Blackberry smartphones were once the peak of mobile technology. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, carrying a Blackberry device was a status symbol in the business world. But despite its early dominance, Blackberry eventually faded into obscurity. So what happened? How did the innovative darling of the tech industry become an afterthought?

In this post, we’ll analyze the factors that led to Blackberry’s decline. We’ll see how complacency, poor leadership decisions, and a failure to innovate ultimately sealed the fate of what was once a titan of industry. There are valuable lessons here for any business leader striving to avoid Blackberry’s missteps.

The Early Days: The Rise of Blackberry

In the beginning, there was Mike Lazaridis and Douglas Fregin. These two engineering students founded Research in Motion (RIM) in 1984 while still attending the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada. For years, RIM mostly focused on wireless data transmission systems and paging networks.

But in 1996, Lazaridis had a game-changing insight: cell phones with data capabilities would soon become ubiquitous. He envisioned an email-capable cell phone that could make wireless communication quick and seamless. Lazaridis correctly predicted the mold-breaking impact such a device would have in the business world.

In 1999, RIM released its first Blackberry smartphone, the 850. While primitive by today’s standards, it was revolutionary at the time. The 850 featured a QWERTY keyboard and allowed users to access email instantly while on the go. It was a massive hit among white-collar workers and gained RIM its all-important foothold in the enterprise market.

For the next several years, Blackberry completely dominated the smartphone space, especially among business users. By 2003, RIM was valued at over $7 billion. The iconic Blackberry design – full QWERTY keyboard, functional format, enterprise focus – set the blueprint that competitors would follow for years to come. Blackberry’s peak came in 2008 when its global user base grew to over 20 million people.

So how did Blackberry gain such an advantage over the early mobile phone market? A few key factors:

• Laser focus on business users. Blackberry positioned itself early on as the go-to phone for enterprises. Workers could stay connected and productive while on the move. This gave Blackberry tremendous appeal among high-paying corporate clients.
• Email capabilities. Instant access to email was a killer feature in the pre-iPhone days. Blackberry made checking emails painless, earning it the nickname “Crackberry” for its addictive nature.
• Top-notch security. Blackberry invested heavily in encrypted networks. This made them the most secure devices available at the time – a big selling point for law firms, governments, and banks.
• QWERTY keyboard. While inferior to touchscreens today, the tangible keyboard allowed faster typing and fewer errors than numeric keypads. It resonated with BlackBerry’s core business demographic.
• Effective proprietary software. BlackBerry OS provided an ecosystem tailored to business needs like messaging, contacts, calendars, etc. It helped differentiate BlackBerry from other mobile platforms.

Through its focus on enterprise users and executive-friendly features, Blackberry was the undisputed king during the pre-iPhone era. But change was on the horizon. Cracks began forming in Blackberry’s armor after the 2007 launch of a revolutionary new product from arch-rival Apple…

The iPhone Changes Everything

When Steve Jobs unveiled the first iPhone in January 2007, the mobile world shifted on its axis. With its expansive touchscreen and sleek, user-friendly design, the iPhone fundamentally redefined consumers’ expectations for smartphones. And for Blackberry, things would never be the same again.

The iPhone’s ascendancy confronted Blackberry with its first true competitive threat. The battles between the two companies highlighted their opposing philosophies:

Blackberry:

• Tailored for business and productivity
• Physical QWERTY keyboard
• Proprietary operating system
• Focus on the enterprise market

iPhone:

• User-friendly design
• Sleek touchscreen interface
• third-party App Store
• Positioned as a lifestyle device

While BlackBerry catered to enterprise clients, Apple adopted a broader consumer-centric approach. The iPhone resonated with customers as both a communication tool and a slick personal accessory. For many, owning an iPhone became a status symbol.

Most damagingly for Blackberry, Apple made smartphones intuitive and enjoyable to use. Easy access to apps through the App Store created limitless possibilities for the iPhone. Downloading music, social networking, streaming video – Apple facilitated all of this in a sleek, user-friendly package.

