2022] 1 S.C.R. 826
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,B.V. NAGARATHNA
4][830-A-D] CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 2055- 2056 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 27.11.2019 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in C.R. No.385 of 2019 and Order dated 10.08.2020 in R.P. No.725 of 2020. Ameet Deshpande, Sr. Adv., Akshat Shrivastava passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Civil Revision Application No.385 of 2019 by which the PREMLATA @ SUNITA v. NASEEB BEE & ORS. A B C D E F G H 828 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 1 S.C.R. High Court has allowed the said Revision Application and has quashed and set
Date of decision : 23-03-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2055/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
32SK NAUSAD RAHAMAN & ORS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – [2022] 12 S.C.R. 591
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,VIKRAM NATH
not govern or prevail when the regime envisaged under RR 2016 came into force. 40. On behalf of the appellants, reliance was sought to be placed on the decision of a two judge Bench of this Court in Prabir Banerjee v. Union of India and Others30. In that case, the jabalpur Bench of the Central
Date of decision : 10-03-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1243/2022 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off
33HEERA TRADERS Vs KAMLA JAIN – [2022] 10 S.C.R. 291
Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
– 5997 of 2021. From the Judgment and Order dated 17.03.2020 and 25.08.2021 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Second Appeal No.523 of 2014. With Civil Appeal Nos.5998-5999 of 2021. Ms. Shobha Menon, Sr. Adv., Akshat Shrivastava, Advs. for the Appellant. Amit Sahni, Arjun Garg
Date of decision : 22-02-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5996/2021 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed
34MS. X Vs REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER – [2022] 15 S.C.R. 57
Judge Name: L. NAGESWARA RAO,BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI
acts. (Vide ADM, jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla [(1976) 2 SCC 521 : AIR 1976 SC 1207] , S.R. Venkataraman v. Union of India [(1979) 2 SCC 491 : 1979 SCC (L&S) 216 : AIR 1979 SC 49] , State of A.P. v. Goverdhanlal Pitti [(2003) 4 SCC 739 : AIR 2003 SC 1941] , BPL Ltd. v. S.P. Gururaja [(2003) 8
Date of decision : 10-02-2022 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)/1137/2018 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed
35OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. Vs THE PRESIDENT, OIL FIELD EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION & ORS. – [2022] 19 S.C.R. 376
Judge Name: L. NAGESWARA RAO,ANIRUDDHA BOSE
) 12 SCC 738 : [2005] 5 Suppl. SCR 63; Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. Their Workmen (1981) 4 SCC 627 : [1982] 1 SCR 929; Jhagrakhan Collieries (P) Ltd. v. G.C. Agarwal, Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, jabalpur (1975) 3 SCC 613 : [1975] 2 Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, jabalpur [(1975) 3 SCC 613 : 1975 SCC (L&S) 63 : AIR 1975 SC 171 : (1975) 2 SCR 873] ]. It is further unquestionable that a minority union of workers may raise an industrial dispute even if another union which consists of the majority of them enters
Date of decision : 04-02-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1033/2022 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed
36UNION OF INDIA Vs KRISHNA MODI & ANR. – [2022] 1 S.C.R. 638
Judge Name: VINEET SARAN,ANIRUDDHA BOSE
APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 909 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur Bench in W.A. No.1971 of 2019. Jayant K. Sud, ASG, Merusagar Samantray, Ms. Preeti Rani, Om Prakash Shukla, Raghav Sharma, Ms. Garima Prasad, A. K
Date of decision : 03-02-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/909/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
37VASUDEV Vs STATE of M.P. – [2022] 1 S.C.R. 514
Judge Name: INDIRA BANERJEE,J.K. MAHESHWARI
the Judgment and Order dated 14.02.2020 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Cr. A. No.622 of 2009. H. K. Chaturvedi, Ms. Anjali Chaturvedi, Sagan Chaturvedi, Ms. Megha Chaturvedi, Advs. for the Appellant. Mukul Singh, Ankit Mishra, Gopal Jha, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by J. K. MAHESHWARI, J. 1. Arising out of the judgment dated 14.02.2020 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 622 of 2009 by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, judicature at jabalpur , confirming the judgment dated 7.3.2009 in S.T. No. 185 of 2006 passed by the 6th Additional
Date of decision : 01-02-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/388/2021 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed
38STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs R.D. SHARMA AND ANR. – [2022] 2 S.C.R. 707
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,BELA M. TRIVEDI
