The US Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) has announced a significant reduction in miners’ Exposure to Silica dust, a hazardous substance known to cause lung damage.

Want to know if you’re earning what you deserve? Find out with LawCrossing’s salary surveys.

Key Changes

• Reduction in Permissible Exposure: The new rule cuts MSHA’s permissible breathable silica levels by 50%. This change aims to protect approximately 289,000 employees across 12,600 mines, including underground coal mines and surface mineral mines.
• Compliance Timeline: Coal mine operators have one year to comply, while operators of other types of mines have two years.

Whether you’re a recent law school grad or an experienced attorney, BCG Attorney Search has the job for you.

Health Implications

• Silica Hazards: Silica, a common mineral, poses serious health risks when miners inhale the dust generated from grinding, sawing, and drilling. Exposure to silica dust can lead to lung diseases such as silicosis, black lung, and cancer.
• Protective Measures: The rule mandates a reduction in the permissible exposure limit for breathable silica from 100 micrograms per cubic meter of air to 50 micrograms during a work shift. Protective measures must be implemented when silica levels reach 25 micrograms.

Stay up-to-date without the overwhelming noise. Subscribe to JDJournal for a curated selection of the most relevant legal news.

Implementation Strategies

• Engineering Controls: The rule prioritizes engineering controls to reduce silica exposure, including improved ventilation systems, water suppression of dust, machine-mounted dust collectors, and enclosed operator cabs with air filtration.
• Medical Examinations: Non-coal mines will now be required to offer medical examinations, such as chest X-rays, to employees, in addition to the existing requirement for coal mines.

Knowledge is power, and knowing your earning potential is no exception. Check out LawCrossing’s salary surveys to gain valuable insights.

Stakeholder Perspectives

• Support: Miner advocates and most mine operators have expressed support for the lower exposure limit, emphasizing the importance of protecting workers’ health.
• Disagreements: While there were disagreements on how to reduce exposures, MSHA ultimately sided with miner advocates in favor of engineering controls over respirators as the primary protection.

Make informed decisions in real-time. Subscribe to JDJournal and be in the know with the latest legal updates.

The implementation of these new standards is a significant step towards safeguarding the health and well-being of miners across the United States.