Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

California’s Senate scramble

Presented by PhRMA: Tomorrow’s conversation, tonight. Know where the news is going next.
Oct 02, 2023 View in browser
 

By Calder McHugh

Presented by

Laphonza Butler, president of EMILY's List, speaks during an event in Washington, June 23, 2023. | Susan Walsh/AP Photo

APPOINTMENT VIEWING — When California Governor Gavin Newsom named Laphonza Butler to the late Dianne Feinstein’s open Senate seat on Sunday, he made a historic selection — and sparked a new set of questions for voters.

Chief among them is whether Butler intends to run for the seat already contested by Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff, Barbara Lee and Katie Porter. Butler is a longtime power player in California politics, first as a union organizer and then as a consultant and as the president of EMILY’s List, a powerful political action committee aimed at electing female Democratic candidates who support abortion rights.

Newsom decided not to name any of the three candidates currently in the race, not wanting to tip the scales for any of them — though Lee fit Newsom’s 2021 promise to nominate a Black woman to Feinstein’s seat if he got the chance. Still, Newsom’s adviser Anthony York told POLITICO that there are no preconditions on Butler’s Appointment; she hasn’t promised not to run in 2024. If she decides to seek a full term, she could further scramble an already tight race.

Californians will now vote four times for Senate in 2024 — for the remainder of Feinstein’s term in primary and general special elections, as well as in the primary and general election for a full term that begins in 2025. With three existing big name Democratic candidates already in the race, it makes for a complicated situation.

To get a better sense of the state of play in California and the political implications of Butler’s nomination, we spoke with the person who broke the news of the appointment, POLITICO’s California Bureau Chief Christopher Cadelago. This conversation has been edited.

How does Laphonza Butler’s appointment affect the 2024 race to fill Dianne Feinstein’s Senate seat?

A lot of this will depend on whether Butler decides to run. I’m told she’s genuinely torn over the decision — and for good reason. The other candidates have been running for months, have political networks of their own and have amassed large warchests, particularly in the cases of Reps. Adam Schiff and Katie Porter. In the short-term, Newsom’s appointment of Butler is a major blow, to say the least, to Rep. Barbara Lee. While Lee and Newsom were not personally close, she put a huge amount of stock in winning this appointment, only to criticize Newsom’s comments before Feinstein died about not wanting to pick an interim senator. Lee was never a lock to get this appointment. But blowing up Newsom was the worst thing she could have done. The timing for her was terrible.

Lee’s allies were still advocating for her appointment — was it those specific comments that certainly sunk her chances? And just how much does not getting the appointment hurt her, given that she’s also lagging behind in raising money?

Lee’s allies were trying to do a few things: Pressure Newsom publicly through groups like the Congressional Black Caucus to choose Lee, particularly after Feinstein’s death on Thursday. Work allies — particularly Black women — to try and get them to turn Newsom down in the event he turned to them for the appointment. And, try to work Newsom with a lighter touch. In the end, none of it mattered. He wasn’t going to pick Lee.

It’s notable, like you mentioned, that Butler is considering running, and also that Newsom didn’t appear to ask her to publicly commit to not doing so. How specifically would a Butler run scramble the race?

Butler has the chance to cut a very dynamic profile in the Senate. She’s California’s first openly gay senator — and the Senate’s first openly gay person of color. Butler’s nearly two decades working in the trenches of organized labor (before becoming a political consultant and the president of EMILY’s List) gives her a real opportunity to speak to the economic anxieties people are facing. There are few members of Congress from the coasts with the history and standing to be a messenger on this. In addition, as Newsom said, Butler also brings credibility when it comes to speaking out against what he calls the “rights regression” and other issues like voting rights.

And she’s also been a player in California politics for a long time. What are her connections with the other three big name candidates?

Butler has worked very closely with nearly every political figure of note in California, either through her labor role or later as a consultant. I’ve talked to folks connected with Lee who say Butler was helping her campaign a bit. EMILY’s List backed Porter in her prior House race, and she drew praise from Butler. But the group also backed a candidate running against Porter’s endorsed pick in the race for the House seat she is vacating, which is currently a toss-up.

And in terms of Newsom, do his assumed national political aspirations factor into his choice of Butler? How so?

