Assuring Stakeholder Confidence

At its core, learning outcomes assessment serves as an assurance mechanism to various stakeholders. These stakeholders encompass a broad spectrum, ranging from the general public to concerned parents and, most crucially, the students themselves. In essence, it acts as a covenant between an institution and its stakeholders, assuring them that the institution is dedicated to fostering student development in alignment with its promises and the marketing campaigns that have been put forth.

Crucial Elements in the Accreditation Process

A vital pillar of the accreditation process for institutions of higher education is the meticulous undertaking of the Learning Outcomes Assessment. This systematic approach involves the collection and in-depth analysis of data pertaining to student learning. Its core mission is to identify disparities and gaps in the educational system and to consistently elevate the bar of academic quality. Through this multifaceted approach, institutions can pinpoint areas that need improvement and implement strategic measures to enhance the quality of education offered.

Rigorous Standards and Accountability

Independent organizations entrusted with the formidable task of accrediting educational institutions hold these establishments to rigorous standards and principles. One of the hallmark requirements placed upon schools and programs seeking accreditation lies in the documentation of their Learning Outcomes Assessment procedures. This documentation serves as a tangible manifestation of an institution’s commitment to the perpetual enhancement of academic quality. It also signifies an unwavering dedication to evidence-based strategies for rectifying any deficiencies in the educational experience.

Exploring Accreditation Bodies in Business Education

To delve deeper into the realm of Learning Outcomes Assessment, it is prudent to examine the distinctive standards set forth by three eminent accrediting bodies in the realm of business education – namely, AACSB, ACBSP, and IACBE. These organizations have established themselves as authoritative entities in the evaluation and accreditation of business schools and programs, each with its unique criteria and expectations. By scrutinizing their individual approaches to Learning Outcomes Assessment, a comprehensive understanding of the diverse facets of quality assurance in higher education is attainable.

AACSB Commonplace 8: A Systematic Approach to Educational Excellence

In accordance with AACSB International’s eighth commonplace, academic institutions are required to employ well-documented and systematic procedures in the pursuit of excellence in education. This standard focuses on the processes that underpin the determination and refinement of degree program learning objectives. It encompasses the entire academic journey, spanning the design, delivery, and enhancement of curriculum to facilitate the achievement of these objectives. Furthermore, it mandates the demonstration of successful attainment of these learning objectives by students.

This standard, with its stringent guidelines, seeks to ensure that educational programs evolve in a deliberate and evidence-based manner. Institutions must adopt a methodical approach when it comes to defining, revising, and verifying the learning objectives associated with their degree programs. A rigorous emphasis is placed on the curriculum design, delivery methods, and continual improvement, all geared towards realizing these learning objectives. The importance of transparency and data-driven decision-making in this process cannot be overstated. It’s about making education a dynamic and adaptable endeavor where students’ needs and societal changes are taken into consideration.

This commitment to systematic processes underscores the idea that education is not static but, rather, a dynamic and ever-evolving process. It encourages a constant cycle of evaluation and improvement, where institutions scrutinize the alignment of their degree programs with their stated learning objectives. Furthermore, it demands accountability by necessitating the presentation of clear evidence that the set objectives have been met, thus ensuring that the educational experience is both effective and relevant.

ACBSP Commonplace 4: Fostering Continuous Improvement through Outcomes Assessment

Under the purview of the Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP), Commonplace 4 highlights the critical importance of outcomes assessment programs in the context of business education. It stipulates that all business schools and programs should have a robust outcomes assessment program in place. This program should not only include documentation of outcomes but should also demonstrate their active utilization in the development and enhancement of the institution’s academic offerings. Additionally, the responsibility for crafting and maintaining such programs falls squarely on the shoulders of individual business programs.

This standard underscores a commitment to a culture of continuous improvement in the realm of business education. Institutions are called upon to go beyond the mere documentation of outcomes; they must actively incorporate these findings into their decision-making processes. This highlights a dynamic feedback loop where the results of the assessment aren’t consigned to reports on a shelf but are instead integral in steering the evolution of business education programs.

Each business program within an institution is granted the autonomy and responsibility to tailor their outcomes assessment program to suit their unique offerings and student needs. This autonomy is not just a practical necessity but also an acknowledgment that effective outcomes assessment is a nuanced undertaking that should be closely aligned with the specific goals and challenges of each program.

