The billionaire boys will be fighting it out in a cage fight at an unconfirmed location. Elon Musk, who owns Tesla, SpaceX, and most recently Twitter, as well as Mark Zuckerberg, who founded Meta (formerly Facebook), which also owns Instagram and WhatsApp.

Although Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) president Dana White’s assertion that “both guys are absolutely dead serious and despite the back-and-forth banter between Musk and Zuckerberg on Social Media, there’s of course still the question as to whether this match is actually going to happen. However, the battle between the social media platforms is 100% real.

As social media platforms have evolved dramatically over the years, it has had a significant impact on the Social Media Marketing landscape. While Twitter has maintained its position as one of the most popular platforms, a new challenger is emerging. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, has announced plans to create a new decentralized social media network, Meta P92, that could potentially upstage Twitter.

But what exactly is Meta P92, and how similar is it to Twitter? In this article, we will explore what we know so far about this upcoming platform, how it may differ from Twitter, and the potential role it in the development of future social media marketing strategies.

What is Meta P92?

First, let’s look at what we know about Meta P92. According to Meta’s statement, P92 is a standalone decentralized social network that will allow users to share text updates. The focus of the platform is on creating a separate space for creators and public figures to share timely updates about their interests.

The announcement came from Adam Mosseri, the Head of Instagram, who is leading the project. Mosseri stated that P92 is still in the early stages of development, but they are exploring the possibility of creating a new platform that will offer an alternative to the current centralized social media networks.

So, how similar will Meta P92 be to Twitter? At this stage, it’s difficult to say for sure, but based on the limited information available, there are some similarities. Like Twitter, Meta P92 will focus on text updates, and it appears that it will be a platform for sharing short messages, similar to tweets. However, the key difference between the two platforms is the approach to decentralization.

The Decentralization of Social Media Networks

With a decentralized social media network, communities within the network can establish their own guidelines without company oversight. This means that there is no central authority or server controlling the network, and users have more control over their data and how they interact with the network. This approach differs significantly from Twitter, which is a centralized platform where all user data is stored on Twitter’s servers.

Decentralization also means that user data gathering and experiences are different because they rely on an expanded network of individual servers. This approach can provide more privacy and security for users, as there is no central point of failure or control. In contrast, Twitter’s centralized model has been criticized for its lack of privacy and its susceptibility to hacking and data breaches.

Another important difference is that with decentralized social networks, users own their data, not the platform. This means that users have greater control over how their data is used and can choose whether to share it or not. This differs from centralized networks like Twitter, where the platform owns the user data and can use it for advertising and other purposes.

It’s important to note that Meta P92 is still in the early stages of development, and there is a lot we don’t know yet about the platform. However, the concept of a decentralized social network is an exciting one, and if Meta can successfully create a platform that offers a viable alternative to centralized networks like Twitter, it could potentially disrupt the social media marketing landscape.

The Benefits of Decentralized Social Media Networks

One of the potential benefits of a decentralized network is that it could provide a more democratic and diverse space for users to share their views and connect with others. With a decentralized network, there is no central authority controlling what users can and cannot say, and communities within the network can establish their own guidelines without company oversight. This could create a more inclusive space for users, particularly those who may have felt marginalized on centralized networks like Twitter.

Another potential benefit is that decentralized networks could offer greater privacy and security for users. With no central point of control, there is less risk of data breaches or hacking. Additionally, because users own their data, they have greater control over how it is used and can choose whether to share it or not.

Meta P92’s Influence on the Social Media Landscape

Marketers can potentially use Meta P92 in a variety of ways, leading the way for it to have a centralized role in the development of future social media marketing strategies. It’s important to keep in mind that the platform is still in development and it’s unclear exactly how it will function. However, here are a few potential ways that marketers could use Meta P92:

Influencer Marketing: If Meta P92 becomes a platform for creators and public figures to share timely updates about their interests, as the Meta statement suggests, it could become a space for influencer marketing. Marketers could potentially partner with influencers on the platform to promote products or services.

Niche Communities: Decentralized networks like Meta P92 could potentially offer a space for more niche communities to form. Marketers could potentially use these communities to target specific audiences with highly targeted messaging.

Content Creation: If Meta P92 becomes a popular platform for sharing text updates, marketers could potentially use the platform to create and share content. For example, they could share updates about industry news or trends to position themselves as thought leaders.

Building Relationships: Because decentralized networks offer a more democratic and diverse space for users, marketers could potentially use Meta P92 to build relationships with their target audiences. By engaging with users and participating in community conversations, they could build brand awareness and loyalty.

It’s important to keep in mind that these are all speculative at this point, as Meta P92 is still in development and it’s unclear exactly how the platform will function. Additionally, it’s important for marketers to approach the platform with caution and respect for the community guidelines that are established within the network. The lack of centralized control means that communities will have greater autonomy over what is allowed and what is not, and it will be important for marketers to respect these boundaries in order to build trust and credibility within the community.

In conclusion, Meta P92 is an exciting development in the social media industry. The concept of a decentralized social network offers potential benefits in terms of privacy, security, inclusivity, and diversity. However, there are also potential challenges that need to be addressed. It will be interesting to see how Meta develops the platform and how it is received by users. If successful, Meta P92 could potentially upstage Twitter and disrupt the social media marketing landscape as we know it.

Need an expert digital and social media marketing team in your corner? 

AIS Media is an award-winning digital marketing agency that helps businesses of all sizes level up their SEO, paid search, and social media marketing to elevate their online brand and drive measurable business results.

Contact AIS Media today for a complimentary consultation.

The post Social Media Marketing: Musk and Twitter vs Zuck and Facebook. Who will win? appeared first on AIS Media, Inc.