The New York Times states this on the basis of court documents and interviews with non-specified persons who were involved in the case. Although the top woman of Huawei, working at the company as CFO, was officially arrested for violating the sanctions against Iran, the suspicions would be against her elsewhere. The United States has for years suspected that Huawei, as an extension of the Chinese government, has espionage activities.
Although the suspicions of fraud in relation to the Iranian sanctions were not the main reason to arrest the Huawei CFO, this charge would have been chosen because it is easier to prove than a case based on national security, says The New York Times.
The investigation was initiated by former President Obama, who suspected Chinese companies, including Huawei, of spying on behalf of the Chinese government. In recent years, researchers might have found evidence that Huawei employees would work on behalf of the Chinese authorities, but a legal case in this area would be ‘complicated’. Then the bank HSBC was looked at, where Huawei was a customer. The bank would have been used to do business with Iran, something that is forbidden under sanction law. That was then used as a reason to the Huawei top woman still to pick up.
Huawei responded to the arrest. The company confirms the extradition desired by the US, talks about ‘unspecified allegations’ and says that it has complied with all applicable rules. The Chinese embassy in Ottawa has asked for the immediate release of the Huawei top woman. In the meantime she has been released on bail while awaiting extradition to the US, but she is not allowed to leave the country.
Previous news article Next news articleViewing:-30
This post first appeared on Need Help Ask Us Now Most Important Technology New, please read the originial post: here