In essence, this standard serves as a cornerstone for fostering a culture of improvement, adaptation, and student-centricity within business education. It places the power to drive change firmly in the hands of those who know their programs best, ensuring a responsive and continually evolving approach to academic excellence.

IACBE Principle 1: The Crucial Nexus of Academic Quality and Student Learning Outcomes

The International Accreditation Council for Business Education (IACBE) places its initial principle at the heart of academic quality, with a specific focus on assessing intended student learning outcomes in business programs. The fundamental premise is that the assurance of quality in business education is intrinsically tied to evaluating the achievements of students. Central to this principle is the requirement for an academic business unit to create and rigorously implement an outcomes assessment plan.

This assessment plan, a cornerstone of IACBE’s approach, entails a meticulous roadmap for evaluating and improving the academic unit’s new business programs. It includes the identification of necessary changes and enhancements driven by the implementation of the plan. This is not merely a documentation exercise but a process that actively informs strategic planning, infusing it with data-driven insights to ensure the alignment of programs with intended learning outcomes.

Crucially, the principle places an obligation on institutions to document and disseminate the outcomes that result from their assessments. This transparency serves to not only demonstrate accountability but to foster a culture of shared learning and improvement within the academic unit and, indeed, across the wider institution.

IACBE Principle 1 underscores the interconnectedness of academic quality and student learning outcomes, where the pursuit of excellence is inextricably linked to the continuous evaluation and enhancement of programs. It emphasizes that academic quality is not an abstract concept but a tangible, measurable outcome and that the path to improvement is through structured and ongoing assessment. This principle acts as a guiding beacon, illuminating the path to academic excellence and the enrichment of the student experience.

Challenges Faced by Accreditation Managers in Studying Outcomes Evaluation

Accreditation Managers, responsible for overseeing Studying Outcomes Evaluation and accreditation reports, grapple with a multitude of complex challenges that significantly complicate the execution of standardized processes, data collection, and subsequent reporting. Let’s delve into three of the most pressing challenges they encounter in the accreditation process. Best Academic Research, Project Paper Writing Services

The path towards effective Studying Outcomes Evaluation and accreditation is fraught with intricate challenges that require careful navigation, collaboration, and a deep understanding of the intricacies involved in this vital educational undertaking. Overcoming these challenges is paramount in the ongoing quest to enhance the quality of education and ensure its alignment with desired learning outcomes.

1. Teacher Pushback: A Clash of Philosophies

In the world of Studying Outcomes Evaluation and accreditation, achieving success necessitates a harmonious collaboration between administrators and instructors. Yet, this synergy often proves elusive due to the inherent resistance from various stakeholders within educational institutions who have grown accustomed to working in silos with limited oversight.

Furthermore, it’s a common conundrum for instructors to perceive the requirements and demands imposed by the administrative echelons of an institution as burdensome interferences in their primary mission of imparting knowledge and nurturing student development. For instance, when Accreditation Managers mandate instructors to employ a specific Studying Outcomes Evaluation tool, they disrupt the status quo, occasionally overriding the instructors’ preferred teaching methodologies.

Hence, it becomes incumbent upon Accreditation Managers to actively engage instructors in both the formulation and execution of accreditation and Studying Outcomes Evaluation procedures. The absence of a consensus on learning objectives and methodologies erects a formidable barrier between stakeholders, impeding the effective improvement of educational quality.

2. The Elusive Quest for Meaningful Data: The Criterion Problem

One of the foremost complications in the realm of Studying Outcomes Evaluation is what is often termed the ‘Criterion Problem.’ It stems from the inherent imperfection of learning assessment. The ‘Criterion Problem’ encompasses two distinct issues – data contamination and data deficiency – both of which are anathema to the pursuit of accurate and meaningful assessment.

Data Contamination is typified by the inclusion of metrics in assessments that do not truly measure learning. These extraneous metrics, though they may populate spreadsheets, hold no relevance to the validity of the resulting reports.

Data Deficiency, on the other hand, pertains to the absence of essential metrics that should be evaluated as part of the learning process. Inadequate knowledge regarding the best practices in Studying Outcomes Evaluation further exacerbates this issue, leading Accreditation Managers to gather assessment data that may be inconsequential to the measured educational outcomes.