In comparison, BlackBerry suddenly felt clunky and limited. The company’s overconfidence left them flat-footed against the speed and style of Apple’s innovation. Blackberry devices were excellent communication tools, no doubt. But Apple made customers ask “what else?” while also delivering on email and messaging. BlackBerry didn’t realize how quickly power was shifting to the consumer space.

By putting design first, Apple’s iPhone captured the public imagination like no smartphone ever had. To compete with the iPhone’s style and app ecosystem, BlackBerry needed to rethink its entire approach. But as we’ll see, internal struggles prevented Blackberry from responding effectively to this tectonic market shift.

Poor Leadership Cripples Blackberry’s Attempted Turnaround

The iPhone’s wild success made one thing clear: BlackBerry could no longer focus on business users alone if it hoped to thrive. The bring-your-own-device trend was accelerating, with more employees using personal devices for work. After years of dominating the enterprise realm, BlackBerry needed to appeal to a mass consumer audience.

They first attempted this pivot with 2008’s BlackBerry Storm. It was BlackBerry’s initial touchscreen phone meant to rival the iPhone. But the Storm was buggy; its SurePress clickable touchscreen suffered from accuracy issues. Most reviews declared it an inferior copycat of iPhone and Android devices. Still, the Storm became BlackBerry’s fastest-selling phone ever, showing glimmers of promise in the consumer market.

Unfortunately, the Storm was more of an aberration than a turning point. In the coming years, Blackberry released several touchscreen phones like the Torch and the Z10. But overall, the company seemed unable to innovate beyond iterating its existing formulas.

In retrospect, BlackBerry’s failure to gain real momentum on the consumer front tied directly to questionable decision-making in the C-suite:

• Lazaridis and Balsillie’s Monopoly: Longtime co-CEOs Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie were brilliant pioneers but weak leaders. As BlackBerry’s market position eroded, they rejected innovation in favor of doubling down on physical keyboards and enterprise software. The co-CEO structure stunted accountability.
• Musical Chairs in the Executive Suite: Thorsten Heins replaced Lazaridis and Balsillie in 2012 but accomplished little in his 2 years at the helm. John Chen righted the ship somewhat after taking over in 2013, but the job required bolder ideas years earlier.
• Too Little Too Late: BlackBerry kept pumping out keyboard phones and half-baked touchscreen devices long after the tides shifted towards iOS and Android. The company wasted time unsuccessfully trying to catch up rather than leapfrogging the competition with the next big thing.

RIM executives missed nearly every opportunity to be the disruptor rather than the disrupted. But this strategic floundering was enabled by the company’s greatest weakness of all…

Complacency Kills: The Curse of BlackBerry’s Early Success

Throughout much of the 2000s, Blackberry possessed one of the world’s most valuable brands. As discussed earlier, the company once defined mobile communication with its trademark smartphones.

But this early success bred complacency at BlackBerry. They became set in their ways, unwilling to upset a winning formula. When the marketplace began changing rapidly, BlackBerry failed to change with it. Its executive team misjudged how profoundly the iPhone and Android would transform customer expectations.

Leaders made the classic mistake of fighting the last war. They remained fixated on keyboards, battery life, and enterprise software – important factors once upon a time. But the market was hungering for touchscreens, apps, and processing power.

Making matters worse, their customer base became paralyzed by indecision. Businesses and government agencies were wary of switching platforms, given BlackBerry’s reputation for reliability and security. Had BlackBerry nimbler leadership, they could have leveraged their brand recognition to shape the new era in mobile computing.

Instead, the company clung stubbornly to legacy technology well past its expiration date. iPhones rendered BlackBerry devices relics of a bygone technological era – and Apple was happy to twist the knife. “Upgrading to iPhone is an easy way for BlackBerry customers to get the security features they need without compromising on usability”, Apple’s CEO suggested in 2016. By then, it was far too late for BlackBerry to pivot.

BlackBerry made half-hearted attempts at reinvention with entries like the PlayBook and BB10 operating system. But in general, innovation was no longer part of their DNA. When your identity is defined by a physical keyboard and enterprise software, it’s tough to envision what comes next.

