Get Even More Visitors To Your Blog, Upgrade To A Business Listing >>

Introducing The Rutger

Introducing The Rutger Brian October 25th, 2018 at 11:38 AM
Rutgers fan celebrates a first down, 2016 [Patrick Barron]

One of our photographers, Patrick Barron, has been trying to make fetch happen in our Slack for a little while now, except in this case "fetch" is actually a useful way of measure how grisly a blowout is. (Also we've discovered that SBN's Jason Kirk had the same idea a couple weeks before Patrick, so he's now Rutger Leibnitz.)

I mentioned it in the game column but here's a more complete introduction to…

The Rutger

A rutger is when you have fewer yards in some aspect of the game than your opponent has points. For example, the 2018 Michigan-Michigan State game saw Michigan (21 points) hand MSU (15 rushing yards) a rushing rugter, at least by NCAA stats.

A Total Rutger, where you have fewer yards than the opposition has points, is a rare event. Total rutger events in the past decade of college football, with FBS matchups bolded:

Season Week Offense Defense Def Pts Off yds Rutger
2013 4 Florida Int Louisville 72 27 2.67
2017 8 Kansas TCU 43 21 2.05
2016 6 Rutgers Michigan 78 39 2.00
2012 2 Savannah State Florida St 55 28 1.96
2008 14 Mississippi St Mississippi 45 24 1.88
2015 20 N Illinois Boise St 55 33 1.67
2014 2 South Carolina State Clemson 73 44 1.66
2017 1 Charleston Southern Mississippi St 49 33 1.48
2016 2 Savannah State Southern Miss 56 41 1.37
2009 4 UTEP Texas 64 53 1.21
2014 1 Delaware Pittsburgh 62 57 1.09
2014 13 Savannah State BYU 64 63 1.02

Michigan-Rutgers 2016, TCU-Kansas 2017, and Louisville-FIU 2013 were all Double Total Rutger events, which sit in a subclass of the rutger: the Rutgers. Nobody has achieved the Triple Rutger in recent CFB history.

Congratulations to Mississippi State, which is the only team to both rutger and be rutger'd, and the only team to get rutger'd in a rivalry game. FCS-level Savannah State is the most generous rutger provider in all the land.

Rushing rutgers, aided by NCAA sack accounting, are stunningly common: about 600 rushing rutgers over the past decade. There have been approximately 200 passing rutgers. With about 8000 games in the data set, any particular game has about a 10% chance to be a single-phase rutger.

[After THE JUMP: beyoooond the ruuuuuutger]

Beyond The Rutger

The Hoke. There is a level of statistical ineptitude even beyond The Rutger wherein you have more negative yards than the opponent has points, a special accomplishment indeed since the bar keeps getting raised the worse you are. This is only realistically possible in a single-phase rutger, and even then it's only because the NCAA counts sack yardage as rushing yardage. This is nonsense, of course, but that does not stop people from referencing historically grisly box scores that sport this nonsense. This is right and just and emphatically happened to Brady Hoke against Michigan State:

image

It is thus dubbed The Hoke. Hoke has the second-worst hoke of the last decade and is the only coach to manage it twice in a single season. The only other coach to show up twice is Mike Leach, who is doing it on purpose. 

Season Offense Defense Def Pts Off Rush Yards Hoke Level
2009 Washington St Arizona St 27 -45 1.67
2013 Michigan Michigan St 29 -48 1.66
2016 Washington St Arizona St 32 -52 1.63
2014 Southern Miss Louisiana Tech 31 -45 1.45
2013 Michigan Nebraska 17 -21 1.24
2014 Louisiana Mon Louisiana Laf 34 -40 1.18
2014 Wake Forest Louisville 20 -22 1.10
2017 Cal Washington 38 -40 1.05
2011 Tennessee Georgia 20 -21 1.05
2010 Rutgers Army 20 -20 1.00
2009 Oklahoma Texas 16 -16 1.00

The bolded games are, incredibly, wins for the team that suffered a hoke.

The Autorutger. Occurs when you have fewer yards than you have points and will never ever happen. The closest approach to a total autorutger was Missouri's 42-13 win over Florida in 2014. Mizzou gained just 119 yards and achieved a remarkable 0.35 autorutger. The next closest autorutger also involves Florida, but this time they're on the good end after a 44-11 win over South Carolina in 2012 in which they gained just 183 yards. Will Muschamp, man.

Individual phase autorutgers are common enough that they don't warrant too much attention, but the Div By Zero Autorutger is a special case. This occurs when a team has zero passing yards and still wins. It's a list populated by the usual suspects and Louisiana Lafayette, somehow.

Season Offense Defense Def Pts Off Pts Off Pass Yards
2016 Louisiana Laf Louisiana Mon 3 30 0
2017 Army FCS 6 64 0
2017 Navy Virginia 7 49 0
2018 Army Miami (OH) 30 31 0
2017 Navy SMU 40 43 0
2011 Navy SMU 17 24 0
2017 Army E Michigan 27 28 0
2012 Air Force Hawaii 7 21 0
2013 Georgia Southern Florida 20 26 0
2017 Army Air Force 0 21 0
2009 Navy Wake Forest 10 13 0

This concludes your introduction to the rutger.

Profile picture for user Hab

Hab

October 25th, 2018 at 1:42 PM ^

If Savannah State were a FBS team, the Rutger might need a new name.

Profile picture for user champswest

In reply to If Savannah State were a FBS… by Hab

champswest

October 25th, 2018 at 2:17 PM ^

It should be the Savannah State. Rutgers has not been “Rutgered” anymore than anyone else.