To quote Jack Friedlander and Andreea Serban, “Often, at any given college, few faculty and staff have been formally trained in creating measurable and valid learning outcomes; aligning the curriculum with these outcomes; devising assessment questions, instruments, and methodologies; and developing and implementing a sustainable, meaningful assessment plan.”

3. Data Alignment: The Challenge of Standardization

An unstandardized Studying Outcomes Evaluation process begets a plethora of diverse and intricate assessment data. The utilization of various assessment methods across a single curriculum yields results that are convoluted and challenging to amalgamate, decipher, and align with specific learning objectives.

This challenge is further compounded by the fact that a significant number of individuals overseeing accreditation and Studying Outcomes Evaluation have not received formal training in the establishment of assessment processes, data collection, or the formulation of accreditation reports.

In the words of Jack Friedlander and Andreea Serban, “Few institutions have designated staff members with the time, knowledge, and skills required to link course, program, and institutional learning outcomes or disseminate the results of student learning outcome endeavors.”

Unlocking Learning Potential with Capsim Modular Examination

In the realm of education, the path to success is often riddled with challenges. Educators continually seek innovative solutions to overcome these hurdles, and in this pursuit, the Capsim Modular Examination emerges as a powerful tool. This brief, versatile, and meticulously graded assessment not only imparts valuable insights but also streamlines evaluation requirements, all the while establishing a standardized framework for accreditation. Here, we delve into the multifaceted capabilities of the Capsim Modular Examination, shedding light on how it transforms the educational landscape.

Tailoring Assessments to Course Learning Aims

One of the most remarkable features of the Capsim Modular Examination is its adaptability, allowing educators to tailor assessments according to their course’s learning objectives. This adaptability is invaluable, as it empowers instructors to add or remove questions, thereby creating a customized evaluation that perfectly aligns with the specific educational goals they aim to achieve. This flexibility ensures that the assessment process becomes a finely tuned instrument, delivering insights directly in sync with the course’s intended outcomes.

Measuring Scholar Learning and Proficiency

The Capsim Modular Examination transcends being a mere evaluation tool; it serves as a comprehensive instrument for tracking student progress and assessing the developmental impact of a course or program. Educators can employ this assessment both as a pre-test and post-test, providing a before-and-after snapshot of a student’s journey. This unique capability enables instructors to gauge the efficacy of their teaching methods and the potency of their educational programs, offering a dynamic perspective on the evolving proficiency of their students.

Streamlining Accreditation Reporting

The labyrinthine process of accreditation reporting can often be a formidable task for educational institutions. With the Capsim Modular Examination, this process undergoes a transformation that simplifies and standardizes the reporting procedures. By administering the modular examination across the entire curriculum, institutions can ensure uniformity in the assessment process. This standardization not only eases the burden on instructors but also enables the compilation of consistent, reliable data for accreditation purposes, rendering it a game-changer in the world of education quality assurance.

Ensuring Relevance and Integrity in Assessment

One of the cornerstones of a meaningful examination lies in the relevance and integrity of the questions posed. The Capsim Modular Examination takes this aspect seriously, crafting examination responses based on simulated experiences that contain unique and pertinent data for each student. This approach ensures that the examination remains rooted in real-world applicability, making it an effective tool for testing practical knowledge. Furthermore, a substantial repository of parallel questions is maintained, assuring the examination’s integrity by preventing repetition and enhancing the overall quality of assessment.

Empowering Students with Tailored Developmental Guidance

Education isn’t just about evaluating; it’s also about nurturing growth and development. The Capsim Modular Examination recognizes this crucial aspect by guiding students through the creation of a Personal Development Plan (IDP). This plan is a tailored roadmap for each student, replete with performance feedback, developmental strategies, and S.M.A.R.T. (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goals. This comprehensive guidance empowers students to embark on a journey of self-improvement, fostering a culture of continuous learning and personal growth.

In summary, the Capsim Modular Examination isn’t just an assessment tool; it’s a dynamic, flexible, and transformative force in the world of education. Its adaptability, precision, and emphasis on student development make it an indispensable instrument for educators aiming to overcome challenges and elevate the quality of their educational programs.