[2002] 1 Suppl. SCR 118 referred to Para 14 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 474- 475 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 28.04.2017 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at jabalpur in W.P. No.14940 of 2013 and Order dated 17.09.2019 in R. P. No.1386 of [2022] 2 S.C.R. the Judgments and Orders dated 28.04.2017 and 17.09.2019 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at jabalpur in W.P. No. 14940 of 2013 and R.P. No. 1386 of 2018 respectively. 3. The respondent no. 2 herein i.e. Government of India, Ministry of Personnel
Date of decision : 27-01-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/474/2022 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
39BHAGWANI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2022] 8 S.C.R. 1
Judge Name: L. NAGESWARA RAO,BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,B.V. NAGARATHNA
referred to Para 7 [1977] 1 SCR 280 relied on Para 13 [2009] 9 SCR 90 relied on Para 13 [2018] 14 SCR 585 relied on Para 15 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal Nos. 101-102 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 09.05.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur Bench in
Date of decision : 18-01-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/101/2022 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed
40STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs JOGENDRA & ANR. – [2022] 2 S.C.R. 295
Judge Name: N.V. RAMANA,A.S. BOPANNA,HIMA KOHLI
on Para 17 A B C D E F G H 301 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 190 of 2012. From the Judgment and Order dated 10.09.2008 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur , Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No.48 of 2004. Bharat Singh, AAG, Prashant Singh, Sr. Adv
Date of decision : 11-01-2022 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/190/2012 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed
41THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. Vs THE REGISTRAR,COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND OTHERS – [2022] 5 S.C.R. 291
Judge Name: AJAY RASTOGI,ABHAY S. OKA
D E F G H 311 “11. On the basis of the said decision of the Full Bench of the Tribunal, other Benches of the Tribunal at Bangalore, Hyderabad, Allahabad, jabalpur , Jaipur, Madras and Ernakulam have passed orders giving relief on the same grounds. These appeals and special leave petitions
Date of decision : 11-01-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/297/2022 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed
42ELLORA PAPER MILLS LIMITED Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2022] 16 S.C.R. 399
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,B.V. NAGARATHNA
Judgment and Order dated 27.08.2021 of the High Court of Judicature for Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Arbitration Case No. 100 of 2019. Sandeep Bajaj, Soayib Qureshi, Ms. Vipul Jai, Advs. for the Appellant. Sunny Choudhary, Nachiketa Joshi, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was
Date of decision : 04-01-2022 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7697/2021 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
43RAVINDER KUMAR DHARIWAL & ANR. Vs THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – [2021] 13 S.C.R. 823
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,SURYA KANT,VIKRAM NATH
; Jeeja Ghosh v. Union of India (2016) 7 SCC 761 : [2016] 4 SCR 638; Apparel Export Promotion Council v. A.K. Chopra (1999) 1 SCC 759 : [1999] 1 SCR 117; Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999) 2 SCC 228 : [1999] 1 SCR 669; Justice Khanna in ADM jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC
Date of decision : 17-12-2021 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/6924/2021 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
44BHAGCHANDRA Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2021] 9 S.C.R. 765
Judge Name: L. NAGESWARA RAO,BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI,B.V. NAGARATHNA
the convict. The appellant has placed on record the affidavits of son of appellant and nephew of appellant and also the report of the Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, jabalpur . The appellant comes from a rural and economically poor background. There are no criminal antecedents. The appellant Para 41 [1983] 3 SCR 413 referred to Para 41 [2018] 14 SCR 585 relied on Para 43 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal Nos. 255-256 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 19.12.2017 of the High Court of Judicature at Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in CRRFC No.03 of 2017 and
Date of decision : 09-12-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/255/2018 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed
45M.P. HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR. Vs K.P. DWIVEDI – [2021] 11 S.C.R. 1083
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,B.V. NAGARATHNA
High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Main Seat jabalpur in Arbitration Revision No.13 of 2017. With Civil Appeal Nos. 6769 and 6770 of 2021. Bharat Singh, AAG, Arjun Garg, Ms. Sagun Srivastava, Advs. for the Appellants. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv., Anuj Tyagi, Ms. Maitry Kakade, Advs. for the Respondent
Date of decision : 03-12-2021 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/6768/2021 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
46SALUJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Vs NORTHERN COALFIELDS LIMITED – [2021] 7 S.C.R. 1111
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,SANJIV KHANNA
Court accordingly modified to that extent – Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – ss. 2(a), 8, 20 and 37. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7041 of 2021. From the Judgment and Order dated 02.01.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in A.A. No. 30 of 2012. Pijush K Leave granted 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 02.01.2018 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh [2021] 7 S.C.R. 1111 1111 A B C D E F G H 1112 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2021] 7 S.C.R. at jabalpur in A.A. No. 30 of 2012, by which the
Date of decision : 25-11-2021 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7041/2021 | Disposal Nature : Case Partly allowed
47STATE OF M.P. Vs GHISILAL – [2021] 10 S.C.R. 1178
Judge Name: R. SUBHASH REDDY,HRISHIKESH ROY
Order dated 08.11.2006 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Second Appeal No. 129 of 2006. Saurabh Mishra, AAG, Aakash Nadolia, Sunny Choudhary, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. SUBHASH REDDY, J
Date of decision : 22-11-2021 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2153/2012 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
48THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. Vs ASHISH AWASTHI – [2021] 7 S.C.R. 444
Judge Name: M.R. SHAH,SANJIV KHANNA
[2020] 1 SCR 408 referred to Para 4.1 (2020) 10 SCC 496 referred to Para 4.1 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No.6903 of 2021. From the Judgment and Order dated 12.12.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at jabalpur in W.A. No.1559/2018. With Civil Appeal No.6904 of 2021. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 12.12.2018 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at jabalpur in WA No. 1559 of 2018 by which the Division Bench of the High Court has allowed the said appeal and has quashed
Date of decision : 18-11-2021 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/6903/2021 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off
49STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR. Vs M/S SAL UDYOG PRIVATE LIMITED – [2021] 11 S.C.R. 142
Judge Name: N.V. RAMANA,SURYA KANT,HIMA KOHLI
-82 to 31st December, 1998. 3. For the sake of completeness, it may be noted that the respondent-Company had filed an application under Section 11(6) of the 1996 Act before the jabalpur Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court praying inter alia for appointment of an Arbitrator. During the pendency, vide circular No. 7/87 dated 27.07.87 the erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh has fixed the general supervision charges as 10% of the price which do not require any assessment. K. That vide order dated 27.08.1999 of Hon’ble High Court, jabalpur in W.P. No. 3177/99 in Bastar Oil Mills case
Date of decision : 08-11-2021 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4353/2010 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off
50DAYLE DE’SOUZA Vs GOVERNMENT OF INDIA THROUGH DEPUTY CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER (C) AND ANOTHER – [2021] 11 S.C.R. 511
Judge Name: R. SUBHASH REDDY,SANJIV KHANNA
Order dated 20.01.2020 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in M. Cr. C. No.846 of 2016. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Samsher Garud, Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, Ms. Subhangi Jain, Pankaj Singhal, Advs. for the Appellant. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG, Subhranshu Padhi, P. V. Yogeswaran Vinod Singh in Criminal Case No. 3398/2014. On 01st August 2015, the Company submitted a detailed representation to the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Marhatal, jabalpur , Madhya Pradesh denying the contents of the notice dated 06th March 2014. 4. Thereafter, on 01st August 2015
Date of decision : 29-10-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1319/2021 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
51SARABJEET SINGH MOKHA Vs THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JABALPUR & ORS. – [2021] 11 S.C.R. 468
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,VIKRAM NATH,B.V. NAGARATHNA
A B C D E F G H 468 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2021] 11 S.C.R.[2021] 11 S.C.R. 468 468 SARABJEET SINGH MOKHA v. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, jabalpur & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 1301 of 2021) OCTOBER 29, 2021 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, VIKRAM NATH AND B V NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Constitution representation- be it an acceptance or a rejection – SARABJEET SINGH MOKHA v. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, jabalpur & ORS. A B C D E F G H 470 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2021] 11 S.C.R. Failure in timely communication of the rejection of representation is a relevant factor for determining the delay
Date of decision : 29-10-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1301/2021 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
