Moscow has removed 700,000 children from Ukraine, says Russian MP
Russia has brought 700,000 Children from the conflict zones of Ukraine into Russian territory, the head of the international committee in the Federation Council, Russia’s upper house of parliament, has said.
Grigory Karasin said on his Telegram messaging channel late on Sunday:
In recent years, 700,000 children have found refuge with us, fleeing the bombing and shelling from the conflict areas in Ukraine.
Reuters also reports that Moscow says its program of bringing children from Ukraine into Russian territory is to protect orphans and children abandoned in conflict zones.
However, Ukraine says many children have been illegally deported and the US says thousands of children have been forcibly removed from their homes.
Most of the movement of people and children occurred in the first few months of the war, which began in February 2022.
In July 2022, the US estimated that Russia had “forcibly deported” 260,000 children, while Ukraine’s ministry of integration of occupied territories says 19,492 Ukrainian children are currently considered illegally deported.
Key events
No need for new military draft to replace Wagner troops, says defence official
There is no need for a further mobilisation in Russia to replace Wagner fighters who have left the battlefield in Ukraine after a short-lived mutiny, state media said on Monday, quoting a defence official.
“There is no threat at all regarding a drop in the combat potential, both in the mid-term and long-term perspective,” Andrey Kartapolov, head of the state duma’s defence committee, was quoted as saying by Russian state news agency Tass.
Reuters reports he also said:
At the time of the rebellion, there were no Wagner PMC [private military company] employees at the forefront, they were all in camps. As for replacing them [Wagner] in the reserve, there is something and someone to replace them with.
The Wagner group’s chief, Yevgeny Prigozhin, led his forces against Russia’s top military brass just over a week ago, embarrassing the Kremlin. He later abandoned his advance on Moscow and struck a deal with the Kremlin under which he accepted exile in neighbouring Belarus.
Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February last year, President Vladimir Putin in September ordered a “partial” military call-up to boost regular forces in the first military mobilisation in Russia since the second world war.
Hundreds of thousands of men have been drafted, while tens of thousands more have fled abroad.
On 13 June – before the Wagner rebellion – Putin told reporters there was “no such need” for any additional mobilisation.
The European Union is considering a proposal to allow a Russian bank under sanctions to carve-out a subsidiary that would reconnect to the global financial network as a sop to Moscow, the Financial Times has reported.
The move would be aimed at safeguarding the Black Sea grain deal that allows Ukraine to export food to global markets, the newspaper said on Monday.
The plan, which was proposed by Moscow through negotiations brokered by the UN, would allow the bank to create a subsidiary to handle payments related to grain exports, the FT said, citing people with knowledge of the matter, Reuters reports.
The new entity would be permitted to use the global Swift financial messaging system, which was closed to the largest Russian banks following the Ukraine invasion last year.
Russia’s envoy to the United Nations in Geneva said there were no grounds to maintain the “status quo” of the Black Sea grain deal that is set to expire on 18 July, the Russian news outlet Izvestia reported on Monday.
Reuters reports that envoy Gennady Gatilov told the outlet that the implementation of Russia’s conditions for the extensions of the agreement was “stalling”. Those conditions included the reconnection of the Russian Agricultural Bank (Rosselkhozbank) to the Swift banking payment system.
Gatilov told Izvestia:
Russia has repeatedly extended the deal in the hope of positive changes. However, what we are seeing now does not give us grounds to agree to maintaining the status quo.
