Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Challenging relationship between the client and the lawyer

Tags: lawyer

Some relationships can be more challenging than that of the Lawyer and the client. The lawyer has a knowledge of knowing what the client wants, then the lawyer is in the better position to deal with such a case and avoid any such kind of a misunderstanding or conflict of interest. Lawyers should be alert at the time of coming into the relationship between the client and the lawyer. These are: client has already been gone through and served with a number of legal representative and has been dissatisfied, if the client does not give sufficient time to the lawyer to work properly then the lawyer has the option to withdraw from such a case and confirm that in writing, Unrealistic expectations which may arise that the client wants to barter the services with that of the services like handling of lawyers work or benefit, to think that the client knows much more and has much knowledge as compared to that of the lawyer who represented the case on his behalf, the client wants that all the other cases should be kept at halt and prior consideration should be taken in into account of the client’s case, unrealistic expectations from the client like that of any guarantees been taken or periodical irritation or complaining constantly, the client has intentionally engaged in the suit in order to injure the reputation of the other party and realistic demands being made by the client towards the lawyer and his staff members.

Whether there exist any challenges between the lawyer and the client relationship but it is still encouraging from the lawyer side to provide such a kind of a legal service whenever the client needs it. At the time of adjudicating the case of the client on his behalf there arises a situation that the relationship between the law and the client becomes challenging. It is encouraged from the lawyers part to make a realistic expectation for the client and try to manage the relationship as best possible way as can be. The best possible way to build a healthy relationship between the parties is increasing another lawyer for second opinions or involving another legal representative with the case to better serve the client and in a timely manner.

Once the lawyer comes into contact with the letter of engagement of the retina is agreement then whatever the challenge maybe the lawyer has to resolve such a challenge and meet the expectation of the client whenever required. Though in situations where the lawyer has the opportunity to withdraw from such a case where there is a reasonable apprehension that such a case would lead to the loss to the client and not on the basis that there is any kind of a challenge being coming between the parties.

Communication with the client

Effective communication is always required to build the healthy relationship between the client and the lawyer. Such kind of maintaining an effective communication is the responsibility of the lawyer and the lawyer should intimate the client at all relevant stages as to how the case is going on in an effective and timely manner. Such information can be in simple words or a simple language which would try to explain to the client at what stage what is going on in the client’s case. Even if the client is not able to understand then to translate can also be appointed for the same to translate in an easy manner to the client but a proper and an effective communication is required to be built between the parties for a healthy relationship and a healthy case to work for. And in case the client is visually impaired or there is any such kind of a disability then in such a scenario as well it is the duty of the lawyer to appoint any such kind of a translator or find any such kind of a solution to communicate that disabled client properly. Since each case that comes into the lawyer’s contact has different demands or expectations for each and every case it requires a different strategy or an approach.
Before properly communicating with the client the lawyer should take into consideration the education, mental health, Physical health, age, communication style, functional ability, ability to provide instructions or make decisions, level of sophistication or understanding.

If the client wants that the lawyer should be communicated to the client in a channel or through communication which is the choice of the client and the Lawyer is not competent enough to communicate through such channel, then the lawyer must decline such kind of an act until and unless the lawyer is competent enough to provide those services, without any risk, undue delay or expense to the client in writing. If both the client and the lawyer agree to communicate through a proper Translator for communicator, then it must be noted that the translator does not have any kind of misunderstanding or conflict of interest and both the parties can rely upon him in accuracy and translate the client’s instruction for the lawyer’s advice.

Lawyers should also be cautious when such an interpreter or a communicator is the family member of the client as such communicators or interpreters do not have a proper training to convey such information between the parties. Such an interpreter or communicator could also compromise the confidential disclosure of Information and advice to meet between the parties and create confusion, misunderstanding or conflict of interest.
If the client is a person with diminished capacity, then the lawyers need to adjust in the manner in which the Canadian client and Immigration Lawyers in Chandigarh could be communicated in a proper manner depending on such client’s abilities and provide the same kind of services with that of other clients who had the ability of communicating properly. Proper communication channels should be considered where both the parties can express what they want from each other which can only be possible through proper communicating channels.

Following are some of the ways of the methods to communicate a very healthy relationship between the client and the lawyer at the time of beginning the retainers agreement or the letter of engagement and also discuss the same with that of the client that what should be the primary source of contact for example email, telephone, fax, courier, mail, home or office visits or priority posts. But with every method of communication there is one or another drawback. Also communicating with the client also depends on which option has been opted by the lawyer and for the future updates as well. They should also mention the method or the source of updating the client for example court documents, sending the copies to the client through the correspondence address or sending memos to the client. It is also mandatory to consider as to how much time it will take from Lawyers in Chandigarh side to respond through search email, calls, letters or any other form of communication.
It is the prime responsibility of the lawyer that whatever the method he has chosen to communicate with the client it should be enough in a reasonable manner and it should be understandable to the client in a proper manner. There might arise certain scenarios where whatever the information is being advised or informed is sensitive information for a very confidential or a crucial information required to be communicated to the client and there is risk of leaking of such information then such advice or information should be written in writing.



This post first appeared on India Grants Divorce To Man Whose Wife Refused To Live With In-laws, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Challenging relationship between the client and the lawyer

×

Subscribe to India Grants Divorce To Man Whose Wife Refused To Live With In-laws

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×