Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

I Own 33% of a Property. What Are My Rights?

Many co-owners with a minority interest in a Property assume they have minimal rights. Fortunately for minority co-owners of property, they have many rights.

Your Rights as a 33% Property Owner

When it comes to California partition law, a minority co-owner in California real estate has the right to force the sale through a partition action, to occupy the entire property, and to collect 33% of the net rental proceeds, among many other rights.

Can I Force the Sale if I Only Own 33%? Do I Need the Consent of All Co-Owners to Sell?

One of the biggest myths in co-ownership is that the consent of all co-owners is required to sell the property. The truth is that a skilled partition lawyer in California can put a prompt end to co-ownership on behalf of a co-owner regardless of their fractional ownership. There is no requirement that co-owners agree on the sale, nor any rule that majority controls. If there was, there would be no need for partition law to exist. Co-ownership is not a lifetime commitment, despite what some co-owners might want you to believe.

Right to Occupy the Entire Property as a 33% Co-Owner

Oftentimes, a co-owner in possession claims that they are entitled to full possession of the property. What’s more, a co-owner may assert that they can exclude the other co-owner(s) by claiming that they have lost their rights to the property by moving out, which is another myth among many co-owners.

In fact, the law is that: “Each tenant in common equally is entitled to share in the possession of the entire property and neither may exclude the other from any part of it.” [1]Zaslow v. Kroenert (1946) 29 Cal. 2d 541, 548 The same is true for 33% co-owner!

Another court explained that: “[T]he cotenants hold the common land by unity of possession, for which reason there can be no specific or determinate portion of the common land which any one of such tenants can claim as his in severalty.”[2]Wood v. Henley (1928) 88 Cal.App. 441, 452

This means that one co-owner cannot exclude other co-owners from parts of the property, and that alleged informal agreements whereby one co-owner occupies one part of the property while another occupies another may not constitute a defense.

This is true even when a co-owner holds only 33% interest in the property.

Talkov Law's Partition Attorneys Can Help

If you want to end your co-ownership relationship, but your co-owner won’t agree, a partition action is your only option. With six, full time partition lawyers, Talkov Law is the #1 law firm for partition actions in California. Our expertise is in ending co-ownership disputes and we've mastered efficiency in forcing the sale of jointly owned property. This is why we can offer you unbeatable prices without compromising on quality. Most importantly, we have developed techniques to end your co-ownership disputes faster - usually within just 3 to 9 months. 

Best of all, we can help you unlock the equity in your property with no retainer and no monthly billing for qualified cases. Our normal hourly rates will be paid when we succeed at getting your property sold, putting money in your pocket! For a free, 15-minute consultation with an experienced partition attorney at Talkov Law, call (844) 4-TALKOV (825568), email us at info(at)talkovlaw.com, or fill out a contact form online.

References

References
1 Zaslow v. Kroenert (1946) 29 Cal. 2d 541, 548
2 Wood v. Henley (1928) 88 Cal.App. 441, 452


This post first appeared on Talkov Law, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

I Own 33% of a Property. What Are My Rights?

×

Subscribe to Talkov Law

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×