By Arianna Skibell

A small globe surrounded by smoke illustrates global warming. | Lionel Bonaventure/AFP via Getty Images

Negotiations over the Biden administration’s proposal for how to set up a new international Climate fund did not go so well this weekend.

Countries could not agree on where the so-called loss and damage fund should be housed or how the money should be allocated, write Karl Mathiesen and Zia Weise. The United States and European Union argue that the World Bank should run the operation, while developing nations say that’s a non-starter, citing its long history as an instrument of wealthy powers.

That leaves negotiators to try again in early November. If they fail, the fund will face major question marks heading into the Nov. 30-Dec. 12 climate summit in Dubai, United Arab Emirates — just a year after governments applauded their “historic” agreement to create the pot of money in the first place.

The fund is meant to assist developing nations with the costs of coping with irreversible damage from climate change. The U.S., which long resisted the idea, has yet to agree to put money into it.

Critics to U.S.: Give up World Bank idea
“If wealthy nations do not come to the next meeting prepared to let go of this unrealistic proposal, meet their international obligations, and set up a stand-alone, rights-based and resourced fund, they might as well not show up at all,” said Lien Vandamme, an observer at the talks for the Center for International Environmental Law.

Failure to reach an agreement could scuttle the negotiations at the summit, warned Preety Bhandari, senior adviser at the World Resources Institute.

The United States argues that placing the loss and damage fund within the World Bank is practical. It wouldn’t require the years it might take to establish an entirely new system. And as one World Bank official told Zack Colman last week, the bank is a “USA policy tool” that doesn’t require new money.

But for developing nations, that’s part of the problem. The World Bank, they argue, has historically helped the industrialized world to impose its economic policies and has given short shrift to climate needs. They want the fund to operate as an independent body under the United Nations.

It's Monday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy.
Send your tips, comments, questions to [email protected]. And folks, let's keep it classy.

A message from Gas Leaks:

Are you ready for a horror story? Despite decades of industry advertising claiming "natural" gas is safe and clean, the reality is that it's actually Methane Gas, and it poses some horrifying threats to your health, safety and the climate. It explodes nearly every day, gives kids asthma and cancer, and makes extreme weather worse. Gas Leaks is exposing the horrors of methane gas and holding the industry accountable for its disinformation. Learn more today!

Today in POLITICO Energy’s podcast: Ry Rivard breaks down the financial outlook of New Jersey’s first offshore wind farm and the bumpy times for the offshore wind industry as a whole.

A message from Gas Leaks:

The sun sets over Southern California during a blistering heat wave in September 2022. | Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images

Carbon market merger?
Washington state is weighing whether to merge its new system for buying and selling permits to emit carbon with the market in California, the only other state to have an economywide cap-and-trade system, writes Anne C. Mulkern.

By linking with the California system — which is jointly run with the Canadian province of Quebec — Washington could help lower the cost that businesses pay to emit carbon dioxide, one of the main drivers of global warming. Environmentalists say the high prices are good for the climate, but the cost can be tough on both businesses and consumers.

Axed CO2 pipeline fallout
The cancellation of a major carbon dioxide pipeline Friday rippled far beyond the Corn Belt, raising questions about the fate of similar projects and the viability of carbon capture technology at the scale envisioned by the Biden administration, write Jeffrey Tomich, Jason Plautz and Niina H. Farah.

While federal regulators oversee most aspects of CO2 pipeline safety, state-level approval is critical. The 1,300-mile Midwestern project was foiled after South Dakota regulators rejected a key project permit.

Pipeline leak finger pointing enrages Russia
Russia called threats to the Kremlin “unacceptable” after Latvia’s president suggested NATO should close off the Baltic Sea if it can be proved Russia was involved in a Finnish gas pipeline leak, writes Claudia Chiappa.

“Any threats should be taken seriously, no matter who they come from. Whoever they come from, the threats to Russia are unacceptable,” said Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov.

Carbon capture capsize: An oil giant quietly ditched the world’s biggest carbon capture plant.

New study: Billions of snow crabs in Alaska likely starved to death due to a warming ocean.

JOIN 10/24 FOR AN UPDATE ON CHIPS: America is rapidly restructuring its semiconductor supply chain and manufacturing base, thanks in part to billion-dollar initiatives like the CHIPS and Science Act. But who is winning the reward? Join POLITICO Oct. 24 to get an update on CHIPS what other challenges have emerged now that the new era is underway. REGISTER NOW.

A showcase of some of our best subscriber content.

President Joe Biden listens during a Feb. 22, 2022, event at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex. | Alex Brandon/AP

The Biden administration has designated 31 U.S. communities as technology hubs — a label that has the potential to drive clean energy and critical mineral production and processing.

The Biden administration has released a road map for meeting its policy aims in the Arctic, doubling down on fighting climate change’s impact on the sensitive ecosystem.

Xcel Energy, which operates one of the nation’s largest wind energy fleets, is looking to add hundreds more turbines in Minnesota to help replace its last operating coal plant in the state.

That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.

JOIN 10/25 FOR A TALK ON THE FUTURE OF GRID RELIABILITY: The EPA’s proposed standards for coal and new natural gas fired power plants have implications for the future of the electric grid. These rules may lead to changes in the power generation mix—shifting to more renewable sources in favor of fossil-fuel plants. Join POLITICO on Oct. 25 for a deep-dive conversation on what it will take to ensure a reliable electric grid for the future. REGISTER NOW.

A message from Gas Leaks:

Are you ready for a horror story? Despite decades of industry advertising claiming "natural" gas is safe and clean, the reality is that it's actually methane gas, and it poses some horrifying threats to your health, safety and the climate. It explodes nearly every day, gives kids asthma and cancer, and makes extreme weather worse!

The fossil fuel industry has taken a page out of the Big Tobacco playbook: spending hundreds of millions of dollars over the years to mislead the public into thinking that methane gas is “clean.” Addressing the rapidly escalating climate crisis requires being honest with the public: there’s nothing “natural” about methane gas — it’s a toxic, explosive fossil fuel that is heating the planet.

Gas Leaks is exposing the horrors of methane gas and holding the industry accountable for its disinformation. Learn more today!

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://www.politico.com/_login?base=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to [email protected] by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Please click here and follow the steps to unsubscribe.