The governor can’t blink without someone analyzing how it might play in 2028, let alone 2024. So you better believe that this Senate appointment — one he really didn’t want to make — is being viewed through a political prism. First, Newsom had pledged to choose a Black woman, after picking Alex Padilla to succeed Kamala Harris. Then, more recently, he said he wouldn’t pick Lee because he didn’t want to tip the scales. He also suggested that his pick would be a temporary senator. That opened the door for criticism of him that he was going to pick a Black woman, but only as a short-timer. And although Newsom didn’t use the word himself, Lee accused him of wanting a “caretaker” for the seat. That didn’t sit well with her allies and some progressives, who said the governor’s remarks would someday be remembered in early primary presidential states like South Carolina. To get himself out of that jam, Newsom’s team spent the weekend making clear that he was putting no preconditions on the pick and that they were free to run in 2024 if they wanted. Politically, Butler is a shrewd choice. And if we can zoom out some more, Newsom’s appointments more broadly have been historic, and reflect the changing demographics of California: Padilla, the Latino son of a short-order cook and a housekeeper; Attorney General Rob Bonta, the first person of Filipino descent to hold the post whose parents organized farmworkers; Secretary of State Shirley Weber, a career academic and the daughter of a sharecropper from a town called Hope, Ark., and now Butler. He’s helped remake the Democratic bench in the state — and very much not in his own image.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at [email protected]. Or contact tonight’s author at [email protected] or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @calder_mchugh.

 

A message from PhRMA:

PBMs are siphoning money away from you. They decide what you pay and what medicines you can get. PBMs steer you toward pharmacies they own that make them more money. And, they're creating new fees that pad their profits, but don't benefit patients. Learn more.

 
What'd I Miss?

— U.S. to send more aid to Ukraine ‘soon’ amid funding concerns, WH says: The U.S. will be sending another aid package to Ukraine “soon,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said today, in an effort to assuage concerns about diminishing support for the embattled country.The latest aid package will come later this week, according to a U.S. official. The announcement comes two days after Congress passed an 11th hour government funding bill that did not include aid for Ukraine, an omission that was a blow for both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and President Joe Biden, who has made support for Ukraine one of his priorities as he seeks reelection in 2024.

— Court rejects Eastman’s bid to scrap rulings that sent his emails to Jan. 6 investigators: The Supreme Court, minus a recused Clarence Thomas, has turned down a bid by attorney John Eastman to erase court rulings that described him as a linchpin in former President Donald Trump’s bid to subvert the 2020 election. The high court’s decision today essentially enshrines rulings by a federal district judge in California that found Eastman’s emails contained evidence of a likely crime related to Trump’s efforts.

— Trump blasts judge during first day of $250 million fraud trial: Donald Trump came face-to-face in a Manhattan court today with the attorney general who is suing him for massive business fraud and the judge who last week revoked his business licenses, as the former president attended the first day of a $250 million civil trial. A scowl on his face as he entered the courtroom, Trump showed up to see opening statements in the trial. New York Attorney General Tish James alleges that Trump, his adult sons, his companies and some of his business associates, fraudulently inflated Trump’s net worth in order to obtain favorable terms from banks and insurance companies.

 

GROWING IN THE GOLDEN STATE: POLITICO California is growing, reinforcing our role as the indispensable insider source for reporting on politics, policy and power. From the corridors of power in Sacramento and Los Angeles to the players and innovation hubs in Silicon Valley, we're your go-to for navigating the political landscape across the state. Exclusive scoops, essential daily newsletters, unmatched policy reporting and insights — POLITICO California is your key to unlocking Golden State politics. LEARN MORE.

 
 
Nightly Road to 2024

RFK JR.’S INDY GAMBIT — A super PAC supporting Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has begun polling his support as an Independent, one of the strongest indications to date that the long-shot Democrat is set to announce a party affiliation switch, reports POLITICO.

The poll, conducted by the firm John Zogby Strategies and commissioned by the American Values 2024 PAC, comes amid growing speculation — fueled by Kennedy himself — that he will leave the Democratic Party in the upcoming weeks. But what the PAC found in its survey may be as notable as the tea leaves around a switch itself: Kennedy, as an Independent, would pull more support away from Republican Donald Trump than Democrat Joe Biden, according to the findings.

All told, the poll shows that in a general election between Trump, Biden and a generic “independent candidate,” the result is Trump at 40 percent, Bident at 38 percent and the independent candidate at 17 percent. In a matchup between Trump, Biden and “Robert F. Kennedy Jr.” as the independent candidate, the result is Trump and Bide tied at 38 percent with Kennedy at 19 percent. The survey did not include Green Party candidate Cornel West.

PROXY VOTE — President Joe Biden’s name won’t appear on the ballot anywhere in 2023, but you wouldn’t know it from the campaigns that Republican candidates for governor are running in Kentucky and Mississippi, writes the Associated Press.

GOP nominees in both states — Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron and first-term Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves — are just as likely to mention the Democratic president as they are to name the person they face in the Nov. 7 general election.

