This is the most common question testers ask, especially among those who have just entered this industry. To answer this question, we want to state that Manual Testing will remain for five years. In a world where technology and automation are increasing, we can see manual tester losing their jobs.

With what we see and experience in the industry, it is a big “NO.”

Automation is good for repetitive tasks. It could be better for checking the interface and usability. For example, to automate a test with an automation tool like Selenium, you will have to write code, which can be a very time-consuming task depending on the complexity of your test case.

However, if you have many similar tests, it makes sense to automate them as it will save time in repeatedly writing the same test cases.

Manual Testing should never be replaced by automation but rather used with automation to build quality products faster than ever with a better customer satisfaction rate.

Reasons Why Manual QA Is Necessary—and Here to Stay

Manual testing is a critical component of the quality assurance process. It’s important to test from a subjective and objective perspective, which means that manual QA is here to stay for a while.

As long as humans are using your product or service, there will be a need for manual QA testing. The human brain can process much more information than any automated system. It’s also much better at identifying subtle differences in performance and behavior between two similar things.

1. There can be no automated testing without manual testing.

Manual testing is an integral part of the software development process. It is a necessary part of every project, and its scope cannot be reduced to only one or two phases. There can be no automated testing without manual testing.

You should remember that there are different types of QA professionals: some test more than others, while some have different specializations (such as security or performance).

2. Testing the interface and usability requires subjective evaluation and a human touch.

In addition to testing the application’s functionality, manual testers perform usability testing. In this type of testing, they evaluate whether users can use an interface and how easy that is for them. Because this evaluation requires subjective judgment and a human touch, automating these tests is difficult.

3. It makes sense to rely on manual testing if there is a need to test new functionality quickly.

Manual testing is quicker. It makes sense to rely on manual testing if there is a need to test new functionality quickly. A single tester can do manual testing. It can also be done by a small team or even a large team if the project requirements require it.

In many cases, manual testing is the most cost-effective way to test. Manual tests are also faster to write and run than automated ones.

The advantage of manual testing is that a single tester can do it. It can also be done by a small team or even a large team if the project requirements require it.

4. It is useful to apply manual testing for short-term projects.

Manual testing is a good way to test new functionality, features, and short-term projects. For example, you can create a manual testing plan if you want to test the new functionality of your product quickly.

When it comes to manual testing, there are two types: exploratory and scripted. Exploratory testing focuses on understanding the application logic, while scripted tests focus on verifying that specific scenarios are working as expected. Both types of tests should be performed during each sprint (iteration).

Conclusion

The answer to this question is no. Manual testing will always be necessary, even if it changes shape or form over time. QA Manual Testing will not disappear in five years.