At this point in the fall television season, one thing is certain: it is time to start questioning the television networks. There will be a lot of new shows, most of which will be terrible failures.

We will all have trouble comprehending. Hypotheses will be quibbled about. Browncoats will encounter fun at others’ expense. The icy brutality of television networks will be extensively discussed. However, the reality is that the majority of us are unable to comprehend how these decisions are made. The following are ten television myths that the majority of us occasionally believe.

1. Each great show gets dropped too early.

This is obviously not the case, and I’m sure that every one of us can think of at least one show that continued after it ran out of ideas. There are a lot of shows that end up being killed off while they still have a few good years left, but there is nothing more heartbreaking than a show that keeps going backwards, taking its tenth victory lap, long after a kind network would have put it out of its misery.) Apologies for the confused metaphor.)

2. Fox is the killer of shows.

One phrase: Fringe. One more word: Dollhouse. If Fox hadn’t smeared her brains across a parking lot, Sarah Connor could tell you that Fox has made some infuriating decisions over the years. Fox, on the other hand, takes more chances than other networks when it comes to picking up high-risk, high-concept shows and keeping them on for a season. Even in the case of Sarah Connor Chronicles, which Fox extended for an additional nine episodes despite being scheduled to end halfway through its second season. Over the years, Fox has tried some pretty crazy ideas and kept shows with fewer viewers on air for longer than necessary.

3. If it’s a police procedural, it will work better.

Although it was a myth that was more recent a few years ago, you still hear it quite frequently. The truth is that, just like a lot of other shows, many police procedurals fail, and most attempts to combine the “police procedural” genre with other genres like science fiction or fantasy have mostly failed. Simply take a gander at Last minute, and a couple of other single-season endeavors to do CSI with strange science or The Mentalist with unusual science. Alternately, take a look at 17th Precinct, a failed attempt at a magical procedural. Police procedurals are a tight kind, as far as what works, and it’s as of now a jam-packed field.

4. Programming on cable TV is always better.

Sure, big, widescreen, edgy programming that you wouldn’t see on regular broadcast TV can be seen in shows like Game of Thrones and the first season of The Walking Dead. However, a lot of link toll is similarly pretty much as unadventurous as communicated television — for each Obvious Blood, there’s a Chloe Lord. What’s more, broadcast networks have attempted some really aggressive, testing stuff, similar to the previously mentioned Sarah Connor, Lords, and Lost thriving.

5. The English allow shows a superior opportunity.

There is a belief that British television does some things better than American television, and this belief is shared by American television viewers. It is true that quality control is improved by the British practice of shorter seasons. In any case, the English are similarly as savage about cutting out shows as we are. Take a look at Outcasts, which seem to have vanished from the water. Or No Heroics, whose popularity earned its author an offer to write the next Iron Man film. or numerous other British shows that aired for only a single season.

6. Science doesn’t matter to TV shows.

As long as it does not conflict with the much more important goal of providing some silly escapist entertainment and selling some cleaning products, many television shows appear to make at least a token effort to get the science right. This is what I took away from the panel about working as a television science advisor, which featured John Scalzi, the Stargate Universe advisor. You can tell that some shows try to use real science, like Eureka and Fringe, to name just two. Sure, a lot of shows care, but they care more about other things.

7. If you want a show to continue airing, you should watch it “live.”

If you’re not a Nielsen household, this is only a myth. Take a tour of the room where you watch television. Do you see a box with a lot of buttons for recording what you watch on TV? It doesn’t matter what you watch or when you watch it if you don’t. Since the organizations and publicists have absolutely no chance of knowing. Someone who is supposed to statistically represent you is recording their television viewing in another household, and that person’s viewing will count as your vote.

8. Live and time-shifted viewings ought to be counted equally.

When we talked to people who study TV ratings, it became pretty clear that there is a lot of disagreement about how to “monetize” people who don’t watch television live. The thing is, even if you watch television on one of the major broadcast networks, it is not actually free. You pay for these television shows by watching ads, and everyone is aware that DVR viewers don’t pay attention to ads. Additionally, it appears that people who watch shows on Hulu and other streaming services only account for a sizable portion of the revenue generated by viewers of live television. If the network is also the production studio, DVD sales can help.) When people say that less than a million people watched Caprica live but a lot of people watched it later on DVR, that still means that fewer than a million people saw the advertisements that ran alongside the show.

9. ” Sets are being destroyed” signifies an air pocket show is either dropped or reestablished.

Sets can be destroyed for a variety of reasons, including the simple fact that they are no longer needed. or that they are being stored during the extended pause between filming sessions. Or on the other hand it can imply that the creation organization will fabricate a humongous huge fire, involving each of the sets where your #1 scenes occurred, on which they will light your fantasies and wishes burning, leaving only unpleasant cinders. But from the outside, it’s hard to tell.

10. Every fan campaign has a significant impact.

The original Star Trek campaign and the Jericho peanut-mailing campaign are two notable examples of fan campaigns that have achieved significant success. Also, all of those Chuck fans who ate sandwiches made a big impression. However, fan campaigns for “bubble” shows frequently appear to have no effect at all, and networks will only keep a show on the air if they truly believe that it makes financial sense to do so. Furthermore, on the other hand, networks don’t drop shows since they disdain them, or in light of the fact that they disdain us — they’re maintaining a business, and on the off chance that The Cape isn’t moving an adequate number of doughnuts, then, at that point, it’s out, and we never get to figure out reality with regards to Summer Glau’s supervillain father. Read more about Smart TV