How to Align Assessment with Learning Outcomes

Aligning assessments with learning outcomes is essential for effective education. This process ensures that what students are assessed on directly corresponds to what they are expected to learn. When assessments are well-aligned with learning outcomes, it leads to more meaningful, purposeful education. In this guide, we will explore ten essential tips to help educators align their assessments with learning objectives, thereby enhancing the educational experience for both students and instructors.

1. Understanding the Purpose of Assessment:

In the realm of educational evaluation, the fundamental principle of aligning assessment to learning outcomes commences with a profound comprehension of the very purpose underlying this pedagogical endeavor. Assessment, when skillfully executed, serves as a beacon guiding both educators and learners along the educational journey. It is, in essence, a compass directing efforts toward educational success. To grasp this fundamental concept, one must delve into the quintessential why behind assessment: Why are we assessing?

Is it to gauge a student’s understanding of a specific topic or to measure the acquisition of broader skills? Is the intent formative, aiming to provide feedback and inform instruction, or summative, intended for grading and certification? Each of these purposes necessitates unique strategies and methodologies, urging educators to consider the ultimate aim of their assessments before setting sail on the assessment design voyage.

2. Establish Clear Learning Outcomes

In the realm of education, the foundational step in harmonizing assessments with learning outcomes rests upon the articulation of unambiguous and concise learning objectives. These learning objectives serve as the compass guiding educators and students through the intricate terrain of a course or a particular lesson. They represent the lighthouse, clearly illuminating what students should possess in terms of knowledge or skills upon the culmination of their educational journey. In essence, these learning outcomes set the stage, forging the bedrock upon which relevant assessments are erected.

3. Understanding the Development of Student Learning

In the orchestration of assessment practices, a vital orchestration must transpire—comprehending the intricate symphony of student learning progression. It is imperative to acknowledge that learning is a dynamic journey, not a static endpoint. To align assessment with learning outcomes, educators must dive deeply into the intricate nuances of how knowledge unfolds in the minds of their students.

This entails recognizing that learners embark on their educational voyage from different points, gradually advancing toward mastery. Therefore, assessments must be tailored to meet students where they stand and guide them toward the desired destination. The concept of scaffolding comes to the fore, as it underscores the importance of crafting assessments that evolve in complexity, mirroring the students’ cognitive development and academic growth.

4. Embrace a Variety of Assessment Types

The tapestry of effective assessment, in all its complexity and beauty, is woven from diverse threads of evaluation methods. Embracing a plethora of assessment types not only enriches the evaluative process but also yields a more holistic understanding of student learning. The spectrum of assessment methods includes quizzes to unravel factual knowledge, essays to uncover critical thinking, presentations to manifest communication skills, and practical assignments to assess hands-on competence.

This multifaceted approach not only respects the diversity in students’ learning styles but also catalyzes the cultivation of a wide array of competencies. Such a symphony of assessment techniques ensures alignment with an equally diverse set of learning outcomes.

5. Maintain Uniformity in Assessment Format

The architecture of assessments demands a cornerstone of uniformity. When students are presented with a consistent format across assessments, a certain sense of familiarity and predictability emerges. This, in turn, acts as a soothing balm for the often anxious minds of learners, allowing them to direct their cognitive resources toward the subject matter at hand.

Furthermore, the symphony of uniformity extends to the content and structure, ensuring that each assessment resonates harmoniously with the designated learning outcomes. This synchronization makes it patently clear to students that there exists an indelible link between what they have imbibed in the course of their studies and what is expected of them during the assessment phase.

6. Being able to verify achievement

In the intricate dance between assessment and learning outcomes, a crucial partner is the ability to validate attainment. It is not enough to merely design assessments; they must also be capable of offering concrete evidence of what students have achieved. Validation requires a rigorous process of alignment, ensuring that the assessment methods, criteria, and rubrics directly correspond to the intended learning outcomes.

This alignment necessitates a meticulous eye for detail, a keen sense of measurement validity, and an understanding of statistical techniques that guarantee the reliability and authenticity of the assessment results. The educator’s role extends beyond designing and administering tests; it encompasses the art of analyzing and interpreting the data yielded to draw accurate conclusions about student attainment.

7. Developing efficient learning process assessments

A cornerstone in the architecture of assessment alignment is the creation of assessments that effectively evaluate learning processes rather than focusing solely on outcomes. In a world evolving at a breathtaking pace, the journey of learning becomes as significant as the destination. Students not only need to reach a particular level of knowledge but also develop essential skills, competencies, and the ability to think critically.