Rather than cannibalizing sales by disrupting their core offerings, Blackberry played it safe. They failed to realize how fast change was coming to the mobile sector. By hesitating, they lost their opportunity to shape the future. Within a few short years, Android and iOS achieved total domination. The era of BlackBerry had come to an unceremonious end.

The Decline: By the Numbers

The depth of BlackBerry’s collapse is clearly illustrated through a few key metrics:

• Share Price: BlackBerry stock peaked at $230/share in 2007. Today, it trades for under $10/share.
• Market Share: BlackBerry controlled 20% of the smartphone market in 2009. That number sits at nearly 0% today.
• Revenue: BlackBerry’s revenue cratered from $20 billion in 2011 to just $1 billion in 2018.
• Employees: At its height, BlackBerry employed 17,500 people. Today, just over 3,000 people work for the company.

As recently as 2011, BlackBerry seemed poised to rule the smartphone world indefinitely. Within 5 years, they stood on the edge of extinction – a stunningly rapid fall from grace. Ultimately, the company survived by transitioning to software and QNX automotive technology. But their glory days as a consumer electronics giant were long gone.

The Lasting Impact of BlackBerry’s Collapse

Blackberry invented the modern smartphone and forever changed how the world communicates. For this, they deserve tremendous respect. When examining what went wrong, we must balance BlackBerry’s poor decisions with credit for their trailblazing early accomplishments.

But the company’s mistakes provide invaluable lessons for other industry leaders seeking to avoid a similar fate:

• Complacency kills – never believe your position is unassailable, no matter how successful.
• The most effective leaders are agents of change, not stewards of the status quo.
• Always keep an ear to the ground for shifts in customer priorities.
• Disrupt yourself before competitors do it for you.
• Brand loyalty has its limits – ultimately, users will flock to the best product.
• Design and user experience matter – cater to consumers, not just enterprise clients.

BlackBerry helped pioneer the wireless world we now inhabit. But success blinded them to looming threats on the horizon. When change came, they clung stubbornly to the past rather than reimagining the future. By the time they mobilized, former allies had become mortal enemies committed to their destruction.

The tech graveyard is littered with one-time leaders who failed to adapt – MySpace, Palm, Yahoo. But few have risen so high and fallen so low in such a brief period as BlackBerry. Their tragic demise offers a cautionary reminder that in tech and business, the only constant is change. Leaders must stay flexible, hungry, and forward-thinking – or risk being left behind.

BlackBerry’s coffin has been nailed shut, but its ghost still haunts the corridors of corporate power. For newly dominant players like Apple, BlackBerry’s fate offers a sobering message: build on your victories but never become too comfortable. Hungry startups can quickly become deadly competitors. In retrospect, BlackBerry’s collapse was overdetermined – but it didn’t have to be that way. With stronger leadership, greater openness to change, and a renewed commitment to innovation, BlackBerry may have rewritten its ending. Instead, they serve as a poignant example that no company stays on top forever.

Related Posts

• 10 Reasons Why Blockbuster Failed
• Why Did Yahoo Fail? An Introspective Look at the Rise and Fall of an Internet Pioneer
• Why Kodak Failed and What Entrepreneurs Can Learn
• Why did WeWork fail? An Inside Look at the Spectacular Rise and Fall of a Unicorn
• Your Startup Failed, Now What? How to Recover and Rebound After Failure

Conclusion

Blackberry once defined the smartphone space but failed to adapt to tectonic shifts in consumer priorities. Their fall from dominance results from several factors:

• Early success blinds them to competitive threats
• Poor leadership decisions atop the company
• An inability to innovate beyond their core competencies
• Clinging stubbornly to legacy technology as the market evolved

The Blackberry story illustrates the fine line between a game-changing market leader and an obsolete has-been. Their experience offers lessons for companies operating in volatile, hypercompetitive environments. With more vision and nimbleness, BlackBerry may have changed the plotline rather than playing the victim. But now they serve as a cautionary tale of missed opportunities and executive hubris run amok.

The post Why Blackberry Failed? An Introspective Look at the Rise and Fall of the Iconic Smartphone Brand appeared first on Tactyqal.