Hits: 0

•Declare me winner of presidential election, Obi tells tribunal 

•Says, Tinubu, Shettima not certified to be on poll

•Seeks president-elect’s disqualification on account of his US drug-related forfeitures

•Accuses INEC of suppressing votes in 18,088 polling models, refusal to current kinds EC8A, EC8B in Rivers for inspection

Alex Enumah in Abuja

Because the curtain falls on the time-frame for submitting of petitions in opposition to the result of the February 25 presidential Election, the presidential candidates of Labour Occasion (LP), Mr. Peter Obi; Peoples Democratic Occasion (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar; Motion Alliance (AA), Solomon Okangbuan; and Allied Folks’s Motion (APM), Chichi Ojei, have filed for the nullification of the declaration of Bola Tinubu of All Progressives Congress (APC) as president-elect by the Impartial Nationwide Electoral Fee (INEC).

AA’s petition was contained in swimsuit quantity CA/PEPC/01/2023, whereas that of APM was CA/PEPC/03/2023, and that of LP was marked CA/PEPC/04/2023.

Atiku swelled the listing along with his petition filed on Tuesday in Abuja. Though particulars of the applying by PDP Candidate had been but to be made out there within the petition marked: /PEPC/05/2023, Atiku and his occasion had since faulted the whole course of that led to the emergence of Tinubu as president-elect.

Atiku’s petition filed final evening got here precisely 21 days after INEC Chairman, Professor Mahmood Yakubu, declared Tinubu president-elect, saying his occasion scored majority of votes forged on the ballot.

In the meantime, Obi, yesterday, requested the Presidential Election Petition Court docket (PEPC) to declare him because the genuine winner of the February 25 presidential election.

Within the petition filed by his workforce of legal professionals, together with 13 Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs), amongst who’re Dr. Livy Uzoukwu, Away Kalu, Onyechi Ikpeazu, Chief Sebastian Hon, and Jibrin Okutepa, Obi hinged his request on the grounds that he, and never Tinubu, scored majority of lawful votes forged on the presidential ballot.

Obi insisted that Tinubu and his vice president-elect, Kashim Shettima, ought to not be on the presidential poll on the grounds that they weren’t lawfully nominated by their occasion.

The INEC chairman had on March 1 declared Tinubu because the president-elect.

Within the outcomes introduced, Tinubu polled 8,794,726 votes to emerge victorious. Atiku, who got here second, scored 6,984,520 votes, whereas Obi scored 6,101,533 votes.

Dissatisfied with the motion of the electoral umpire, Obi and his occasion approached the courtroom to put aside the return of Tinubu as president-elect and declare him winner as an alternative.

The petition, marked: CA/PEPC/03/2023 and filed by Uzoukwu, was predicated on three grounds, amongst which had been that: Tinubu as on the time of the election was not certified to contest the election; the election of Tinubu was invalid by cause of corrupt practices or non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act, 2022; and that Tinubu was not duly elected by majority of the lawful votes forged on the presidential election.

Whereas Obi and LP are the Petitioners within the swimsuit dated March 20, 2023, INEC, Tinubu, Shettima, and APC are First, Second, Third, and Fourth respondents, respectively.

Within the first floor of the petition, Obi and LP argued that the nomination of Shettima as vp was completed in violation of the regulation and as such ought to be disqualified.

The LP presidential candidate’s petition learn, “The petitioners aver that on July 14, 2022, the third respondent, opposite to the provisions of the Electoral Act 2022, while nonetheless being a senatorial candidate for Borno Central Constituency, knowingly allowed himself to be nominated because the vice presidential candidate to the second respondent on the platform of the fourth respondent and have become the brand new candidate for the workplace of the vp on that date (14 July 2022).

“The petitioners shall depend on Kind EC11A signed by the 3rf Respondent and the officers of the 4th Respondent on that very same July 14, 2022.”

