ITAT Mumbai held that as entire reasons for Reopening were recorded by Incorrect Assumption of facts, accordingly, reopening was invalid and bad-in-law. Hence, subsequent invocation of revisional jurisdictional under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is untenable in law.

The post Reopening on incorrect assumption of fact is invalid, hence Subsequent Revision order u/s 263 bad-in-law appeared first on TaxGuru.