Control details

Sociodemographic control details was basically examined from the standard: age, investigation site, education, a job reputation, marital standing, and you will month-to-month money. , 2014), i and additionally regulated having quantity of lovers before six months when performing analyses with the help of our contradictory condom have fun with situated changeable.

Processes

All the people given informed created consent to participate in for each part with the research study. Every studies tips and you may protocols was in fact authorized by the Institutional Remark Chat rooms during the College away from Illinois during the il, the brand new School from North carolina at Church Hill, therefore the Instituto Dominicano de Dermatologia y Cirugia de los angeles Piel Dr. Heriberto Bogaert inside Santo Domingo, DR.

Analyses

I present detailed statistics for every single of your own sociodemographic details, GRC/S scale, and you may mainly based details. For every single of your three dependent parameters, we presented bivariate logistic regression into the standard GRC/S get because independent varying. We report unadjusted opportunity ratios (OR) and you may 95% trust times of these bivariate analyses. Subsequently, i presented multivariate logistic regression for each centered changeable with standardized GRC/S rating and full set of controls. Of these analyses, i report adjusted chance ratios (AOR) and you can 95% rely on times (CI). The analyses advertised lower than were conducted when you look at the SAS variation nine.cuatro.

Overall performance

Group functions receive in Table step 1 . Most males was indeed under the period of 29 (median: 26; range: 18-41) and you can a majority (69%) got no less than a highschool training. Seventy-three percent of men was indeed functioning (both specialized otherwise relaxed labor market), 11% was basically unemployed, and you may 16% was in fact college students. Merely 8% earned more twenty-five,one hundred thousand Dominican Pesos (DOP) previously day, on the 625 U.S. dollars (USD). Nineteen % acquired lower than one thousand DOP (25 USD) and remaining men (72%) generated between a thousand DOP and you will twenty-five,000 DOP. Half the brand new people reported becoming unmarried but had a partner, 14% was in fact hitched, and you will thirty-five% have been solitary and no regular lover.

We mentioned three sexual exposure practices ( Dining table step 1 ). Thirty-1 percent of men claimed which have two or more couples within this for the last 1 month. Of males one reported with a low-constant mate inside previous 6 months (n = 194), 43% stated contradictory condom fool around with with low-steady people in earlier times 6 months. When men reported towards the past day they’d sex, 21% mentioned that these people were drinking alcohol.

Prior to standardizing, new GRC/S level got a hateful of 18.dos (range: 3–34) and you may an excellent SD of five.eight ( Dining table dos ). Look for Dining table dos for everyone measure facts.

When evaluation the fresh bivariate contacts between for every single intimate exposure conclusion and you may men’s GRC/S score, we discovered relationship on the expected guidelines ( Louisville dating sites Desk step 3 ). Particularly, boys who had a top GRC/S rating had higher probability of reporting for each and every intimate choices. A couple of sexual behaviors–having 2 or more partners previously 30 days, and you may alcohol consumption at last intercourse – had been significantly of that have an elevated GRC/S. New bivariate matchmaking between inconsistent access to condoms having non-steady lovers and GRC/S wasn’t significant.

After dealing with for sociodemographic qualities ( Dining table step three ), high GRC/S is rather of this improved likelihood of with one or two or even more couples in past times 1 month (AOR: 1.33, 95% believe interval [CI]: step one.0step one-step one.74), contradictory condom explore which have non-constant couples (AOR: step one.forty five, 95% CI: 1.04-dos.01), and you may alcohol consumption for once sex (AOR: step 1.56, 95% CI: step 1.13-2.17).

Conversation

All of our analysis considering service into the relationship between GRC/S and men’s intimate exposure practices, and additionally level of intimate partners, contradictory condom play with having low-regular couples, and alcohol consumption for a change sex.