In response to the petitioners, as on the time Shettima purportedly turned a vice presidential candidate, he was nonetheless the nominated senatorial candidate of APC for the senatorial election for Borno Central Senatorial Constituency.

The petition stated, “It’s also the petitioners’ case {that a} candidate, on this case the third Respondent, shall not knowingly enable himself to be nominated in a couple of constituency.

“The petitioners shall contend on the trial that the purported sponsorship of the 2nd and third Respondents by the 4th Respondent was rendered invalid by cause of the third Respondent knowingly permitting himself to be nominated because the Vice Presidential Candidate while he was nonetheless a Senatorial Candidate for the Borno Central Constituency.

“The petitioners shall additional contend that because of this, the votes purportedly recorded for the 2nd Respondent on the contested presidential election had been/are wasted votes and should be disregarded”.

Apart from, Obi and LP additionally insisted that Tinubu was “on the time of the election not certified to contest for election to the workplace of President as he was fined the sum of $460,000.00 (4-Hundred and Sixty Thousand United States {Dollars}) for an offence involving dishonesty, specifically narcotics trafficking imposed by the US District Court docket, Northern District of Illinois, Japanese Division, in Case No: 93C 4483.”

Paperwork they intend to tender in proving their declare embody; a) Verified Grievance for Forfeiture, submitted by Michael J. Shepard (United States Legal professional) and signed by Marsha A. McClellan (Assistant United States Legal professional);

b) Stipulations and Compromise Settlement of Claims to the Funds held by Heritage Financial institution and CitiBank; and c) Decree of Forfeiture as to Funds held by First Heritage Financial institution, signed by United States District Decide, John A. Nordberg.

“The petitioners shall contend that by cause of the stated disqualification of the 2nd and third Respondents, the votes purportedly recorded for the 2nd Respondent within the election had been/are wasted and invalid; and that the first Petitioner who from the right results of the election obtained the very best variety of lawful votes forged within the election and met the constitutional necessities to be declared and returned because the winner of the election, should be declared because the winner of the Presidential election held on February 25, 2023.”

On the alleged corrupt practices or non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act, 2022, it was the case of the petitioners that INEC, the fourth respondent, did not transmit outcomes electronically as stipulated by the regulation.

Obi and LP contended that the deployment of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System BVAS (BVAS), Election Outcomes Collation System (CSRVS), and the INEC Outcomes Viewing Portal had been aimed toward giving the election obligatory transparency and credibility.

They claimed that regardless of a courtroom order, INEC refused to provide/concern these kinds and refused to permit the inspection of the kinds.

They argued, “The petitioners additional plead that as a result of 1st Respondent’s refusal and neglect to add and transmit the results of the election within the Polling Models to the IReV as required by regulation on the day of the election, the first Respondent suppressed the precise scores obtained by the petitioners.

“The suppression of the first petitioner’s scores which occurred in Eighteen Thousand and Eighty-Eight (18,088) Polling Models was orchestrated by the first Respondent intentionally importing unreadable and blurred Types EC8As on the IReV; and thereby, suppressed the lawful scores obtained by the Petitioners within the stated Polling Models.

“The petitioners hereby plead and shall at trial depend on a Unfold Sheet containing the Polling Models Codes and particulars of the aforesaid Eighteen Thousand and Eighty-Eight Polling Models, in addition to the genuine leads to the aforesaid Eighteen Thousand and Eighty Eight Polling Models. As well as, the Petitioners plead that in Benue State, the 1 Respondent additionally mischievously uploaded blurred Types EC8A allegedly for Polling Models in an try and suppress the lawful results of the election within the Polling Models. The Petitioners shall additionally at trial depend on a Forensic Report of the Presidential election held in Polling Models in Benue State.”

Obi and LP additional claimed that INEC had introduced the scores of the petitioners in Rivers State as 175,071 votes and Tinubu and APC as having 231,591 votes. Nevertheless, by the precise scores obtained on the polling models, the petitioners’ lawful votes in Rivers State are 205,110 votes, whereas the Tinubu and APC rating should be 84,108 votes.