In 2020, then-President Donald Trump won 62% of the vote in Kentucky and 58% in Mississippi in his loss to Biden. The Kentucky and Mississippi gubernatorial campaigns might well serve as messaging test drives for the 2024 presidential election year, when Biden is expected to be on the ballot. And while there’s a Republican incumbent in Mississippi and it’s a Democrat seeking a second term in Kentucky, the competitions bear striking similarities to each other. In each state, the Democrat has a previously existing brand that could help distinguish them from the Republican effort to define them as Biden allies.

 

A message from PhRMA:

 
AROUND THE WORLD

President Joe Biden walks with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy ahead of a working session on Ukraine during the G7 Leaders' Summit in Hiroshima. | Susan Walsh/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

CORRUPTION CONCERNS — Biden administration officials are far more worried about corruption in Ukraine than they publicly admit, a confidential U.S. strategy document obtained by POLITICO’s Nahal Toosi suggests.

The “sensitive but unclassified” version of the long-term U.S. plan lays out numerous steps Washington is taking to help Kyiv root out malfeasance and otherwise reform an array of Ukrainian sectors. It stresses that corruption could cause Western allies to abandon Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion, and that Kyiv cannot put off the anti-graft effort.

“Perceptions of high-level corruption” the confidential version of the document warns, could “undermine the Ukrainian public’s and foreign leaders’ confidence in the war-time government.”

That’s starker than the analysis available in the little-noticed public version of the 22-page document, which the State Department appears to have posted on its website with no fanfare about a month ago.

The confidential version of the “Integrated Country Strategy” is about three times as long and contains many more details about U.S. objectives in Ukraine, from privatizing its banks to helping more schools teach English to encouraging its military to adopt NATO protocols. Many goals are designed to reduce the corruption that bedevils the country.

The administration wants to press Ukraine to cut graft, not least because U.S. dollars are at stake. But being too loud about the issue could embolden opponents of U.S. aid to Ukraine, many of them Republican lawmakers who are trying to block such assistance. Any perception of weakened American support for Kyiv also could cause more European countries to think twice about their role.

 

DOWNLOAD THE POLITICO APP: Stay in the know with the POLITICO mobile app, featuring timely political news, insights and analysis from the best journalists in the business. The sleek and navigable design offers a convenient way to access POLITICO's scoops and groundbreaking reporting. Don’t miss out on the app you can rely on for the news you need. DOWNLOAD FOR iOS – DOWNLOAD FOR ANDROID.

 
 
Nightly Number

Nearly 709,000

The number of Ford vehicles that U.S. auto safety investigators are probing for potential engine failures. The National Highway Safety Traffic Administration posted documents today that indicated the investigation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis, which is closer to a recall. The investigation covers the F-150 pickup truck, as well as Explorer, Bronco and Edge SUVs and Lincoln Nautilus and Aviator SUVs. The mechanical issue is largely with faulty valves that can cause engine failure under normal driving conditions.

RADAR SWEEP

RENTING RAT RACE — If you’re renting an apartment in a city with rent control protections, the dream is to find one of those apartments: a unit that has protections from the landlord significantly raising the rent each year. And as various housing crises overtake American cities and rents skyrocket, rent control becomes even more valuable for renters. For landlords, it’s the opposite — rent control stymies them from making profits. And the politics of rent control have gotten increasingly complicated, as some landlords and local politicians are claiming getting rid of rent control would be a racial justice victory. For The Baffler, Charlie Dulik reports on the future of the hot button issue and what it might mean for rent in multiple major American cities.

Parting Image

On this date in 1969: British Army Riot Squad troops wore gas masks, bullet proof vests and wielded two-foot-long batons during a demonstration in Belfast, Northern Ireland. The squad was designed to penetrate rioting crowds to bring out ringleaders and lawbreakers in the midst of The Troubles and fears of political and sectarian violence in Northern Ireland. | Peter Kemp/AP Photo

Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

 

A message from PhRMA:

Health insurers and PBMs can refuse to share savings that should go to you. Now they've got another trick. A new report shows PBMs found new ways to profit off your prescriptions. They've doubled the amount of fees they charge on medicines in the commercial market. They tie these fees to the price of medicines. And experts warn this can lead PBMs to cover medicines with higher prices instead of lower-cost options.

 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Charlie Mahtesian @PoliticoCharlie

Calder McHugh @calder_mchugh

 

Follow us

 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://www.politico.com/_login?base=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to [email protected] by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Please click here and follow the steps to unsubscribe.



This post first appeared on Test Sandbox Updates, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

California’s Senate scramble

×

Subscribe to Test Sandbox Updates

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×