Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Judge rules country homeowners aren’t entitled to peace and quiet

A judge has ruled that Country Homeowners are not entitled to the peace and quiet a rural paradise would normally be expected to provide, in a row over a barn conversion. Zoe Bucknell, a corporate lawyer, was told by a judge that she “is not automatically entitled to the maintenance of the same rural peace and quiet” as when she bought her £1.3 million property in 2014 after she tried to block a development near her farmhouse in Kent. Mrs Bucknell clashed with Mark Stoneham, a game-shooting pedigree beef farmer, over his plans to convert a next-door barn into two houses while using her drive as access for heavy construction traffic. The keen horse rider – with her own stables at home – said “noise disturbance, vibration [and] fumes” from traffic passing up the 55 metre driveway past her “quiet and secluded forever home” posed a threat not just to her peace but to the fabric of the driveway and

The post Judge Rules Country Homeowners aren’t entitled to peace and quiet appeared first on Balanced News Summary.



This post first appeared on Balanced News Summary, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Judge rules country homeowners aren’t entitled to peace and quiet

×

Subscribe to Balanced News Summary

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×