The petitioners additional contended that if INEC had, because it was mandated to do, utilised the scores recorded on the Types EC8A, as in opposition to the fictional kinds uploaded on the IReV, the petitioners would have gained Rivers State.

They added, “Equally, in Benue State, the first Respondent while suppressing the lawful votes obtained by the Petitioners, introduced that the Petitioners scores from the polling models in Benue State is 308,372 votes.

“The 2nd and 4th Respondents’ rating was falsely introduced as being 310,468 votes. Nevertheless, the precise scores of the Petitioners from the polling models in Benue State was 329,003 votes, whereas the 2nd and 4th Respondents’ scores had been 300,421 votes.

“The petitioners had been additionally, by the illegal announcement made by the first Respondent, denied because the winner of the election in Benue State. The petitioners shall at trial depend on the forensic evaluation of the election for Rivers State and Benue State made pursuant to the inspection of the election supplies as ordered by the courtroom.

“The first Respondent and its Officers/Brokers while purportedly appearing below the duvet of importing the results of the Presidential Election held on 25 February 2023 on the IReV, embarked and are nonetheless embarking on large misrepresentation and manipulation by importing fictitious leads to Polling Models the place there have been no elections in addition to importing incorrect outcomes. The precise scores of the petitioners have been decreased, tampered with and false.

“The precise scores of the petitioners obtained from the Polling Models and from the results of the election pursuant to the Inspection of the election supplies as ordered by the courtroom, shall be proven within the Forensic Report of the election outcome. The stated Forensic Report is hereby pleaded and can also be included on this Petition.

“The petitioners additional aver that the scores obtained by the Petitioners had been unlawfully decreased and added by the first Respondent to the scores of the 2nd Respondent. Additional, the first Respondent intentionally uploaded blurred outcome, which had been in favour of the Petitioners on the IReV in a bid to hide them.

“The petitioners shall pray the honourable courtroom to deduct these illegal scores added to the 2nd Respondent and for these scores which had been legitimately obtained by the Petitioners to be credited to the Petitioners’ scores.

“The petitioners additionally state that when the scores unlawfully added to the 2nd Respondent are deducted, the petitioners could have the very best variety of votes within the election, as proven is within the Forensic Report pleaded above.

“The petitioners aver that when the outcomes of Polling Models, Wards, Native Governments, States are correctly tabulated and calculated as required by the Electoral Act and the Rules and Tips for election, the general outcomes of the election and the chances scored by the Political Events will present that the Petitioners gained the Presidential election of 25 February 2023.

“The petitioners shall depend on a Report of Inspection of the electoral supplies pursuant to the orders of this Honourable Court docket, which orders had been made to allow the Petitioners institute and preserve this petition. The orders made by this Honourable Court docket are hereby pleaded and shall be relied upon on the trial.”

The reliefs they sought from the courtroom included a dedication that on the time of the presidential election held on February 25, 2023, Tinubu and Shettima weren’t certified to contest the election.

They sought, “That it’s decided that every one the votes recorded for Tinubu (2nd Respondent) within the election are wasted votes owing to the non-qualification/disqualification of Tinubu and Shettima.

“That it’s decided that Tinubu having failed to attain one-quarter of the votes forged on the presidential election within the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja was not entitled to be declared and returned because the winner of the presidential election held on twenty fifth February, 2023.

“Within the different to 2 above: an order cancelling the election and compelling INEC to conduct a contemporary election at which Tinubu, Shettima and APC shall not take part.

“Within the different to 1,2,3 above, I) that it might be decided that Tinubu was not duly elected by majority of the lawful votes forged within the election for the workplace of the president and due to this fact the declaration and return of the 2nd Respondent because the winner of the Presidential Election’ are illegal, unconstitutional and of no impact in any respect.

The post Obi, Atiku, Two Others Need Tribunal to Void Tinubu’s Declaration as President-elect appeared first on Regia Radio.