Inference Of Military In Politics 

 Days before balancing his spikes after six years as the chief of the Armed Forces, General Qamar Javed Bajwa spoke on Saints Day. This conversation is both interesting and important and has not taken off as expected.

Bajwa's Discuss About Politics 

  General Bajwa discussed the military's mediation in the political framework and acknowledged that the Military lends itself to clear, public scrutiny because of its seven long-term visions. He said the Army was undergoing its own "therapy" and after much deliberation had concluded that it would remain redundant.

  Unexpectedly, however, as one might expect, he then issued a list of the Army's accomplishments following the Association's "order" (his statement) and stated that the Army would continue in that role. . Similarly, the conversation pointed to the political turn of events, use of fake and secret stories by ideological groups to defame the army and its initiative, and foul language.

  I need not go into the details of what has happened in the more than eight months since he became famous and has been endlessly debated in the drawing rooms and dhabas of this nation. All things being equal, it is more enlightening to focus on the core issues: why the military mediates the framework and what we mean by "mediation."

  Acting Chief of the Armed Forces General Bajwa promised that the army had learned its lessons and would never again intervene in government affairs. Be that as it may, the sum of Pakistan's experiences does not offer incredible expectations. Will future commandants comply with this objective? Also, more significantly, given the nation's elements, can they?