52RAMAWATAR Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2021] 10 S.C.R. 499
Judge Name: N.V. RAMANA,SURYA KANT,HIMA KOHLI
[2004] 6 Suppl. SCR 406 referred to para 8 2021 (11) SCALE 555 affirmed para 10 [1998] 2 SCR 795 followed para 14 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No.1393 of 2011. From the Judgment and Order dated 02.08.2010 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Criminal Appeal) of the SC/ST Act and consequential sentence of six months rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1000/-. The Appellant challenged his conviction and sentence before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur Bench but his appeal was dismissed vide the impugned judgment dated 02.08.2010. BRIEF
Date of decision : 25-10-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1393/2011 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
53  English           हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs MAHENDRA ALIAS GOLU – [2021] 10 S.C.R. 133
Judge Name: SURYA KANT,HIMA KOHLI
Pradesh at jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No.1089 of 2007. Mukul Singh, Dy. AG, Upendra Mishra, Sunny Choudhary, Advs. for the Appellant. Anil K. Sharma, Praveen Chaturvedi, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SURYA KANT, J. 1. State of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as “Appellant”) is in appeal against the impugned judgment dated 08.10.2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Bench at jabalpur whereby the respondent’s conviction under Section 376(2)(f) read with Section 511 of Indian Penal Code (for short, “IPC”) has been set
Date of decision : 25-10-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1827/2011 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
54PRASHANT SINGH RAJPUT Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. – [2021] 10 S.C.R. 161
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,B.V. NAGARATHNA
; (iii)not collecting CCTV footage between jabalpur and the scene of offence; (iv) relying on CDRs without determining if the respondents had actually used the number; and (v) not conducting any finger print analysis. In the order dated 13 February 2021, the JMFC identified these deficiencies with Judgment and Order dated 01.07.2021 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur Bench in MCRC No.31835 of 2021. With Criminal Appeal No.1203 of 2021 Uday Gupta, Ms. Shivani M. Lal, Sourabh Singh, M. K. Tripathi, Harish Dasan, Rajiv Ranjan, Hiren Dasan, Abhinav Shrivastava, Sunny Choudhary, Advs
Date of decision : 08-10-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1202/2021 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
55RAMGOPAL & ANR. Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2021] 6 S.C.R. 249
Judge Name: N.V. RAMANA,SURYA KANT
Para 17 [1998] 2 SCR 795 relied on Para 17 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No.1489 of 2012. From the Judgment and Order dated 27.11.2009 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Review No.1010 of 2006 With Criminal Appeal No.1488 of 2012. R
Date of decision : 29-09-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/1489/2012 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off
56  English           हिन्दी – Hindi Disclaimer
MOHD. RAFIQ @ KALLU Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2021] 9 S.C.R. 163
Judge Name: K.M. JOSEPH,S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Judgment and Order dated 27.02.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Seat at jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No.1570 of 1995. Ms. Ritu Gangele, Anil Kumar Gautam, Advs. for the Appellant. Gopal Jha, Shreyash Bhardwaj, Nishant Verma, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was
Date of decision : 15-09-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/856/2021 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
57STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR Vs AKHILESH JHA & ANR – [2021] 6 S.C.R. 146
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,VIKRAM NATH,HIMA KOHLI
: Civil Appeal No.5153 of 2021. From the Judgment and Order dated 05.09.2019 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at jabalpur in MP NO.3854 of 2018. Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, AG, Mrinal Elker Mazumdar, Manish Yadav, Advs. for the Appellants. Braj K. Mishra, Joby P. Varghese. Soon thereafter, he moved the Central Administrative Tribunal1 at jabalpur for challenging the charge-sheet which was served on him on 8 June 2016. The Tribunal, by its order dated 28 July 2016, declined to interfere with the charge-sheet but granted an opportunity to the first respondent to
Date of decision : 06-09-2021 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/5153/2021 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
58MADHAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2021] 8 S.C.R. 451