Profile picture for user Ali G Bomaye

In reply to It should be the Savannah… by champswest

Ali G Bomaye

October 25th, 2018 at 3:12 PM ^

Savannah State is a team that has a fraction of the resources of a FBS team, let alone a P5 team. They show up regularly to get slaughtered because their school needs money and they're a guaranteed bodybag.

Rutgers is a team which should theoretically be competitive, as a P5 school in a fertile recruiting ground in the highest-paying conference in the land. They deserve the shame of the Rutger label far more than a FCS sacrificial lamb does.

Profile picture for user 1VaBlue1

In reply to It should be the Savannah… by champswest

1VaBlue1

October 25th, 2018 at 3:17 PM ^

The Rutger is named after Rutger because Rutger is in the B1G.  Somehow.  In no way should a B1G team get Rutger'd.  Not even Rutger.

So, in conclusion - Fuck Rutger and Fuck Delaney for bring Rutger into the B1G.

Profile picture for user matty blue

In reply to The Rutger is named after… by 1VaBlue1

matty blue

October 25th, 2018 at 4:03 PM ^

i still say that rutgers as a big ten team is some sort of weird-ass mass hallucination.

Profile picture for user GreyJello

In reply to i still say that rutgers as… by matty blue

GreyJello

October 25th, 2018 at 6:41 PM ^

It's just like that movie 'Shazaam' starring Sinbad.

Get the hell out of my brain, Rutgers! You aren't real!

Profile picture for user Section 1.8

In reply to It should be the Savannah… by champswest

Section 1.8

October 25th, 2018 at 6:36 PM ^

Not so fast my friend.  I think we need to give Rutgers a chance to play the 2018 Don Brown defense.  And in fact, the 2018 Scarlet Knights' season concludes with Wisconsin, Michigan, Penn State and Michigan State.  And then, an autopsy inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.

kyeblue

October 25th, 2018 at 1:45 PM ^

I feel bad for Rutgers but wonder how Hoke managed to lose to them

Profile picture for user befuggled

In reply to I feel bad for Rutgers but… by kyeblue

befuggled

October 25th, 2018 at 2:11 PM ^

They were a marginal bowl team in 2014, and Michigan that year... wasn't. 2014 was the end of the run started by Greg Schiano; they'd had one good year under Schiano (11-2 in 2006) and a bunch of years where they won enough to get into a bowl game but struggled against any team with a pulse.

Schiano's successor Kyle Flood got himself fired in 2015 and Rutgers hit rock bottom in 2016 under Chris Ash. I'm not sure how much of that is Ash's fault, but I'm also not sure he can get them out.

Profile picture for user truferblue22

In reply to They were a marginal bowl… by befuggled

truferblue22

October 25th, 2018 at 2:21 PM ^

Chris Ash still having a job is a Rutger in-and-of-itself. 

I mean I get it, you're Rutgers but like....HOW?

Profile picture for user stephenrjking

In reply to Chris Ash still having a job… by truferblue22

stephenrjking

October 25th, 2018 at 2:33 PM ^

They actually took a real step forward last year, and you can't blame 2016 on him with the way Flood destroyed the program.

The humiliating reversion this season, though, is tough to overlook. They might give Ash another year, but it looks like it's over. 

Profile picture for user Durham Blue

In reply to They actually took a real… by stephenrjking

Durham Blue

October 25th, 2018 at 3:47 PM ^

If they fire Chris Ash, Rutger should hire Hoke.  I wonder if that would cause the universe to shift from expansion to contraction?

Profile picture for user Njia

In reply to If they fire Chris Ash,… by Durham Blue

Njia

October 26th, 2018 at 3:30 AM ^

If Rutger hires Hoke this would cause a singularity event that compresses football statistics to a point of infinite points allowed while fielding almost no players during punting situations.

In reply to Chris Ash still having a job… by truferblue22

treetown

October 25th, 2018 at 2:41 PM ^

I believe this may help - the New Jersey media were equally puzzled that (a) Chris still had a job and (b) recently got an extension until some digging around found a very important clause in his contract.

https://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/index.ssf/2018/09/revisiting_chris_ashs_contract_extension_why_rutge.html

And there is an accompanying question - why hasn't Rutgers bailed out from the Big Ten.

https://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/index.ssf/2018/09/please_rutgers_fans_enough_second_guessing_the_big.html

Profile picture for user ken725

In reply to Chris Ash still having a job… by truferblue22

ken725

October 25th, 2018 at 3:21 PM ^

I wonder the same thing for Hugh Jackson.

Profile picture for user Mgotri

In reply to They were a marginal bowl… by befuggled

Mgotri

October 25th, 2018 at 2:26 PM ^

Rutger even had a rushing rutger against howard in 2006 and again against norfolk st in 2007. i stopped looking after those two

Profile picture for user WolverineHistorian

In reply to I feel bad for Rutgers but… by kyeblue

WolverineHistorian

October 25th, 2018 at 2:24 PM ^

That may be the only time I was too disgusted with our performance to care that we got screwed by the refs. 

Darboh's catch was good for a first down on the last drive that would have set up a much easier game winning field goal but the ref decided to call it out of bounds.  Unfortunately, it doesn't take away the fact that Rutgers QB had about 9,000 yards yards passing in the first half alone.  It was about the most pitiful 26-24 game you'll ever see. 

screwed.jpg

In reply to That may be the only time I… by WolverineHistorian

tybert

October 26th, 2018 at 12:31 AM ^

I remember that play. It may have been the most grotesque "process of the catch" BS ruling I've ever seen. I think Brady rightfully challenged the play and lost.

Not sure Weil's kick wouldn't have been blo



This post first appeared on Mgoblog, please read the originial post: here

Share the post

Introducing The Rutger

×

Subscribe to Mgoblog

Get updates delivered right to your inbox!

Thank you for your subscription

×