As such, educators must craft assessments that encompass the learning journey itself, capturing the iterative and evolving nature of knowledge acquisition. This entails the use of assessment methods such as reflective journals, project-based tasks, and peer reviews, which not only measure the final product but also the process of learning, enabling a more comprehensive evaluation of student growth.

8. Employ Rubrics for Transparency

In the realm of assessment, clarity is the oil that keeps the machinery running smoothly. Rubrics, those finely detailed roadmaps for evaluating student work, serve as the lighthouse in the tumultuous sea of academic evaluation. Through the meticulous application of rubrics, educators are bestowed with the remarkable ability to elucidate their expectations and the exact criteria by which student work shall be judged.

This transparency not only demystifies the enigma of assessment but also ensures that the evaluations are intricately linked with the specific learning outcomes. In the process, it provides students with an invaluable compass, directing them toward the precise destination of academic achievement.

9. Foster a Culture of Frequent Feedback

Within the fertile ecosystem of learning and assessment, feedback emerges as the lifeblood that nurtures both the budding student and the seasoned educator. Timely and constructive feedback, both formative and summative, embodies an essential facet of the educational mosaic. It is the nurturing hand that guides students along the winding pathways of their learning journey.

Moreover, it furnishes educators with a two-fold advantage, enabling them to not only chart their pedagogical course more precisely but also to finetune their methods for a more congruous alignment with the desired learning outcomes. This nexus of feedback encompasses various mechanisms, ranging from the discerning eye of peer reviews and the reflective self-assessment to the sagacious guidance of instructor feedback.

10. Thinking about the Learning Stage

When striving for alignment between assessment and learning outcomes, educators must bear in mind the distinct stages of learning. Students are not homogenous entities; they exhibit diverse aptitudes and experiences. For this reason, assessments should be meticulously tailored to suit the developmental stage and readiness of the learners.

Early education requires a different approach from tertiary education, and the transition between stages necessitates adjustments in assessment methodologies. A dynamic curriculum should reflect this progression, with assessments that align with the cognitive, emotional, and social development of the students, ensuring they are neither overwhelmed by complexity nor bored by simplicity.

11. Outline Your Goals

In the pursuit of educational alignment, educators must embark on a journey that begins with a clear roadmap – outlining their goals. Setting explicit objectives for what is to be achieved through assessments is pivotal. These objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). Articulating goals provides a sense of purpose and direction in the assessment design process.

Are the goals focused on knowledge retention, skill development, or a combination of both? Are they designed to encourage creativity, critical thinking, or mastery of foundational concepts? The clarity of these goals shapes the entire assessment framework and serves as a foundation for its successful alignment with learning outcomes.

12. Mapping Assessments to Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom’s Taxonomy, a pedagogical framework, provides a structured hierarchy of cognitive skills, encompassing a spectrum from fundamental knowledge recall to advanced critical thinking and problem-solving. When educators meticulously align their assessments with the relevant level within this taxonomy, they undertake a meticulous exercise in gauging the depth and intricacy of their students’ learning outcomes.

This meticulous approach ensures that the assessment process delves beyond the superficial layers of knowledge and fosters a more profound and insightful evaluation of student progress. By scaling the ladder of Bloom’s Taxonomy, instructors can effectively tailor their assessments to the specific cognitive demands of the educational content they seek to measure, making the evaluation process richer and more enlightening.

13. Embracing Real-World Applications

To imbue their assessments with practicality and real-world relevance, educators ought to craft tasks that echo the intricacies of authentic applications. Establishing this bridge between classroom learning and tangible, real-world skills not only imbues education with a sense of immediacy but also allows students to discern the direct impact of their academic endeavors on their future pursuits.

This educational synergy contributes to the alignment of pedagogy with tangible, real-world outcomes, making the learning process an immersive and experiential journey, whereby students comprehend the far-reaching implications of their studies.

14. The Incorporation of Authentic Assessments

Authentic assessments, by design, mirror the genuine challenges and tasks that students are likely to confront within their future careers. By adroitly integrating such assessments, including the likes of intricate case studies, realistic simulations, and engrossing projects, educators can fashion evaluations that closely parallel the demanding skill sets and knowledge essential for succeeding in the dynamic realms of professional life.