Judge Name: INDIRA BANERJEE,V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Appeal No.852 of 2021. From the Judgment and Order dated 19.09.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in CRA No.727 of 2009. With Criminal Appeal No.853 of 2021 Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, Amit Arjariya, Karan Singh Dalal, Ritaj Kacker, Deepkaran of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur , Accused Nos. 2 and 3 have come up with these criminal appeals. A B C D E F G H 457 3. We have heard Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad and Mr. Amit Arjariya, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Shri S.U. Lalit, learned counsel appearing for
Date of decision : 18-08-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/852/2021 | Disposal Nature : Leave Granted & Allowed
59SOMESH CHAURASIA Vs STATE OF M.P. & ANR. – [2021] 6 S.C.R. 692
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,HRISHIKESH ROY
477 relied on Para 36 (2003) 10 SCC 195 relied on Para 36 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal Nos. 590-591 of 2021 From the Judgment and Order dated 23.07.2019 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Bench jabalpur in I. A. No.6837 of 2019 and I. A. No.5781 of 2019 in enquiry, the Hon’ble Additional Session Judge, Hata and both the JMFC, Hata were contacted but they showed their inability to give any statement unless permitted by the Hon’ble High Court of jabalpur . In this context on 17.03.21 an application was filed before the Hon’ble Registrar General, Madhya
Date of decision : 22-07-2021 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/590/2021 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off
60CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (IPC) MP POWER TRADING CO LTD & ANR. Vs NARMADA EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD – [2021] 4 S.C.R. 430
Judge Name: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,M.R. SHAH,SANJIV KHANNA
of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in A.C. No. 1 of 2015. Varun K Chopra, Gurtejpal Singh, M/S. Vkc Law Offices, Advs. for the appellants. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Sarthak Nema, Ms. Ankita Khare, J.K. Pillai, Advs. for the respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD by the Company Provisions of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 9or any enactment that replaces the said Act) shall apply in such arbitrator. The arbitration proceedings shall be held at head Quarter of the Board i.e. at jabalpur . (b) The award rendered shall apportion the costs of
Date of decision : 23-03-2021 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/1051/2021 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
61CHINTELS INDIA LTD. Vs BHAYANA BUILDERS PVT. LTD. – [2021] 1 S.C.R. 829
Judge Name: R.F. NARIMAN,NAVIN SINHA,K.M. JOSEPH
set aside an award under section 34 should be returned to the proper court dependent upon where the seat of arbitration was located. 1Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Sun Petpack jabalpur Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. 2009 (4) M.P.L.J. 514. 2E-Square Leisure Pvt. Ltd., Pune v. K.K. Dani
Date of decision : 11-02-2021 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/4028/2020 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
62UMC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LTD. Vs FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. M.A. No. 175/2021 In – [2021] 4 S.C.R. 396
Judge Name: S. ABDUL NAZEER,SANJIV KHANNA
] 13 SCR 1175 – Rest of the order remain as it is – Application allowed. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : M.A. No. 175 of 2021 in Civil appeal no. 3687 of 2020. From the Judgment and Order dated 13.02.2019 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in W.P. No. 2778 of 2019. Sahil Tagotra
Date of decision : 02-02-2021 | Case Number : MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION/175/2021 | Disposal Nature : Case Allowed
63THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & ORS. Vs SHAJI POULOSE & ORS. – [2020] 9 S.C.R. 851
Judge Name: ASHOK BHUSHAN,M.R. SHAH,R. SUBHASH REDDY
Notification dated 25.05.1987 being violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. Misc. Petition No.2844 of 1989 – Prem Chand & Ors. Vs. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India & Anr. was filed before A B C D E F G H 855 the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur , challenging
Date of decision : 09-12-2020 | Case Number : TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL)/2849/2019 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
64AMISH DEVGAN Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS – [2020] 14 S.C.R. 198
Judge Name: A.M. KHANWILKAR,SANJIV KHANNA
Chishti. • Respondent no. 5, State of Uttar Pradesh,53 reiterated the facts of the FIR lodged at the instance of informant Amish Devgan. Also, it has been mentioned that one FIR which was filed in jabalpur against the Petitioner Amish Devgan was transferred by jabalpur police to Gautam Budhh Nagar
Date of decision : 07-12-2020 | Case Number : WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL)/160/2020 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off
65UMC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR. – [2020] 13 S.C.R. 1175
Judge Name: S. ABDUL NAZEER,BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI
referred to Para 13 [1975] 2 SCR 674 relied on Para 16 [1988] 3 Suppl. SCR 867 relied on Para 17 [2014] 13 SCR 617 relied on Para 18 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020. From the Judgment and Order dated 13.02.2019 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur dated 13.02.2019 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Writ Petition No. 2778 of 2019. By the impugned order, the High Court has dismissed the writ petition and has upheld the validity of the order dated 09.01.2019 passed by respondent no.1, namely Food Corporation of India
Date of decision : 16-11-2020 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/3687/2020 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
66HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – [2020] 9 S.C.R. 455
Judge Name: L. NAGESWARA RAO,AJAY RASTOGI,HEMANT GUPTA
JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 715 of 2020. From the Judgment and Order dated 09.01.2020 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in Criminal Revision No. 37 of 2020. With Criminal Appeal No. 716 of 2020 Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advs, Ms. Priya Puri, Vibhav Srivastava passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur on 9.1.2020 whereby the revision filed by Shri Nirmal Sen, appellant/Nominated Officer (Incharge) of the Hindustan Unilever Limited1, was allowed, however the matter was remitted back to the trial court to revisit the evidence adduced by both
Date of decision : 05-11-2020 | Case Number : CRIMINAL APPEAL/715/2020 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
67ANIL BHARDWAJ Vs THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. – [2020] 9 S.C.R. 442
Judge Name: ASHOK BHUSHAN,M.R. SHAH
relied on Para 13 [2014] 11 SCR 155 distinguished Para 15 [2016] 7 SCR 445 relied on Para 17 [2018] 1 SCR 112 relied on Para 18 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3419 of 2020. From the Judgment and Order dated 06.01.2020 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in WP-27779 of
Date of decision : 13-10-2020 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/3419/2020 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed
68STATE OF M.P. & ORS. Vs RAKESH SETHI & ANR. – [2020] 7 S.C.R. 734
Judge Name: L. NAGESWARA RAO,S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Appeal Nos. 7074 of 2008. From the Judgment and Order dated 15.05.2008 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at jabalpur in W.P. No. 2344 of 2004. Vikramjeet Banerjee, ASG, Saurabh Mishra, AAG, Arjun Garg, Aakash Nandolia, Ankit Swarup, Neelmani Pant, Jawad Tariq, Ms. Vidisha Swarup, Gurmeet Singh
Date of decision : 26-08-2020 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/7074/2008 | Disposal Nature : Appeals(s) allowed
69IN RE: PRASHANT BHUSHAN AND ANR. Vs IN RE: – [2020] 8 S.C.R. 443
Judge Name: ARUN MISHRA,KRISHNA MURARI
; *P.N. Duda v. P. Shiv Shanker & Others (1988) 3 SCC 167 : [1988] 3 SCR 547; Pritam Pal v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur through Registrar (1993) Supp 1 SCC 529; In re: Vinay Chandra Mishra (1995) 2 SCC 584 : [1995] 2 SCR 638; D. C. Saxena v. Chief Justice of India (1996) 5 SCC 216 Madhya Pradesh, jabalpur Through Registrar, a 2 Judge Bench of this Court held as follows:— “15. Prior to the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, it was held that the High Court has inherent power to deal with a contempt of itself summarily and to adopt its own procedure, provided that it gives a fair
Date of decision : 14-08-2020 | Case Number : SUO MOTO CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL)/1/2020 | Disposal Nature : Directions issued | Direction Issue : Contemnor No. 1 held guilty
70SUKH SAGAR MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. – [2020] 11 S.C.R. 397
Judge Name: A.M. KHANWILKAR,DINESH MAHESHWARI,SANJIV KHANNA
. 2843 of 2020. From the Judgment and Order dated 06.01.2020 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal seat at jabalpur in W.P. No. 17946 of 2019. A B C D E F G H 403 Saurabh Mishra, AAG for Madhya Pradesh, Dushyant Dave, Vikas Singh, Sr. Advs., Sankalp Kochar, Mayank Certificate granted to Gyanjeet Sewa Mission Trust1 for establishing a medical college at jabalpur in the State of Madhya Pradesh, being contrary to the decision of a two-Judge Bench of this Court in Chintpurni Medical College and Hospital & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors.2? 3. Shorn of
Date of decision : 31-07-2020 | Case Number : CIVIL APPEAL/2843/2020 | Disposal Nature : Dismissed
71S. KASI Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAMAYNALLUR POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT – [2020] 5 S.C.R. 277
Judge Name: ASHOK BHUSHAN,M.R. SHAH,V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
; Achpal Alias Ramswaroop and Another v. State of Rajasthan (2019) 14 SCC 599 : [2018] 12 SCR 327 ; State of Punjab and Another v. Devans Modern Breweries ltd. and Another (2004) 11 SCC 26 : [2003] 5 Suppl. SCR 930 – relied on. Additional District

Related Articles



This post first appeared on Jabalpur Advocate: Best Jabalpur Advocate Top Jabalpur Lawyer High Court DRT, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Jabalpur Judgments Supreme Court of India

×

Subscribe to Jabalpur Advocate: Best Jabalpur Advocate Top Jabalpur Lawyer High Court Drt

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×