Through these measures, assessments are not mere academic exercises but, rather, springboards for future competence, fostering an education more intrinsically linked with the pragmatic, day-to-day realities of the working world.

15. Continuous Alignment of Assessments

The alignment of assessments with learning objectives is not a finite, static process but rather a continual and iterative undertaking. A persistent vigilance to periodically review and adapt assessments is essential to guarantee their perpetual synchrony with the evolving landscape of learning outcomes and educational objectives.

This dynamic adaptability is indispensable in preserving the resonance of the relationship between assessment and learning outcomes, ensuring that these two facets of education remain interconnected, vibrant, and adept at accommodating the ever-changing contours of knowledge and competency.

16. The Power of Collaboration and the Sharing of Best Practices

The effective alignment of assessments with learning outcomes is a collaborative endeavor that thrives through cooperation among educators and educational institutions. When these stakeholders pool their knowledge, experiences, and expertise, they engender a more comprehensive understanding of what truly works and what falls short in the realm of pedagogical evaluation.

The ensuing collaborative synergy has the potential to birth innovative and progressive assessment strategies that are better poised to resonate with the ever-evolving landscape of education. Through this exchange of insights and practices, educators fortify their collective wisdom, thereby contributing to the perpetual refinement and relevance of the assessment-learning outcome nexus.

17. Determine the Best Method for Demonstrating Attainment

A central facet of aligning assessment with learning outcomes is the determination of how attainment can be effectively demonstrated. This task requires a discerning perspective, wherein educators explore a diverse array of assessment methods and instruments that best capture the multifaceted dimensions of learning. It involves contemplating whether written tests, practical demonstrations, presentations, or real-world applications are the most fitting means to showcase mastery.

The consideration of cultural diversity, special learning needs, and individual preferences adds another layer of complexity. Thus, this aspect of assessment alignment necessitates a judicious selection of methods that not only validate attainment but also respect the individuality of learners, enabling them to express their learning in ways that resonate with their unique capabilities and potential.

18. What Exactly Does Performance Look Like

In the intricate tapestry of educational assessment, the notion of defining what performance looks like stands as the final, yet integral, thread. It beckons educators to craft clear and precise criteria for success, establishing benchmarks that serve as a touchstone for learners to gauge their progress. These criteria outline the expectations and standards that must be met to demonstrate the attainment of the intended learning outcomes.

The meticulous creation of rubrics, scoring guides, or exemplars is paramount in providing transparency and objectivity in assessment. By elucidating what constitutes exemplary, proficient, or emerging performance, educators empower both themselves and their students with a shared understanding of what excellence in learning truly means. Grow Your Skills and Employability with Certifications

Final thought

Aligning assessments with learning outcomes is a critical element of effective education. When done thoughtfully and systematically, it ensures that assessments are not only a measure of student performance but also a means to promote learning and achievement. By following these ten tips, educators can enhance the educational experience for their students and contribute to the overall success of their educational programs.

More Interesting Articles

• Corporate Communication – Jobs, Strategy, and Functions
• Example of Transactional Leadership – Characteristics, Style, Definition
• Right Leadership Styles – Which Leadership Models Motivate a Team
• Interview Questions about Multitasking – The Best Answer
• Five Basic Generic Competitive Business Level Strategies
• Types of Goal Setting for Life in Management and Business
• Strengths of Transformational Leadership
• Creative Self Introduction Example for Students in English
• Advantages of Teamwork – Benefits of Team in Workplace Examples
• Qualities of a Bad Leader – Tricks to Hook Ineffective Leadership
• Hard Skills List – Best Job Skills in Resume for Interview Strength
• Characteristics of Entrepreneurship – Worthy Skills of Entrepreneur
• Job Interview Conversation – Questions and Answers Sample
• How to Write a Follow-up Email after a Phone Interview?
• New Employee Introduction Email Sample to Colleagues
• Personal Introduction | Elevator Pitch | Self Introduction Example
• True Creativity Articles – What is Creativity that Leads to Success
• Opportunities and Threats – List with Detailed SWOT Analysis Examples
• Types of Competitive Strategy Examples for Market Leaders
• Follow-up email after Job Application for a Pending Job Offer

The post 18 Tips How to Align Assessment with Learning Outcomes appeared first on CareerCliff.